SlideShare uma empresa Scribd logo
1 de 12
Surojeet Sadhu Brajesh Pandey Mahendra Singh  Rishabh Garg Ankit Garg
[object Object]
[object Object]
[object Object]
[object Object]
[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Question 2) High Status members in a group are given a wider range of discretion. They tend to be more assertive ,criticize more, state more commands and interrupt others more often. The status differences actually inhibit diversity of ideas and creativity in groups because lower-status members tend to be less active participants in group discussions and their expertise and insights are not likely to be fully utilized and they become less participative do not raise their opinion which results in a groupthink.
Question 4) How might group characteristics such as size and cohesiveness affect groupthink? Although size affects diversity of views but people grow more intimidated and hesitant as group size increases, they likely to feel less personal responsibility as group gets larger. Again because of large group size social loafing may occur where individuals expand less effort and conform to the group decision without any counter views. This generates the pressure on individuals holding counter views to reserve it to themselves. When a group is too cohesive, there is a tremendous desire of unanimity. Seeking consensus becomes an end in itself. There members tend to become unwilling to criticize one anothers’ ideas or suggestions
 
 
[object Object]

Mais conteúdo relacionado

Mais procurados

169836560 group-stages-and-dynamics-in-12-angry-men
169836560 group-stages-and-dynamics-in-12-angry-men169836560 group-stages-and-dynamics-in-12-angry-men
169836560 group-stages-and-dynamics-in-12-angry-men
Paula912226
 
Group decision making
Group decision makingGroup decision making
Group decision making
Krishna Jith
 
GROUPTHINK
GROUPTHINKGROUPTHINK
GROUPTHINK
wrhoad
 
What problems might surface in teams at each stage in the five-stage group de...
What problems might surface in teams at each stage in the five-stage group de...What problems might surface in teams at each stage in the five-stage group de...
What problems might surface in teams at each stage in the five-stage group de...
Syaff Hk
 

Mais procurados (20)

Smart Teams and Dumb Teams
Smart Teams and Dumb TeamsSmart Teams and Dumb Teams
Smart Teams and Dumb Teams
 
Decision dilemma
Decision dilemmaDecision dilemma
Decision dilemma
 
GREG JAMES @ SUN MICROSYSTEMS, MANAGING A GLOBAL TEAM
GREG JAMES @ SUN MICROSYSTEMS, MANAGING A GLOBAL TEAMGREG JAMES @ SUN MICROSYSTEMS, MANAGING A GLOBAL TEAM
GREG JAMES @ SUN MICROSYSTEMS, MANAGING A GLOBAL TEAM
 
Managing a global team: Sun Microsystems business case
Managing a global team: Sun Microsystems business caseManaging a global team: Sun Microsystems business case
Managing a global team: Sun Microsystems business case
 
Group think presentation
Group think presentationGroup think presentation
Group think presentation
 
Acme and omega
Acme and omegaAcme and omega
Acme and omega
 
Consulting & Entrepreneurship Quiz - Answers
Consulting & Entrepreneurship Quiz - AnswersConsulting & Entrepreneurship Quiz - Answers
Consulting & Entrepreneurship Quiz - Answers
 
169836560 group-stages-and-dynamics-in-12-angry-men
169836560 group-stages-and-dynamics-in-12-angry-men169836560 group-stages-and-dynamics-in-12-angry-men
169836560 group-stages-and-dynamics-in-12-angry-men
 
We googled you- HBR Case Study
We googled you- HBR Case StudyWe googled you- HBR Case Study
We googled you- HBR Case Study
 
Group decision making
Group decision makingGroup decision making
Group decision making
 
Managing up
Managing upManaging up
Managing up
 
Thomas Green Case Study Presentation.
Thomas Green Case Study Presentation.Thomas Green Case Study Presentation.
Thomas Green Case Study Presentation.
 
GROUPTHINK
GROUPTHINKGROUPTHINK
GROUPTHINK
 
Apex corporation case study
Apex corporation case studyApex corporation case study
Apex corporation case study
 
Managing Up Grace - Case Study
Managing Up Grace - Case StudyManaging Up Grace - Case Study
Managing Up Grace - Case Study
 
GE's Two-Decade Transformation: Jack Welch's Leadership
GE's Two-Decade Transformation: Jack Welch's LeadershipGE's Two-Decade Transformation: Jack Welch's Leadership
GE's Two-Decade Transformation: Jack Welch's Leadership
 
New York times Paywall case study
New York times Paywall case study New York times Paywall case study
New York times Paywall case study
 
Team dynamics
Team dynamicsTeam dynamics
Team dynamics
 
What problems might surface in teams at each stage in the five-stage group de...
What problems might surface in teams at each stage in the five-stage group de...What problems might surface in teams at each stage in the five-stage group de...
What problems might surface in teams at each stage in the five-stage group de...
 
Ge
GeGe
Ge
 

Destaque (6)

What makes an 'insight' actually an insight?
What makes an 'insight' actually an insight?What makes an 'insight' actually an insight?
What makes an 'insight' actually an insight?
 
Groupthink
GroupthinkGroupthink
Groupthink
 
Groupthink presentation
Groupthink presentationGroupthink presentation
Groupthink presentation
 
Change management models - ADKAR, Satir, 8 step, Switch and Lewin models
Change management models - ADKAR, Satir, 8 step, Switch and Lewin modelsChange management models - ADKAR, Satir, 8 step, Switch and Lewin models
Change management models - ADKAR, Satir, 8 step, Switch and Lewin models
 
Group Behavior
Group BehaviorGroup Behavior
Group Behavior
 
O.b. c 9 foundations of group behaviour
O.b. c  9 foundations of group behaviourO.b. c  9 foundations of group behaviour
O.b. c 9 foundations of group behaviour
 

Semelhante a Dangers of group thinking

Work teams and group
Work teams and groupWork teams and group
Work teams and group
cymark09
 
Michael Rodriguez.docx
Michael Rodriguez.docxMichael Rodriguez.docx
Michael Rodriguez.docx
ARIV4
 
Informal and formal groups
Informal and formal groupsInformal and formal groups
Informal and formal groups
Maridel Viernes
 
[Type text][Type text][Type text]Chapters 9 and 10 Reflectio.docx
[Type text][Type text][Type text]Chapters 9 and 10 Reflectio.docx[Type text][Type text][Type text]Chapters 9 and 10 Reflectio.docx
[Type text][Type text][Type text]Chapters 9 and 10 Reflectio.docx
odiliagilby
 
Chapter 7can define a group as three or more people who interact.docx
Chapter 7can define a group as three or more people who interact.docxChapter 7can define a group as three or more people who interact.docx
Chapter 7can define a group as three or more people who interact.docx
christinemaritza
 

Semelhante a Dangers of group thinking (20)

Ceo Presentation Mgd
Ceo Presentation   MgdCeo Presentation   Mgd
Ceo Presentation Mgd
 
Deliberating Differently in the Boardroom
Deliberating Differently in the BoardroomDeliberating Differently in the Boardroom
Deliberating Differently in the Boardroom
 
Work teams and group
Work teams and groupWork teams and group
Work teams and group
 
Formal and informal groups
Formal and informal groupsFormal and informal groups
Formal and informal groups
 
Participative leadership theory
Participative leadership theoryParticipative leadership theory
Participative leadership theory
 
7 Solving Problems and Making Decisions GROUP SKILLS PREVIEW.pdf
7 Solving Problems and Making Decisions GROUP SKILLS PREVIEW.pdf7 Solving Problems and Making Decisions GROUP SKILLS PREVIEW.pdf
7 Solving Problems and Making Decisions GROUP SKILLS PREVIEW.pdf
 
Free video lecture in india
Free video lecture in indiaFree video lecture in india
Free video lecture in india
 
Michael Rodriguez.docx
Michael Rodriguez.docxMichael Rodriguez.docx
Michael Rodriguez.docx
 
Managing Groups & Teams
Managing Groups & TeamsManaging Groups & Teams
Managing Groups & Teams
 
Self assessment and improvement tool
Self assessment and improvement toolSelf assessment and improvement tool
Self assessment and improvement tool
 
Informal and formal groups
Informal and formal groupsInformal and formal groups
Informal and formal groups
 
Goup Decision Making Essay
Goup Decision Making EssayGoup Decision Making Essay
Goup Decision Making Essay
 
[Type text][Type text][Type text]Chapters 9 and 10 Reflectio.docx
[Type text][Type text][Type text]Chapters 9 and 10 Reflectio.docx[Type text][Type text][Type text]Chapters 9 and 10 Reflectio.docx
[Type text][Type text][Type text]Chapters 9 and 10 Reflectio.docx
 
CONFLICT_REPORT.docx
CONFLICT_REPORT.docxCONFLICT_REPORT.docx
CONFLICT_REPORT.docx
 
Chapter 7can define a group as three or more people who interact.docx
Chapter 7can define a group as three or more people who interact.docxChapter 7can define a group as three or more people who interact.docx
Chapter 7can define a group as three or more people who interact.docx
 
Effective teamwork strategies for law firms
Effective teamwork strategies for law firmsEffective teamwork strategies for law firms
Effective teamwork strategies for law firms
 
Group-Dynamics.ppt
Group-Dynamics.pptGroup-Dynamics.ppt
Group-Dynamics.ppt
 
Principal of Management Report : Pharmaplex Company
Principal of Management Report :  Pharmaplex  CompanyPrincipal of Management Report :  Pharmaplex  Company
Principal of Management Report : Pharmaplex Company
 
Module 3: Increasing Engagement
Module 3: Increasing EngagementModule 3: Increasing Engagement
Module 3: Increasing Engagement
 
Pa685 m3 ppt_alternate
Pa685 m3 ppt_alternatePa685 m3 ppt_alternate
Pa685 m3 ppt_alternate
 

Dangers of group thinking

  • 1. Surojeet Sadhu Brajesh Pandey Mahendra Singh Rishabh Garg Ankit Garg
  • 2.
  • 3.
  • 4.
  • 5.
  • 6.
  • 7.
  • 8. Question 2) High Status members in a group are given a wider range of discretion. They tend to be more assertive ,criticize more, state more commands and interrupt others more often. The status differences actually inhibit diversity of ideas and creativity in groups because lower-status members tend to be less active participants in group discussions and their expertise and insights are not likely to be fully utilized and they become less participative do not raise their opinion which results in a groupthink.
  • 9. Question 4) How might group characteristics such as size and cohesiveness affect groupthink? Although size affects diversity of views but people grow more intimidated and hesitant as group size increases, they likely to feel less personal responsibility as group gets larger. Again because of large group size social loafing may occur where individuals expand less effort and conform to the group decision without any counter views. This generates the pressure on individuals holding counter views to reserve it to themselves. When a group is too cohesive, there is a tremendous desire of unanimity. Seeking consensus becomes an end in itself. There members tend to become unwilling to criticize one anothers’ ideas or suggestions
  • 10.  
  • 11.  
  • 12.