Assessment and Evaluation Edu 361
Denunciar
Tom WhitbySeguir
26 de Aug de 2009•0 gostou•1,963 visualizações
Assessment and Evaluation Edu 361
26 de Aug de 2009•0 gostou•1,963 visualizações
Baixar para ler offline
Denunciar
Educação
Tecnologia
Tom WhitbySeguir
Mais conteúdo relacionado
Mais procurados
Outcomes-Based EducationJennefer Edrozo
Principles of assessmentlovesterlovester29
Grading system (education)Redbutts Ash
measurement assessment and evaluationalizia54
Definition of Assessment,Joanna Rose Saculo
Assessment.....pptRahul Dhaker
Destaque
Evaluation in Capacity-Building Strategy: The Next Step in the LMD PhilosophyNaouel Abdellatif Mami
SAGrader comparisonIdea Works
Evaluation.pptInternational advisers
Test interpretation and report writingCarlo Magno
Testing writing (for Language Teachers)Wenlie Jean
Rubrics: Transparent Assessment in Support of LearningKenneth Ronkowitz
Similar a Assessment and Evaluation Edu 361
Assessment for Learning ICALT
Lesson-5.pptxMarjoriAnneDelosReye
Performance assessment by rubric methodAbigail Sapico
Process orientedperformance-basedassessmentjabello glaiza
Assessment primerCHARMY22
10 29 09 Day Of DifferentiationPSU Summer Institute
Mais de Tom Whitby
Cemetary Path Lesson AnalysisTom Whitby
Writing Instructional ObjectivesTom Whitby
Writing Instructional ObjectivesTom Whitby
Bloom's Taxonomy Objectives Tom Whitby
Models Of InstructionTom Whitby
Writing Instructional Objectives Tom Whitby
Último
In vitro.pptxHimadripriyaGogoi2
9.28.23 The Social Construction of Race.pptxMaryPotorti1
Project Management Starters.pptxAnkitaNayak83
BPOPS203 PRINCIPLES OF PROGRAMMING USING C LAB Manual.pdfSyed Mustafa
REPRODUCTION PART -1.pptxMISSRITIMABIOLOGYEXP
ChatGPT Multi Modal.pptxScottOrtes
![clinical Neuroanatomy_of_ventricular_system_ and CSF suparna[1]-1.pptx](https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/clinicalneuroanatomyofventricularsystemandcsfsuparna1-1-230924035820-cf8de8bc-thumbnail.jpg?width=1600&height=908&fit=bounds)
Assessment and Evaluation Edu 361
- 23. ASSESSMENT AND EVALUATION Any Questions?
Notas do Editor
- must be alert & aware that we’re checking for understanding. e.g. “An Open Mind” assignment: Student who asks, “How can you count my opinion as wrong?” doesn’t understand the material required in the written backup. Student who insists on doing character with one line doesn’t understand that the characteristics illustrated don’t have to come from interpretation of the play.
- My main points: Students work for grades, so grading formative assessment in some way is usually necessary. Checking and/or grading formative assessments makes students accountable for their own learning. 3. Grading that occurs before opportunity for feedback should count considerably less than grading that occurs subsequently. Thus, homework grades, classwork grades, quiz grades, etc. will count less than any unit test or project used as a summative assessment.
- Distribute example of DAHS short story exam. Look at sample items for thinking level and matching question to skill taught.
- What are advantages?
- What are advantages?
- Remember: all should be aligned with unit objectives that have been taught in class. NOT ACTIVITY FOR THE SAKE OF ACTIVITY. Use my poetry unit as example: aligned with unit objectives and individual lesson objectives (oral interpretation; written interpretation)
- Examples will be in packet distributed in class.
- Go it it. Illustrate.
- Students will have copy of the rubric, but Voice Quality criteria missing. After illustrating how to arrive at criteria with this slide, go over the other two that have been prepared. Have them complete Voice Quality.
- 4 items – therefore 25% each But what if you decide that the oral interpretation and overall quality are really more important? A student earning 4’s on accompaniment and voice quality shouldn’t get the same as a student earning 4’s on oral interp & overall quality. The answer: next
- 4 items: therefore multipliers will add up to 25
- Review NYS Assessment rubrics
- Review rubric from packet