CoordiNet- Large scale demonstrations for TSO-DSO Cooperatio

CoordiNet- Large scale
demonstrations for TSO-
DSO Cooperation
Marco Baron, Gonca Gürses-Tran, Kris Kessels
December 2019

ISGAN in a Nutshell
Created under the auspices of:
the Implementing
Agreement for a
Co-operative
Programme on Smart
Grids
05/12/2019 ISGAN WEBINAR - COORDINET PRESENTATION 2
Strategic platform to support high-level government
knowledge transfer and action for the accelerated
development and deployment of smarter, cleaner
electricity grids around the world
International Smart Grid Action Network is
the only global government-to-
government forum on smart grids.
an initiative of the
Clean Energy
Ministerial (CEM)
Annexes
Annex 1
Global
Smart Grid
Inventory Annex 2
Smart Grid
Case
Studies
Annex 3
Benefit-
Cost
Analyses
and
Toolkits
Annex 4
Synthesis
of Insights
for
Decision
Makers
Annex 5
Smart Grid
Internation
al
Research
Facility
Network
Annex 6
Power
T&D
Systems
Annex 7
Smart Grids
Transitions
Annex 8:
ISGAN
Academy
on Smart
Grids

ISGAN’s worldwide presence

Value proposition
4
ISGAN
Conference
presentations
Policy
briefs Technology
briefs
Technical
papers
Discussion
papers
Webinars
Casebooks
Workshops
Broad international
expert network
Knowledge sharing,
technical assistance,
project coordination
Global, regional &
national policy support
Strategic partnerships
IEA, CEM, GSGF,
Mission Innovation, etc.
Visit our website:
www.iea-isgan.org05/12/2019 ISGAN WEBINAR - COORDINET PRESENTATION

Gonca Gürses-Tran (RWTH Aachen)The Use Case Methodology applied to TSO-DSO platform demonstrations3
Kris Kessels (VITO)Grid services, products and market models2
Marco Baron (ENEL)Introduction to the CoordiNet project1
Agenda

Introduction
CoordiNET at a glance
Project Timeline: 1° of January 2019 – 30° of June 2022
Project Budget and funding : 19.2M€ - 15.1M€
Total number of partners: 23 + 10 Linked Third Parties
Large-scale TSO-DSO-Consumer demonstrations of innovative network
services through demand response, storage and small-scale distributed
generation
Objectives:
 Demonstrate the activation and provision of services through a TSO-
DSO coordination
 Define and test standard products that provide services to the network
operators
 Develop a TSO-DSO-consumer collaboration platform in demonstration
areas to pave the way for the interoperable development of a pan-
European market
Demo areas
Countries involved

The Consortium
Type of company Number of
participants
Company logo
TSO 3
DSO 5
Research Centres and Universities 8
DSO associations 1
Technology provider 1
Flexibility providers and
aggregators
3
Solution providers 2

The TSO-DSO coordination in the
Clean Energy Package
Electricity Directive, Article 32(1)

Differences among DERs
06/12/2019 10
Aggregation is important to
foster LV DER service provision.
Still incipient in the 3 demo countries

Coordination
schemes
According to current
market features and
expected products
and services
Economic
assessment
Through demo
results, market
simulations and
business cases
Scalability &
replicability:
Recommendations
& Roadmap for an
adapted market
design at EU-level
ICT
requirements
for platforms
standardization
or integration
Main activities

Grid services and products
• Grid services are “services provided to Distribution System Operators (DSOs)
and Transmission System Operators (TSOs) to keep the operation of the grid
within acceptable limits for security of supply and are delivered mainly by third
parties” (adapted from CEDEC et al., 2019)
• Standard products are “harmonized products for the exchange of grid service(s)
with common characteristics across Europe (i.e. shared by all TSOs or by all
DSOs or by all TSOs and DSOs)” (adapted from EBGL)
• Specific Products are “products different from standard products” (adapted from
EBGL)
Sources:
• CEDEC, EDSO, ENTSO-E, Eurelectric, GEODE, 2019. TSO-DSO Report An integrated approach to active system management with the focus on TSO-
DSO coordination in congestion management and balancing.
• EBGL. Commission regulation (eu) 2017/2195 of 23 november 2017 establishing a guideline on electricity balancing (No. L312/6).

Possible grid services in CoordiNet
Balancing
Inertial response
Congestion management
Voltage control
Black start
Controlled islanding
FSP
TSO
DSO
EV
FSP Flexibility Service Provider
TSO Transmission System Operator
DSO Distribution System Operator

From grid services towards products
• Definition of one or more standard products for each of the grid services
considered with some commonly defined attributes
• Not all product attributes are fixed
• Some common attributes for different services
• Currently no specific products, but can be defined when needed
• For each service a capacity product can be defined next to the energy
products
We assembled feedback based on a questionnaire and received feedback
from 16 partners

Standard products - characteristics
Preparation
period (1)
Ramping
period (2)
Full
activation
time (3)
Quantity (4)
Delivery
period (5)
Deactivation
period (6)
Granularity
Validity
period
Recovery
period
Mode of
activation
Pricing Divisibility
Location Aggregation
Product
symmetry

Balancing
FFR
FCR
aFRR
mFRR
RR
Congestion
management
Congestion
management
product
reserved
Congestion
management
non-reserved
Voltage
control
Steady state
reactive power
Dynamic
reactive power
Active power
Inertial
response
(physical)
inertial response
Black start
Black start
system
restoration
Controlled
islanding
See balancing +
voltage control
Products within CoordiNet
FFR Fast Frequency Response
FCR Frequency Containment Reserves
aFRR automatic Frequency Restoration Reserves
mFRR manual Frequency Restoration Reserves
RR Replacement Reserves

Market models - coordination schemes
• A coordination scheme is defined as “the relation between TSO and DSO, defining the
roles and responsibilities of each system operator, when procuring and using system
services…” (Gerard et al., 2018).”
• No one-size-fits-all coordination scheme
• A mapping of coordination schemes and a common nomenclature is proposed
• Proposition of a categorization structure to group similar coordination needs together
• Only “market coordination” (procurement phase)
• Approach:
• Starting basis: five coordination schemes (CSs) as introduced by the H2020 the SmartNet
project (Gerard et al., 2018)
• Complimented with: literature on new coordination schemes and reports that cover certain
aspects of coordination
Source: Gerard, H., Rivero Puente, E.I., Six, D., 2018. Coordination between transmission and distribution system operators in the electricity sector: A
conceptual framework. Util. Policy 50, 40–48. https://doi.org/10/gc49cb

Assessment of coordination schemes
Reference Alternative coordination scheme
(Gerard et al., 2016) Centralized AS market model
Local AS market model
Shared balancing responsibility model
Common TSO-DSO AS market model
Integrated flexibility market model
(Kristov et al., 2016)
(Martini et al., 2015)
Total TSO model
Minimized or minimal DSO model
Market DSO model C1 (and C2) or Total DSO model
(Neuhoff and Richstein, 2017) Full integration market model
(Kim et al., 2018) System Balancing Cost Allocation based on the Cost-Causality Principle
(Burger et al., 2018) Enhanced Bulk Balancing Authority (BA) Model variant A
Enhanced Bulk BA Model variant B
Hybrid model
(Brazier et al., 2019)
(CEDEC et al., 2018)
Separated TSO and DSO congestion management
Combined TSO and DSO congestion management, with separated balancing
Combined balancing and congestion management for all system operators together
(ENTSO-E, 2017a) Single Flexibility Market Place
(Vicente-Pastor et al., 2019) Sequential Design, TSO-DSO Mechanism, and TSO-DSO-Retailer Mechanism
(Ecofys and Fraunhofer IWES, 2017) Regional Reserve MarketPlus (‘RegelenergiemarktPlus’)
Cascade model (‘Kaskadenmodell’)
Regional IntradayPlus market
New flexibility platform (‘neue Flexibilitätsplattform’)
Full sources available within: Vanschoenwinkel, J., Delnooz, A., Kessels, K., & Puente, E. R. (2019). Definition of scenarios and products for the demonstration
campaigns (H2020 CoordiNet Report No D1.3).

Coordination schemes within CoordiNet
20
Central & Local
DSO&TSO
DSO & TSO & External
Stakeholder
Peers
𝟏𝟏 > 𝟏
Yes Yes No
Fragmented
Yes
Central
TSO
𝟏
Yes No
Local
Peers DSO
𝟏≥ 𝟏 ≥ 𝟏
Where is the need located in the system?
Who is the primary buyer of the flexibility?
Common
Integrated
Multi-Level
Distributed
Central
Local
05/12/2019 ISGAN WEBINAR - COORDINET PRESENTATION
How many markets are utilized to buy flexibilities?
Resulting Market Model
Does the TSO have access to assets on the distribution level?

21
Central & Local
DSO&TSO
Stakeholder
Peers
𝟏𝟏 > 𝟏
Yes Yes No
Fragmented
Yes
TSO
𝟏
Yes No
Local
Peers DSO
𝟏≥ 𝟏 ≥ 𝟏
Who is the primary buyer of the flexibility?
Common
Integrated
Multi-Level
Distributed
Central
Local
Need Central

22
Central & Local
DSO&TSO
Stakeholder
Peers
𝟏𝟏 > 𝟏
Yes Yes No
Fragmented
Yes
TSO
𝟏
Yes No
Local
Peers DSO
𝟏≥ 𝟏 ≥ 𝟏
Common
Integrated
Multi-Level
Distributed
Central
Local
Need
Buyer
Central

23
Central & Local
DSO&TSO
Stakeholder
Peers
𝟏𝟏 > 𝟏
Yes Yes No
Fragmented
Yes
TSO
𝟏
Yes No
Local
Peers DSO
𝟏≥ 𝟏 ≥ 𝟏
Common
Integrated
Multi-Level
Distributed
Central
Local
Need
Buyer
# Markets
Central

24
Central & Local
DSO&TSO
Stakeholder
Peers
𝟏𝟏 > 𝟏
Yes Yes No
Fragmented
Yes
TSO
𝟏
Yes No
Local
Peers DSO
𝟏≥ 𝟏 ≥ 𝟏
Common
Integrated
Multi-Level
Distributed
Central
Local
Need
Buyer
# Markets
Access?
Market
models
Central

The Use Case Methodology IEC 62559-2
• Objective: Fostering a common
understanding of functionalities,
actors and processes across
different stakeholders
• A single layer of the SGAM is a two-
dimensional plane
• Domains: electrical energy
conversion chain from generation to
consumption
• Zones: task distribution towards
management of technical and
business processes Smart Grid Architecture Model (SGAM) (Gottschalk et al. 2017)
Premises

Top-Down Approach
05/12/2019 ISGAN WEBINAR - COORDINET PRESENTATION C 27
1. Compiled first information from
templates
2. Short recap and feedback in
workshop groups
3. Each BUC detailed out and re-
arranged
4. Mapping coordination schemes &
products
5. Diagram creation
6. Final Document
https://private.coordinet-project.eu//files/documentos/5d724207ca982Coordinet_Deliverable_1.5.pdf

Terminologies
The CoordiNet platform is intended…
… to form an interface to manage interactions
between the TSO, DSOs and FSPs,
… to coordinate the functions necessary to
perform the Use Cases,
… to support: data exchange between actors
related to market bids, technical limitations
on networks, market clearing functions,
market results.
…
…
…

Example UML-Overview

Greek Business Use Cases
30G. GÜRSES-TRAN | RWTH AACHEN
Connected with Hedno

Actors and Objectives in GR-1a&b
31
DSO
• Keep voltage level in acceptable limits
• Minimize renewable energy curtailment
• Improve grid efficiency and guarantee secure operation
• Use flexibility from distribution network for voltage control
• Enable non-discriminatory market access (local & TSO ancillary...)
TSO
• Keep voltage level in acceptable limits
• Minimize renewable energy curtailment
• Flexibility from transmission (and distribution) for voltage control
• Improve system efficiency and guarantee secure operation
• Enable non-discriminatory market access (TSO ancillary services)
Aggregator
• Achieve more revenue streams by
increasing the attractiveness for flex.
providers to participate
Service Provider
(separate for transmission, distribution
and flexibility)
• Optimize flexible resources
management business
a)Multi-level
b)Fragmented
G. GÜRSES-TRAN | RWTH AACHEN

32
Connected with e-distribución
Connected with Iberdrola Distribución Electrica
Spanish Business Use Cases

Actors and Objectives in ES-1
33
DSO
• Procure flexibility from resources connected at both transmission
and distribution network
• Solve temporary congestions that can occur in both networks using
a common and local ancillary services market
TSO
• Procure flexibility from resources connected at both transmission
and distribution network
• Solve temporary congestions that can occur in both networks using
a common ancillary services market
Aggregator
Service Provider
and flexibility)
management business
a)Common
b)Local

Actors and Objectives in ES-4
34
DSO
• To operate in islanding mode during outages
• To operate in islanding mode during planned maintenance
• To maintain uninterrrupted power supply
TSO
• To evaluate the effect of the DSO’s islanding operation on
balancing
Aggregator
Service Provider
and flexibility)
management business
Local

Swedish Business Use Cases
35
Connected with Vattenfall
Connected with Eon

Actors and Objectives in SE-2
36
Local DSO
• To connect new renewable energy sources
• To improve power quality and security of supply
Local & Regional DSO
• To unlock flexibility and increase attractiveness for flexibility
service providers to participate on the CoordiNet platform
TSO
• To increase the liquidity of the manual frequency restoration
reserve market
Aggregator
Service Provider
(separate for distribution and flexibility)
management business
Local

Actors and Objectives in SE-3
37
Local & Regional DSO
• To give customers opportunity to optimize their resources
• To meet grid needs with a market opportunity
TSO
• To increase the liquidity of the manual frequency restoration
reserve market
Aggregator
Service Provider
(separate for distribution and flexibility)
management business
Multi-level

Resulting ambition overview

Baron, Marco; Kessels, Kris; Gürses-Tran, Gonca
• marco.baron2@enel.com
• Kris.kessels@vito.be
• GGuerses@eonerc.rwth-aachen.de
CoordiNet has received funding from the
European Union’s Horizon 2020 research
and innovation programme under grant
agreement No 824414

Assessment of coordination schemes
5 possible coordination schemes from SmartNet project
• Centralized AS market model
• Local AS market model
• Shared balancing responsibility model
• Common TSO-DSO AS market model
• Integrated flexibility market model
Source: Gerard, H., Rivero Puente, E.I.,
Six, D., 2018. Coordination between
transmission and distribution system
operators in the electricity sector: A
conceptual framework. Util. Policy 50, 40–
48. https://doi.org/10/gc49cb

Product characteristics
Characteristic Definition
Preparation period The period between the request by the SO and the start of the ramping period.
Ramping period The period during which the input and/or output of power will be increased or decreased until the requested amount is reached.
Full activation time The period between the activation request by the SO and the corresponding full delivery of the concerned product.
Minimum/maximum quantity The power (or change in power) which is offered and which will be reached at the end of the full activation time. The minimum quantity represents the
minimum amount of power for one bid. The maximum quantity represents the maximum amount of power for one bid.
Min/max duration of delivery
period
The minimum/maximum length of the period of delivery during which the service provider delivers the full requested change of power in-feed to, or the full
requested change of withdrawals from the system.
Deactivation period The period for ramping from full delivery to a set point, or from full withdrawal back to a set point.
Granularity The smallest increment in volume of a bid.
Validity period The period when the bid offered by the service provider can be activated, where all the characteristics of the product are respected. The validity period is
defined by a start time and an end time.
Mode of activation The mode of activation of bids, i.e. manual or automatic. Automatic activation is done automatically during the validity period, whereas a manual activation is
done at the request of the SO.
Availability price Price for keeping the flexibility available (mostly expressed in € /MW/hour of availability)
Activation price Price for the flexibility actually delivered (mostly expressed in € /MWh)
Divisibility The possibility for a system operator to use only part of the bids offered by the service provider, either in terms of power activation or time duration. A
distinction is made between divisible and indivisible bids.
Locational information included This attribute determines whether certain locational information needs to be included in the bid (e.g. identification of LFC area, congested area...)
Recovery period Minimum duration between the end of deactivation period and the following activation.
Aggregation allowed This attribute determines whether a grouped offering of power by covering several units via an aggregator is allowed.
Symmetric/asymmetric product This attribute determines whether only symmetric products are allowed. For a symmetric product upward regulation volume and for downward regulation
volume has to be equal.

CoordiNet- Large scale demonstrations for TSO-DSO Cooperatio

Recomendados

Recomendados

Mais conteúdo relacionado

Mais procurados

Mais procurados (20)

Semelhante a CoordiNet- Large scale demonstrations for TSO-DSO Cooperatio

Semelhante a CoordiNet- Large scale demonstrations for TSO-DSO Cooperatio (20)

Mais de Leonardo ENERGY

Mais de Leonardo ENERGY (20)

Último

Último (20)

CoordiNet- Large scale demonstrations for TSO-DSO Cooperatio

Notas do Editor