This document discusses different types of intraocular lenses (IOLs) used to correct presbyopia. It begins by explaining that monofocal IOLs only correct far vision and do not provide near vision correction without glasses. It then describes multifocal IOLs, including bifocal and trifocal lenses, which aim to provide both near and far vision corrections simultaneously. The document discusses key principles and technologies used in multifocal IOLs, specifically refractive lenses with multiple zones, diffractive lenses using interference patterns, and apodized diffractive lenses. It provides details on specific IOL models and compares technologies between traditional bifocal, trifocal, and newer trifocal lenses.
Multifocal IOLs provide both near and distance vision without glasses by utilizing concentric zones of different optical powers (refractive MFIOLs) or diffractive properties to split light between two focal points. While eliminating need for glasses, they can cause visual side effects like glare and reduced contrast sensitivity. Careful patient selection and counseling, accurate biometry and surgical technique are important for successful multifocal IOL implantation outcomes.
Specular microscopy is used to examine the corneal endothelium and analyze pathological changes. There are contact and non-contact types, with contact providing higher resolution but potential discomfort. The procedure involves placing the patient comfortably and using fixation to keep the eye still while obtaining images. Images are then analyzed to study normal endothelium morphology, diagnose corneal endothelial diseases, and monitor conditions like aging, diabetes, surgery, trauma, and compare surgical techniques. Specular microscopy can detect disorders like Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy and help with decisions like eye banking and surgery.
1) Toric IOLs are used to correct corneal astigmatism during cataract surgery. They have a cylindrical optic to neutralize corneal astigmatism.
2) The material and design of toric IOLs affect their postoperative rotational stability, with acrylic IOLs showing the highest stability. Larger diameter and loop haptic designs also increase stability.
3) Proper patient selection, preoperative measurements, surgical technique, and IOL alignment are important for achieving optimal visual outcomes with toric IOL implantation. Accurate axis alignment is critical to achieve the intended astigmatic correction.
The document discusses various formulas used for calculating intraocular lens (IOL) power, including SRK, SRK2, Holladay, Haigis, and Holladay 2. It explains the factors these formulas account for such as axial length, corneal power, anterior chamber depth, and how they have evolved over generations to improve accuracy. Special considerations for calculating IOL power in cases involving prior refractive surgery, silicone oil filling, posterior staphyloma, and using optical biometry devices are also summarized.
Troubleshooting bifocals and Market Availability in Nepal
Bifocals in Anisometropia
Prismatic Effect in Bifocal
Bifocal Prescription
Bifocals in High Astigmatism
This document provides an overview of modern options for correcting presbyopia. It discusses both static and dynamic correction techniques. Static techniques include glasses, contact lenses, corneal procedures like inlays/onlays, and intraocular lenses using monovision or being multifocal. Dynamic techniques aim to restore accommodation and include accommodating intraocular lenses, lens refilling procedures, and scleral expansion techniques. The document provides details on many of these specific procedures.
This document discusses the use of bandage contact lenses after refractive surgery procedures like LASIK and PRK. It describes how bandage contact lenses can help reduce pain, promote healing of the epithelium, and prevent complications like striae or epithelial in-growth after surgery. Different types of bandage contact lens materials are reviewed, including hydrogels, silicone hydrogels, collagen shields, and scleral lenses. Factors like oxygen transmissibility, diameter, and disposable versus reusable lenses are discussed when selecting a bandage contact lens. Potential complications are also mentioned.
IOL power calculation is challenging in eyes with prior refractive surgery or other special situations. In eyes with prior radial keratotomy, standard keratometry overestimates corneal power due to flattening outside the central optical zone. Multiple methods of IOL power calculation should be used, including topography to measure the flattest central corneal power. A study comparing methods in eyes with prior RK found IOL power calculation using topographic keratometry was least accurate compared to formulas from the ESCRS calculator. No single method provided reliable results, highlighting the difficulty in IOL power calculation for eyes with prior refractive surgery.
Multifocal IOLs provide both near and distance vision without glasses by utilizing concentric zones of different optical powers (refractive MFIOLs) or diffractive properties to split light between two focal points. While eliminating need for glasses, they can cause visual side effects like glare and reduced contrast sensitivity. Careful patient selection and counseling, accurate biometry and surgical technique are important for successful multifocal IOL implantation outcomes.
Specular microscopy is used to examine the corneal endothelium and analyze pathological changes. There are contact and non-contact types, with contact providing higher resolution but potential discomfort. The procedure involves placing the patient comfortably and using fixation to keep the eye still while obtaining images. Images are then analyzed to study normal endothelium morphology, diagnose corneal endothelial diseases, and monitor conditions like aging, diabetes, surgery, trauma, and compare surgical techniques. Specular microscopy can detect disorders like Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy and help with decisions like eye banking and surgery.
1) Toric IOLs are used to correct corneal astigmatism during cataract surgery. They have a cylindrical optic to neutralize corneal astigmatism.
2) The material and design of toric IOLs affect their postoperative rotational stability, with acrylic IOLs showing the highest stability. Larger diameter and loop haptic designs also increase stability.
3) Proper patient selection, preoperative measurements, surgical technique, and IOL alignment are important for achieving optimal visual outcomes with toric IOL implantation. Accurate axis alignment is critical to achieve the intended astigmatic correction.
The document discusses various formulas used for calculating intraocular lens (IOL) power, including SRK, SRK2, Holladay, Haigis, and Holladay 2. It explains the factors these formulas account for such as axial length, corneal power, anterior chamber depth, and how they have evolved over generations to improve accuracy. Special considerations for calculating IOL power in cases involving prior refractive surgery, silicone oil filling, posterior staphyloma, and using optical biometry devices are also summarized.
Troubleshooting bifocals and Market Availability in Nepal
Bifocals in Anisometropia
Prismatic Effect in Bifocal
Bifocal Prescription
Bifocals in High Astigmatism
This document provides an overview of modern options for correcting presbyopia. It discusses both static and dynamic correction techniques. Static techniques include glasses, contact lenses, corneal procedures like inlays/onlays, and intraocular lenses using monovision or being multifocal. Dynamic techniques aim to restore accommodation and include accommodating intraocular lenses, lens refilling procedures, and scleral expansion techniques. The document provides details on many of these specific procedures.
This document discusses the use of bandage contact lenses after refractive surgery procedures like LASIK and PRK. It describes how bandage contact lenses can help reduce pain, promote healing of the epithelium, and prevent complications like striae or epithelial in-growth after surgery. Different types of bandage contact lens materials are reviewed, including hydrogels, silicone hydrogels, collagen shields, and scleral lenses. Factors like oxygen transmissibility, diameter, and disposable versus reusable lenses are discussed when selecting a bandage contact lens. Potential complications are also mentioned.
IOL power calculation is challenging in eyes with prior refractive surgery or other special situations. In eyes with prior radial keratotomy, standard keratometry overestimates corneal power due to flattening outside the central optical zone. Multiple methods of IOL power calculation should be used, including topography to measure the flattest central corneal power. A study comparing methods in eyes with prior RK found IOL power calculation using topographic keratometry was least accurate compared to formulas from the ESCRS calculator. No single method provided reliable results, highlighting the difficulty in IOL power calculation for eyes with prior refractive surgery.
1) Intraocular lenses (IOLs) are artificial lenses implanted during cataract surgery to replace the clouded natural lens and correct vision. 2) IOLs have evolved over generations from rigid PMMA lenses to modern foldable designs made of silicone, acrylic, or hydrogel materials. 3) IOLs can be mono-focal, providing a single vision correction, or multi-focal, attempting to provide both near and distance vision without glasses. Accommodating IOL designs also aim to restore the eye's ability to focus at different distances.
This document summarizes a presentation on dysphotopsia, or unwanted visual images, following cataract surgery. The key points are:
- Dysphotopsia is a common complaint following uncomplicated cataract surgery, with 1 in 10 patients experiencing symptoms. Negative dysphotopsia, involving a dark shadow, is most prevalent.
- Factors influencing dysphotopsia include intraocular lens (IOL) edge design, material, and coverage of the anterior capsule. Newer IOL designs have reduced symptoms by minimizing light scattering and reflections.
- Managing patient expectations before surgery and using techniques like overlapping the capsulorhexis rim over the IOL edge can help reduce dys
UBM and ASOCT provide high-resolution cross-sectional images of the anterior segment including the cornea, anterior chamber, angle, and iris. ASOCT uses optical coherence tomography with a wavelength of 1310nm for improved penetration and reduced retinal damage compared to posterior segment OCT. It allows high-speed imaging of dynamic structures. ASOCT has applications in assessing corneal diseases and procedures, glaucoma (including angle anatomy and iridotomy evaluation), and intraocular lens implantation. Measurements of angle width parameters help evaluate angle closure risk. While valuable for objective angle assessment, ASOCT cannot image all anatomical structures involved in glaucoma.
Fitting Philosophies and Assessment of Spherical RGP lenses Urusha Maharjan
This document discusses the fitting of spherical rigid gas permeable (RGP) contact lenses. It covers preliminary measures like determining corneal curvature and diameter. Forces affecting lens fit like gravity and tear flow are described. Selection of the first trial lens involves choosing the appropriate back optic zone radius, diameter, and power based on factors like corneal curvature and prescription. Dynamic and static fitting criteria are provided. The lens is assessed for proper movement, centration, and vision. Neutralization of corneal astigmatism by about 90% with a spherical RGP lens is explained through an example.
This document compares and contrasts AS-OCT (anterior segment optical coherence tomography) and ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM) imaging techniques for evaluating the anterior eye segment.
It discusses that AS-OCT provides non-contact, high resolution cross-sectional imaging of the anterior segment structures without touching the eye. UBM uses high frequency ultrasound to generate detailed 2D images of the anterior segment, allowing visualization of structures like the iris and angle.
While both techniques allow qualitative and quantitative assessment of the anterior chamber angle and structures, AS-OCT has advantages of being non-contact, faster imaging, and less operator dependency compared to UBM. However, UBM can image deeper into the posterior iris and has greater penetration than
Contact lens for congenital aphakia and other eye conditions for infants and toddlers. The slide presentation encompasses indications for CL fitting in paediatric, contact lens options, fitting techniques, challenges and contact lens as myopia control.
Presbyopic Contact Lenses: Bifocals and MultifocalsRabindraAdhikary
This document discusses presbyopic contact lenses and their history, principles, types, designs, fitting considerations, and tips for success. It provides an overview of bifocal contact lens options including simultaneous vision, alternating vision, monovision, multifocal, and non-refractive designs. Key aspects of the fitting process like determining the ideal candidate, measuring important parameters, and troubleshooting vision outcomes are summarized.
Types of pediatric contact lens [autosaved]Bipin Koirala
This document discusses pediatric contact lens fitting and evaluation. It begins by outlining the advantages of contact lenses over glasses for children, including a wider field of view. Key considerations for fitting include small eye size, tear production, and compliance. Conditions that may require lenses include refractive errors, amblyopia treatment, and aphakia following cataract surgery. Evaluations include testing visual acuity and ocular health. Lens options discussed are silicone, hydrogel, and rigid gas permeable lenses. Special fitting considerations for aphakic children include initially high powers of +20D to +35D, depending on age.
The Implantable Collamer Lens (ICL) is a soft, flexible, posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens made of collagen-copolymer material called Collamer. Studies have shown ICL implantation is safe and effective for correcting myopia between -3 to -25 diopters and astigmatism up to -6 diopters. It provides stable refractive results with few complications over 4 years. Toric ICL models were found to be superior to LASIK in safety, efficacy, predictability and stability for high myopic astigmatism. The procedure is reversible and preserves corneal tissue, reducing risks compared to LASIK.
This document discusses toric intraocular lenses (IOLs) for correcting astigmatism during cataract surgery. It provides details on the evolution of toric IOL designs from early PMMA lenses that often rotated, to current acrylic models with improved stability. Precise keratometry measurements and accounting for surgically induced astigmatism are important for toric IOL power calculations. The document outlines the toric IOL implantation procedure and factors affecting postoperative rotation. Toric IOLs can provide high levels of spectacle independence when used appropriately in patients with regular corneal astigmatism over 1.5 D.
This document discusses the fitting of toric contact lenses. It begins with an introduction and discusses preliminary testing, fitting steps, and different toric lens designs. Stabilization techniques for toric lenses like prism ballast, truncation, and reverse prism are explained. The conclusion emphasizes measuring axis mislocation and compensating for lens rotation when determining the final prescription.
This document discusses different types of multifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) used in cataract surgery. There are three main types: refractive, diffractive, and a combination. Refractive IOLs use concentric rings of different optical powers while diffractive IOLs use diffraction optics to create two focal points. Combination IOLs can provide the advantages of both refractive and diffractive technologies. The document also covers specific multifocal IOL models and considerations for patient selection.
This document discusses the history of intraocular lens (IOL) implantation and development of technologies for calculating IOL power. It begins with Sir Harold Ridley implanting the first IOL in 1949 using the human lens as a model. Over subsequent decades, improvements were made such as developing foldable lenses to allow for smaller incisions. Advances in biometry technologies like ultrasound A-scan and optical biometry using partial coherence interferometry allowed for more accurate measurements of eye dimensions needed for precise IOL power calculations.
This document discusses the treatment of suppression and arc. It defines suppression as a cortical phenomenon that eliminates visual confusion and diplopia in strabismus. There are various types and causes of suppression. The purpose of suppression is to avoid diplopia and confusion. Treatment aims to eliminate suppression and establish binocular vision through techniques like occlusion, prism adaptation, and use of instruments like the TV trainer and bar reader that break suppression by manipulating target parameters.
Keratometry measures the curvature of the cornea using the reflection of light off the corneal surface. There are two main types - manual keratometers using movable mires or prisms to assess curvature, and automated keratometers using photosensors. Keratometry is used to detect astigmatism, monitor corneal conditions, and assist in contact lens and refractive surgery. It provides important information but has limitations as it only measures the central cornea and assumes a symmetrical shape.
This document discusses biometry techniques used for precise intraocular lens (IOL) power calculations. Keratometry and axial length measurements are essential but prone to errors. Manual keratometry uses fixed or variable object sizes while automated keratometry uses reflected images. A-scan ultrasound can overestimate axial length due to corneal compression. Immersion and optical biometry are more accurate. IOL power formulas continue improving but require adjustments for high myopia, silicone oil, pediatric or post-surgical eyes. Accurate biometry is critical for optimal IOL calculations and patient outcomes.
Gives a very brief review of how to evaluate a case of squint in day to day clinical practice. How to diagnose a basic abnormality of the movement of eye.
Anisometropia is a condition where the two eyes have unequal refractive power. It can be congenital or acquired later in life due to trauma, keratoplasty in one eye, or asymmetric aging changes. There are several types of anisometropia depending on whether it involves myopia, hyperopia, or astigmatism in each eye alone or in combination. Symptoms include eyestrain, headaches, nausea, light sensitivity, and tiredness. Anisometropia is diagnosed through retinoscopy and tests of binocular vision. Treatment options include glasses, contact lenses, or refractive surgery to correct the refractive error in each eye.
Light is electromagnetic radiation that is visible to the human eye, ranging from 400-700 nanometers in wavelength. The law of reflection states that the angle of incidence is equal to the angle of reflection. Reflection occurs when light rays hit a surface and bounce off. There are two main types of reflection - regular reflection from smooth surfaces like mirrors, and irregular reflection from rough surfaces that scatters light in many directions. Reflection has many practical applications including the use of concave and convex mirrors, total internal reflection in optical fibers, and its role in vision and communications technologies.
Monovision is a technique for correcting presbyopia by giving the person clear vision both near and far. It works by correcting one eye for distance and the other eye for near vision, inducing anisometropia. The brain learns to use the distance eye for far and the near eye for close up. It is most successful when the non-dominant eye is corrected for near. Multifocal IOLs provide multiple focal points in each eye to give clear vision at different distances, but reduce contrast sensitivity and can cause glare or halos. Factors like dominance, suppression, lifestyle and expectations must be considered for both techniques.
1) Intraocular lenses (IOLs) are artificial lenses implanted during cataract surgery to replace the clouded natural lens and correct vision. 2) IOLs have evolved over generations from rigid PMMA lenses to modern foldable designs made of silicone, acrylic, or hydrogel materials. 3) IOLs can be mono-focal, providing a single vision correction, or multi-focal, attempting to provide both near and distance vision without glasses. Accommodating IOL designs also aim to restore the eye's ability to focus at different distances.
This document summarizes a presentation on dysphotopsia, or unwanted visual images, following cataract surgery. The key points are:
- Dysphotopsia is a common complaint following uncomplicated cataract surgery, with 1 in 10 patients experiencing symptoms. Negative dysphotopsia, involving a dark shadow, is most prevalent.
- Factors influencing dysphotopsia include intraocular lens (IOL) edge design, material, and coverage of the anterior capsule. Newer IOL designs have reduced symptoms by minimizing light scattering and reflections.
- Managing patient expectations before surgery and using techniques like overlapping the capsulorhexis rim over the IOL edge can help reduce dys
UBM and ASOCT provide high-resolution cross-sectional images of the anterior segment including the cornea, anterior chamber, angle, and iris. ASOCT uses optical coherence tomography with a wavelength of 1310nm for improved penetration and reduced retinal damage compared to posterior segment OCT. It allows high-speed imaging of dynamic structures. ASOCT has applications in assessing corneal diseases and procedures, glaucoma (including angle anatomy and iridotomy evaluation), and intraocular lens implantation. Measurements of angle width parameters help evaluate angle closure risk. While valuable for objective angle assessment, ASOCT cannot image all anatomical structures involved in glaucoma.
Fitting Philosophies and Assessment of Spherical RGP lenses Urusha Maharjan
This document discusses the fitting of spherical rigid gas permeable (RGP) contact lenses. It covers preliminary measures like determining corneal curvature and diameter. Forces affecting lens fit like gravity and tear flow are described. Selection of the first trial lens involves choosing the appropriate back optic zone radius, diameter, and power based on factors like corneal curvature and prescription. Dynamic and static fitting criteria are provided. The lens is assessed for proper movement, centration, and vision. Neutralization of corneal astigmatism by about 90% with a spherical RGP lens is explained through an example.
This document compares and contrasts AS-OCT (anterior segment optical coherence tomography) and ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM) imaging techniques for evaluating the anterior eye segment.
It discusses that AS-OCT provides non-contact, high resolution cross-sectional imaging of the anterior segment structures without touching the eye. UBM uses high frequency ultrasound to generate detailed 2D images of the anterior segment, allowing visualization of structures like the iris and angle.
While both techniques allow qualitative and quantitative assessment of the anterior chamber angle and structures, AS-OCT has advantages of being non-contact, faster imaging, and less operator dependency compared to UBM. However, UBM can image deeper into the posterior iris and has greater penetration than
Contact lens for congenital aphakia and other eye conditions for infants and toddlers. The slide presentation encompasses indications for CL fitting in paediatric, contact lens options, fitting techniques, challenges and contact lens as myopia control.
Presbyopic Contact Lenses: Bifocals and MultifocalsRabindraAdhikary
This document discusses presbyopic contact lenses and their history, principles, types, designs, fitting considerations, and tips for success. It provides an overview of bifocal contact lens options including simultaneous vision, alternating vision, monovision, multifocal, and non-refractive designs. Key aspects of the fitting process like determining the ideal candidate, measuring important parameters, and troubleshooting vision outcomes are summarized.
Types of pediatric contact lens [autosaved]Bipin Koirala
This document discusses pediatric contact lens fitting and evaluation. It begins by outlining the advantages of contact lenses over glasses for children, including a wider field of view. Key considerations for fitting include small eye size, tear production, and compliance. Conditions that may require lenses include refractive errors, amblyopia treatment, and aphakia following cataract surgery. Evaluations include testing visual acuity and ocular health. Lens options discussed are silicone, hydrogel, and rigid gas permeable lenses. Special fitting considerations for aphakic children include initially high powers of +20D to +35D, depending on age.
The Implantable Collamer Lens (ICL) is a soft, flexible, posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens made of collagen-copolymer material called Collamer. Studies have shown ICL implantation is safe and effective for correcting myopia between -3 to -25 diopters and astigmatism up to -6 diopters. It provides stable refractive results with few complications over 4 years. Toric ICL models were found to be superior to LASIK in safety, efficacy, predictability and stability for high myopic astigmatism. The procedure is reversible and preserves corneal tissue, reducing risks compared to LASIK.
This document discusses toric intraocular lenses (IOLs) for correcting astigmatism during cataract surgery. It provides details on the evolution of toric IOL designs from early PMMA lenses that often rotated, to current acrylic models with improved stability. Precise keratometry measurements and accounting for surgically induced astigmatism are important for toric IOL power calculations. The document outlines the toric IOL implantation procedure and factors affecting postoperative rotation. Toric IOLs can provide high levels of spectacle independence when used appropriately in patients with regular corneal astigmatism over 1.5 D.
This document discusses the fitting of toric contact lenses. It begins with an introduction and discusses preliminary testing, fitting steps, and different toric lens designs. Stabilization techniques for toric lenses like prism ballast, truncation, and reverse prism are explained. The conclusion emphasizes measuring axis mislocation and compensating for lens rotation when determining the final prescription.
This document discusses different types of multifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) used in cataract surgery. There are three main types: refractive, diffractive, and a combination. Refractive IOLs use concentric rings of different optical powers while diffractive IOLs use diffraction optics to create two focal points. Combination IOLs can provide the advantages of both refractive and diffractive technologies. The document also covers specific multifocal IOL models and considerations for patient selection.
This document discusses the history of intraocular lens (IOL) implantation and development of technologies for calculating IOL power. It begins with Sir Harold Ridley implanting the first IOL in 1949 using the human lens as a model. Over subsequent decades, improvements were made such as developing foldable lenses to allow for smaller incisions. Advances in biometry technologies like ultrasound A-scan and optical biometry using partial coherence interferometry allowed for more accurate measurements of eye dimensions needed for precise IOL power calculations.
This document discusses the treatment of suppression and arc. It defines suppression as a cortical phenomenon that eliminates visual confusion and diplopia in strabismus. There are various types and causes of suppression. The purpose of suppression is to avoid diplopia and confusion. Treatment aims to eliminate suppression and establish binocular vision through techniques like occlusion, prism adaptation, and use of instruments like the TV trainer and bar reader that break suppression by manipulating target parameters.
Keratometry measures the curvature of the cornea using the reflection of light off the corneal surface. There are two main types - manual keratometers using movable mires or prisms to assess curvature, and automated keratometers using photosensors. Keratometry is used to detect astigmatism, monitor corneal conditions, and assist in contact lens and refractive surgery. It provides important information but has limitations as it only measures the central cornea and assumes a symmetrical shape.
This document discusses biometry techniques used for precise intraocular lens (IOL) power calculations. Keratometry and axial length measurements are essential but prone to errors. Manual keratometry uses fixed or variable object sizes while automated keratometry uses reflected images. A-scan ultrasound can overestimate axial length due to corneal compression. Immersion and optical biometry are more accurate. IOL power formulas continue improving but require adjustments for high myopia, silicone oil, pediatric or post-surgical eyes. Accurate biometry is critical for optimal IOL calculations and patient outcomes.
Gives a very brief review of how to evaluate a case of squint in day to day clinical practice. How to diagnose a basic abnormality of the movement of eye.
Anisometropia is a condition where the two eyes have unequal refractive power. It can be congenital or acquired later in life due to trauma, keratoplasty in one eye, or asymmetric aging changes. There are several types of anisometropia depending on whether it involves myopia, hyperopia, or astigmatism in each eye alone or in combination. Symptoms include eyestrain, headaches, nausea, light sensitivity, and tiredness. Anisometropia is diagnosed through retinoscopy and tests of binocular vision. Treatment options include glasses, contact lenses, or refractive surgery to correct the refractive error in each eye.
Light is electromagnetic radiation that is visible to the human eye, ranging from 400-700 nanometers in wavelength. The law of reflection states that the angle of incidence is equal to the angle of reflection. Reflection occurs when light rays hit a surface and bounce off. There are two main types of reflection - regular reflection from smooth surfaces like mirrors, and irregular reflection from rough surfaces that scatters light in many directions. Reflection has many practical applications including the use of concave and convex mirrors, total internal reflection in optical fibers, and its role in vision and communications technologies.
Monovision is a technique for correcting presbyopia by giving the person clear vision both near and far. It works by correcting one eye for distance and the other eye for near vision, inducing anisometropia. The brain learns to use the distance eye for far and the near eye for close up. It is most successful when the non-dominant eye is corrected for near. Multifocal IOLs provide multiple focal points in each eye to give clear vision at different distances, but reduce contrast sensitivity and can cause glare or halos. Factors like dominance, suppression, lifestyle and expectations must be considered for both techniques.
The document discusses the slit lamp biomicroscope, its components, uses, and techniques. It describes:
- The history and development of the slit lamp from the 1860s to present.
- The main components including the viewing arm, biomicroscope, illumination arm, and controls for slit size, shape, filters and intensity.
- Common techniques like varying slit width and lamp angle to illuminate different tissue depths and structures.
- Methods of illumination including direct, indirect, retro-illumination and their uses in examining different anterior segment structures.
Microscopy and centrifugation techniques are described. Microscopy includes light, phase contrast, fluorescence, and electron microscopy. Light microscopy can magnify from 10x-1000x and resolve structures down to 200nm. Phase contrast converts phase shifts to brightness changes. Fluorescence microscopy uses fluorescent dyes and tags proteins or structures. Electron microscopy uses electron beams and can achieve 100,000x magnification but requires vacuum and coating of non-conductive samples. Centrifugation separates particles by mass and size through differential, density gradient, or ultracentrifugation.
The document defines key terms and components related to microscopy. It discusses the principles of microscopy including magnification, resolving power, and limit of resolution. It describes the parts and functioning of different types of light microscopes such as brightfield, darkfield, phase contrast, and fluorescence microscopes. The document also discusses electron microscopes and newer high-resolution techniques like confocal and scanning probe microscopy. It provides details on specimen preparation and factors affecting resolution for different microscopy methods.
This document summarizes key concepts in optics, including:
1. Refraction of light at interfaces and how refractive index is defined. Total internal reflection occurs when light passes from higher to lower index medium at an angle greater than the critical angle.
2. Optical phenomena like diffraction, scattering, polarization are discussed. Refractive errors and accommodation are also covered.
3. Optical aberrations like spherical aberration and chromatic aberration are properties of thick lenses. Laser components and mechanisms of laser tissue damage complete the summary.
This document provides an overview of optics and refraction. It defines key terminology like refraction, reflection, interference, diffraction, and polarization. It describes the refractive components of the eye including the cornea, lens, vitreous, and their optical properties. It discusses refractive states like emmetropia, myopia, hyperopia, and astigmatism. It also covers objective refraction techniques like retinoscopy which involves illuminating the retina and observing the light reflex in the pupil to determine a person's refractive error.
1. The document discusses key terms and concepts related to microscopy including refraction, diffraction, dispersion, magnification, interference, and resolving power.
2. It describes different types of light microscopy like brightfield, darkfield, phase contrast, and fluorescence microscopy.
3. Electron microscopy techniques like transmission electron microscopy and scanning electron microscopy are also summarized, noting their higher resolving power compared to light microscopy.
4. The working principles, applications, and construction of transmission electron microscopes and scanning electron microscopes are provided in brief.
The document provides an overview of the history and development of microscopy. It discusses early microscopes from the 2nd century BC to the 17th century. Key developments include the compound microscope in the 1600s, the introduction of achromatic lenses in the 1700s to reduce chromatic aberration, and advances by Ernst Abbe and Carl Zeiss in the late 1800s that improved resolution. It also describes the basic components and optical systems of microscopes as well as techniques like phase contrast, dark field, and fluorescence microscopy.
This document provides an introduction to microscopes. It discusses the history of microscopes beginning with Anton van Leeuwenhoek in the 16th century being the first to observe microorganisms. It then describes the basic parts of a classical/light microscope including the ocular lens, stage, objectives, condenser, and illuminator. It also discusses magnification, resolution, working distance, and different types of microscopy including bright field, dark field, phase contrast, and fluorescence microscopes. The document explains how light interacts with lenses and specimens to produce microscope images.
This document defines key terms related to dispensing spectacles, including that dispensing involves making and fitting corrective lenses and frames. It describes the job of opticians is to transform prescriptions into comfortable, attractive glasses that provide the prescribed visual improvement. Corrective lenses, including glasses, contacts, and IOLs, are used to treat various vision conditions by bending light before it reaches the eye.
The slit lamp bimicroscope allows for high-magnification examination and evaluation of the anterior segment of the eye. It has three main components: an illumination system using a slit of light, an observation system with binocular lenses, and a mechanical system to position the eye. Various illumination techniques like diffuse, direct, and indirect can be used to examine different ocular tissues. The slit lamp has a long history and continues to be the most important tool for anterior segment evaluation, enabling detection of many abnormalities. Accessories can further aid in examination of structures like the retina, angle, and measurement of eye pressure.
The document describes the Michelson Interferometer, which uses a laser, two mirrors (one movable), and a beam splitter to create interference patterns. Light from the laser is split by the beam splitter, reflected by the mirrors, and recombined to produce alternating bright and dim fringes as one mirror is moved. The changing fringe pattern is used to determine the laser's wavelength, with each fringe corresponding to a path difference change of one wavelength.
1) The document describes different types of microscopes including optical, electron, and scanning probe microscopes.
2) Optical microscopes use visible light and lenses to magnify images up to 2000x, while electron microscopes use electron beams for higher magnification up to 2 millionx and better resolution.
3) Scanning probe microscopes like atomic force microscopes and scanning tunneling microscopes use physical probes to generate high resolution images of surface topography at the atomic scale without using light or electron beams.
Prescribing low vision devices by SURAJ CHHETRISuraj Chhetri
The document discusses prescribing low vision devices, including optical and non-optical devices. It covers prescribing distance optical devices like spectacles, contact lenses, and telescopes. Details are provided on prescribing near optical devices such as microscopes, magnifiers, and closed-circuit television. Non-optical devices and factors to consider in prescribing such as visual needs, age, and cost are also outlined. Examples of calculations for determining magnification needed from telescopes and reductions in brightness are included.
The document provides an overview of microscopes, including:
1) The history of microscopes from early compound microscopes developed in the 1590s to improvements made by Antony van Leeuwenhoek and Robert Hooke that increased magnification.
2) How microscopes work using convex lenses, with light being focused and magnified through an objective lens and further magnified through an ocular lens.
3) Different types of microscopes including brightfield, darkfield, phase contrast, and fluorescent microscopes and how they produce images.
1. The document discusses presbyopia, which is the age-related loss of accommodation that begins around the age of 40 and leads to difficulty with near vision.
2. It defines presbyopia and explains the physiological changes that cause it, including lenticular and extra-lenticular changes.
3. Various types of multifocal lenses are described that can help with presbyopia, including bifocal, trifocal, and progressive addition lenses, along with their advantages and disadvantages. Precise fitting of these lenses is important to reduce issues like prismatic effects and distortions.
This document discusses the history and principles of aberrometry and wavefront sensing techniques. It begins with a brief history of aberrometry dating back to the early 1900s. It then describes different wavefront sensing methods including Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensors. The principles of Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensing are explained along with how it converts ray deflections into a measurement of the wavefront. Various metrics for quantifying optical quality are defined including RMS wavefront error and modulation transfer function. Sources of higher order aberrations and their effects on vision are also summarized.
Phase contrast and fluorescence microscopes allow viewing of unstained live samples.
Phase contrast microscopy uses interference of light waves passing through a sample to create contrast between structures of different refractive indices. Fluorescence microscopy employs fluorophores and fluorescent dyes excited by UV or blue light to emit visible light, allowing specific structures to be viewed with a dark background. Both techniques have advanced biological and medical research by enabling observation of otherwise transparent live cells and structures.
Semelhante a Principle of presbyopia correcting iols (20)
The document discusses considerations for selecting premium intraocular lenses (IOLs). It emphasizes listening to patients' desires and managing expectations. Various IOL options are suitable for different patients depending on their visual needs, personality, and ocular health factors. Careful preoperative evaluation, surgical technique, and postoperative management can help optimize outcomes and patient satisfaction.
This document discusses accurate biometry measurements and toric intraocular lens (IOL) calculations for cataract surgery patients. It emphasizes the importance of precise keratometry and axial length measurements, and describes techniques to obtain accurate readings. It also discusses toric IOL calculators, choosing the appropriate residual astigmatism, proper IOL alignment and centration, and managing unexpected refractive outcomes. The document provides information on various multifocal IOL models and pearls for maximizing outcomes with these lenses.
The document describes the two main components of phacoemulsification technology - ultrasound power generated by piezoelectric crystals and a fluidics circuit used to remove emulsified lens material while maintaining the anterior chamber. It discusses how power is created and modified through variables like frequency, stroke length, and tip selection, as well as how fluidics are regulated by a pump to balance inflow and outflow via parameters such as sleeve size, aspiration rate, and vacuum level. Proper adjustment of these power and fluidic parameters at different surgical stages helps achieve efficient lens removal while minimizing complications.
The document describes the use of various Pentacam maps and indices for screening patients for keratoconus, including:
1) The standard 4-map composite report, keratoconus map, Holladay report, and Belin/Ambrosio Enhanced Ectasia Display.
2) Key features to examine on each map include anterior and posterior elevation maps, pachymetry maps, curvature maps, and indices values.
3) The Belin/Ambrosio Enhanced Ectasia Display aims to improve sensitivity by calculating an "enhanced" best fit sphere reference surface that excludes the thinnest corneal region, highlighting differences between normal and ectatic corneas.
This document discusses corneal topography and keratometry. It defines topography as determining and describing the features of a surface, specifically the corneal surface. It describes methods of measuring corneal topography including reflection-based methods like keratometry and projection-based methods like slit photography and rasterstereography. It also discusses different topographic maps including axial, tangential, and refractive maps, and indices used to quantify topography such as the simulated keratometry values, surface asymmetry index, and surface regularity index.
Advances in IOL calculation now offer more accurate results due to improvements in calculation strategies, devices, and formulas. Raytracing calculations that trace individual rays through the eye provide a more realistic model compared to the thin lens and Gaussian optics approximations used by current formulas. The Okulix raytracing calculator and ORA intraoperative wavefront aberrometer utilize raytracing to reduce error in IOL power prediction, especially for patients with previous refractive surgery or atypical corneal shapes. Further advances in measurement devices and the incorporation of OCT and topography are helping to optimize IOL calculations.
This document discusses Dual Scheimpflug imaging technology. It captures slit images from both sides of an illuminated slit, which allows for assessment of anterior and posterior corneal topography, anterior chamber depth, and anterior and posterior topography of the lens. This dual imaging improves detection of the posterior corneal surface and provides accurate pachymetry across the cornea, even with eye movements. However, eye movements can generate errors in apparent thickness of up to 30um with 1mm of deviation. But averaging the two Scheimpflug views reduces decentration error by a factor of 10. The dual technique is also faster than single Scheimpflug as it only requires 180 camera rotation instead of 360. It also has good eye tracking capabilities
This document discusses various options for treating presbyopia, including corneal inlays. It provides details on three types of corneal inlays - Raindrop, Flexivue Microlens, and Kamra. Raindrop uses a hydrogel implant to change corneal curvature and improve near vision. Flexivue Microlens is a removable hydrogel lens that creates two focal points for bifocal vision. Kamra utilizes a small aperture to increase depth of focus by blocking peripheral light rays. Both Flexivue and Kamra are approved in Europe but still in clinical trials in the US, while Raindrop is also in US trials and approved in Europe.
Discovery of An Apparent Red, High-Velocity Type Ia Supernova at 𝐳 = 2.9 wi...Sérgio Sacani
We present the JWST discovery of SN 2023adsy, a transient object located in a host galaxy JADES-GS
+
53.13485
−
27.82088
with a host spectroscopic redshift of
2.903
±
0.007
. The transient was identified in deep James Webb Space Telescope (JWST)/NIRCam imaging from the JWST Advanced Deep Extragalactic Survey (JADES) program. Photometric and spectroscopic followup with NIRCam and NIRSpec, respectively, confirm the redshift and yield UV-NIR light-curve, NIR color, and spectroscopic information all consistent with a Type Ia classification. Despite its classification as a likely SN Ia, SN 2023adsy is both fairly red (
�
(
�
−
�
)
∼
0.9
) despite a host galaxy with low-extinction and has a high Ca II velocity (
19
,
000
±
2
,
000
km/s) compared to the general population of SNe Ia. While these characteristics are consistent with some Ca-rich SNe Ia, particularly SN 2016hnk, SN 2023adsy is intrinsically brighter than the low-
�
Ca-rich population. Although such an object is too red for any low-
�
cosmological sample, we apply a fiducial standardization approach to SN 2023adsy and find that the SN 2023adsy luminosity distance measurement is in excellent agreement (
≲
1
�
) with
Λ
CDM. Therefore unlike low-
�
Ca-rich SNe Ia, SN 2023adsy is standardizable and gives no indication that SN Ia standardized luminosities change significantly with redshift. A larger sample of distant SNe Ia is required to determine if SN Ia population characteristics at high-
�
truly diverge from their low-
�
counterparts, and to confirm that standardized luminosities nevertheless remain constant with redshift.
CLASS 12th CHEMISTRY SOLID STATE ppt (Animated)eitps1506
Description:
Dive into the fascinating realm of solid-state physics with our meticulously crafted online PowerPoint presentation. This immersive educational resource offers a comprehensive exploration of the fundamental concepts, theories, and applications within the realm of solid-state physics.
From crystalline structures to semiconductor devices, this presentation delves into the intricate principles governing the behavior of solids, providing clear explanations and illustrative examples to enhance understanding. Whether you're a student delving into the subject for the first time or a seasoned researcher seeking to deepen your knowledge, our presentation offers valuable insights and in-depth analyses to cater to various levels of expertise.
Key topics covered include:
Crystal Structures: Unravel the mysteries of crystalline arrangements and their significance in determining material properties.
Band Theory: Explore the electronic band structure of solids and understand how it influences their conductive properties.
Semiconductor Physics: Delve into the behavior of semiconductors, including doping, carrier transport, and device applications.
Magnetic Properties: Investigate the magnetic behavior of solids, including ferromagnetism, antiferromagnetism, and ferrimagnetism.
Optical Properties: Examine the interaction of light with solids, including absorption, reflection, and transmission phenomena.
With visually engaging slides, informative content, and interactive elements, our online PowerPoint presentation serves as a valuable resource for students, educators, and enthusiasts alike, facilitating a deeper understanding of the captivating world of solid-state physics. Explore the intricacies of solid-state materials and unlock the secrets behind their remarkable properties with our comprehensive presentation.
PPT on Sustainable Land Management presented at the three-day 'Training and Validation Workshop on Modules of Climate Smart Agriculture (CSA) Technologies in South Asia' workshop on April 22, 2024.
BIRDS DIVERSITY OF SOOTEA BISWANATH ASSAM.ppt.pptxgoluk9330
Ahota Beel, nestled in Sootea Biswanath Assam , is celebrated for its extraordinary diversity of bird species. This wetland sanctuary supports a myriad of avian residents and migrants alike. Visitors can admire the elegant flights of migratory species such as the Northern Pintail and Eurasian Wigeon, alongside resident birds including the Asian Openbill and Pheasant-tailed Jacana. With its tranquil scenery and varied habitats, Ahota Beel offers a perfect haven for birdwatchers to appreciate and study the vibrant birdlife that thrives in this natural refuge.
Authoring a personal GPT for your research and practice: How we created the Q...Leonel Morgado
Thematic analysis in qualitative research is a time-consuming and systematic task, typically done using teams. Team members must ground their activities on common understandings of the major concepts underlying the thematic analysis, and define criteria for its development. However, conceptual misunderstandings, equivocations, and lack of adherence to criteria are challenges to the quality and speed of this process. Given the distributed and uncertain nature of this process, we wondered if the tasks in thematic analysis could be supported by readily available artificial intelligence chatbots. Our early efforts point to potential benefits: not just saving time in the coding process but better adherence to criteria and grounding, by increasing triangulation between humans and artificial intelligence. This tutorial will provide a description and demonstration of the process we followed, as two academic researchers, to develop a custom ChatGPT to assist with qualitative coding in the thematic data analysis process of immersive learning accounts in a survey of the academic literature: QUAL-E Immersive Learning Thematic Analysis Helper. In the hands-on time, participants will try out QUAL-E and develop their ideas for their own qualitative coding ChatGPT. Participants that have the paid ChatGPT Plus subscription can create a draft of their assistants. The organizers will provide course materials and slide deck that participants will be able to utilize to continue development of their custom GPT. The paid subscription to ChatGPT Plus is not required to participate in this workshop, just for trying out personal GPTs during it.
The cost of acquiring information by natural selectionCarl Bergstrom
This is a short talk that I gave at the Banff International Research Station workshop on Modeling and Theory in Population Biology. The idea is to try to understand how the burden of natural selection relates to the amount of information that selection puts into the genome.
It's based on the first part of this research paper:
The cost of information acquisition by natural selection
Ryan Seamus McGee, Olivia Kosterlitz, Artem Kaznatcheev, Benjamin Kerr, Carl T. Bergstrom
bioRxiv 2022.07.02.498577; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.07.02.498577
TOPIC OF DISCUSSION: CENTRIFUGATION SLIDESHARE.pptxshubhijain836
Centrifugation is a powerful technique used in laboratories to separate components of a heterogeneous mixture based on their density. This process utilizes centrifugal force to rapidly spin samples, causing denser particles to migrate outward more quickly than lighter ones. As a result, distinct layers form within the sample tube, allowing for easy isolation and purification of target substances.
Anti-Universe And Emergent Gravity and the Dark UniverseSérgio Sacani
Recent theoretical progress indicates that spacetime and gravity emerge together from the entanglement structure of an underlying microscopic theory. These ideas are best understood in Anti-de Sitter space, where they rely on the area law for entanglement entropy. The extension to de Sitter space requires taking into account the entropy and temperature associated with the cosmological horizon. Using insights from string theory, black hole physics and quantum information theory we argue that the positive dark energy leads to a thermal volume law contribution to the entropy that overtakes the area law precisely at the cosmological horizon. Due to the competition between area and volume law entanglement the microscopic de Sitter states do not thermalise at sub-Hubble scales: they exhibit memory effects in the form of an entropy displacement caused by matter. The emergent laws of gravity contain an additional ‘dark’ gravitational force describing the ‘elastic’ response due to the entropy displacement. We derive an estimate of the strength of this extra force in terms of the baryonic mass, Newton’s constant and the Hubble acceleration scale a0 = cH0, and provide evidence for the fact that this additional ‘dark gravity force’ explains the observed phenomena in galaxies and clusters currently attributed to dark matter.
Candidate young stellar objects in the S-cluster: Kinematic analysis of a sub...Sérgio Sacani
Context. The observation of several L-band emission sources in the S cluster has led to a rich discussion of their nature. However, a definitive answer to the classification of the dusty objects requires an explanation for the detection of compact Doppler-shifted Brγ emission. The ionized hydrogen in combination with the observation of mid-infrared L-band continuum emission suggests that most of these sources are embedded in a dusty envelope. These embedded sources are part of the S-cluster, and their relationship to the S-stars is still under debate. To date, the question of the origin of these two populations has been vague, although all explanations favor migration processes for the individual cluster members. Aims. This work revisits the S-cluster and its dusty members orbiting the supermassive black hole SgrA* on bound Keplerian orbits from a kinematic perspective. The aim is to explore the Keplerian parameters for patterns that might imply a nonrandom distribution of the sample. Additionally, various analytical aspects are considered to address the nature of the dusty sources. Methods. Based on the photometric analysis, we estimated the individual H−K and K−L colors for the source sample and compared the results to known cluster members. The classification revealed a noticeable contrast between the S-stars and the dusty sources. To fit the flux-density distribution, we utilized the radiative transfer code HYPERION and implemented a young stellar object Class I model. We obtained the position angle from the Keplerian fit results; additionally, we analyzed the distribution of the inclinations and the longitudes of the ascending node. Results. The colors of the dusty sources suggest a stellar nature consistent with the spectral energy distribution in the near and midinfrared domains. Furthermore, the evaporation timescales of dusty and gaseous clumps in the vicinity of SgrA* are much shorter ( 2yr) than the epochs covered by the observations (≈15yr). In addition to the strong evidence for the stellar classification of the D-sources, we also find a clear disk-like pattern following the arrangements of S-stars proposed in the literature. Furthermore, we find a global intrinsic inclination for all dusty sources of 60 ± 20◦, implying a common formation process. Conclusions. The pattern of the dusty sources manifested in the distribution of the position angles, inclinations, and longitudes of the ascending node strongly suggests two different scenarios: the main-sequence stars and the dusty stellar S-cluster sources share a common formation history or migrated with a similar formation channel in the vicinity of SgrA*. Alternatively, the gravitational influence of SgrA* in combination with a massive perturber, such as a putative intermediate mass black hole in the IRS 13 cluster, forces the dusty objects and S-stars to follow a particular orbital arrangement. Key words. stars: black holes– stars: formation– Galaxy: center– galaxies: star formation
Evidence of Jet Activity from the Secondary Black Hole in the OJ 287 Binary S...Sérgio Sacani
Wereport the study of a huge optical intraday flare on 2021 November 12 at 2 a.m. UT in the blazar OJ287. In the binary black hole model, it is associated with an impact of the secondary black hole on the accretion disk of the primary. Our multifrequency observing campaign was set up to search for such a signature of the impact based on a prediction made 8 yr earlier. The first I-band results of the flare have already been reported by Kishore et al. (2024). Here we combine these data with our monitoring in the R-band. There is a big change in the R–I spectral index by 1.0 ±0.1 between the normal background and the flare, suggesting a new component of radiation. The polarization variation during the rise of the flare suggests the same. The limits on the source size place it most reasonably in the jet of the secondary BH. We then ask why we have not seen this phenomenon before. We show that OJ287 was never before observed with sufficient sensitivity on the night when the flare should have happened according to the binary model. We also study the probability that this flare is just an oversized example of intraday variability using the Krakow data set of intense monitoring between 2015 and 2023. We find that the occurrence of a flare of this size and rapidity is unlikely. In machine-readable Tables 1 and 2, we give the full orbit-linked historical light curve of OJ287 as well as the dense monitoring sample of Krakow.
ESA/ACT Science Coffee: Diego Blas - Gravitational wave detection with orbita...Advanced-Concepts-Team
Presentation in the Science Coffee of the Advanced Concepts Team of the European Space Agency on the 07.06.2024.
Speaker: Diego Blas (IFAE/ICREA)
Title: Gravitational wave detection with orbital motion of Moon and artificial
Abstract:
In this talk I will describe some recent ideas to find gravitational waves from supermassive black holes or of primordial origin by studying their secular effect on the orbital motion of the Moon or satellites that are laser ranged.
2. Introduction
What are Monofocal IOLs?
• Monofocal IOLs have only one optical power
• Monofocal IOLs are usually implanted to correct the patient’s FAR
VISION
• As a matter of fact, the pseudophakic patient implanted with a
monofocal IOL has lost accommodation, therefore needs glasses for
NEAR CORRECTION
Far correction Near correction
3. Application
What are Multifocal IOLs?
• Bifocal IOLs bend or spread the light in two different focus points:
• one for NEAR VISON
• one for FAR VISION
• The goal of a multifocal implantation is to provide the
pseudophakic patient both corrections for FAR and NEAR VISION
simultaneous distance and and near correction
4. Hoffer in 1982 was the first to hit upon the idea of a multifocal IOL
after observing a patient who had 6/6 vision in spite of an IOL that
was decentered by more than 50% of the pupillary area
The credit goes to Dr John Pierece in 1986 who was to implant the
bull’s eye style of the multifocal IOL
6. Refraction vs. Diffraction
• Refraction: An optic with a smooth, continuous surface that bends light rays,
focusing them into a single image.
• Diffraction: An optic surface that contains physical steps, that divides light waves into
wavelets that form the near & distant images on the retina
8. Asymmetric zonal refractive lenses
• LENTIS Mplus IOL (Oculentis GmbH) one-piece zonal
refractive lens was the first commercially available IOL to
have a rotationally asymmetric design.
• It features plate haptics and two refractive segments,
• a large aspheric distance- vision zone and
• a sector-shaped near vision zone with an addition of 3.00 D to
direct light to a near focal point.
9. Compared with the LENTIS Mplus IOL (left), the Mplus X IOL (right)
features additive paraxial asphericity(APA) and surface desighn
optimisation(SDP)
11. Optical Principles
Refraction
Refraction is a fundamental property of light.
•Refraction is created when light passes media with different refractive indices
•Snell’s (Descartes‘) law of refraction provides the basis of calculation:
n sin i = n‘ sin i‘
• Essential characteristics:
– The law of refraction is non-linear!
Most types of aberrations are due to these non-linear effects!
– Also applies to reflection (negative refractive index!)
– For small angles of incidence, the law of refraction
can be linearized:
n i = n‘ i‘ (paraxial approximation)
n‘
n
i
i‘
12. Optical Principles
How do refractive multifocal IOLs work?
• 2 to 7 refractive zones, alternating for near and far focus
• function depends on the pupil size and centration
• segmented surfaces with well defined power
• Distance / Near energy split accomplished by geometric
segmentation of pupil
21.10.2009
near focus far focus
13. near power zone
in the distance focus ray 1 and ray 2
exhibit an optical path length difference
consequence: partially destructive
interference
wavefront
ray 1 through a zone
of distance power
ray 2 through a zone
of distance power
additional
path t
Drawbacks:
•Pupil size dependent
•Wave optics conditions “phase matching” not fulfilled
•“diffractive mismatch“ causes image degradation
Conventinal refractive bifocal lenses
14. n=near
e.g. IOLAB
NuVue
e.g. Storz
True Vista
Zonal Refractive Multifocal Lenses
d=distance
e.g. AMO
Array
d n
d
n
d
n
d
2 zones 3 zones
5 zones
d
Zonal Refractive
• Uses the concept of refraction to create an optic that provides multiple
images
• Intermittent refractive rings are placed in different zones of the optic
• One ring is dedicated to distance, another to near
15. Zonal Refractive Multifocal Lenses
Lens surface is not continuous (i.e., smooth)
The boundaries between zones are optical
discontinuities
Annular (ring-shaped) lens regions have reduced
image quality
Light spreads out at the inner & outer boundaries
d n
d
n
16. Refractive Multifocal IOL
d n
d
n
Light energy equally shared
over broad range of
pupils/lighting conditions,
contributes to halos at night
Light energy equally shared for
bright to moderate lighting/pupils
– apodization gradually increases
distance energy with larger pupils
- reduces halos at night
Zonal Refractive (5 Zones) – AMO Array
Full Optic Diffractive – 3M/Pfizer 811E
Apodized Diffractive - Alcon
d
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
1 2 3 4 5
Pupil Diameter (mm)
RelativeEnergy
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
1 2 3 4 5 6
Pupil Diameter (mm)
RelativeEnergy
Distance Focus
Near Focus0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
1 2 3 4 5
Pupil Diameter (mm)
FractionalEnergy
AMOd AMOn
Light energy dramatically varies
with number of zones exposed by
pupil, contributes to halos at night
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
Distance
Distance
Distance
Near
Near
18. What is a wavefront?
plano wavefront
circular wavefont distorted wavefront
Light ray = wave train
19. Wave trains in parallel phase relation
Constructive interference
•two light trains (blue & red) oscillate in parallel
•the resultant light train (green) has an amplitude
which is twice the individual
amplitudesWave trains in opposite phase relation
Destructive interference
•two light trains (blue & red) oscillate in
opposite direction
•the resultant light train(green) amplitude
is 0General case:
Partially destructive interference
•two light trains (blue & red) oscillate in
arbitrary, but constant phase relation
•the resultant light train(green) amplitude
is between 0 and total sum of both aplitudes
Phase relation and interference of
waves
20. Optical Principles
Principles of Diffraction
Diffraction
•Diffraction is the bending of waves round an obstacle or through a hole
•Plane waves are transformed into spherical waves after diffraction
•Spherical wave propagation form different diffraction points leads to wave interference
according to the Huygens-Fresnel principle
•Interference refers to the combination of two or more wave fronts
• Wave interference patterns depend on phase shifts between
different wave fronts
• Destructive interference due to opposite phase relation leads
to 0 amplitude
• Constructive interference due to parallel phase relation results
in new wave with2x the amplitude, creating focal points
•Diffraction technology and interference patterns are utilized in IOLs to create more than one focal point
21. Optical Principles
Diffraction
• Described by Thomas Young for the first time
• Occur when a wave encounters an obstacle or a slit
• Interference of waves according the the Huygens–Fresnel
principle
• Plane wave transformed into spherical waves after diffraction
• light waves incident on two slits will spread out and exhibit an interference pattern in
the region beyond.
02/21/19 21
22. incident wave
step
index n1
lens
index n2
> n1
index n1
destructive interference
(zero intensity)
constructive interference(first diffractive order)
constructive interference
(zeroth diffractive order)
• With the introduction of an optical step between lens zones it can be achieved that
Light interferes constructively in more than one direction
• Mind: the refractive power of the zones is different from both the zeroth and the first
diffractive lens power
Optical Principles
How do diffractive IOLs work?
23. •the higher the grating density the
stronger is the angle deviation of
the light
•the more rings are placed on a
lens surface the higher is usually
the add power
Basic principles of diffractive elements
Grating density and diffraction angles
low ring density
medium ring density
high ring density
24. 24
Diffraction
Diffractive Steps
Step width determines addition power+3D, +4D, +3.75D
○ Short steps high addition
○ Wide steps small addition
02/21/19
↖
26. 26
Diffraction
Diffractive Steps
Step height determines energy repartition between far
and near vision
○ High steps more energy for near vision
○ Small steps more energy for far vision
02/21/19
↖
28. ReSTOR Single piece optic
Optic Diameter
Optic Type
Haptic angulation
Diopters
− 6.0 mm
− Apodized diffractive surface - central 3.6 mm /
Refractive - outer 2.4 mm
− +4 Diopter add power for near vision equals +3.2 Diopter
at spectacle plane
− +3 Diopter add power for near vision equals +2.25
Diopter at spectacle plane
− 0 degrees - planar
− 6 - 34 Dpt
29. Apodized Diffractive Optic
Step heights
decrease
peripherally from
1.3 – 0.2 microns
A +4.0 add at lens
plane equaling
+3.2 at spectacle
plane
Central 3.6 mm
diffractive
structure
Patented
peripherally
decreasing
zone widths
Alcon internal use only - do not distribute!
30. 0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
1 2 3 4 5 6
Pupil diameter (mm)
Relativeenergy
Distant focus
Near focus
Above max. 82%!
Near vision: Photopic
vision (reading)
Distance vision
Mesopic vision
Alcon internal use only - do not distribute!
31. Refractive MF and Diffractive IOLs
d n
d
n
Light energy equally shared
over broad range of
pupils/lighting conditions,
contributes to halos at night
Light energy equally shared for
bright to moderate lighting/pupils
– apodization gradually
increases distance energy with
larger pupils - reduces halos at
night
Zonal Refractive (5 Zones) – AMO ARRAY
Full Optic Diffractive – 3M
Apodized Diffractive – Alcon ReSTOR
d
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
1 2 3 4 5
Pupil Diameter (mm)
RelativeEnergy
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
1 2 3 4 5
Pupil Diameter (mm)
RelativeEnergy
Light energy dramatically varies
with number of zones exposed
by pupil, contributes to halos at
night
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
1 2 3 4 5 6
Pupil Diameter (mm)
Distance Focus
Near Focus
RelativeEnergy
32. Diffractive Technology comparison
Traditional bifocal IOLs:
• 1 step height = 1 add power
• May sacrifice good intermediate
vision for better near & distance
Step 1: 40 cm
33. Diffractive Technology comparison
Traditional bifocal IOLs:
• 1 step height = 1 add power
• May sacrifice good intermediate vision
for better near & distance
Current Trifocal:
• 2 step heights = 2 add powers
• Intermediate focal point of 80 cm to
maintain usable near vision
Step 1: 40 cm
Step 2: 80 cm
34. Diffractive Technology comparison
Traditional bifocal IOLs:
• 1 step height = 1 add power
• May sacrifice good intermediate vision for better
near & distance
Current Trifocal:
• 2 step heights = 2 add powers
• Intermediate focal point of 80 cm to maintain
usable near vision
New Quadrafocal Technology:
• 3 step heights = 3 add powers
• More continuous vision
• May sacrifice distance contrast
Step 1: 40 cm
Step 3: 120 cm
Step 2: 60 cm
35. Diffractive Technology comparison
Traditional bifocal IOLs:
• 1 step height = 1 add power
• May sacrifice good intermediate vision for
better near & distance
Current Trifocal:
• 2 step heights = 2 add powers
• Intermediate focal point of 80 cm to
maintain usable near vision
ENLIGHTEN™ Optical
Technology:
• Non-apodized new trifocal design
• Redirects light from the 3rd
step height to
distance
Step 1: 40 cm
Step 2: 60 cm
36. Diffractive Technology comparison
Traditional bifocal IOLs:
• 1 step height = 1 add power
• May sacrifice good intermediate vision for
better near & distance
Current Trifocal:
• 2 step heights = 2 add powers
• Intermediate focal point of 80 cm to maintain
usable near vision
ENLIGHTEN™ Optical Technology:
• Non-apodized new trifocal design
• Redirects light from the 3rd
step height to
distance
38. Benefit #1: optimized light utilization
Transmits 88% of light at 3 mm
pupil size to the retina1,2
• Allocates half of light to distance
• Splits the rest evenly between near and
intermediate
• Other Trifocals*
= 86%†,3
*Trademarks are the property of their respective owners.
†
At 3.0 mm aperture pupil size.
1. AcrySof® IQ PanOptix™ IOL Directions for Use. 2. Alcon Laboratory Notebook:14073:77. 3. Gatinel D, Pagnoulle C, Houbrechts
Y, Gobin L. Design and qualification of a diffractive trifocal optical profile for intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg.
2011;37(11):2060-2067.
Total Light Energy Distribution1
Distance
+
Near
+
Intermediate
=
88%†,2
PAN15013SKi
39. Benefit #2: DESIGNED FOR more comfortable near to intermediate range
•40-80 cm range of vision1
•Intermediate focal point of 60 cm1,2
○ Other trifocals = 80 cm3,4
1. PanOptix™ Diffractive Optical Design. Alcon internal technical report: TDOC-0018723. Effective date 19 Dec 2014. 2. Alcon Laboratory Notebook:14073:78. 3. ZEISS AT LISA* IOL Sales Brochure. 4. PhysIOL FineVision* Sales Brochure
*Trademarks are the property of their respective owners
Theoretical Defocus Curve2
PAN15013SKi
40. Intermediate Focal Distance Comparison1
Image-based visual acuity (VA) estimation method is computationally configured via artificial neural network architecture based on four IOLs with published
clinical VA data.
1. Alcon Laboratory Notebook:14073:78. 2. PanOptix™ Diffractive Optical Design. Alcon internal technical report: TDOC-0018723.
Effective date 19 Dec 2014. 3. Charness N, Dijkstra K, Jastrzembski T, et al. Monitor viewing distance for younger and older
workers. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 52nd Annual Meeting, 2008.
http://www.academia.edu/477435/Monitor_Viewing_Distance_for_Younger_and_Older_Workers. Accessed April 9, 2015. 4.
Average of American OSHA, Canadian OSHA and American Optometric Association Recommendations for Computer Monitor
Distances.
1
2
PAN15013SKi
41. Benefit #3: less dependence on pupil size1
Features 4.5 mm diffractive zone for less pupil
dependence1,2
•Multifocal < 4.0 mm3
•Other trifocals > 5.0 mm4,5
1. PanOptix™ Diffractive Optical Design. Alcon internal technical report: TDOC-0018723. Effective date 19 Dec 2014. 2. AcrySof® IQ PanOptix™ IOL Directions for Use.
3. AcrySof® IQ ReSTOR® +3.0 D IOL Directions for Use. 4. ZEISS AT LISA* IOL Sales Brochure. 5. PhysIOL FineVision* Sales Brochure. *Trademarks are the property
of their respective owners.
PAN15013SKi
42. Why Diffractive Zone Size matters
4.5 mm = designed to be less dependent on
pupil size or lighting conditions
• Smaller = May compromise near and
intermediate performance in low light or in
large-pupil patients
• Larger = May compromise contrast sensitivity
and impact visual disturbances, such as glare
and halo
Distanc
e
PAN15013SKi
44. AT.LISA Principles – SMP-Technology
SMP-Technology (smooth micro phase technology) is a worldwide unique patented
technique to create a lens surface
The lens surface does not exhibit any square edges or sharp angles.
Guarantees ideal optical imaging quality without any scattered light
A diffractive focus can be generated which correlates with the theoretically required
surface structures of the lens
46. Concept LISA
L : Light distributed asymmetrically (between F
and N : halos and glare)↓
I : Independency from pupil size
S : SMP technology no right angles for reduced light
scattering
A : Aberration correcting optimized aspheric
optic ( contrast sensitivity, depth of field and sharper↑
vision)
50. Tecnis Symphony
TECNIS Symfony IOL is the first FDA approved lens of its class.[1]
The IOL has a biconvex wavefront-designed anterior aspheric surface
and a posterior achromatic diffractive surface with an echelette design.
This proprietary format creates an achromatic diffractive pattern that
elongates a single focal point and compensates for the chromatic
aberration of the cornea.
51. IC 8 IOL
Applying the same small-aperture principle optics as the
KAMRA inlay,the IC-8 IOL incorporates a non-diffractive 3.23
mm diameter opaque mask with a 1.36 mm central aperture
embedded within a 6.0 mm one-piece hydrophobic acrylic lens.
The mask creates a pinhole effect, which delivers nearly 3.0
diopters of extended depth of focus by blocking unfocused
peripheral light rays and isolating more focused central and
paracentral rays through the central aperture2.
52. Maximizing outcomes
Accurate selection of patients
Biometry : Calculation of lens power
Choice of lens model
Con-struction of astigmatically neutral incision
No perfect device available for correction of presbyopia
Patients should have reasonable expectations
Operate on healthy eyes
Best candidates presbyopic hyperopes
Pa-tients who must drive at night not generally good
candidates for multifocal IOLs
53. Choice of lens model
Refractive Multifocal IOLs
ReZoom:
M-flex:
Sulcoflex:
AF-1 iSii:
Diffractive Multifocal IOLs
ReSTOR: spectacle independence of 88% reported
TECNIS: 93% spectacle independence reported
TECNIS SYMPHONY
Acri.LISA:, toric version corrects £12 D
PANOPTIX
54. Multifocal IOLs
Restore ,Rezoom and …
Accurate preoperative biometry is essential to attaining optimal results with the Multifocal IOLs.
Preoperative biometry measurements include axial length and corneal curvature.
Axial Length
Use of a IOLMaster (optical biometry ) or standard immersion A-scan is recommended
Keratometry
manually or by an automated method.
Personalisation
It is important to target emmetropia and to personalise the A constants for all IOLs.
Formula
Calculations on patients with axial lengths of between 22 and 25 mm with corneal powers of between
42.00 and 46.00 D will do well with current third-generation formulas (the Holladay 1,SRK/T,and
Hoffer Q). For cases outside this range, the Holladay 2 or optimized haigis should be used to ensure
accurac
Astigmatism
Post-operative astigmatism needs to be reduced to one diopter or less. For patients with astigmatism
greater than this, limbal relaxing incisions, LASIK, or other corneal refractive procedures may be
needed
55. Although IOL design is the primary factor in the constant , variation in surgical technique such as
The placement of the Iol
The location of the incision
design of the axiometers and keratometers also affects the personalized lens constant
Most surgeon must perform 20 to 40 cases in order to personalize their lens constant
A constant
nominal
A constant
SRKII
A constant
SRKT
Haigis
A0
Haigis
A1
Haigis
A2
P ACD SF
Restor
SA60D3
118.1 118.7 118.5 -0.123 0.099 0.189 5.23 1.46
Restor
SA60D1
118.9 119.3 119.1 0.385 0.197 0.204 5.61 1.83
Acrilisa
tri839MP
118.3 119.0 118.9 -1.477 0.058 0.262 5.48 1.72
AMO Tecnis
ZMB00
118.8 119.7 119.7 1.73 0.40 0.10 5.96 2.15
Alcon Panoptix
TFNT00
119.1 119.3 119.1 1.39 0.40 0.10 5.63 1.83
AMO Tecnis 1
ZCB00
118.8 119.6 119.3 -1.302 0.210 0.251 5.80 2.02
Multifocal IOLs
Personalization…
58. Multifocal IOLs
CHOOSING THE POSTOPERATIVE REFRACTIVE TARGET
Determining the desired postoperative refractive target for multifocal IOLs is
slightly different than for monofocal IOLs, where a slight amount of myopia may be
beneficial.
With the refractive ReZoom and AcrySof Restor ,Panoptix, Acrilisa or Tecnis
multifocal the target should be
exactly zero (plano) or the nearest hyperopic choice to zero. Patients' near vision with each
of these lenses is excellent, but slight myopia moves the near point too close for comfortable
reading.
With the Symphony aim for plano in 1 eye and -0.75 in the second eye to get
excellent reading and distance vision
This choice must be discussed with patients, however, especially if they may
compare their two eyes for distance.
They should understand the possibility of a slight sacrifice in depth perception to
have near vision in one eye.
59.
60. •all diffraction orders occur simultaneously
•blazed structures help to suppress disturbing and unwanted orders
•unwanted orders create stray light and reduce overall contrast
Basic principles of diffractive elements
Diffraction orders
63. Step width determines the addStep width determines the add
power (+4.0D)power (+4.0D)
Step height determines theStep height determines the
amount of light at near focusamount of light at near focus
• Geometry is very important:
– Diffractive steps developed
to direct the light
– The light from every step is
focused at near and distant
focal points
Alcon internal use only - do not distribute!
64. Binocular Defocus Curve
Refraction (D)
IQ ReSTOR®
IOL +3.0 D [N=117] IQ ReSTOR®
IOL +4.0 D [N=114]
70 cm
(28 in)
50 cm
(20 in)
40 cm
(16 in)
33 cm
(13 in)
∞
20/25
20/32
20/40
20/50
20/63
20/80
20/100
20/20
+1.00 +0.50 0.00 -0.50 -1.00 -1.50 -2.00 -2.50 -3.00 -3.50 -4.00
Snellen
65. • Optical performance of the ReSTOR +3.0 Aspheric and ReSTOR +4.0 Aspheric
IOL are similar
Optical Performance Comparison
Measured Distance and Near Optical Quality
Modified ISO Model Eye
MTF @ 100 lp/mm (30 cpd)
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
0.30
0.35
0.40
0.45
0.50
5mm, distance 3mm, distance
MTF
ReSTOR® Asph. +4 D (n=10)
ReSTOR® Asph. +3 D (n=10)
66. Halo Performance Comparison
Line Spread Function generated by near add when viewing distance target
The apodized diffractive optic in the ReSTOR IOLs generates significantly less
halos on the bench.
The ReSTOR +3.0 D Aspheric IOL decreases halos on the bench as compared with
the existing ReSTOR +4.0 D IOL.
Comparison of measured halos
of 3 ReSTOR IOLs to 2 other multifocal IOLs
(in model eye with 0.2 um spherical aberration and 5 mm pupil)
0.000
0.050
0.100
0.150
0.200
0.250
0.300
0.00 0.03 0.06 0.09 0.12 0.15 0.18 0.21 0.24
Image location (mm)
Intensityrelativetopeak
Array SA40N
ReSTOR Apsheric +4 D Add
ReSTOR Aspheric +3 D Add
Current ReSTOR +4 D Add
Tecnis MIOL ZM900
Halos
Focused
distance images
Array SA40N
ReSTOR Apsheric +4 D Add
ReSTOR Aspheric +3 D Add
Current ReSTOR +4 D Add
Tecnis MIultifocal ZM900
(Modified ISO Model Eye with 5 mm pupil)
Array SA40N
ReSTOR Apsheric +4 D Add
ReSTOR Aspheric +3 D Add
Current ReSTOR +4 D Add
Tecnis Multifocal ZM900
Comparison of measured halos
of 3 ReSTOR IOLs to 2 other multifocal IOLs
(in Modified ISO Model Eye with 5 mm pupil)
®
Comparison of measured halos
of 3 ReSTOR IOLs to 2 other multifocal IOLs
(in model eye with 0.2 um spherical aberration and 5 mm pupil)
0.000
0.050
0.100
0.150
0.200
0.250
0.300
0.00 0.03 0.06 0.09 0.12 0.15 0.18 0.21 0.24
Image location (mm)
Intensityrelativetopeak
Array SA40N
ReSTOR Apsheric +4 D Add
ReSTOR Aspheric +3 D Add
Current ReSTOR +4 D Add
Tecnis MIOL ZM900
Halos
Focused
distance images
Array SA40N
ReSTOR Apsheric +4 D Add
ReSTOR Aspheric +3 D Add
Current ReSTOR +4 D Add
Tecnis MIultifocal ZM900
Comparison of measured halos
of 3 ReSTOR IOLs to 2 other multifocal IOLs
(in model eye with 0.2 um spherical aberration and 5 mm pupil)
0.000
0.050
0.100
0.150
0.200
0.250
0.300
0.00 0.03 0.06 0.09 0.12 0.15 0.18 0.21 0.24
Image location (mm)
Intensityrelativetopeak
Array SA40N
ReSTOR Apsheric +4 D Add
ReSTOR Aspheric +3 D Add
Current ReSTOR +4 D Add
Tecnis MIOL ZM900
Halos
Focused
distance images
Comparison of measured halos
of 3 ReSTOR IOLs to 2 other multifocal IOLs
(in model eye with 0.2 um spherical aberration and 5 mm pupil)
0.000
0.050
0.100
0.150
0.200
0.250
0.300
0.00 0.03 0.06 0.09 0.12 0.15 0.18 0.21 0.24
Image location (mm)
Intensityrelativetopeak
Array SA40N
ReSTOR Apsheric +4 D Add
ReSTOR Aspheric +3 D Add
Current ReSTOR +4 D Add
Tecnis MIOL ZM900
Halos
Focused
distance images
Array SA40N
ReSTOR Apsheric +4 D Add
ReSTOR Aspheric +3 D Add
Current ReSTOR +4 D Add
Tecnis MIultifocal ZM900
Array SA40N
ReSTOR Apsheric +4 D Add
ReSTOR Aspheric +3 D Add
Current ReSTOR +4 D Add
Tecnis MIultifocal ZM900
(Modified ISO Model Eye with 5 mm pupil)
Array SA40N
ReSTOR Apsheric +4 D Add
ReSTOR Aspheric +3 D Add
Current ReSTOR +4 D Add
Tecnis Multifocal ZM900
Array SA40N
ReSTOR Apsheric +4 D Add
ReSTOR Aspheric +3 D Add
Current ReSTOR +4 D Add
Tecnis Multifocal ZM900
Comparison of measured halos
of 3 ReSTOR IOLs to 2 other multifocal IOLs
(in Modified ISO Model Eye with 5 mm pupil)
®
67. Human hair thickness: 60 microns
Red blood cell diameter: 7 microns
Step height at periphery IOL: 0.2 microns
Technology of the ReSTOR apodization IOL in ‘human’ terms
68. Add Power Comparison*
Spectacle plane
IOL & Add Effective Add Reading Distance
ReSTOR®
4.0D 3.00D 33.3 cm / 13.5”
ReSTOR®
3.0D 2.25D 43.5 cm / 17.8”
ReZoom** 3.5D 2.63D 38.5 cm / 15.7”
Tecnis** 4.0D 2.66D 37.0 cm / 15.1”
* Bench Data: Actual reading distance will depend on biometry, lens* Bench Data: Actual reading distance will depend on biometry, lens
position and other patient-related factors. Clinical experience withposition and other patient-related factors. Clinical experience with
ReSTORReSTOR 4.0 demonstrated an effective add power of 3.2D.4.0 demonstrated an effective add power of 3.2D.
****
ReZoom and Tecnis trademarks of Abbott Medical Optics, Inc.ReZoom and Tecnis trademarks of Abbott Medical Optics, Inc.
Alcon internal use only - do not distribute!
69. Optical Principles
Principle of Diffraction
•Diffraction is the ability of light to bend around edges
•Waves are subject to diffraction if they encounter, e.g.
Obstruction
Aperture
•Diffraction depends on wavelength:
Green light has a wider wave length than the blue light
Therefore the green picture is more expanded than
the blue one
Notas do Editor
Birefringence is the optical property of a material having a refractive index that depends on the polarization and propagation direction of light.[1] These optically anisotropic materials are said to be birefringent (or birefractive). The birefringence is often quantified as the maximum difference between refractive indices exhibited by the material. Crystals with asymmetric crystal structures are often birefringent, as are plastics under mechanical stress.
Birefringent bifocal lenses are made from materials that have two different refractive indices. Such materials are called «birefringent»., birefringent ophthalmic lenses have never made it to the market, since birefringent soft materials have not been available to date.
Diffractive lenses are based upon the wave nature of light. A diffractive bifocal lens is subdivided into a relatively large number of concentric annular zones; and light passing through the different annular zones is brought to interference in a controlled fashion due to optical steps between the zones. The result of such interference is also called a «diffraction pattern», and, consequently, such lenses are referred to as «diffractive lenses »
As will be understood, a lens made from a material possessing two refractive indices is a bifocal lens. Examples of birefringent materials are certain types of crystal, such as calcite crystals; also many polymers can be made birefringent by special treatment like stretching. Although the birefringent concept per se is elegant
Key concepts of monofocal lenses:
The lens surfaces are smooth and continuous
Any break in the surface, or deformation of the lens, creates problems with image quality
We sometimes overlook the fact that zonal lenses may affect image quality because of the discontinuities on the lens surface
The Mplus X technology features two major innova- tions compared with the Mplus (Figure 1): additive paraxial asphericity (APA) and surface design optimization (SDO).
APA describes a central modification that broadens the two foci into far and near focus zones. The objective of this is to achieve a general enhancement and extension of the depth of focus, not just an improvement of individual focus points. The defocus curve of the Mplus X visualizes the following: Instead of being limited to the maximization of peaks in near, intermediate, and far vision, the Mplus X maximizes the total area under the defocus curve, which corresponds to the entire viewing zone (Figure 2).
APA also simplifies neuronal image interpretation by the retinal cones and rods due to intelligent focal modulation. Depending on light condition and pupil size, the APA cre-
ates a retinal image that is tailored to the then-prevailing resolutional capability of the retinal pigment epithelium (Figure 3). The second innovation of the Mplus designis called SDO. By enlarging the near vision segment, the Mplus X is now more pupil independent and provides bet- ter reading performance. Second, by minimizing the transi- tion between the two optic zones, light efficiency of more than 95% is achieved (Figure 4).
Additionally, the homogeneous optic-haptic transition significantly reduces the incidence of photic phenomena.
The 5 zonal refractive lens is similar to the Array
There are alternating near and distance zones
Light goes through one of these zones to the power of interest, near or distance making the lens pupil dependent
The optical surface of a Zonal Refractive is not continuous
Light spreads out when it hits the optical discontinuities at the zonal boundaries
This spreading of light is related to visual disturbances – particularly in night conditions
This illustration on the left depicts the light energy balance transfer curve of a Zonal Refractive lens.
It is important to note that this graph does not depict image quality but simply illustrates the distribution of light energy.
As illustrated Zonal Refractive lenses are pupil DEPENDENT.
When the pupil is near 2 mm (photopic conditions), there is no light distribution to the near focal point
This may be counter-intuitive. In a bright lighting situation, with a small (2 mm) pupil, none of the light energy is dedicated to the near image. This may reduce the quality of reading vision in a condition that is traditionally designed for near vision tasks.
As the pupil enlarges (mesopic conditions), the pupil allows more light energy to the subsequent zones.
KEY POINT: The criss-crossing lines on the graph show the inefficient use of light energy as the pupil increases in size.
The image on the right illustrates the two focal points established by the Refractive Zonal lens (on the 1.5 line).
The focal points are difficult to distinguish due to the inefficient use of light energy (point to the beams above and below the 1.5 line on the far right side of the graphic).
This lost light energy is the cause of the visual disturbances noticed by the patients.
n physics, a wavefront is the locus of points characterized by propagation of positions of identical phase: propagation of a point in 1D, a curve in 2D or a surface in 3D.[1]
Diffraction refers to various phenomena which occur when a wave encounters an obstacle or a slit. In classical physics, the diffraction phenomenon is described as the interference of waves according to the Huygens Frêsenel principle.
That mean the plane wave transformed into spherical waves after diffraction.
According to Huygens’s principle, light waves incident on two slits will spread out and exhibit an interference pattern in the region beyond
Obstacle – Hindernis
Encounters – treffen auf
The width between each kinoform step controls the amount of added vergence: from the center to the periphery of the kinoform, the space between each step tend to decrease (as shown by the double yellow arrows). If the steps had the same width, the light energy diffracted in the 1st order would be deviated to another direction in a « parallel » fashion, instead of converging to a distinct foci. The higher the addition (the shorter the distance to 1st order foci), the coarser the rings are, globally. Reciprocally, globally enlarging the spacing between the steps results in a lesser added vergence. Hence, one could think of enlarging the steps until an addition of +1.75 D of vergence is provided.
Apodization is the gradual reduction or blending of diffractive step heights. This technology optimally distributes the appropriate amount of light to near and distant focal points, regardless of the lighting situation. aim minimizing visual disturbances
This is another way to evaluate the surface structure of the lens. The surface profile has been expanded in one direction here and it has been positioned underneath the energy balance plot for the apodized diffractive lens. The energy balance plot covers pupil diameters from 1 to 6 mm, like the earlier plots for the other lenses.
Near the center of the lens, the energy is directed fairly equally to the two lens powers (point), where the diffractive step height is similar to that of a full optic diffractive lens. At the edge of the optic, there is no diffractive structure, and all the light goes to the distance focus. (point). In-between, the diffractive step heights gradually reduce. The lower the step, the lower the proportion of light energy that is directed to the near lens power.
For smaller pupils, the energy is fairly evenly divided between the two primary lens powers. As the pupil opens up, more and more energy is directed to the distance lens power. This happens gradually, so that the energy balance gradually changes. For smaller pupils, more energy is available for reading. For larger pupils at night, most of the energy is directed to the distance focus.
An additional benefit of apodization is that more of the total light energy is used for the two primary images for larger pupils. A diffractive lens only uses about 82% of the energy for the two primary images, but for larger pupils the outer region is solely refractive, and the total energy utilization increases to over 90% for larger pupils with the ReSTOR lens.
Read directly from the slide.
Put apodization in the end
Here’s a closer look at how the PanOptix™ IOL compares to ZEISS AT Lisa* and PhysIOL FineVision* trifocals in acuity throughout the full range of vision.
Some bifocals or “multifocals” have smaller diffractive zones—such as those under 4 mm. When a patient has naturally large pupils, or if they are simply in low lighting and their pupil dilates to compensate, so much of the distance zone around the periphery of the lens is exposed that distance vision overwhelms the performance of the near and intermediate diffractive zone. All the patient can really see is distance in those conditions.
Conversely, with a massive diffractive zone—say more than 5 mm, especially up to 6 mm--it is extremely difficult in dim lighting for enough light to reach the distance zone or zones, so that far distance vision is sacrificed somewhat.
But, with a 4.5 mm diffractive zone on a 6 mm optic, the PanOptix™ IOL gives you the best of both worlds. Even when the pupil is large or dilated in low lighting, just enough of the distance zone is exposed to allow patients to see well at all distances.
In this examle you can see that the smaller the step hight, the more light energy is distributet to the 0th diffractive order (blue doted arrows) and less energy to the first diffractive order (yellow doted arrows)
Discuss +3 having 2x the range of near to intermediate vision compared to +4.