Wouldn't you like to have the power to transform any SSO into one recognised externally as a high performing SSO? Ian McAllister introduced a ‘service performance model’ to Nationwide with the aim of achieving this in 18 months. He has used it previously across three industry sectors for both transactional and high-value-added activities. What are the secrets? Attend this session and learn:
• Key features of this target operating model that can realise service quality AND cost reduction improvements for you
• How to overcome challenges such as customer resistance, employee engagement, systems capability and a willingness for people to see the bigger picture
• Key results including a boost to customer satisfaction and optimised transaction costs
The seven culture traits to take you to a customer-focused shared services op...
Toning up your shared services operation for elite performance
1. Toning up your shared services operation
for elite performance
….formalised service performance modelling to fit with your organisation
Ian McAllister
March 2012
2. For today…….
Context
The Nationwide Building Society
Finance Business Services
Service Performance modelling
Interactive session: your views
Our model: the ‘HOW and the ‘WHAT’
Interactive session: how are you managing service performance
In summary
Key challenges and next steps
Risk management (if we have time)
3. Context: The Nationwide Building Society in numbers
165 years.…….experience - as a mutual
£190 billion....assets held - the world’s largest building society, UK’s largest mutual
£320 million…last reported profit (2011)
15 million..…..members – borrowers and savers
16,000……..….employees – in approximately 700 locations
180+…….………similar organisations – acquired or merged
1st………………..retail internet banking - introduction in the UK
8...………….……range of retail financial products – savings, mortgages, loans, investments etc..
♯2…………...…UK savings and mortgage provider
♯1…………...…for customer satisfaction (Financial Research Survey: February 2012)
4. Context: forming Finance Business Services (FBS)
• Nationwide transactional activities (mainly P2P and R2R) branded as ‘shared
services’ but in reality are centralised accounting (and in another location)
• This shared services proposition:-
• a provider of Business Intelligence and other analytics to senior
decision-makers
• focus is on delivering high quality, often complex outputs through a
combination of efficient transactional activities and insight.
• Shared services as a business
• This story: how…..
• we intend to deliver on our proposition
• an embedded Service Performance Model (of any design) is equally
effective for a range of shared services solutions
5. Context: Operating model for ‘Financial Performance’
Business Customers
Financial Performance
Board and Regulatory Business Partnering
Group [Product]
Operational Channel
Financial Group Cost Capital Income and
Cost Performance
Planning and Management Management Margin
Management Management
Analysis Management
Service Performance [Model] Management
Shared Services
Finance Business Services
6. Finance Business Services: being organised as a ‘Business’
Our Vision To be a high performance shared services business
Our Mission Delivering excellence to each customer first time, every time
People Process Technology Service
Developing capability Continuously Improving Clear strategy Raising Service levels
Our Critical Creating opportunities Raising standards Optimising automation Delivering on time, in full
Success factors Being accountable Best Operating Practice Engage and support Developing partnerships
Recognising excellence Embracing change Re-engineer Expanding range of services
•Viewpoint score •SLA success rate - various •LV7 downtime •Customer satisfaction
Our Key •Absenteeism •# Exceptions •P1 & P2 faults raised •Process improvements
Performance •Attrition rate •Cost of rework •SLA performance •SLA performance
Indicators (w-i-p) •# PRIDE awards •Projects completed on time •OTIF delivery
•Average PA score •% self-service application
•% development plans in place
Embed a structured and formalised way of working – Service Performance Model implementation
Review our product and service offering – Service Performance Model implementation
Achieving the
vision: Review, optimise processes for delivery – FMT27 outcomes
STRATEGY for Review, modify organisational structure to support delivery – FBS aligned to process
2012-3
Focus on developing capability – people and systems
7. Finance Business Services: being organised as a ‘Business’
Our Vision To be a high performance shared services business
Our Mission Delivering excellence to each customer first time, every time
People Process Technology Service
Developing capability Continuously Improving Clear strategy Raising Service levels
Our Critical Creating opportunities Raising standards Optimising automation Delivering on time, in full
Success factors Being accountable Best Operating Practice Engage and support Developing partnerships
Recognising excellence Embracing change Re-engineer Expanding range of services
•Viewpoint score •SLA success rate - various •LV7 downtime •Customer satisfaction
Our Key •Absenteeism •# Exceptions •P1 & P2 faults raised •Process improvements
Performance •Attrition rate •Cost of rework •SLA performance •SLA performance
Indicators (w-i-p) •# PRIDE awards •Projects completed on time •OTIF delivery
•Average PA score •% self-service application
•% development plans in place
Embed a structured and formalised way of working – Service Performance Model implementation
Review our product and service offering – Service Performance Model implementation
Achieving the
vision: Review, optimise processes for delivery – FMT27 outcomes
STRATEGY for Review, modify organisational structure to support delivery – FBS aligned to process
2012-3
Focus on developing capability – people and systems
8. Finance Business Services: being organised as a ‘Business’
Our Vision To be a high performance shared services business
Our Mission Delivering excellence to each customer first time, every time
People Process Technology Service
Developing capability Continuously Improving Clear strategy Raising Service levels
Our Critical Creating opportunities Raising standards Optimising automation Delivering on time, in full
Success factors Being accountable Best Operating Practice Engage and support Developing partnerships
Recognising excellence Embracing change Re-engineer Expanding range of services
•Viewpoint score •SLA success rate - various •LV7 downtime •Customer satisfaction
Our Key •Absenteeism •# Exceptions •P1 & P2 faults raised •Process improvements
Performance •Attrition rate •Cost of rework •SLA performance •SLA performance
Indicators (w-i-p) •# PRIDE awards •Projects completed on time •OTIF delivery
•Average PA score •% self-service application
•% development plans in place
Embed a structured and formalised way of working – Service Performance Model implementation
Review our product and service offering – Service Performance Model implementation
Achieving the
vision: Review, optimise processes for delivery – FMT27 outcomes
STRATEGY for Review, modify organisational structure to support delivery – FBS aligned to process
2012-3
Focus on developing capability – people and systems
9. Finance Business Services: being organised as a ‘Business’
Our Vision To be a high performance shared services business
Our Mission Delivering excellence to each customer first time, every time
People Process Technology Service
Developing capability Continuously Improving Clear strategy Raising Service levels
Our Critical Creating opportunities Raising standards Optimising automation Delivering on time, in full
Success factors Being accountable Best Operating Practice Engage and support Developing partnerships
Recognising excellence Embracing change Re-engineer Expanding range of services
•Viewpoint score •SLA success rate - various •LV7 downtime •Customer satisfaction
Our Key •Absenteeism •# Exceptions •P1 & P2 faults raised •Process improvements
Performance •Attrition rate •Cost of rework •SLA performance •SLA performance
Indicators (w-i-p) •# PRIDE awards •Projects completed on time •OTIF delivery
•Average PA score •% self-service application
•% development plans in place
Embed a structured and formalised way of working – Service Performance Model implementation
Review our product and service offering – Service Performance Model implementation
Achieving the
vision: Review, optimise processes for delivery – FMT27 outcomes
STRATEGY for Review, modify organisational structure to support delivery – FBS aligned to process
2012-3
Focus on developing capability – people and systems
10. Finance Business Services: being organised as a ‘Business’
Our Vision To be a high performance shared services business
Our Mission Delivering excellence to each customer first time, every time
People Process Technology Service
Developing capability Continuously Improving Clear strategy Raising Service levels
Our Critical Creating opportunities Raising standards Optimising automation Delivering on time, in full
Success factors Being accountable Best Operating Practice Engage and support Developing partnerships
Recognising excellence Embracing change Re-engineer Expanding range of services
•Viewpoint score •SLA success rate - various •LV7 downtime •Customer satisfaction
Our Key •Absenteeism •# Exceptions •P1 & P2 faults raised •Process improvements
Performance •Attrition rate •Cost of rework •SLA performance •SLA performance
Indicators (w-i-p) •# PRIDE awards •Projects completed on time •OTIF delivery
•Average PA score •% self-service application
•% development plans in place
Embed a structured and formalised way of working – Service Performance Model implementation
Review our product and service offering – Service Performance Model implementation
Achieving the
vision: Review, optimise processes for delivery – FMT27 outcomes
STRATEGY for Review, modify organisational structure to support delivery – FBS aligned to process
2012-3
Focus on developing capability – people and systems
11. Your views: what a Service Performance model looks like
Interactive session: at your tables……………..two questions:
1.What should ‘good look like’ for managing Service Performance
2.What do you think the benefits are of having a ‘model’
14. Our execution: 7 priorities, 5 workstreams
Something to………
1. Support a business mindset………....vision, mission, critical success factors
2. Establish where we currently are….baselines
3. Monitor how we are performing…..scorecards
4. Set out our service promise………....service level agreements
5. Sustain a learning culture…………....exceptions management
6. Deliver performance………...............formal continuous improvement
7. Assist in managing priorities……..….self-managed teams
15. Service Performance model: Execution through process excellence
• A bit of interactive ‘fun’………………….not scientific
• On the handout provided, we would like you to indicate where your shared
services business is up to with regard to modelling ‘Service Performance’
• As we share the contents of this particular model, we would like you to score
that progress as follows:
Score
0………………….not started, not applicable, not interested!!
1………………….thought about it, at the ideas stage, may implement
2………………….have a plan for implementation
3………………….currently implementing
4………………….fully implemented, still evolving
5………………….totally embedded
• We’ll total at the end
• Maximum score is…………110
• Would like to collect in at the end of the session, replies can be anonymous
17. Service Performance model: Execution through process excellence
Performance Measurement – process checklist
So what…
Current transaction unit costs
Expense ratios, budget performance
Establish where we currently are…. 1. Baselines
Productivity measures ✔
Cost of exceptions
Best practice in Shared Services
Identify key processes for measurement
Measure process performance……. 2. Process metrics Establish measures – link into SLA ✔
Agree internally and with customers
Publication
Establish contacts
Point of comparison if you can Agree benchmarks ✔
access them……………….. 3. Internal Benchmarks
Measure and report
Share and identify influences
Establish contacts – Hackett, SSF
Powerful point of comparison if you Agree benchmarks
can get them…………………. 4. External Benchmarks
Measure and report ✔
Share and identify influences
Best practice in Shared Services
Report to stakeholders................... 5. Balanced Scorecard Design local scorecard ✔
Agree targets and implement
Make it easy to execute………………. Enable Performance Measurement processes
6. Performance modelling ✔
Increased automation in production
18. Service Performance model: Execution through process excellence
Capability Development – process checklist
So what…
Evaluate current FBS status and structure
Organisational Define end-state
1.
Establish the optimum
delivery structure……………..
capability analysis
Gap analysis
Fill through skills development
✔
Job specification and competency profiles
Development and retention programme
Succession planning ✔
People performance Reward and recognition process
2. Improved use of existing tools e.g. Reviews/360
management systems
Develop our people………..... Resources for training and development
Leverage the Capability Framework
Leadership competency
Viewpoint
Get the team’s perspective 3. Employee surveys Action planning ✔
and act…………………………….. Accountability, progress monitoring and delivery
Communication/stakeholder management
Systems optimisation Training and awareness approach
Leverage technology………… 4.
strategy Protocols for development and initiatives ✔
Process for prioritisation of business as usual
A visible, well defined process
Formalised continuous Shared with customers and branded
Delivery, effectiveness, 5.
improvement Incentivised ✔
efficiency, differentiation…….. Tracked benefits
19. Service Performance model: Execution through process excellence
Customer Relationship Management – process checklist
So what…
Agree Design
Establish FBS service measures
Set out our service promise…… 1. Service Level Agreements
Establish customer reverse measures
Set targets and Implement
✔
Define who the customer is
Get the customer view on a 2. Voice of the customer Customer review meetings
systematic basis……………………..
Customer survey and managing feedback
✔
Agree what is to be delivered
Product development – customer led ✔
So what do we do………………….. 3. Products Definition Product development – FBS innovation
Measure delivery and quality - insight
Agree when and how we deliver
How should we deliver….......... 4. Service Definition Measure delivery and quality ✔
Capability development
Design process
5. Exceptions Management
Communicate out ✔
A sustainable learning culture…. Prototype
Monitor , measure and action planning
SLA requirements
Engagement at all levels…………. 6. Communications strategy Relationship governance ✔
Exceptions processes
Exceptions modelling
Make CRM easy to execute…….. 7. CRM modelling Collecting and reporting SLA performance data ✔
20. Service Performance model: Execution through process excellence
So what… Workload Management – process checklist
Create schedule of regular activities
Identify standard and ad hoc Review ad hoc requests
activity, establish baselines, focus Map out peaks and troughs ✔
1. Activity Analysis Assess flexibility of resource
effort on CI……………………………….
Identify insight, focus on consistency
Feed in to Capability Development process
work is effectively prioritised - urgency of the
request, the importance to the customer
ensure fluctuations in the FBS workload are managed
Develop a sense of team working within the planned staffing levels
and shared ownership, pro-active Hotspots
plan the allocation of work to individuals and teams ✔
managment of issues on a 2. (Communication in a timely manner.
systematic basis…………………….. cells) consider the skills, competencies and preferences of
individuals and teams
ensure the developmental needs of individuals and
teams are catered for
Understanding cost of service, Use activity analysis
impact of re-working, basis for Activity Based Create activity cost analysis ✔
3. Feed in the unit cost calculation
transaction unit costs Management
Examine cost sensitivity and impact of exceptions
Research best practice
Charging
Influence behaviours………… 4.
mechanism
Prototype FBS model ✔
Discuss potential impact with stakeholders
21. Challenges and next steps
• Challenges…..
• Winning hearts and minds – culture, ‘bit theoretical?’
• Choosing the ‘right model’ – priorities, delivery, resources, ‘fit’
• Implementation – timing, change management
• Sustainability - measurement systems, evolution, embed
• Next steps…..
JDI for superior shared services delivery (in my humble opinion…..)
24. Your Service Performance model: where are you up to?
Performance measurement Score Customer Relationship Management Score
1. Baselines 1. Service Level Agreements
2. Process metrics 2. Voice of the customer
3. Internal Benchmarks 3. Products Definition
Total 4. External Benchmarks 4. Service Definition
5. Balanced Scorecard 5. Exceptions Management
6. Performance modelling 6. Communications strategy
Maximum 30………. 7. CRM modelling
Maximum 35………….
Capability Development Score
out of….
1. Organisational capability analysis Workload Management Score
110 2. People performance management systems 1. Activity analysis
3. Employee surveys 2. Hotspots (Communication cells)
4. Systems optimisation strategy 3. Activity Based Management
5. Formalised continuous improvement 4. Charging mechanism
Maximum 25…….. Maximum 20………..
Score
0 - not started 1 - at the ideas stage, may implement 2 - have a plan for implementation
3 - currently implementing 4 - fully implemented, still evolving 5 - totally embedded
26. Risk assessment: mitigating risk supported by the model
Strategic Potential risks of going off-
Managing that risk……
themes track……..
• Lack of clarity of objectives, expectations • Specification, competencies for all roles
People
Engage and • Absence of shared services leadership • Skills development strategies
enable the team • Rewards systems are inadequate • Succession, retention, reward programme
• Failure to act on employee feedback • Satisfaction surveys and positive actions
Committed to • Processes and controls not understood • Documentation, standardisation, streamline
Process
process • Audit failure, reputation damaged • Formalised issues resolution, CI
excellence and • Ineffective change management • Change control process and governance
‘product’ quality • Lack of response, follow up on exceptions • Quality control, risk management focus
Embracing • Inappropriate technology selection • High levels of automation, % self service
Techno
technology to • Incomplete implementation, lack of training • Fit for purpose systems, few side applications
support service • Under-utilisation of the functionality • Project management expertise
delivery • Missing out on leveraging automation • Defined relationship with IS organisation
Developing • Lack of customer engagement • Well executed communications strategy
partnerships, • Non-compliance to agreed processes • Defined and agreed services and products
focus on • Service and ‘product’ failures • Key performance indicators – duly managed
Service
customers • Not leveraging the benefits from the SPM • Customer Satisfaction Surveys – gain insight
• Lack of organisational credibility • Baselining, bench-marking, scorecards
Being ‘organised’ • Low levels of ‘business-like behaviour’ • Leadership, objectives, CSF’s
as a ‘business’ • Inability to influence business customers • Charging mechanisms
• Ineffective communication • Communicated vision, strategy, mission