4. Behavioral Learning Theory
Three basic assumptions:
Learning results in a change in
behavior
Environment shapes behavior
Principles of contiguity and
reinforcement
5. Behavioral Theory Today
Measurable goals and objectives
Competency based instruction
Outcomes-focused
Skill development reinforced w/ repetition
Training and development
6. Cognitivism
An information processing perspective on adult learning;
major proponents were Ausubel, Bruner (who wrote about a
cognitive approach to instructional design, Gagne, Lewin,
and Piaget
This little video depicts Piagetian theory.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IhcgYgx7aAA
7. Cognitive Learning Theory
Defined learning as reorganization of
experience to make sense of stimuli from
the environment
Focuses on mental processes
Accounts for insight
Locus of control for learning is not in the
environment, but internal to the learner
9. Evidences of Cognitive
Learning Theory in Use Today
Research on cognitive development
in adulthood
Learning how to learn research
(metacognition)
Study of learning processes as a
function of age
10. Humanism
Learning with the goal of development of the whole person
This short clip of Dr. Carl Rogers describes his approach to
client-centered therapy in humanistic psychology; this
approach, from an educational perspective, focuses on
learner- or student-centered teaching and learning
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o0neRQzudzw
11. Humanist Learning Theory
Humans are in control of their own
destinies with unlimited potential for
growth
Motivation to learn is intrinsic
Goal of learning is self-actualization
12. Influences of Humanistic
Thought in Learning Theory
Andragogy (Knowles, Houle, Tough)
Personal growth movement
Self-directed learning
Teacher as “facilitator”
Developer of talent through coaching,
mentoring, role modeling
Embodied, spiritual, narrative learning
13. Who was Abraham
Maslow?
Famous for concept of a
hierarchy of human needs
Who was Carl Rogers?
Known for “client-centered” or non-
directive therapy. Education adopted his
views in “learner-centered” teaching
14. Social
Cognitivism
This short video introduces some basics of social cognitive theory
(often called social learning theory) by discussing Bandura’s
concept of role modeling others’ behavior in the Bobo doll
experiment.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zerCK0lRjp8
15. Social Cognitism Learning
Theory
Draws from both behaviorist and
cognitivist perspectives
Belief that behavior is a function of the
person and the environment
Learning through observation and imitation
of others
Occurs in social context
16. Evidences of Social
Cognitivism in Use Today
Increasing awareness of importance of context
to learning
Vicarious learning through role modeling
Mentoring
Self-efficacy research
17. Situated Learning and Social
Construction of Learning
Theory
Participation in communities of practice
Novice to expert continuum
Cognitive apprenticeships
Tool-dependent
Learning “in situ”
18. Constructivism
There are numerous video clips on constructivism. This one,
although rather long (20 minutes), was intended for medical
educators. When you have time, it provides a useful overview of the
application of constructivist principles for teaching.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=krqjqGIuC-A
We will be emphasizing the constructivist principles of transformative
learning theory later in the semester.
19. Constructivist Learning Theory
Learning as meaning-making
Meaning actively constructed through
knowledge “structures”
Internal cognitive activity
Central role of experience
Developmental throughout the lifespan
20. Evidences of Constructivism in
Use Today
Experiential learning
Self-directed learning / learner autonomy
Reflective practice
Perspective transformation and
transformative learning
21. Which of these theoretical
approaches most closely
represents your own
philosophy of practice as an
educator?
Notas do Editor
The basis for what I’m going to cover is outlined by Merriam and Caffarella in Learning in Adulthood; however, they don’t adequately address theories of situated learning and critical theories, so I am going to talk about these two theoretical perspectives separately.
If you want to follow M & C’s outline that was in your assigned readings, feel free to pull it out now and use it as a guide to give you some additional info on these theoretical orientations to learning. For those of you who weren’t able to copy this from Prometheus, here are copies.
When we finish this overview, we’ll talk about how these compare to the 5 teaching perspectives that Pratt discovered in his research. Then, I’ll introduce you to a framework that was introduced by two sociologists a number of years ago that is applicable to organize these theories into frameworks that are commonly used in educational research for categorizing them according to theoretical orientation.
Here’s what you should focus on: a macro-level understanding of these seven different orientations to learning. You will run into these terms again and again in the adult educ literature, so consider this your “first” exposure.
The first five of these are listed in Merriam and Caffarella’s overview. However, they do very little to address critical theory in their textbook and they have combined situated theories of learning and social constructivist perspectives into the constructivist categories. I’m lifting them out as worthy of separate discussion.
The behaviorist orientation to learning derives from behavioral psychology. The process of learning in behaviorist theories has three basic assumptions:
1. Observable behavior rather than internal thought processes is the focus of study. How do we know when learning has occurred? When there is a change in observable behavior. If there is no change in behavior, then learning has not occurred.
2. Second, this view assumes that the environment has a role in shaping people’s behavior; what a person learns is determined by the elements in the environment, not by the individual learner. Learning involves moving from a present performance level through successive approximations to a goal.
3. Two principles are central to explaining learning: How close in time two events must be for a bond to be formed between them (principle of contiguity)
Principle of Reinforcement - any means of increasing the likelihood that an event will be repeated.
Today, behavioral learning strategies are best used for skill development whenever a motor or cognitive skill needs to be learned as accurately and efficiently as possible. However, behaviorism is deeply rooted in workplace learning practices (reward and punishment theories of behavior).
The behaviorist orientation to learning derives from behavioral psychology. The process of learning in behaviorist theories has three basic assumptions:
1. Observable behavior rather than internal thought processes is the focus of study. How do we know when learning has occurred? When there is a change in observable behavior. If there is no change in behavior, then learning has not occurred.
2. Second, this view assumes that the environment has a role in shaping people’s behavior; what a person learns is determined by the elements in the environment, not by the individual learner. Learning involves moving from a present performance level through successive approximations to a goal.
3. Two principles are central to explaining learning: How close in time two events must be for a bond to be formed between them (principle of contiguity)
Principle of Reinforcement - any means of increasing the likelihood that an event will be repeated.
Today, behavioral learning strategies are best used with either beginning or advanced skill development, whenever a motor or cognitive skill needs to be learned as accurately and efficiently as possible.
The earliest challenge to behaviorist thinking came in 1929 with a publication by Bode, a gestalt psychologist who criticized behaviorism for being too concerned with singular events and actions and too dependent on overt behavior to explain learning. The Gestalt psychologists proposed looking at the whole, instead of the parts and at patterns rather than isolated events.
By the mid 20th century, gestalt views of learning rivaled the behaviorist models. These views have become incorporated into what we know as cognitive or information processing learning theories.
Whereas the words we associate with behaviorism include stimulus-response, repetition, reinforcement, cueing, shaping, the words that we associate with cognitive theories include such terms as organization of knowledge; simple to complex; divergent and convergent thinking. From the gestaltists we have have terms such as perception, insight, and meaning.
Cognitive learning theory is an information processing model that defines learning as the reorganization of experience to process stimuli that come in from the environment. According to cognitive theorists, the human mind is not just a passive exchange terminal system where stimuli arrive and the appropriate response leaves; instead, the thinking person interprets sensations and gives meaning to events that impinge upon her consciousness.
In cognitive theory, the starting point is the mental processes involved in learning. A sensory register in the brain acts as a filtering and control mechanism determining what info comes in and how it is processed.
Levels of cognitive processing: goal is match level of cognitive processing with the task, and gradually move up the hierarchy to more sophisticated levels of cognitive processing.