Smart Grid in Europe Presentation, IET Power in Unity Conference.

Smart Grid in Europe
Graham Ault
Smarter Grid Solutions

London
16th October 2013

Essential Engineering Intelligence

1

Overview


European smart grid landscape:





Vision and roadmap: European Electric Grid Initiative (EEGI)
Standardisation and development: Smart Grid Architecture Model
(SGAM)

Whole system smart grid implications:




Ireland
United Kingdom
Belgium


2

The European Smart Grid
Landscape
EERA

CIGRE

CENELEC
ENTSO-E

ETP
SmartGrids

CIRED
EURELECTRIC
CEER/ACER

EDSO4SG

EU/EC

ERA-NET


3

European Electricity Grid Initiative
(EEGI)
 ‘Research & Innovation Roadmap’
and ‘Implementation Plan’
 Key challenges:




http://www.smartgrids.eu/European
-Electricity-Grid-Initiative





Development of renewable generation at
transmission level
Implementing new network infrastructures
Transition from aging fossil-fuelled plant to
small residential PV and large scale wind
Power electronics for generation and grid
Transmission-Distribution interface issues
Grid supporting market development


4

‘System of Systems’


5

EEGI: Innovation Roll-Out


6

Research and Innovation Plan


7

Smart Grid Architecture Model
(SGAM)
 Standardisation framework requested as
EU directive:








Means to communicate in a common view/language
about system context with industry, customers and
regulators
Integration of various existing state-of-the-art approaches
into one model with additional European aspects
Methods to serve as a basis to analyse and evaluate
alternative implementations of an architecture
Support for planning for transition from an existing legacy
architecture to a new smart grid-driven architecture
Criteria for properly assessing conformance with
identified standards and given interoperability
requirements.


8

Smart Grid Architecture Model


9

Example: DER Reactive Power Control


10

SGAM: Use Case Mapping


11

SGAM: Component Layer


12

SGAM: Business Layer


13

SGAM: Functional layer and design


14

SGAM: Business  Information Layer


15

SGAM: Information Layer


16

SGAM: Communications layer and options


17

Ireland: Wind power voltage support

Paul Cuffe,
Paul Smith,
Andrew Keane

 Large distribution connected wind
power portfolio
 Erosion of ‘traditional’ generation
voltage support capability
 Exploration of aggregated resource
capability of wind power from DSO to
TSO network
 Need to integrate results into
transmission planning

18

Reactive support from Distributed
Wind Generation

Cuffe, P: ‘Reactive Power From Distributed Generators: Characterisation And
Utilisation Of The Resource’, PhD Thesis, 2013.


19

Wind power voltage support
(Qnet) here









Each generator locally
maximising reactive power
Dispatch active power to
minimize total reactive
support
Minimize reactive power
injection into transmission
system: min (Qnet)
Find the worst combination
of active power flows that
may align to hinder reactive
power provision


20

Capability with enhanced LDC


United Kingdom
Accelerating Renewable Connections (ARC)



Scottish Power Distribution £8M+ LCNF T2 Project
Aims to offer faster, more economic DG connections via:
 A new connections process;
 The use of smart interventions to accelerate
connections – Active Network Management and other
Technologies; and
 ANM-enabling GSPs approaching capacity ahead of
need.


23

ANM-enabled
Grid Supply Point

ANM-enabled
Grid Supply Point

ANM-enabled
Grid Supply Point

24

Circuit Rating:
Summer:
90MVA
Spring/Autumn: 100MVA
Winter:
110MVA

Circuit Rating:
Summer:
90MVA
Winter:
110MVA

132/33kV
60MVA

132/33kV
60MVA

Export Capacity
Exceeded during low
demand/max output

GSP

Overload
Tripping
Scheme

Wind Farm A
48 MW

Wind Farm B
62.5 MW

Max Demand: 36.5MW
Min Demand: ~10MW

New EFW
27.5MW


25

Reinforcement Options
Circuit Rating:
Summer:
90MVA
Winter:
110MVA

Circuit Rating:
Summer:
90MVA
Winter:
110MVA

132/33kV
90MVA

132/33kV
90MVA

Transformer
Replacement

GSP

Overload
Tripping
Scheme

Wind Farm A
48 MW

Wind Farm B
62.5 MW

New EFW
27.5MW

Max Demand: 36.5MW
Min Demand: ~10MW


26

Reinforcement Options
Circuit Rating:
Summer:
160MVA

Circuit Rating:
Summer:

160MVA

132/33kV
60MVA

132/33kV
60MVA

GSP A Board

Wind Farm B
62.5 MW

50% Existing Demand

132/33kV
90MVA

Additional
Transformers
+
Reinforcement of
132kV

GSP B Board

Wind Farm A
48MW

New EFW
27.5MW

50% Existing Demand


27

Circuit Rating:
Summer:
90MVA
Winter:
110MVA

Circuit Rating:
Summer:
90MVA
Winter:
110MVA

ANM
Alternative

132/33kV
60MVA

132/33kV
60MVA

DNP3/ICCP
DNP3

Existing Comms

GSP

DNP3

Overload
Tripping
Scheme

Wind Farm A
48 MW

Wind Farm B
62.5 MW

Max Demand: 36.5MW
Min Demand: ~10MW

New EFW
27.5MW


28

ARC – Challenges at the
DNO/TO/SO Boundary






Multiple Stakeholders
New Commercial Agreements
Understanding the impact on system security
Understanding the visibility required by the SO
New Planning/Operational Planning tools required


29

Belgium: East Loop
Comblain

62 MVA
70.360
62 MVA
70.359

84 MVA
0.9 km
298 AMS

30 MVA

10 MVA
20 MVA
T2A

3.9 km
93 AMS

11 MVA

15.7 kV

15.47

Bütgenbach

20 MVA

41 MVA

T2

15.7 kV
9.6 km
93 AMS

70.329

T1

110 MVA

T4

300 MVA

T1
T3

20 MVA

Amel

Brume
380 kV

90 MVA

33 MVA

7.3 km
148 AMS

70.330 41 MVA

13 MVA

13 MVA

70.325 160 MVA

T2

Overloaded circuit (N-1)

20 MVA

48 MVA
70.328 (55 MVA)
60 MVA

T11

T1


T2

T1

22 MVA

40 MVA

40 MVA

T3

15.8 kV

Out of service
planned on 2015

15.1 km
148 AMS

15.8 kV

18.5 km
148 AMS

Cierreux

20 MVA
12 MVA

T2

15.6 kV

510 MVA

0.3 km
2x 298 AMS

48 MVA
70.327 (55 MVA)

220.504

22 km
1000 AluPRC

97 MVA
70.363

27.5 km
2x 298 AMS

220.504

510 MVA

T1

14 MVA

St Vith

Brume
220 kV

Villeroux
220 kV

18 MVA

T2B

0.8 km
2x 298 AMS

Hydroelectric

Switch (disconnector)
Circuit breaker

15.8 kV

HY
2.5 MVA

70.332

T1

East Loop

T3

10 MVA

Stephanshof

Trois-Ponts

Legend

10.1 km
93 AMS

Coo

T2
6 kV

HY

70.331

84 MVA
6.9 km
298 AMS

70.350

16.5 km
182 AMS

T1

18 MVA

41 MVA

62 MVA

Bronrome

Rimière

http://www.cired.net/publications/cired2011/part1/paper
s/CIRED2011_0316_final.pdf

Pepinster

Beverce
70.362

HY

70.360

24.1 km
182 AMS

Romsée
220 kV
36 MVA
6.4 km
48 Cu

70.351

T8

Soiron

15.6 kV
11.2 km
93 AMS

41 MVA
70.349

HY 5 MVA

Bomal

Romsée 70 kV
10.3 km
182 AMS

13 MVA

T1
6 kV

4.5 km
182 AMS

13 MVA

Heid de Goreux 70 kV
T2

127 MVA

 DG growth creating bidirectional flows creating
congestion on Trans (70kV)
and Dist (15kV) networks
 TSO and DSO collaboration
and data exchange required to
safeguard system
 Active Network Management
proposed

TurboJet
IBV 18 MVA
25 MVA
6 kV

Houffalize 70 kV

Spanolux

8.4 MVA

30

Belgium: East Loop
Comblain

62 MVA
70.360
62 MVA
70.359

84 MVA
0.9 km
298 AMS

30 MVA

10 MVA
20 MVA
T2A

3.9 km
93 AMS

11 MVA

15.7 kV

15.47

Bütgenbach

20 MVA

41 MVA

T2

15.7 kV
9.6 km
93 AMS

70.329

T1

110 MVA

T4

300 MVA

T1
T3

20 MVA

Amel

Brume
380 kV

90 MVA

33 MVA

7.3 km
148 AMS

70.330 41 MVA

13 MVA

13 MVA

70.325 160 MVA

T2

Overloaded circuit (N-1)

20 MVA

48 MVA
70.328 (55 MVA)
60 MVA

T11

T1

T2

T1

22 MVA

40 MVA

40 MVA

T3

15.8 kV

Out of service
planned on 2015

15.1 km
148 AMS

15.8 kV

18.5 km
148 AMS

Cierreux

20 MVA
12 MVA

T2

15.6 kV

510 MVA

0.3 km
2x 298 AMS

48 MVA
70.327 (55 MVA)

220.504

22 km
1000 AluPRC

97 MVA
70.363

27.5 km
2x 298 AMS

220.504

510 MVA

T1

14 MVA

St Vith

Brume
220 kV

Villeroux
220 kV

18 MVA

T2B

0.8 km
2x 298 AMS

Hydroelectric

Switch (disconnector)
Circuit breaker

15.8 kV

HY
2.5 MVA

70.332

T1

East Loop

T3

10 MVA

Stephanshof

Trois-Ponts

Legend

10.1 km
93 AMS

Coo
Rimière

T2
6 kV

HY

70.331

84 MVA
6.9 km
298 AMS

16.5 km
182 AMS

T1

18 MVA

41 MVA

62 MVA

Bronrome

70.350

Pepinster

Beverce
70.362

HY

70.360

24.1 km
182 AMS

Romsée
220 kV
36 MVA
6.4 km
48 Cu

70.351

T8

Soiron

15.6 kV
11.2 km
93 AMS

41 MVA
70.349

HY 5 MVA

Bomal

Romsée 70 kV
10.3 km
182 AMS

13 MVA

T1
6 kV

4.5 km
182 AMS

13 MVA

Heid de Goreux 70 kV
T2

127 MVA

 TSO takes lead in calculating
constraint actions
 Control link planned between
DSO and TSO SCADA systems.
 Grid Code changes required
 Market and regulation
changes identified
 Commercial arrangements
required: TSO, DSO, DG

TurboJet
IBV 18 MVA
25 MVA
6 kV

Houffalize 70 kV

Spanolux

8.4 MVA


31

Summary
 Major European efforts on coordination, stimulus
and standardisation
 Clear market statements of need (e.g. EEGI)
 Tools to underpin innovation and integration are
promising (e.g. SGAM)
 Real smart grid initiatives provide clear indications
of whole system approaches spanning the physical
system and across multiple actors


32

www.smartergridsolutions.com


33

Smart Grid in Europe Presentation, IET Power in Unity Conference.

Recomendados

Recomendados

Mais conteúdo relacionado

Mais procurados

Mais procurados (20)

Semelhante a Smart Grid in Europe Presentation, IET Power in Unity Conference.

Semelhante a Smart Grid in Europe Presentation, IET Power in Unity Conference. (20)

Mais de Smarter Grid Solutions

Mais de Smarter Grid Solutions (7)

Último

Último (20)

Smart Grid in Europe Presentation, IET Power in Unity Conference.