3. Helping your quality assurance team
test more of an application in less time.
Testing Session 20h
28%
Manual
72%
Automated
4. 1. Eye ball testing
2. It requires less time and expense to begin
productive manual testing.
3. Easily we can update our test case according
to project movement
4. Automation cannot replace human intuition,
inference, and inductive reasoning.
5. 1. Manual testing is time and cost
consuming
2. Its difficult to test Multilanguage sites
3. You can run tests over night
4. Increase in execution Speed and test
coverage
5. Manual testing is boring hence its error
prone
6. Define scope of automation
Test tool Selection
Planning, Design and
Development
Test Execution
Maintenance
7. Test cases that are executed
repeatedly
Test Cases that are difficult or time
consuming to perform manually
High risk
8. X Test cases that are newly designed
X Test Cases that the requirements
change frequently
X Add hoc tests
9. 1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Decide what Test Cases to Automate
Test Early and Test Often
Select the Right Automated Testing Tool
Divide your Automated Testing Efforts
Create Good, Quality Test Data
Create Automated Tests that are
Resistant to Changes in the UI
10. • Ease of use scripting language
• Support for different types of tests
• Multiple Frameworks and OS
11. Steps
Manual time (sec)
Automated time (sec)
Open xls
visit url
get page source
find title
compare titles
report
10
15
3
5
4
10
0,5
20
0,4
0,1
0,1
0,1
25
Test Type Total
Manual
47 (sec)
Automated 21,2 (sec)
20
15
10
5
0
manual
Automated
