6. PROTOTYPES development 1st prototype 2nd prototype 3rd prototype 4th prototype 5th prototype Conseptual level Physical level + Technical Solution building Risk Management analysis Common data Implementation of links (knowledge mgt) Integration of advanced features Ergonomic and customisation finishings
7.
8. Method The PRIMA method focuses on the bid process. The method allows the building of technical solutions. To choose between several technical solutions, the method supports cost estimation and risk evaluation.
9.
10.
11. PROCESS Request For Proposal Analysis Bid Proposal Knowledge over time Risk Management & Knowledge DataBase Bid / No Bid External Risks (Experience / Knowledge) Internal Risks (Experience / Knowledge)
12. The PRIMA TOOL The PRIMA tool objective is to support the method. it is a co-operative support system
16. Decision support system external Information data base Models internal Information Price Cost Internal Risk External Risk dashboard, value analysis Decision
Project initialised in 1998 between UT1 and Alcatel , presented and improved twice (“too innovative” and management by an industrial was asked) before receiving the EC agreement This project dealing with Risk management method, corporate knowledge management was , and still is in line with « continuous improvement « in the programs management. No support from ASPI R&D, but no denial
Project initialised in 1998 between UT1 and Alcatel , presented and improved twice (“too innovative” and management by an industrial was asked) before receiving the EC agreement This project dealing with Risk management method, corporate knowledge management was , and still is in line with « continuous improvement « in the programs management. No support from ASPI R&D, but no denial
Project initialised in 1998 between UT1 and Alcatel , presented and improved twice (“too innovative” and management by an industrial was asked) before receiving the EC agreement This project dealing with Risk management method, corporate knowledge management was , and still is in line with « continuous improvement « in the programs management. No support from ASPI R&D, but no denial
Project initialised in 1998 between UT1 and Alcatel , presented and improved twice (“too innovative” and management by an industrial was asked) before receiving the EC agreement This project dealing with Risk management method, corporate knowledge management was , and still is in line with « continuous improvement « in the programs management. No support from ASPI R&D, but no denial
Project initialised in 1998 between UT1 and Alcatel , presented and improved twice (“too innovative” and management by an industrial was asked) before receiving the EC agreement This project dealing with Risk management method, corporate knowledge management was , and still is in line with « continuous improvement « in the programs management. No support from ASPI R&D, but no denial
Project initialised in 1998 between UT1 and Alcatel , presented and improved twice (“too innovative” and management by an industrial was asked) before receiving the EC agreement This project dealing with Risk management method, corporate knowledge management was , and still is in line with « continuous improvement « in the programs management. No support from ASPI R&D, but no denial
Project initialised in 1998 between UT1 and Alcatel , presented and improved twice (“too innovative” and management by an industrial was asked) before receiving the EC agreement This project dealing with Risk management method, corporate knowledge management was , and still is in line with « continuous improvement « in the programs management. No support from ASPI R&D, but no denial
Project initialised in 1998 between UT1 and Alcatel , presented and improved twice (“too innovative” and management by an industrial was asked) before receiving the EC agreement This project dealing with Risk management method, corporate knowledge management was , and still is in line with « continuous improvement « in the programs management. No support from ASPI R&D, but no denial
Project initialised in 1998 between UT1 and Alcatel , presented and improved twice (“too innovative” and management by an industrial was asked) before receiving the EC agreement This project dealing with Risk management method, corporate knowledge management was , and still is in line with « continuous improvement « in the programs management. No support from ASPI R&D, but no denial
Project initialised in 1998 between UT1 and Alcatel , presented and improved twice (“too innovative” and management by an industrial was asked) before receiving the EC agreement This project dealing with Risk management method, corporate knowledge management was , and still is in line with « continuous improvement « in the programs management. No support from ASPI R&D, but no denial
Project initialised in 1998 between UT1 and Alcatel , presented and improved twice (“too innovative” and management by an industrial was asked) before receiving the EC agreement This project dealing with Risk management method, corporate knowledge management was , and still is in line with « continuous improvement « in the programs management. No support from ASPI R&D, but no denial
Project initialised in 1998 between UT1 and Alcatel , presented and improved twice (“too innovative” and management by an industrial was asked) before receiving the EC agreement This project dealing with Risk management method, corporate knowledge management was , and still is in line with « continuous improvement « in the programs management. No support from ASPI R&D, but no denial