Shared Decision Making Champions
•
0 gostou•3,296 visualizações
25 Champions of Shared Decision Making, selected by the staff of the Informed Medical Decisions Foundation. This is not a top 25 list, merely a list of 25 individuals the staff wanted to recognize.
Denunciar
Compartilhar
Denunciar
Compartilhar
Recomendados
Building A Team: Patient/Stakeholder – Researcher Matching�
Building A Team: Patient/Stakeholder – Researcher Matching�Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
This document describes a challenge to develop a system to connect patients and stakeholders with researchers. It provides criteria for evaluating proposed conceptual models or prototypes for a matching system. The challenge aims to facilitate meaningful engagement throughout the research process, as required by PCORI funding announcements. Winners will receive $10,000 or $40,000 to further develop their proposal. The submission deadline is April 15th, with winners to be announced at a spring conference. The evaluation will focus on technical feasibility, usability, scalability, and maximizing patient-centeredness and scientific rigor.UNevada Reno Award Address
This document summarizes Steven G. Oberg's presentation about integrating environmental health and safety programs into university research and teaching. It describes how the University of Nevada, Reno transformed their program from being in chronic violation in 1995 to achieving full regulatory compliance in 2005 by taking an integrated, enterprise-wide approach. This involved attracting quality EH&S staff aligned with the university mission, integrating EH&S staff within departments and academic processes, and integrating EH&S management within the university structure through advisory committees and information sharing. The results were improved lab safety, regulatory compliance, and receiving the 2005 ACS-CHAS Lab Safety Program award.
Keynote Address: Jack Wennberg
Aligning Incentives for Patient Engagement: Enabling Widespread Implementation of Shared Decision Making
May 24, 2013
John E. Wennberg, The Dartmouth Institute
Workshop on Patient Engagement
Aligning Incentives for Patient Engagement: Enabling Widespread Implementation of Shared Decision Making
May 23, 2013
Angela Coulter, Informed Medical Decisions Foundation
Dominick Frosch, Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation
Floyd J. Fowler, Informed Medical Decisions Foundation
Purchaser Perspectives on Shared Decision Making
Kate Chenok, a director at Pacific Business Group on Health, provides the purchaser perspective on shared decision making and maternity care.
This presentation was part of a Shared Decision Making Month webinar -- Maternity Care and Shared Decision Making: Improving Care for Mothers and Babies.
Maternity Care and Shared Decision Making: Improving Care for Mothers and Babies
Maternity Care and Shared Decision Making: Improving Care for Mothers and BabiesInformed Medical Decisions Foundation
Kristen Oganowski, CD(DONA) shares her experience as a parent/patient doula advocate.
This presentation was part of a Shared Decision Making Month webinar -- Maternity Care and Shared Decision Making: Improving Care for Mothers and Babies.Maternity Care and Shared Decision Making: Improving Care for Mothers and Bab...
Maternity Care and Shared Decision Making: Improving Care for Mothers and Bab...Informed Medical Decisions Foundation
Maureen Corry, executive director of Childbirth Connection, provides an overview of the state of shared decision making and maternity care.
This presentation was part of a Shared Decision Making Month webinar -- Maternity Care and Shared Decision Making: Improving Care for Mothers and Babies.Shared Decision Making Through the Decades
Do you know where the term “shared decision making” was first used…or when the first center dedicated to its research and implementation was opened? Our infographic “Shared Decision Making through the Decades” will take you on a historical journey through four decades of shared decision making to understand where it is today and what the future might hold.
Recomendados
Building A Team: Patient/Stakeholder – Researcher Matching�
Building A Team: Patient/Stakeholder – Researcher Matching�Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
This document describes a challenge to develop a system to connect patients and stakeholders with researchers. It provides criteria for evaluating proposed conceptual models or prototypes for a matching system. The challenge aims to facilitate meaningful engagement throughout the research process, as required by PCORI funding announcements. Winners will receive $10,000 or $40,000 to further develop their proposal. The submission deadline is April 15th, with winners to be announced at a spring conference. The evaluation will focus on technical feasibility, usability, scalability, and maximizing patient-centeredness and scientific rigor.UNevada Reno Award Address
This document summarizes Steven G. Oberg's presentation about integrating environmental health and safety programs into university research and teaching. It describes how the University of Nevada, Reno transformed their program from being in chronic violation in 1995 to achieving full regulatory compliance in 2005 by taking an integrated, enterprise-wide approach. This involved attracting quality EH&S staff aligned with the university mission, integrating EH&S staff within departments and academic processes, and integrating EH&S management within the university structure through advisory committees and information sharing. The results were improved lab safety, regulatory compliance, and receiving the 2005 ACS-CHAS Lab Safety Program award.
Keynote Address: Jack Wennberg
Aligning Incentives for Patient Engagement: Enabling Widespread Implementation of Shared Decision Making
May 24, 2013
John E. Wennberg, The Dartmouth Institute
Workshop on Patient Engagement
Aligning Incentives for Patient Engagement: Enabling Widespread Implementation of Shared Decision Making
May 23, 2013
Angela Coulter, Informed Medical Decisions Foundation
Dominick Frosch, Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation
Floyd J. Fowler, Informed Medical Decisions Foundation
Purchaser Perspectives on Shared Decision Making
Kate Chenok, a director at Pacific Business Group on Health, provides the purchaser perspective on shared decision making and maternity care.
This presentation was part of a Shared Decision Making Month webinar -- Maternity Care and Shared Decision Making: Improving Care for Mothers and Babies.
Maternity Care and Shared Decision Making: Improving Care for Mothers and Babies
Maternity Care and Shared Decision Making: Improving Care for Mothers and BabiesInformed Medical Decisions Foundation
Kristen Oganowski, CD(DONA) shares her experience as a parent/patient doula advocate.
This presentation was part of a Shared Decision Making Month webinar -- Maternity Care and Shared Decision Making: Improving Care for Mothers and Babies.Maternity Care and Shared Decision Making: Improving Care for Mothers and Bab...
Maternity Care and Shared Decision Making: Improving Care for Mothers and Bab...Informed Medical Decisions Foundation
Maureen Corry, executive director of Childbirth Connection, provides an overview of the state of shared decision making and maternity care.
This presentation was part of a Shared Decision Making Month webinar -- Maternity Care and Shared Decision Making: Improving Care for Mothers and Babies.Shared Decision Making Through the Decades
Do you know where the term “shared decision making” was first used…or when the first center dedicated to its research and implementation was opened? Our infographic “Shared Decision Making through the Decades” will take you on a historical journey through four decades of shared decision making to understand where it is today and what the future might hold.
Implementation of Shared Decision Making: Measuring Success
Aligning Incentives for Patient Engagement: Enabling Widespread Implementation of Shared Decision Making
May 24, 2013
Methods for Fostering the Widespread Implementation of Shared Decision Making
Methods for Fostering the Widespread Implementation of Shared Decision MakingInformed Medical Decisions Foundation
Aligning Incentives for Patient Engagement: Enabling Widespread Implementation of Shared Decision Making
May 24, 2013
Jeff Thompson, Washington State Health Care Authority
David Downs, Engaged Public
David Swieskowski, Mercy ACO Mercy Clinics, Inc.
Lisa Weiss, High Value Healthcare Collaborative
Kate Chenok, Pacific Business Group on HealthDecision Quality Measurement
Aligning Incentives for Patient Engagement: Enabling Widespread Implementation of Shared Decision Making
May 23, 2013
Karen Sepucha, Massachusetts General Hospital
Dale Collins Vidal, The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy & Clinical Practice
Shared Decision Making in the Real World: Successes and Challenges
Shared Decision Making in the Real World: Successes and ChallengesInformed Medical Decisions Foundation
Aligning Incentives for Patient Engagement: Enabling Widespread Implementation of Shared Decision Making
May 23, 2013
Neil Korsen, MaineHealth
Larry Morrisey, Stillwater Medical Group
Charlie Brackett, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
Grace Lin, Palo Alto Medical Foundation
Carmen Lewis, University of North Carolina
Leigh Simmons, Massachusetts General HospitalShared Decision Making in England
This document discusses shared decision making initiatives in England. It describes 3 key programs - the Health Foundation's MAGIC program which developed decision aids and trained clinicians, the NHS Right Care program which created 38 online decision aids for conditions like cancer and joint replacements, and Bupa UK's treatment options service which engaged over 10,000 members through health coaching. It outlines successes of each program like cost savings, high patient satisfaction, and policy influence, but also challenges of sustainability, embedding in healthcare systems, and overcoming cultural barriers. The document advocates for further adoption of shared decision making in the NHS, expanding decision aid availability, and building awareness among patients.
Treatment Choices for Peripheral Artery Disease
This document summarizes a medical editors meeting about treatment options for peripheral artery disease (PAD). It discusses the development of an educational program about PAD for patients. The program aims to help patients make informed decisions about improving walking ability and reducing cardiovascular risk. Challenges in developing the program included communicating treatment benefits, comparing varied efficacy data, and addressing uninsurance coverage for supervised exercise. The document outlines strategies for addressing these challenges.
TRENDS: A National Survey of Medical Decisions
This document summarizes the results of a national survey of medical decisions. It found that 77% of Americans aged 40+ discussed at least one medical decision in the past two years. The most common decisions discussed were starting or stopping medication (52%) and discussing screening tests (59%). Knowledge about medical conditions was low, ranging from 20% to 84% correct depending on the condition. Discussion of pros and cons varied, from 6% to 84% depending on the decision. The decision process score, which measures how informed and collaborative the decision process was, ranged from 1.5 to 3.2 out of 5 depending on the decision. In the end, patients had surgery 42% of the time, took medication 79% of the
Using Patient Interviews to Support Patient Decisions
The document discusses using patient interviews to support patient decisions in medical care. It notes that patient interviews were initially used because patients should hear other patients' voices and be exposed to different choices. However, patient interviews are now being reexamined because they are relatively expensive and questions have been raised about their need as media moves to more web and mobile formats. While some argue patient interviews can be biasing, the organization finds them engaging and believes they can help patients understand options when used properly and not inherently bias decisions. More research is still needed on how different uses of interviews impact decision making.
Content Development Team: 2013-2013 Activity
The document summarizes the activities of the Content Development Team at the Foundation from 2012-2013, including program updates, new programs developed, and collaborations. Some of the key projects discussed include adapting decision aids for use in Australia, collaborating with outside organizations on grants and standards, and new partnerships to create medication decision aids with the American College of Cardiology.
Are Narratives a "Necessary Ingredient" of Decision Aids?
Narratives play several roles in decision aids such as engaging patients, informing them, modeling behaviors, helping patients weigh trade-offs and clarify values, but they also raise some concerns. While narratives can make information more memorable, they risk focusing on outliers and distracting from facts. The evidence on whether narratives influence decisions is mixed, though they certainly have power. The document advocates using curated patient narratives in addition to factual information to complement rather than replace facts, mitigate potential biases, and represent both common and uncommon patient viewpoints and experiences.
Correlates of Treatment Discussions and Treatment Choices in Depression - the...
Correlates of Treatment Discussions and Treatment Choices in Depression - the...Informed Medical Decisions Foundation
This study examined factors that predict whether patients with depression choose to start or continue medication treatment, or discuss non-medication treatment options with their healthcare provider. The study found that patients with worse health status or who prioritize quick relief were more likely to take medication. Patients concerned about medication side effects or costs were less likely to take them. Minority patients and those without health insurance were more likely to discuss alternative options or less likely to take medication, possibly due to stigma or lack of access. Overall, patients appeared informed about their treatment decisions.Decisions about Medication Use and Cancer Screening Among Elderly Adults in t...
Decisions about Medication Use and Cancer Screening Among Elderly Adults in t...Informed Medical Decisions Foundation
This study surveyed U.S. adults aged 40 and older about their medical decision making regarding cancer screening tests and medications for common conditions. It found that decision processes were generally poor across age groups. While knowledge about treatments was higher for medications than screening, all groups valued potential benefits highly. The oldest group (75+) reported less discomfort with some cancer screenings and less importance on costs or side effects of medications. The study concludes there is opportunity to better educate elderly patients and their doctors about estimated benefits, competing risks when considering screenings or adding medications.Patient Narratives in Decision Aids
Diana Stilwell, MPH, chief production officer at the Informed Medical Decisions Foundation, walks through the role of narratives in decision aids and how the available evidence relates to the Foundation approach.
This presentation was part of a Shared Decision Making Month webinar -- The Power of Narratives: How They Shape the Way Patients Make Medical Decisions.
Using Patient Interviews to Support Patient Decisions
Jack Fowler, PhD, senior scientific advisor at the Informed Medical Decisions Foundation provides an overview of the Foundation's path to developing decision aids that included patient narratives.
This presentation was part of a Shared Decision Making Month webinar -- The Power of Narratives: How They Shape the Way Patients Make Medical Decisions.
All Stories are Not Alike: A Taxonomy of Patient Narratives
Victoria Shaffer, PhD, describes the the pros and cons of narratives and then explains her work to develop a system of classification for narratives as part of the solution. Victoria provides an overview of the narrative taxonomies she and her colleague have developed.
This presentation was part of a Shared Decision Making Month webinar -- The Power of Narratives: How They Shape the Way Patients Make Medical Decisions.
Measuring and Improving Decision Quality
Karen Sepucha, PhD, describes what a good decision is, how we measure decision quality and how the decision quality instrument might be used.
This presentation was part of a Shared Decision Making Month webinar -- What Makes a Good Medical Decision? Defining and Implementing Decision Quality Measures.
What Makes a Good Medical Decision?
Doctors need to ensure patients are informed, involved in the decision making process, and that the final decision aligns with what is most important to the patient. Measuring decision quality helps evaluate support strategies, assess provider support of patients facing medical decisions, and ensures informed patient input is included. The key elements of measuring decision quality are that patients know key facts, doctors meaningfully involve patients, and the decision aligns with patient priorities.
Reducing Costs Using Shared Decision Making
David Wennberg, MD, MPH, describes a recent randomized trial he was involved with that studied the potential of shared decision making to reduce costs among preference-sensitive conditions. David also explains the vision of the 20-member High Value Healthcare Collaborative.
This presentation was part of the Shared Decision Making Month webinar "Turning Shared Decision Making Policy into a Reality."
Turning Shared Decision Making Policy into a Reality: Can We Really Improve t...
Turning Shared Decision Making Policy into a Reality: Can We Really Improve t...Informed Medical Decisions Foundation
Ben Moulton, JD, MPH, provides an overview of the shared decision making policy landscape.
This presentation was part of a Shared Decision Making Month webinar -- Turning Shared Decision Making Policy into a Reality: Can We Really Improve the Quality of Care While Reducing the Costs.Implementing Patient Decision Aids for Increased Patient Engagement and Reduc...
Implementing Patient Decision Aids for Increased Patient Engagement and Reduc...Informed Medical Decisions Foundation
David Arterburn, MD, MPH, describes the Group Health experience in implementing decision aids as part of the shared decision making pathway. David also notes his publication in Health Affairs detailing the results of decision aid implementation.Role of Mukta Pishti in the Management of Hyperthyroidism
Muktapishti is a traditional Ayurvedic preparation made from Shoditha Mukta (Purified Pearl), is believed to help regulate thyroid function and reduce symptoms of hyperthyroidism due to its cooling and balancing properties. Clinical evidence on its efficacy remains limited, necessitating further research to validate its therapeutic benefits.
Histololgy of Female Reproductive System.pptx
Dive into an in-depth exploration of the histological structure of female reproductive system with this comprehensive lecture. Presented by Dr. Ayesha Irfan, Assistant Professor of Anatomy, this presentation covers the Gross anatomy and functional histology of the female reproductive organs. Ideal for students, educators, and anyone interested in medical science, this lecture provides clear explanations, detailed diagrams, and valuable insights into female reproductive system. Enhance your knowledge and understanding of this essential aspect of human biology.
Mais conteúdo relacionado
Mais de Informed Medical Decisions Foundation
Implementation of Shared Decision Making: Measuring Success
Aligning Incentives for Patient Engagement: Enabling Widespread Implementation of Shared Decision Making
May 24, 2013
Methods for Fostering the Widespread Implementation of Shared Decision Making
Methods for Fostering the Widespread Implementation of Shared Decision MakingInformed Medical Decisions Foundation
Aligning Incentives for Patient Engagement: Enabling Widespread Implementation of Shared Decision Making
May 24, 2013
Jeff Thompson, Washington State Health Care Authority
David Downs, Engaged Public
David Swieskowski, Mercy ACO Mercy Clinics, Inc.
Lisa Weiss, High Value Healthcare Collaborative
Kate Chenok, Pacific Business Group on HealthDecision Quality Measurement
Aligning Incentives for Patient Engagement: Enabling Widespread Implementation of Shared Decision Making
May 23, 2013
Karen Sepucha, Massachusetts General Hospital
Dale Collins Vidal, The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy & Clinical Practice
Shared Decision Making in the Real World: Successes and Challenges
Shared Decision Making in the Real World: Successes and ChallengesInformed Medical Decisions Foundation
Aligning Incentives for Patient Engagement: Enabling Widespread Implementation of Shared Decision Making
May 23, 2013
Neil Korsen, MaineHealth
Larry Morrisey, Stillwater Medical Group
Charlie Brackett, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
Grace Lin, Palo Alto Medical Foundation
Carmen Lewis, University of North Carolina
Leigh Simmons, Massachusetts General HospitalShared Decision Making in England
This document discusses shared decision making initiatives in England. It describes 3 key programs - the Health Foundation's MAGIC program which developed decision aids and trained clinicians, the NHS Right Care program which created 38 online decision aids for conditions like cancer and joint replacements, and Bupa UK's treatment options service which engaged over 10,000 members through health coaching. It outlines successes of each program like cost savings, high patient satisfaction, and policy influence, but also challenges of sustainability, embedding in healthcare systems, and overcoming cultural barriers. The document advocates for further adoption of shared decision making in the NHS, expanding decision aid availability, and building awareness among patients.
Treatment Choices for Peripheral Artery Disease
This document summarizes a medical editors meeting about treatment options for peripheral artery disease (PAD). It discusses the development of an educational program about PAD for patients. The program aims to help patients make informed decisions about improving walking ability and reducing cardiovascular risk. Challenges in developing the program included communicating treatment benefits, comparing varied efficacy data, and addressing uninsurance coverage for supervised exercise. The document outlines strategies for addressing these challenges.
TRENDS: A National Survey of Medical Decisions
This document summarizes the results of a national survey of medical decisions. It found that 77% of Americans aged 40+ discussed at least one medical decision in the past two years. The most common decisions discussed were starting or stopping medication (52%) and discussing screening tests (59%). Knowledge about medical conditions was low, ranging from 20% to 84% correct depending on the condition. Discussion of pros and cons varied, from 6% to 84% depending on the decision. The decision process score, which measures how informed and collaborative the decision process was, ranged from 1.5 to 3.2 out of 5 depending on the decision. In the end, patients had surgery 42% of the time, took medication 79% of the
Using Patient Interviews to Support Patient Decisions
The document discusses using patient interviews to support patient decisions in medical care. It notes that patient interviews were initially used because patients should hear other patients' voices and be exposed to different choices. However, patient interviews are now being reexamined because they are relatively expensive and questions have been raised about their need as media moves to more web and mobile formats. While some argue patient interviews can be biasing, the organization finds them engaging and believes they can help patients understand options when used properly and not inherently bias decisions. More research is still needed on how different uses of interviews impact decision making.
Content Development Team: 2013-2013 Activity
The document summarizes the activities of the Content Development Team at the Foundation from 2012-2013, including program updates, new programs developed, and collaborations. Some of the key projects discussed include adapting decision aids for use in Australia, collaborating with outside organizations on grants and standards, and new partnerships to create medication decision aids with the American College of Cardiology.
Are Narratives a "Necessary Ingredient" of Decision Aids?
Narratives play several roles in decision aids such as engaging patients, informing them, modeling behaviors, helping patients weigh trade-offs and clarify values, but they also raise some concerns. While narratives can make information more memorable, they risk focusing on outliers and distracting from facts. The evidence on whether narratives influence decisions is mixed, though they certainly have power. The document advocates using curated patient narratives in addition to factual information to complement rather than replace facts, mitigate potential biases, and represent both common and uncommon patient viewpoints and experiences.
Correlates of Treatment Discussions and Treatment Choices in Depression - the...
Correlates of Treatment Discussions and Treatment Choices in Depression - the...Informed Medical Decisions Foundation
This study examined factors that predict whether patients with depression choose to start or continue medication treatment, or discuss non-medication treatment options with their healthcare provider. The study found that patients with worse health status or who prioritize quick relief were more likely to take medication. Patients concerned about medication side effects or costs were less likely to take them. Minority patients and those without health insurance were more likely to discuss alternative options or less likely to take medication, possibly due to stigma or lack of access. Overall, patients appeared informed about their treatment decisions.Decisions about Medication Use and Cancer Screening Among Elderly Adults in t...
Decisions about Medication Use and Cancer Screening Among Elderly Adults in t...Informed Medical Decisions Foundation
This study surveyed U.S. adults aged 40 and older about their medical decision making regarding cancer screening tests and medications for common conditions. It found that decision processes were generally poor across age groups. While knowledge about treatments was higher for medications than screening, all groups valued potential benefits highly. The oldest group (75+) reported less discomfort with some cancer screenings and less importance on costs or side effects of medications. The study concludes there is opportunity to better educate elderly patients and their doctors about estimated benefits, competing risks when considering screenings or adding medications.Patient Narratives in Decision Aids
Diana Stilwell, MPH, chief production officer at the Informed Medical Decisions Foundation, walks through the role of narratives in decision aids and how the available evidence relates to the Foundation approach.
This presentation was part of a Shared Decision Making Month webinar -- The Power of Narratives: How They Shape the Way Patients Make Medical Decisions.
Using Patient Interviews to Support Patient Decisions
Jack Fowler, PhD, senior scientific advisor at the Informed Medical Decisions Foundation provides an overview of the Foundation's path to developing decision aids that included patient narratives.
This presentation was part of a Shared Decision Making Month webinar -- The Power of Narratives: How They Shape the Way Patients Make Medical Decisions.
All Stories are Not Alike: A Taxonomy of Patient Narratives
Victoria Shaffer, PhD, describes the the pros and cons of narratives and then explains her work to develop a system of classification for narratives as part of the solution. Victoria provides an overview of the narrative taxonomies she and her colleague have developed.
This presentation was part of a Shared Decision Making Month webinar -- The Power of Narratives: How They Shape the Way Patients Make Medical Decisions.
Measuring and Improving Decision Quality
Karen Sepucha, PhD, describes what a good decision is, how we measure decision quality and how the decision quality instrument might be used.
This presentation was part of a Shared Decision Making Month webinar -- What Makes a Good Medical Decision? Defining and Implementing Decision Quality Measures.
What Makes a Good Medical Decision?
Doctors need to ensure patients are informed, involved in the decision making process, and that the final decision aligns with what is most important to the patient. Measuring decision quality helps evaluate support strategies, assess provider support of patients facing medical decisions, and ensures informed patient input is included. The key elements of measuring decision quality are that patients know key facts, doctors meaningfully involve patients, and the decision aligns with patient priorities.
Reducing Costs Using Shared Decision Making
David Wennberg, MD, MPH, describes a recent randomized trial he was involved with that studied the potential of shared decision making to reduce costs among preference-sensitive conditions. David also explains the vision of the 20-member High Value Healthcare Collaborative.
This presentation was part of the Shared Decision Making Month webinar "Turning Shared Decision Making Policy into a Reality."
Turning Shared Decision Making Policy into a Reality: Can We Really Improve t...
Turning Shared Decision Making Policy into a Reality: Can We Really Improve t...Informed Medical Decisions Foundation
Ben Moulton, JD, MPH, provides an overview of the shared decision making policy landscape.
This presentation was part of a Shared Decision Making Month webinar -- Turning Shared Decision Making Policy into a Reality: Can We Really Improve the Quality of Care While Reducing the Costs.Implementing Patient Decision Aids for Increased Patient Engagement and Reduc...
Implementing Patient Decision Aids for Increased Patient Engagement and Reduc...Informed Medical Decisions Foundation
David Arterburn, MD, MPH, describes the Group Health experience in implementing decision aids as part of the shared decision making pathway. David also notes his publication in Health Affairs detailing the results of decision aid implementation.Mais de Informed Medical Decisions Foundation (20)
Implementation of Shared Decision Making: Measuring Success
Implementation of Shared Decision Making: Measuring Success
Methods for Fostering the Widespread Implementation of Shared Decision Making
Methods for Fostering the Widespread Implementation of Shared Decision Making
Shared Decision Making in the Real World: Successes and Challenges
Shared Decision Making in the Real World: Successes and Challenges
Using Patient Interviews to Support Patient Decisions
Using Patient Interviews to Support Patient Decisions
Are Narratives a "Necessary Ingredient" of Decision Aids?
Are Narratives a "Necessary Ingredient" of Decision Aids?
Correlates of Treatment Discussions and Treatment Choices in Depression - the...
Correlates of Treatment Discussions and Treatment Choices in Depression - the...
Decisions about Medication Use and Cancer Screening Among Elderly Adults in t...
Decisions about Medication Use and Cancer Screening Among Elderly Adults in t...
Using Patient Interviews to Support Patient Decisions
Using Patient Interviews to Support Patient Decisions
All Stories are Not Alike: A Taxonomy of Patient Narratives
All Stories are Not Alike: A Taxonomy of Patient Narratives
Turning Shared Decision Making Policy into a Reality: Can We Really Improve t...
Turning Shared Decision Making Policy into a Reality: Can We Really Improve t...
Implementing Patient Decision Aids for Increased Patient Engagement and Reduc...
Implementing Patient Decision Aids for Increased Patient Engagement and Reduc...
Último
Role of Mukta Pishti in the Management of Hyperthyroidism
Muktapishti is a traditional Ayurvedic preparation made from Shoditha Mukta (Purified Pearl), is believed to help regulate thyroid function and reduce symptoms of hyperthyroidism due to its cooling and balancing properties. Clinical evidence on its efficacy remains limited, necessitating further research to validate its therapeutic benefits.
Histololgy of Female Reproductive System.pptx
Dive into an in-depth exploration of the histological structure of female reproductive system with this comprehensive lecture. Presented by Dr. Ayesha Irfan, Assistant Professor of Anatomy, this presentation covers the Gross anatomy and functional histology of the female reproductive organs. Ideal for students, educators, and anyone interested in medical science, this lecture provides clear explanations, detailed diagrams, and valuable insights into female reproductive system. Enhance your knowledge and understanding of this essential aspect of human biology.
NARCOTICS- POLICY AND PROCEDURES FOR ITS USE
This document outlines policies and procedures for handling narcotic and controlled drugs in NABH accredited hospitals.
Does Over-Masturbation Contribute to Chronic Prostatitis.pptx
In some case, your chronic prostatitis may be related to over-masturbation. Generally, natural medicine Diuretic and Anti-inflammatory Pill can help mee get a cure.
Artificial Intelligence Symposium (THAIS)
Artificial Intelligence Symposium (THAIS). Parc Taulí. Sabadell
Hemodialysis: Chapter 5, Dialyzers Overview - Dr.Gawad
- Video recording of this lecture in English language: https://youtu.be/Pt1nA32sdHQ
- Video recording of this lecture in Arabic language: https://youtu.be/uFdc9F0rlP0
- Link to download the book free: https://nephrotube.blogspot.com/p/nephrotube-nephrology-books.html
- Link to NephroTube website: www.NephroTube.com
- Link to NephroTube social media accounts: https://nephrotube.blogspot.com/p/join-nephrotube-on-social-media.html
share - Lions, tigers, AI and health misinformation, oh my!.pptx
• Pitfalls and pivots needed to use AI effectively in public health
• Evidence-based strategies to address health misinformation effectively
• Building trust with communities online and offline
• Equipping health professionals to address questions, concerns and health misinformation
• Assessing risk and mitigating harm from adverse health narratives in communities, health workforce and health system
Clinic ^%[+27633867063*Abortion Pills For Sale In Tembisa Central
Clinic ^%[+27633867063*Abortion Pills For Sale In Tembisa Central Clinic ^%[+27633867063*Abortion Pills For Sale In Tembisa CentralClinic ^%[+27633867063*Abortion Pills For Sale In Tembisa CentralClinic ^%[+27633867063*Abortion Pills For Sale In Tembisa CentralClinic ^%[+27633867063*Abortion Pills For Sale In Tembisa Central
Histopathology of Rheumatoid Arthritis: Visual treat
Histopathology of Rheumatoid Arthritis: Visual treat
pathology MCQS introduction to pathology general pathology
pathology MCQS introduction to pathology general pathology
Ketone bodies and metabolism-biochemistry
This slide consists of all the topics of ketone . This can be used for exam purpose for writing about Diabetic keto acidosis etc . Thank you
Journal Article Review on Rasamanikya
Rasamanikya is a excellent preparation in the field of Rasashastra, it is used in various Kushtha Roga, Shwasa, Vicharchika, Bhagandara, Vatarakta, and Phiranga Roga. In this article Preparation& Comparative analytical profile for both Formulationon i.e Rasamanikya prepared by Kushmanda swarasa & Churnodhaka Shodita Haratala. The study aims to provide insights into the comparative efficacy and analytical aspects of these formulations for enhanced therapeutic outcomes.
All info about Diabetes and how to control it.
One health condition that is becoming more common day by day is diabetes.
According to research conducted by the National Family Health Survey of India, diabetic cases show a projection which might increase to 10.4% by 2030.
Último (20)
Role of Mukta Pishti in the Management of Hyperthyroidism
Role of Mukta Pishti in the Management of Hyperthyroidism
Does Over-Masturbation Contribute to Chronic Prostatitis.pptx
Does Over-Masturbation Contribute to Chronic Prostatitis.pptx
Hemodialysis: Chapter 5, Dialyzers Overview - Dr.Gawad
Hemodialysis: Chapter 5, Dialyzers Overview - Dr.Gawad
share - Lions, tigers, AI and health misinformation, oh my!.pptx
share - Lions, tigers, AI and health misinformation, oh my!.pptx
Muscles of Mastication by Dr. Rabia Inam Gandapore.pptx
Muscles of Mastication by Dr. Rabia Inam Gandapore.pptx
Clinic ^%[+27633867063*Abortion Pills For Sale In Tembisa Central
Clinic ^%[+27633867063*Abortion Pills For Sale In Tembisa Central
Histopathology of Rheumatoid Arthritis: Visual treat
Histopathology of Rheumatoid Arthritis: Visual treat
pathology MCQS introduction to pathology general pathology
pathology MCQS introduction to pathology general pathology
Vestibulocochlear Nerve by Dr. Rabia Inam Gandapore.pptx
Vestibulocochlear Nerve by Dr. Rabia Inam Gandapore.pptx