Keynote address at OSU's 2016 Open Education Day

1. Dept.
of
Psychology,
Kwantlen
Polytechnic
University
OER
Research
Fellow,
Open
Education
Group
Faculty
Workshop
Facilitator,
Open
Textbook
Network
Rajiv
Jhangiani,
Ph.D.
@thatpsychprof
Serving SOCIAL
JUSTICE
&
PEDAGOGICAL
INNOVATION through
OPEN
EDUCATIONAL
PRACTICES

5. “higher education
shall
be
equally
accessible
to
all”

6. $2,000
$3,000
$4,000
$5,000
$6,000
$7,000
$8,000
$9,000
$10,000
1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014
Oregon
Higher
Education
Funding
-­‐ $/FTE
State Funding Tuition Revenue
http://www.sheeo.org

13. What can YOU do?
• Survey your student body
• #textbookbroke campaign
• Presentations
• Utilize visuals, create displays
• Speak directly to faculty & admin
• Suggest that faculty review a textbook
• Showcase examples
• Form a student-­led OER group
• Connect. Collaborate.

15. Buy
used
(if
possible)
Buy
online
Resell
(if
possible)
Rent
Shared
purchase
(Inter)library
loans
Photocopy
International
edition
Old
edition

19. 2012 2016
63.6% 66.5%
Not
purchase
the
required
textbook
49.2% 47.6% Take
fewer
courses
45.1% 45.5% Not
register
for
a
specific
course
33.9% 37.6% Earn
a
poor
grade
26.7% 26.1% Drop
a
course
17.0% 19.8% Fail
a
course
Florida
Student
Textbook
Survey
19

22. Revise Remix
Retain Redistribute
Reuse
Source:
David
Wiley,
http://opencontent.org/blog/archives/3221
March
5,
2014,
CC-­‐BY
open =
free
+
permissions

24. Source:
Creative
Commons,
2015
State
of
the
Commons
report

25. rijksmuseum.nl

26. gutenberg.org

27. openstaxcollege.org

29. open.bccampus.ca

31. open.umn.edu

32. Source:
Creative
Commons,
2015
State
of
the
Commons
report

33. But
what
about
quality?

36. "Opening
the
Curriculum:
Open
Education
Resources
in
U.S.
Higher
Education,
2014"by I.
Elaine
Allen
&
Jeff
Seaman,
Babson
Survey
Research
Group is
licensed
under CC
BY
4.0
80% 75%

37. But
what
do
students
think?

38. Below
average
3%
Average
20%
Above
average
34%
Excellent
43%
HOW
WOULD
YOU
RATE
THE
QUALITY
OF
YOUR
OPEN
TEXTBOOK?
Strongly
agree
6%
Slightly
agree
12%
Neither
17%
Slightly
disagree
15%
Strongly
disagree
50%
WOULD
YOU
HAVE
PREFERRED
A
TRADITIONAL
TEXTBOOK?
Jhangiani
&
Jhangiani
(2016)

39. HOW
IMPORTANT
TO
YOU
ARE
THE
FOLLOWING
FEATURES
OF
YOUR
OPEN
TEXTBOOK?
12.6
6.7
9.6
7.8
2.9
1
13.6
22.1
15.4
4.9
1
1.9
31.1
20.2
21.2
16.5
10.6
9.6
21.4
26
21.2
32
36.5
26.9
21.4
25
32.7
38.8
49
60.6
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Shareability
Permanent
retention
Option
to
print
Convenience/portability
Immediate
access
Cost
savings
Not
important
at
all Of
little
importance Of
average
importance
Very
important Absolutely
essential
Jhangiani
&
Jhangiani
(2016)

40. I
would
not
have
bought
the
text
book
for
this
course
because
it's
an
elective.
I
would
have
possibly
walked
away
with
a
C,
now
I
might
actually
get
an
A-­‐
It
is
easily
accessible
and
convenient.
Material
is
easy
to
understand
and
follow
I
personally
really
like
the
convenience
of
having
the
complete
set
of
chapters
on
my
computer
and
even
accessible
from
my
phone
if
I
need
it.
I
like
that
I
don't
have
to
lug
around
another
text
book
It's
free
and
it's
a
great
money
saver

41. 13 Peer
Reviewed
Studies
of
Efficacy
http://openedgroup.org/

42. 119,720 Students
http://openedgroup.org/

43. 95%
Same
or
Better Outcomes
http://openedgroup.org/

44. openedgroup.org/review
"Evidence" by Bill
Selak is
licensed
under CC
BY-­‐ND
2.0

45. Jhangiani
et
al.
(under
review)
Jhangiani,
R.
S.,
Dastur,
F.,
LeGrand,
R.,
&
Penner,
K.
(under
review).
As
good
or
better
than
commercial
textbooks:
Students’
perceptions
and
outcomes
from
using
open
digital
and
open
print
textbooks.
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Exam
1 Exam
2 Exam
3
Percent
Correct
Traditional
Open
Print
Open
Digital
p <
0.05 ns ns

46. “Mad” “Glad”
“Sad” “Rad”
Cost
Completing
with
C
or
Better
Student
Success
per
Dollar
0 100%
$200

47. “Mad” “Glad”
“Sad” “Rad”
Cost
Completing
with
C
or
Better
Commercial
Student
Success
per
Dollar
0 100%
$200

48. “Mad” “Glad”
“Sad” “Rad”
Cost
Completing
with
C
or
Better
Commercial
OER
Student
Success
per
Dollar
0 100%
$200

49. Cost
savings
Access
Portability
Course
performance
Adapt,
update,
&
remix
Enrolment
Student
retention
Program
completion

51. The Z-Degree
REMOVING TEXTBOOK COSTS AS A
BARRIER TO STUDENT SUCCESS
THROUGH AN OER-BASED CURRICULUM
Decreased
cost
to
graduate
by
25%
Increased
pedagogical
flexibility

52. Commercial
vs.
OER
Hilton et al. (in press)

54. RESEARCH
ESSAYS.
I
CAN
WRITE
RESEARCH
ESSAYS

56. "Recycling
Water
Bottles" by Mr.TinDC is
licensed
under CC
BY-­‐ND
2.0

58. • >8,500
Psychology
articles
• Viewed
>64,000
times
every
six
months
• ~63%
have
gone
through
Wikipedia’s
peer
assessment
• ~9%
have
achieved
“good
article”
status

60. Benefits
• Achieve
deeper
understanding
of
the
topic(Farzan &
Kraut,
2013)
• Evaluate
and
defend
credibility
of
sources
(Marentette,
2014)
• Write
more
concisely
and
think
more
critically
(Farzan &
Kraut,
2013)
• Collaborating
with
students
from
around
the
world
(Karney,
2012)
• Provide
and
receive
constructive
feedback
(Ibrahim,
2012)
• Enhance
digital
literacy
(Silton,
2012)
• Communicate
ideas
to
a
general
audience
(APS,
2013)

62. 14,000
35,000
92%
Students
who
have
taken
on
Wikipedia
assignments
since
2010
New
articles
that
students
have
created
Instructors
who
say
they
will,
or
plan
to,
teach
with
Wikipedia
again

64. PM4ID

67. "GB
Airways
A320"by Tony
Evans is
licensed
under CC
BY-­‐ND
2.0

68. "Recycling
Water
Bottles" by Mr.TinDC is
licensed
under CC
BY-­‐ND
2.0

69. Maslakh Camp for Displaced, Afghanistan by United Nations Photo CC-­BY-­NC-­ND 2.0

71. rajiv.jhangiani@kpu.ca
@thatpsychprof
slideshare.net/thatpsychprof
"Open
Textbook
Summit
2015"by BCcampus_News is
licensed
under CC
BY-­‐SA
2.0