Default lists are linked-lists in F
•Transferir como PPTX, PDF•
0 gostou•363 visualizações
Copy: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1lwqRUFZstZZj5ag2SXY5h92qtm6CWVKpd_HujNdY34U/edit?usp=sharing
![Default lists are linked-lists Execute The same for the rest :: let rec loop action mylist = match mylist with | [] -> [] | first::rest -> action first :: loop action rest](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/f-references-110610100624-phpapp02/85/F-references-and-some-misc-slides-1-320.jpg)
Recomendados
Mais conteúdo relacionado
Destaque
Semelhante a Default lists are linked-lists in F
Semelhante a Default lists are linked-lists in F (20)
Mais de Tuomas Hietanen
Último
Último (20)
Default lists are linked-lists in F
- 1. Default lists are linked-lists Execute The same for the rest :: let rec loop action mylist = match mylist with | [] -> [] | first::rest -> action first :: loop action rest
- 3. Sites http://www.meetup.com/FSharpHelsinki/ http://fssnip.net/ http://www.tryfsharp.org/ http://cs.hubfs.net/ http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/fsharp/ http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/um/cambridge/projects/fsharp/ http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/Going+Deep http://www.stackoverflow.com
- 4. F# related blogs http://community.bartdesmet.net/blogs/bart/default.aspx http://tomasp.net/blog/ http://blogs.msdn.com/b/dsyme/ http://codebetter.com/blogs/matthew.podwysocki/default.aspx http://rogeralsing.com/ http://fsharp-code.blogspot.com/ http://fsharpcode.blogspot.com/ http://call-with-cc-en.blogspot.com/ http://blogs.msdn.com/b/andrewkennedy/ http://wadler.blogspot.com/ http://blogs.msdn.com/chrsmith/default.aspx http://lorgonblog.wordpress.com/ http://blogs.msdn.com/b/lukeh/ http://strangelights.com/blog/Default.aspx http://themechanicalbride.blogspot.com/ http://zamboch.blogspot.com/ http://fsharpnews.blogspot.com/ http://geekswithblogs.net/akraus1/Default.aspx http://bloggemdano.blogspot.com/ http://diditwith.net/
- 5. F# Books
Notas do Editor
- let toFirst = 0::[1;2;3] let myConcat = toFirst @ [4;5;6] @ [7;8;9] http://blogs.msdn.com/b/chrsmith/archive/2008/05/02/f-in-20-minutes-part-i.aspxhttp://blogs.msdn.com/b/chrsmith/archive/2008/05/02/f-in-20-minutes-part-ii.aspxhttp://blogs.msdn.com/b/chrsmith/archive/2008/07/10/mastering-f-lists.aspx
- Detailed explanation:http://codemonkeyism.com/function-tail-recursive/http://community.bartdesmet.net/blogs/bart/archive/2009/11/08/jumping-the-trampoline-in-c-stack-friendly-recursion.aspxhttp://community.bartdesmet.net/blogs/bart/archive/2010/07/07/the-case-of-the-failed-demo-stackoverflowexception-on-x64.aspx
- F# future: Compiler to compile automatically different data sources to .NET-types: http://channel9.msdn.com/Events/PDC/PDC10/FT12
- Statistics from the stackoverflow-site:Ratio = unanswered questions / all questions- The picture is missing OCaml which is about the F# levels. (Not surprisingly, F# is OCaml.)- And Prolog which is about 0.10, so between pythonin and c#. Both of those have totals under 1000.What are the conclusions?- Easy questions are closed immediately from stackoverflow. The problems are real, hard problems of the language or the environment Objective c is the development language of Applen, actionscript is Flash
- This has been converted from the excel compared to c-language (=direct total and ratio divided by c-language values).C-language is often a reference and did actually perform ok in both axis.Notable: C# and F# together are superior.The lead of functional languages in the quality… Is there any reason why they would have “better programmers”?