BDSM⚡Call Girls in Hari Nagar Delhi >༒8448380779 Escort Service
Equity report on apollo tyres
1. Market Approach for Valuation of Apollo Tyres
OBJECTIVE – To projectthe price of ApolloTyresusingTradingComparables
From Researchreportswe foundforvaluationsP/Eratioof companiesisusedinvariousreports
Hence comparingP/E ratiosof trade comparables
Sr.No. Tyre Companies 12 month trainling P/E ratio
1 MRF 11.23
2 Apollo 12.96
3 Balkrishna Industries 13.75
4 Ceat Tyres 8.46
5 JK Tyres 7.81
6 GoodYear 13.39
7 Dunlop N.A (no results for last 4 quarters)
8 TVS Srichakra 12.46
9 PTL Enterprises 15.37
10 Modi Rubber 49.09
Furthercomparingthe Assets, RevenuesandEBITDA of these companiessothatwe can analyse which
companiesApolloTyresismostcomparable to
Sr.No. Tyre Companies Assets In Rs.Crore
Revenue from
Operations 2014-15
in Rs.Crore
Operating
Profit in
Rs.Crore
1 MRF 6332 13,197 1927
2 Apollo 3634 8711 1098
3 Balkrishna Industries 4228 3576 907
4 Ceat Tyres 1964 5354 628
5 JK Tyres 3056 5951 595
6 GoodYear 495 1579 185
7 Dunlop
8 TVS Srichakra 468 1670 123
9 PTL Enterprises 125 40 35
10 Modi Rubber 138 4.47 -14
2. Conclusions
If we see AssetTurnoverratiowe canfindCeatTyres,TVSSrichakra,GoodYear,MRFcan be
comparable
For Revenue fromOperations,JKtyres,Ceat Tyres,BalkrishnaIndustriesandMRFare comparable
We are thus eliminatingPTLEnterprisesandModi Rubberdue tothe misfitin the above
parameters
Classifyingthese companies furtherintoMatrix form
Sr.No. Tyre Companies Revenue growth
Asset
Turnover
Ratio
Historical(CAGR 3
YEARS)
Projected as
RM prices are
stable
1 MRF 2.08 9.58 9.5
2 Apollo 2.40 14.32 14.3
3 Balkrishna Industries 0.85 21.20 21.2
4 Ceat Tyres 2.73 14.31 14.3
5 JK Tyres 1.95 5.47 5.5
6 GoodYear 3.19 2.31 2.3
7 TVS Srichakra 3.57 12.56 12.6
Sr.No. Tyre Companies EBITDA growth YOY in percent
Historical( CAGR 3
YEARS) Projected
1 MRF 33.91 30
2 Apollo 22.31 20
3 Balkrishna Industries 34.71 30
4 Ceat Tyres 54.89 50
5 JK Tyres 18.45 15
6 GoodYear 10.87 10
8 TVS Srichakra 6.44 6
3. Sr.No. Tyre Companies
RM /sales from
Operationsin
Percentage
R.M expenses
growth
Historical Projected
1 MRF 65.20 4.28 5
2 Apollo 68.23 12.00 15
3
Balkrishna
Industries 52.05 13.47 15
4 Ceat Tyres 65.99 9.33 10
5 JK Tyres 69.30 2.83 3
6 GoodYear 68.72 -0.44 0
7 TVS Srichakra 68.14 6.20 7
Conclusionsand Inferences
As per Global Reports RubberPrices which amount for 60-70 percent ofexpenditure
will be stable till 2017
FinalizingP/E ratio
1. P/e RATIO in comparison with MRF- MRF beingan assetheavycompanygetsa competitive
advantage due to the size andinvestmentsinRubberIndustry.Ithasperformedexceptionally
well onthe basisof EBITDA marginsand stablitlyof RMcostsbut Revenue growthrate has not
beensignificant.Sowe have takenaP/Eratiowhichwill be herthanthat of MRF comparedto
Apolloi.e greaterthan11.23
2. P/e Ratio in comparison with Balkrishna Industries- EbitdaGrowth,Revenue Growthof
BalkrishnaIndustriesishigherthanApollo tyresalsotheyhave maintainedthisgrowtheven
thoughtheirRM expensesare high.P/Eratioshouldbe slightlylessthan13.47 for ApolloTyres
3. P/e Ratio in comparison with Ceat- Ceat *******
4. P/e ratio in comparison with JK tyre& Goodyear – JK tyres and Goodyearcannotbe
comparedat all as it has lowergrowthrates,lowersalesbothEBITA andRevenue Wise.
4. 5. P/e ratio in comparison with TVS Srichakra
Althoughlowersalesturnoverbutrevenuegrowthrate ishigherlow EBITDA marginsas their
RM expenseshave rose significantly.P/Eratioof Apollowillbe definitelyhigherthanthatof TVS
Srichakrai.e.12.46
Since only Balkrishna Industriescan be compared to Apolli tyres and with the steadyprices of Rubber
in Indonesianand other exportingmarkets we have consideredthe P/E ratio of ApolloTyres as 13
ApolloTyres – NewP/e ratio= 13
EPS for Apollo Tyres
Now usingthe Projectedrates-
Dividendper Share for FY2014-2015: Rs. 2
EPS ( TTM) : 12.70 For FY 14-15
Market Price of ApolloTyres= Projected P/e RATIO * EPS
= 13*12.70
= Rs. 165.1
Current Market Price of ApolloTyres =164.20 onNSE
Recommendation
Apollois valuedcorrectly andthe projectedprice matches market price