IFPRI - NAIP PME in ICAR - survey results and workshop recommendation - mryuthunjaya
National Agricultural Innovation Project (NAIP), ICAR and the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) organized a two day workshop on ‘Impact of capacity building programs under NAIP’ on June 6-7, 2014 at AP Shinde Auditorium, NASC Complex, Pusa, New Delhi. The main purpose of the workshop was to present and discuss the findings of the impact evaluation study on capacity building programs under NAIP by IFPRI. The scientists from ICAR and agricultural universities were sent abroad to receive training in specialized research techniques. Post-training, scientists were expected to work on collaborative projects within the ICAR, which would further enrich their knowledge and skills, expand their research network and stimulate them’ to improve their productivity, creativity and quality of their research. The ICAR commissioned with IFPRI (International Food Policy Research Institute) to undertake an evaluation of these capacity building programs under NAIP in July 2012. The workshop shared the findings on the impact of capacity building programs under NAIP and evolve strategies for future capacity building programs
Recomendados
Recomendados
Mais conteúdo relacionado
Mais procurados
Mais procurados (8)
Semelhante a IFPRI - NAIP PME in ICAR - survey results and workshop recommendation - mryuthunjaya
Semelhante a IFPRI - NAIP PME in ICAR - survey results and workshop recommendation - mryuthunjaya (20)
Mais de International Food Policy Research Institute- South Asia Office
Mais de International Food Policy Research Institute- South Asia Office (20)
Último
Último (20)
IFPRI - NAIP PME in ICAR - survey results and workshop recommendation - mryuthunjaya
- 1. PME in ICAR Status, Survey Results & Recommendations of the Workshop Held on 27 May 2014, New Delhi 6 June 2014 NASC Complex, New Delhi Mruthyunjaya IFPRI, NEW DELHI
- 2. Outline • PME Initiatives in ICAR • PME Survey Results – General Observation – Composition and functional Status – Constraints • Workshop Recommendations – Institutionalization – Research Priority Setting – Functional Excellence 2
- 3. PME Initiatives in ICAR • Formal/Informal monitoring efforts existed earlier (RCMU/ Technical Cell/PMC Section/RPC Cell, etc.) • 1998: O&M Task Force and PME Task Force; NATP-32PME Cells • 2006: NAIP-14 PME Cells • 2010:S.L.Mehta Committee • 2011: ICAR Order on constitution of PME Cells in all institutions to integrate and mainstream 3
- 4. PME Organogram Priority Setting Project allocation Project Monitoring/ Evaluation Technology Validation / Impact Assessment Capacity Creation Information Management PME Cell Functions PMC Director PMC Act on Priorities as recommended by PME Allocate priority projects to Scientists Constitute committee of 2 experts (internal + external) , and report to PME – annual Plan for Capacity Creation – annual Validating/ vetting Information – six monthly Constitute committee of 2 experts (internal + external) , and submit report to PME – annual Coordinate / synthesise QRT, IRC, RAC and Vision Docs & recommend Priority list to Director Recommendation to Director – annual Coordinate with 2 experts (internal + external) - annual Coordinate with 2 experts (internal + external) - annual Execute Capacity Building Programme Information Management and Dissemination 4 PME
- 6. General Observation • PME Cells exist and PME is practiced in all, but professional and analytical back-up weak 6
- 7. Staff Strength 7 Average Work-time Spent By PME Staff 60%13% 27% Biological Scientists Social Scientists Support Staff Small Institutes 3-4 Large Institutes 5-11 25% 75% Scientists Support Staff
- 8. PME Functions 8 Mandated • Research Prioritization / Project Allocation • Project Monitoring and Evaluation • Impact Assessment / Technology Validation • Capacity Creation • Information Management Other Tasks • Reports • Secretarial Work • General Maintenance • Web-hosting • Seminar/workshops/meetings • MoUs, ISO certification, RTI, Fellowships
- 9. 9 Key PME Functions, Less Priority Note: Figures indicate percentage of institutions performing these PME functions 90% 58% 58% 56% 46% 44% 14% Otherworks CBP InfoMgt M&E ProjectAllocation PrioritySetting Impact Assessment
- 10. Constraints Identified 10 Administrative Skill Statutory Recognition Manual Dedicated Staff Wtg. In Assessments Mainstreaming Hierarchy / Role Directors’ Interest Trained Staff Training Financial Earmarked and adequate budget Coordination Intra-Institute & ICAR HQ Facilities State of Art Facilities / IT set-up
- 11. 11 Note: Figures indicate percentage of institutions indicating constraints 72% 72% 56% 44% 38% Admin Skill Facilities Coordination Finance Admin and Capacity Major Constraints
- 12. Workshop Recommendations Held on 27 May 2014 12
- 13. Institutionalization Change of Mind-set Be Clear; PME is at the Core Integration & Mainstream Status & Incentives
- 14. Reach Out
- 15. Research Priority Setting National Priorities Farmers’ Needs
- 16. Functional Excellence Coordination - Policy Division at ICAR – HQ Develop Manual and 24x7 Helpline Develop Indicators for M&E and Impact Assessment Harmony and Help
- 17. Ingredients for Functional Excellence Trained Staff Capacity Creation Budget and Financial Powers Using PME for Decision making
- 18. Thank You