1. GURUKUL
Educational Organization
management system
By
Kaustubh Joshi
Dhananjay Rakshe
Monika Zutshi
Komal Bhat
Group Id : 6

2. Introduction
GURUKUL - Educational
Organization management
system

3. Brief scenario about system

4. Overall system architecture

5. System flow (UI wise)
•Browse organization information portal
•Apply for MIS
I •FAQ, App demos and other documentation
•Browse Applications / use them
•Generate and maintain logs
•Guardian / incharge / self notifications
II •Applications management and parameter setting
•SMS operations
•Notification management
III

6. Planning
GURUKUL - Educational
Organization management
system

7. R.A.D. Model for SDLC

8. KLOC analysis
 Total number of code is approximately 4.15
Efforts:
E=3.2*(KLOC)^1.02
E=3.2*(4.15)^1.02
E=14 persons/month
Development Time(in months):
D=E/N
D=14/4
D=3.5 months
Development time for the project:
Requirement analysis requires 2.1 months
Implementation and testing requires 3.5 months
D = 5.6 months

9. Milestones
 M1: Requirement Gathering & Validation
 M2: system design
 M3: partial report completion
 M4: Attendance- generating time tables, resource
allocation strategies, periodic logs, guardian
notification statements.
 M5: Public transit to manage public transit profile via
dynamic and static commuters to consumer’s model
 M6: GKUL drive- implementing SNS sharable platform for
digital media.
 M7: testing of the system.
 M8: release of final system with complete
documentation.

10. Semester I timeline

11. Semester II timeline

12. Implementation
GURUKUL - Educational
Organization management
system

13. Basic Use Case

14. Break down structure

15. Web access
Module Web access
CMS Tasks GUI Database Admin
Events,
Information , CMS
CSS , JS Brochures Interface
to edit
Description details
Customize Whatever
looks that promotes Editor
institute…

16. SMS Operations
Module SMS
Operations Send Receive
It is an interface
This receives
Description that implements
customization
notification from
from apps
each module

17. L.M.S.
CASE I Resource Available
CASE II Resource not Available

18. Experts Blog
Recommendation generator
a) Accept MIS ID, Class, Branch, Subject list related to
member.
b) Search all blogs with this fields as their tags.
c) Group them as per their subject names.
a) Compare all blogs within a subject group that has a
maximum of sum for
d) View + Rate + Followers and subtract no. of flags for it,
the equation thus becomes,
e) View + Rate + followers – Flags = Recommendation Rank
a) Copy first two to recommendation array
f) Repeat above procedure for all groups
g) Display recommendations

19. Experts Blog
Experts Blog – Block resolver
a) Accept author MIS ID
b) Accept flag count, followers,view,
ratings. And blocked=TRUE
c) Accept cleanCheatCount.
d) Compute
a) blockAccount = flagCount-(1/followers)-
(1/views)-(1/ratings)
e) IfcleanCheat<blockAccount
f) fblocked=FALSE

20. Campus money

21. Campus money
Campus Money- Two way authentication[5]
 Accept order with client MIS Id.
 Update order to the system.
 Check for valid MIS ID
 Check for valid transaction
 Create Session
 Generate transaction ID
 Notify to Client
 Accept transaction ID
 Update to system.
 Update session
 Check user pic
 Deliver order
 Destroy session

22. Divya-Drushti

23. Break down structure

24. Deployment diagram

25. Risk Management
GURUKUL - Educational
Organization management
system

26. Risk management [ I ]
Technical feasibility
 Failure of technology on which the system rely on.
This can’t be avoided, only solution is developing
entire system on any-other parallel technology. Thus,
we can stay updated with discussion forums related
to technology . And we should at-least have another
technology support to notify users of the system
about system status.
 Failure at utilizing SPM up to its defined degree.
 Change or addition of requirements after
communication phase may cause system a lot.

27. Risk management [ II ]
Cost feasibility
 Any better system more efficient, stable & user friendly. This is the only risk
of our system. An efficient, stable & user friendly system should be
developed.
 User may or may not be technically sound, so requirements should be in
a proper format (normal, expected & excited). We should try avoiding
direct documenting requirements as specified by customers and follow
proper requirements analysis, verification & validation. Also the risks
should be managed as per the requirements.
 Change or addition of requirements after communication phase may
cause system a lot. We should try deep analysis & make proper user
agreement.
 Failure at utilizing SPM up to its defined degree.
 Risk of making development tools available which are upto the mark.

28. Conclusion
This project aims at reducing overheads
from members of education organization
and atomizing all repetitive tasks or the task
which can be formulated and generated
on the basis of existing computation.
We also aim to serve the human quench for
information about environment surrounding
them.

29. References
1. Omer Rashid, Paul Coulton, Reuben Edwards, Andrew Fisher, Robert
Thompson,”Mobile Information Systems Providing Estimated Time of Arrival for Public
Transport Users” Department of Communication Systems Lancaster University
Lancaster UK
2. Jalal Kawash, Christo El Morr, WissamCharaf, and HamzaTaha, “building mobile
virtual communities for public transport awareness” Department of Computer
Science American University of Sharjah P.O. Box 2666, Sharjah, UAE
3. S.BermanV.Katoma “An e learning framework based on semantic weblogs”,
Computer Science Department University of Cape Town Cape Town, South Africa
4. Mohammed AlZomaiAudunJøsang Adrian McCullagh, “Strengthening SMS-Based
Authentication through Usability”, Queensland University of Technology Brisbane,
Australia alzomaim@isi.qut.edu.au and fa.mccullagh, e.foog@qut.edu.au
5. FadiAloul, Syed Zahidi “Two Factor Authentication Using Mobile Phones”,
Department of Computer Science & Engineering American University of Sharjah, UAE
{faloul, b00017408}@aus.edu
6. Zhang Guoli “The Applied Research of Cloud Computing Platform Architecture In
the E-Learning Area”, School of Electronic Information Engineering Liaoning
Technical University Hu Ludao, Liaoning e-mail: zgl_lesli@126.com
7. Ramesh Jain “Micro-blogging Sentiment Detection by Collaborative Online
Learning”, School of Information and Computer Sciences University of California
Irvine CA 92697 jain@ics.uci.edu
8. ZHANG Jia-Gui “Research Online college learning platform based on cloud
computing”, Jinhua Vocation and Technology College Jinhua China
Zhangjg@jhc.cn