A description of predatory publishers and predatory journals, how to spot them and how to avoid them delivered online to forum of nurses in Pakistan in 2020
General concepts of publication in international scientific journalsEngy Shams
This document provides an overview of key concepts for publishing in international scientific journals. It discusses reasons for publishing such as sharing research findings, career advancement, and obtaining funding. It also covers topics such as targeting peer-reviewed journals, using citation metrics and journal indexing to evaluate journals, avoiding predatory journals, and finding a suitable journal to publish one's work. The presentation emphasizes evaluating journals based on multiple factors rather than impact factor alone and provides tips on manuscript formatting and the peer review process.
2011 nurse as scholar information resources may 16 2011copyPamela Alderman
This document provides information resources for nursing students, including how to access scholarly nursing articles. It outlines the session goals of being able to locate resources using the library website and CINAHL database. Key parts of scholarly articles are defined, such as the title, author credentials, abstract, introduction, methods, results, discussion and references. CINAHL is demonstrated as a database for nursing publications. Tips are provided for off-campus access and searching CINAHL using keywords and subject headings. Criteria for evaluating information sources are also summarized. Contact information is given for research assistance.
2011 nurse as scholar information resources may 16 2011Pamela Alderman
This document provides information resources for nursing students, including how to access scholarly nursing articles. It outlines the session goals of being able to locate resources using the library website and CINAHL database. Key parts of scholarly articles are defined, such as the title, author credentials, abstract, introduction, methods, results, discussion and references. CINAHL is demonstrated as a database for nursing publications. Tips are provided for off-campus access and searching CINAHL using keywords and subject headings. Criteria for evaluating information sources are also summarized. Contact information is given for research assistance.
Predatory journals aggressively market themselves and promise quick publication for a fee without providing proper editorial or publishing services. Their main goal is financial gain rather than communicating science. They take advantage of researchers in developing countries and the focus on quantity over quality of publications. Features of predatory journals include lack of contact information, broad topics to attract articles, and claims of being leading publishers without following standard practices. The rise of these journals is fueled by academic performance indicators, focus on quantity, and lack of oversight in scholarly publishing. Researchers must carefully check for journals on blacklists and follow transparency of peer review processes to avoid being preyed upon by predatory journals.
PubMed is a free online database developed by the National Library of Medicine that contains over 20 million citations for biomedical literature from MEDLINE and other sources. The document provides instructions on how to search PubMed effectively, including using Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms, conducting advanced searches, applying limits, and finding full-text articles. Contact information is also included for medical librarians available to help with PubMed searches.
Predatory journals find prey in RussiaAlexei Lutay
Analysis of Russian publications in journals no longer indexed in Scopus
Original text (in Russian): http://goo.gl/18aqx8
Slides in Russian: http://www.slideshare.net/waydze/predatory-52531393
Interactive map: http://t.co/SyA7EpxuW4
General concepts of publication in international scientific journalsEngy Shams
This document provides an overview of key concepts for publishing in international scientific journals. It discusses reasons for publishing such as sharing research findings, career advancement, and obtaining funding. It also covers topics such as targeting peer-reviewed journals, using citation metrics and journal indexing to evaluate journals, avoiding predatory journals, and finding a suitable journal to publish one's work. The presentation emphasizes evaluating journals based on multiple factors rather than impact factor alone and provides tips on manuscript formatting and the peer review process.
2011 nurse as scholar information resources may 16 2011copyPamela Alderman
This document provides information resources for nursing students, including how to access scholarly nursing articles. It outlines the session goals of being able to locate resources using the library website and CINAHL database. Key parts of scholarly articles are defined, such as the title, author credentials, abstract, introduction, methods, results, discussion and references. CINAHL is demonstrated as a database for nursing publications. Tips are provided for off-campus access and searching CINAHL using keywords and subject headings. Criteria for evaluating information sources are also summarized. Contact information is given for research assistance.
2011 nurse as scholar information resources may 16 2011Pamela Alderman
This document provides information resources for nursing students, including how to access scholarly nursing articles. It outlines the session goals of being able to locate resources using the library website and CINAHL database. Key parts of scholarly articles are defined, such as the title, author credentials, abstract, introduction, methods, results, discussion and references. CINAHL is demonstrated as a database for nursing publications. Tips are provided for off-campus access and searching CINAHL using keywords and subject headings. Criteria for evaluating information sources are also summarized. Contact information is given for research assistance.
Predatory journals aggressively market themselves and promise quick publication for a fee without providing proper editorial or publishing services. Their main goal is financial gain rather than communicating science. They take advantage of researchers in developing countries and the focus on quantity over quality of publications. Features of predatory journals include lack of contact information, broad topics to attract articles, and claims of being leading publishers without following standard practices. The rise of these journals is fueled by academic performance indicators, focus on quantity, and lack of oversight in scholarly publishing. Researchers must carefully check for journals on blacklists and follow transparency of peer review processes to avoid being preyed upon by predatory journals.
PubMed is a free online database developed by the National Library of Medicine that contains over 20 million citations for biomedical literature from MEDLINE and other sources. The document provides instructions on how to search PubMed effectively, including using Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms, conducting advanced searches, applying limits, and finding full-text articles. Contact information is also included for medical librarians available to help with PubMed searches.
Predatory journals find prey in RussiaAlexei Lutay
Analysis of Russian publications in journals no longer indexed in Scopus
Original text (in Russian): http://goo.gl/18aqx8
Slides in Russian: http://www.slideshare.net/waydze/predatory-52531393
Interactive map: http://t.co/SyA7EpxuW4
This document provides guidance on finding literature for a 3rd year psychology course at UEA. It outlines several search tools available, including the library catalog and journal databases that can retrieve books and articles. It recommends searching the discovery tool Primo or individual databases by topic to find resources, and provides examples of relevant databases for psychology like PsycINFO and PsycARTICLES. The document also provides examples of citing journal articles and describes accessing articles off-campus or getting help from a librarian.
A presentation on predatory publishing, in the Information Interventions series, sponsored by the LACUNY Scholarly Communications Roundtable , the CUNY Office of Library Services, and Just Publics @ 365.
It is critical to understand the history and background of predatory publishing, a fairly recent phenomenon, whether you are an author or a librarian called upon to assess a publisher. This talk addresses the politics of Gold Open Access, the Bohannon "sting," and the issue of "third world-ism." Red herrings of predatory publishers are an especially useful aspect of this presentation.
Open Access: Identifying Quality Journals & Avoiding Predatory Publishersciakov
Slideshow for presentation on open access. Topics include defining Gold OA (APCs, business models, subsidies), OA citation advantage, predatory publishers, whitelists/blacklists.
Predatory journals are defined as publishers that exploit the open-access model by charging publication fees without providing proper peer review or editorial oversight. They engage in deceptive practices like not informing authors of fees until after acceptance, spamming scholars to publish or join editorial boards, quickly accepting low-quality papers including hoaxes, and falsely listing scholars as authors or editorial board members without permission. Predatory journals can be identified by checking lists maintained at sites like predatoryjournals.com, which catalog journals based on criteria like exorbitant fees, lack of transparency, and questionable publication practices.
This document compares the characteristics of scholarly and popular press publications. Scholarly publications are intended for other scholars and specialists, contain original research findings, use in-text citations or footnotes, and are published by university presses or academic publishers. Popular press publications are intended for a general audience, often summarize information from other sources, may use more sensational language, and authors could be subject experts or journalists. Examples given include a scholarly book on genetically modified foods and popular books on the same topic with different points of view.
Predatory publishers aim to exploit the open-access model by publishing counterfeit journals and charging publication fees without providing proper editorial and publishing services. They often target inexperienced researchers. Jeffrey Beall, who coined the term "predatory open access publishing," warns that these publishers use deception to appear legitimate and entrap researchers into submitting work and paying fees. The number of predatory publishers has grown rapidly since 2011. Researchers should carefully vet journals and publishers to avoid predatory practices by checking for full contact details, legitimate editorial boards, transparent fee policies, and signs the operation may intend to deceive authors.
Reputation, authority and incentives. Or: How to get rid of the Impact FactorBjörn Brembs
The document discusses issues with the current journal impact factor system and proposes alternatives that provide a more comprehensive assessment of research. It suggests moving beyond just counting citations and journal hierarchy to evaluate where work is published, media coverage, community feedback and ratings, usage statistics, and other alternative metrics. The current impact factor system is criticized as being narrowly focused only on citations, irreproducible, and failing to assess the quality and reach of individual articles.
The class agenda includes a library visit to learn about research methods for fiction writing and opportunities. It also includes an in-class library task to post a correctly formatted works cited page using one source from four of six provided source types: a book, academic encyclopedia, academic journal article, biographical author information, book review, or newspaper/magazine article. The works cited is to be posted before leaving class.
This document outlines the agenda for a workshop on genre analysis. It includes activities for students to analyze genres in their disciplines by looking at recurring situations, participants, and features. Students are asked to choose a discipline to study and analyze 3 articles from that field to identify genre conventions. They will then peer review each other's papers, providing feedback on strengths, main issues, and suggestions for improvement. The next day is reserved for individual conferences on the papers.
This document provides a tutorial on how to use PubMed and MeSH (Medical Subject Headings) to search for medical articles on the Mount Library website. It outlines the steps to find MeSH terms for a topic, search PubMed using those terms, filter search results, access full text articles through the Mount Library collection, and request items not available digitally through document delivery. The tutorial emphasizes connecting searches in PubMed to resources available through the Mount Library for students.
This document provides instructions for using A to Z Journals to search for journal articles in the Evans Library. It walks through selecting the Journals tab, searching for a specific title like the "International Journal of Aviation Psychology", and finding available years and formats. It then demonstrates accessing the full text by selecting a database, entering search terms to find articles, and clicking the PDF full text link. Contact information is provided for help from the library liaison.
This document provides guidance on finding and accessing journal articles. It outlines key steps such as determining relevant journals in one's field of study, learning how to access those journals, managing references found, and tracking citations. It also defines different types of periodicals like journals and magazines. The document notes various tools and resources for finding articles, including research guides, the library catalog, journal finders and current periodicals. It emphasizes beginning the search process at the local library and utilizing interlibrary loan if articles cannot be accessed directly.
Learn how to identify what to look for when selecting resources; judge if information will be relevant for your assignments and recognise if a source is credible.
Genres are responses to recurring situations developed by discourse communities. This document discusses genres and introduces an assignment to analyze genres in a chosen discipline. Students will analyze three articles, looking at genre settings, participants, features, subjects and patterns, citing sources in the appropriate format for their discipline. Peer review involves reading, marking for revision, suggesting quotes or examples, and writing a letter identifying strengths, main issues, and three specific suggestions.
This document provides guidance on accessing and evaluating resources for researching healthy living topics. It outlines 3 steps: 1) Using background sources like dictionaries, encyclopedias and handbooks. 2) Searching journal article indexes and databases to find current research. 3) Evaluating internet search results and limiting searches to trusted educational and government sites. Tips are provided on searching specific journal indexes, evaluating information quality, and getting help from library staff.
The document provides guidance on finding reliable sources of information for research. It discusses searching Google and Google Scholar, as well as reviewing journals, researchers' websites, newspapers, magazines and Wikipedia. It notes that journals, researchers' websites and organization websites tend to be the most reliable sources, as they are written and reviewed by experts. However, their articles may use complex language and jargon. Newspapers and magazines use plainer language but can be biased. Wikipedia provides brief summaries and references, but information can be edited by anyone. The document concludes by emphasizing the importance of checking sources and being critical when evaluating information.
Library orientation vsb fellows spring 2018lindahauck
This document provides an overview of the objectives and resources available from the Villanova University library for business students. It outlines how to access subscription databases and journals, search for articles, manage citations, and find data sources. The objectives are to help students efficiently navigate the library website, search article databases, get full texts of important articles, and evaluate business journals. It also provides tips on using citation management tools like RefWorks and Zotero and identifies several specialized business databases that require additional login credentials.
The document provides tips for an assignment on summarizing a news clipping about a psychology study. It instructs students to:
- Carefully read the highlighted phrases and words in the provided news clipping.
- Follow the steps outlined in the slides to search for and find the original journal article described in the news clipping using the PsycINFO database.
- Once found, provide a brief summary of the journal article and comment on how it compares to the information presented in the news clipping.
The document guides students through searching PsycINFO and finding the source journal article to help complete their assignment.
Predatory journals actively solicit manuscripts from researchers but lack proper peer review and editorial boards. They often publish low-quality papers solely to charge publication fees without providing legitimate scholarly services. Researchers should be wary of these journals as publishing in them can corrupt the academic literature and mislead others about the quality of their work. Various studies have exposed predatory journals by getting computer-generated nonsense papers and unqualified scientists accepted. Scholars can check for warning signs like missing or fake editorial boards, poor website quality, and surprise article fees to identify potentially predatory journals.
Predatory Publications and Software Tools for IdentificationSaptarshi Ghosh
Journals that publish work without proper peer review and which charge scholars sometimes huge fees to submit should not be allowed to share space with legitimate journals and publishers, whether open access or not. These journals and publishers cheapen intellectual work by misleading scholars, preying particularly early career researchers trying to gain an edge. The credibility of scholars duped into publishing in these journals can be seriously damaged by doing so. It is important that as a scholarly community we help to protect each other from being taken advantage of in this way.
This document provides guidance on finding literature for a 3rd year psychology course at UEA. It outlines several search tools available, including the library catalog and journal databases that can retrieve books and articles. It recommends searching the discovery tool Primo or individual databases by topic to find resources, and provides examples of relevant databases for psychology like PsycINFO and PsycARTICLES. The document also provides examples of citing journal articles and describes accessing articles off-campus or getting help from a librarian.
A presentation on predatory publishing, in the Information Interventions series, sponsored by the LACUNY Scholarly Communications Roundtable , the CUNY Office of Library Services, and Just Publics @ 365.
It is critical to understand the history and background of predatory publishing, a fairly recent phenomenon, whether you are an author or a librarian called upon to assess a publisher. This talk addresses the politics of Gold Open Access, the Bohannon "sting," and the issue of "third world-ism." Red herrings of predatory publishers are an especially useful aspect of this presentation.
Open Access: Identifying Quality Journals & Avoiding Predatory Publishersciakov
Slideshow for presentation on open access. Topics include defining Gold OA (APCs, business models, subsidies), OA citation advantage, predatory publishers, whitelists/blacklists.
Predatory journals are defined as publishers that exploit the open-access model by charging publication fees without providing proper peer review or editorial oversight. They engage in deceptive practices like not informing authors of fees until after acceptance, spamming scholars to publish or join editorial boards, quickly accepting low-quality papers including hoaxes, and falsely listing scholars as authors or editorial board members without permission. Predatory journals can be identified by checking lists maintained at sites like predatoryjournals.com, which catalog journals based on criteria like exorbitant fees, lack of transparency, and questionable publication practices.
This document compares the characteristics of scholarly and popular press publications. Scholarly publications are intended for other scholars and specialists, contain original research findings, use in-text citations or footnotes, and are published by university presses or academic publishers. Popular press publications are intended for a general audience, often summarize information from other sources, may use more sensational language, and authors could be subject experts or journalists. Examples given include a scholarly book on genetically modified foods and popular books on the same topic with different points of view.
Predatory publishers aim to exploit the open-access model by publishing counterfeit journals and charging publication fees without providing proper editorial and publishing services. They often target inexperienced researchers. Jeffrey Beall, who coined the term "predatory open access publishing," warns that these publishers use deception to appear legitimate and entrap researchers into submitting work and paying fees. The number of predatory publishers has grown rapidly since 2011. Researchers should carefully vet journals and publishers to avoid predatory practices by checking for full contact details, legitimate editorial boards, transparent fee policies, and signs the operation may intend to deceive authors.
Reputation, authority and incentives. Or: How to get rid of the Impact FactorBjörn Brembs
The document discusses issues with the current journal impact factor system and proposes alternatives that provide a more comprehensive assessment of research. It suggests moving beyond just counting citations and journal hierarchy to evaluate where work is published, media coverage, community feedback and ratings, usage statistics, and other alternative metrics. The current impact factor system is criticized as being narrowly focused only on citations, irreproducible, and failing to assess the quality and reach of individual articles.
The class agenda includes a library visit to learn about research methods for fiction writing and opportunities. It also includes an in-class library task to post a correctly formatted works cited page using one source from four of six provided source types: a book, academic encyclopedia, academic journal article, biographical author information, book review, or newspaper/magazine article. The works cited is to be posted before leaving class.
This document outlines the agenda for a workshop on genre analysis. It includes activities for students to analyze genres in their disciplines by looking at recurring situations, participants, and features. Students are asked to choose a discipline to study and analyze 3 articles from that field to identify genre conventions. They will then peer review each other's papers, providing feedback on strengths, main issues, and suggestions for improvement. The next day is reserved for individual conferences on the papers.
This document provides a tutorial on how to use PubMed and MeSH (Medical Subject Headings) to search for medical articles on the Mount Library website. It outlines the steps to find MeSH terms for a topic, search PubMed using those terms, filter search results, access full text articles through the Mount Library collection, and request items not available digitally through document delivery. The tutorial emphasizes connecting searches in PubMed to resources available through the Mount Library for students.
This document provides instructions for using A to Z Journals to search for journal articles in the Evans Library. It walks through selecting the Journals tab, searching for a specific title like the "International Journal of Aviation Psychology", and finding available years and formats. It then demonstrates accessing the full text by selecting a database, entering search terms to find articles, and clicking the PDF full text link. Contact information is provided for help from the library liaison.
This document provides guidance on finding and accessing journal articles. It outlines key steps such as determining relevant journals in one's field of study, learning how to access those journals, managing references found, and tracking citations. It also defines different types of periodicals like journals and magazines. The document notes various tools and resources for finding articles, including research guides, the library catalog, journal finders and current periodicals. It emphasizes beginning the search process at the local library and utilizing interlibrary loan if articles cannot be accessed directly.
Learn how to identify what to look for when selecting resources; judge if information will be relevant for your assignments and recognise if a source is credible.
Genres are responses to recurring situations developed by discourse communities. This document discusses genres and introduces an assignment to analyze genres in a chosen discipline. Students will analyze three articles, looking at genre settings, participants, features, subjects and patterns, citing sources in the appropriate format for their discipline. Peer review involves reading, marking for revision, suggesting quotes or examples, and writing a letter identifying strengths, main issues, and three specific suggestions.
This document provides guidance on accessing and evaluating resources for researching healthy living topics. It outlines 3 steps: 1) Using background sources like dictionaries, encyclopedias and handbooks. 2) Searching journal article indexes and databases to find current research. 3) Evaluating internet search results and limiting searches to trusted educational and government sites. Tips are provided on searching specific journal indexes, evaluating information quality, and getting help from library staff.
The document provides guidance on finding reliable sources of information for research. It discusses searching Google and Google Scholar, as well as reviewing journals, researchers' websites, newspapers, magazines and Wikipedia. It notes that journals, researchers' websites and organization websites tend to be the most reliable sources, as they are written and reviewed by experts. However, their articles may use complex language and jargon. Newspapers and magazines use plainer language but can be biased. Wikipedia provides brief summaries and references, but information can be edited by anyone. The document concludes by emphasizing the importance of checking sources and being critical when evaluating information.
Library orientation vsb fellows spring 2018lindahauck
This document provides an overview of the objectives and resources available from the Villanova University library for business students. It outlines how to access subscription databases and journals, search for articles, manage citations, and find data sources. The objectives are to help students efficiently navigate the library website, search article databases, get full texts of important articles, and evaluate business journals. It also provides tips on using citation management tools like RefWorks and Zotero and identifies several specialized business databases that require additional login credentials.
The document provides tips for an assignment on summarizing a news clipping about a psychology study. It instructs students to:
- Carefully read the highlighted phrases and words in the provided news clipping.
- Follow the steps outlined in the slides to search for and find the original journal article described in the news clipping using the PsycINFO database.
- Once found, provide a brief summary of the journal article and comment on how it compares to the information presented in the news clipping.
The document guides students through searching PsycINFO and finding the source journal article to help complete their assignment.
Predatory journals actively solicit manuscripts from researchers but lack proper peer review and editorial boards. They often publish low-quality papers solely to charge publication fees without providing legitimate scholarly services. Researchers should be wary of these journals as publishing in them can corrupt the academic literature and mislead others about the quality of their work. Various studies have exposed predatory journals by getting computer-generated nonsense papers and unqualified scientists accepted. Scholars can check for warning signs like missing or fake editorial boards, poor website quality, and surprise article fees to identify potentially predatory journals.
Predatory Publications and Software Tools for IdentificationSaptarshi Ghosh
Journals that publish work without proper peer review and which charge scholars sometimes huge fees to submit should not be allowed to share space with legitimate journals and publishers, whether open access or not. These journals and publishers cheapen intellectual work by misleading scholars, preying particularly early career researchers trying to gain an edge. The credibility of scholars duped into publishing in these journals can be seriously damaged by doing so. It is important that as a scholarly community we help to protect each other from being taken advantage of in this way.
Dr. Vinay Kumar discusses the issues of predatory publishing and journals. He defines predatory journals as those that exploit scholars' need to publish by failing to uphold proper editorial and peer review standards while still charging publication fees. This corrupts the literature and can mislead inexperienced researchers. Warning signs of predatory journals include lack of transparency, incorrect English, and inclusion on blacklists. Efforts are being made to combat predatory journals through improved awareness, evaluation of publishing practices, and removal of bogus journals from approved lists.
Dr. Vinay Kumar discusses the issues of predatory publishing and journals. He defines predatory journals as those that exploit scholars' need to publish by failing to uphold proper editorial and peer review standards while charging publication fees. This corrupts the literature and can damage researchers' careers. Warning signs of predatory journals include lack of transparency, poor English, and inclusion on blacklists. Efforts to combat predatory journals include creating white and blacklists, improving publication literacy, and the HRD ministry removing bogus journals from India's UGC list.
This document outlines the rise of predatory publishers and presents a 10-point plan to protect researchers from them. It discusses how predatory publishers generate $75 million annually through fake journals and conferences. They hijack legitimate journals and academics, publishing computer-generated nonsense. The 10-point plan advises researchers to check lists of predatory publishers, discuss publication options with colleagues, and publish in reputable journals they are already familiar with through their own research. It emphasizes the importance of being wary of flattery and never paying publication fees to submit work.
This document discusses predatory publishing and provides context and examples. It begins by defining predatory publishing as journals that exploit the open-access model by publishing counterfeit journals and lacking transparency. It then discusses the history, including librarian Jeffrey Beall first noticing spam solicitations in 2009 and coining the term "predatory publisher" in 2010. Examples of predatory journals, bogus metrics, and questionable peer review processes are shown. Finally, it discusses initiatives like Think Check Submit that provide checklists to help researchers identify trusted journals and avoid predatory publishers.
Talk 2 at Research Integrity workshop at Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research in Cologne, April 6th 2018
http://www.mpipz.mpg.de/events/13302/4358571
Predatory publishing is a relatively recent phenomenon that seems to be exploiting some key features of the open access publishing model, sustained by collecting APCs that are far less than those found in legitimate open access journals. This CME aims to introduce to the participants on the phenomenon of predatory journals, why they continue to thrive, characteristics that are suggestive of a predatory journal, and how one can take step to minimize the risk of faling into predatory journal publication
Predatory journals: Why you should not publish your manuscript in a predatory journal, and how to spot a predatory journal. Visit here: https://bit.ly/2wKX7tr
This document provides guidance on using library databases to find academic sources and properly cite them. It outlines key databases like Gale PowerSearch that contain peer-reviewed journal articles, and how to limit searches to only academic sources. It defines important terms like "academic journal" and "peer-reviewed" and explains how to find the abstract and important details in articles. The document demonstrates how to cite sources within the text and create a works cited list using citation tools in databases or other bibliography generators.
This document provides guidance on selecting a journal to publish a research manuscript in. It outlines 14 factors to consider when choosing a journal, such as whether it is peer-reviewed, publishes similar topics, has a good reputation in the field, is indexed in major databases, and matches the intended audience. Following journal guidelines exactly is also important. Narrowing options based on these criteria helps ensure the manuscript is submitted to the most appropriate journal.
Scholarly Research and Publishing: from SHSU Dissertation Boot Camp, Oct 2019Erin Owens
This document outlines the process of adapting dissertation content for scholarly journal publication. It discusses selecting specific dissertation elements for submission, considering length and format requirements. The scholarly publishing process is then described, including author submission, editor screening, peer review, and final decision steps. Guidelines are provided for identifying appropriate journals, such as ensuring they are reputable and peer-reviewed. Predatory journals are defined and reasons to avoid them explained. Finally, tools for supporting the publication process are listed, including databases for finding journals and evaluating quality, and contacts for library research support.
Target audience: graduate students or beginning faculty who want to publish in scholarly or academic journals. Includes info about selecting & targeting the right journal, preparing and submitting a manuscript, and responding to decisions.
1SCIN132Valerie Parris-ReidAmerican Military University.docxfelicidaddinwoodie
1
SCIN132
Valerie Parris-Reid
American Military University
Annotated bibliography
References
Metcalf, T., & Metcalf, G. (2008). Diabetes. Detroit: Thomson/Gale. Comment by Dr. M.: Please correct your APA.
Additionally, this book is ten years old. Please find newer information in journal articles in the library. This is too old. 5 years or younger please.
Summary
This source analyzes the abnormal metabolism of carbohydrates in people suffering from diabetes. This abnormal metabolism of carbohydrates leads to a situation where an individual has an abnormal amount of glucose in the blood. This abnormal amount of glucose can also be detected in the urine of the affected individual.
Assessment
This source is a book and is found in the university library. It is peer reviewed. This means that the information it contains has been scrutinized and verified by other experts in the field. It is, therefore, a very reliable source.
Critique
This source is very relevant to my research as a whole. First of all it gives information on the working dynamics of diabetes. This is with reference to the blood and urine of the affected individual. A weakness of this source is the lack of visual aids. However, it has no clear biases.
Sheen, B. (2013). Diabetes (4th ed.). Farmington Hills, MI: Lucent Books Comment by Dr. M.: This is better than the previous book…but get away from books. Use journal articles instead. Get the most current, most up-to-date info.
Summary
This source looks at type 2 diabetes. This is a form of diabetes in which the body produces insulin. However, this insulin is not used by the body as is appropriate. The result of this is an imbalance in the blood sugar levels.
Assessment
This source is found in the city library. It is in the pure sciences section. It is peer reviewed which means that it is a valid source of information on the subject. It is very strong when it comes to analysis of type 2 diabetes.
Critique
A major bias of this source is that it ignores type 1 diabetes and only looks at type 2. It also has no visual aids. This makes it very difficult to picture what the author is trying to convey as readers have to rely on their imaginations and understanding of the subject.
Stewart, G. B. (2014). Diabetes. San Diego, CA: Kidhaven Press. Comment by Dr. M.: ONE book is plenty. Use better sources please.
Summary
This source covers type 1 diabetes. This is a condition in which the body of the affected individual fails to make insulin. The absence of this hormone means that there is no catalyst to help with the breaking down of glucose.
Assessment
This source is found in the university library. It is also peer reviewed which means that the information it contains is highly factual. The author is also a renowned scholar of the condition.
Critique
This source is very useful as it covers type 1 diabetes comprehensively. It also has visual aids to help with the explanations. However, it is slightly biased as it only covers one type of ...
The document provides guidance on finding and accessing journal articles. It discusses determining relevant journals for one's major, learning how to access those journals, managing references, and tracking what is found. Key steps include identifying top journals in one's field, where relevant work is published, good starting places like advisors or discipline associations, and using library resources like databases, catalogs, and guides. The library offers assistance via reference librarians, appointments, email, phone, and chat.
This course teaches students how to effectively research information for school and lifelong learning. It covers developing a research topic, finding background information from reference sources, evaluating internet and periodical sources, using the online catalog to find books, assessing source credibility, and citing sources using MLA or APA style. The goal is for students to understand key concepts of information access and use library resources appropriately.
Predatory journals: Why you should not publish your manuscript in a predatory journal, and how to spot a predatory journal. Visit here: https://bit.ly/2wKX7tr
This document provides tips for identifying scholarly journal articles. It notes that scholarly articles are primarily research-based, written by experts in the field, and go through a rigorous peer review process. Key clues for identifying scholarly articles include checking the author's affiliation and credentials, looking for an abstract written by the author that summarizes the article, examining the content and formal writing style, and looking for a bibliography or reference list of cited sources. The document includes a quiz to test the reader's understanding of characteristics that distinguish scholarly articles from other types of publications.
A sample of an information literacy presentation for ENG 106 Writing Through Literature. Topics covered include finding resources in the library OPAC, differentiating between primary and secondary sources, and searching literary databases.
Research into mealtimes and older people with dementia.pptxRoger Watson
This document discusses research into helping older people with dementia during mealtimes. Dementia can cause problems with intelligence, memory, language, wandering, aggression and more. It also discusses the ethical issues around feeding those with dementia. The Edinburgh Feeding Evaluation in Dementia scale is presented as the most widely used and validated measure of feeding difficulty. Several studies testing interventions like music or Montessori-based activities found positive outcomes, though more rigorous research is still needed. Spaced retrieval training was found to reduce mealtime difficulties and promote independence. Creating the right environment, social interactions and individualized care can help prolong eating ability in dementia patients.
Research into mealtimes and older people with dementiaRoger Watson
This document discusses research into helping older people with dementia during mealtimes. Dementia can cause problems with intelligence, memory, language, wandering, aggression and more. It also raises ethical questions around feeding. The Edinburgh Feeding Evaluation in Dementia scale is presented as the most validated measure of feeding difficulty. Several studies testing interventions like music or Montessori-based activities found positive outcomes, though more rigorous research is still needed. Factors like environment, social interaction and individualizing care can help promote independence in feeding for longer. Spaced retrieval training also showed promise in reducing mealtime difficulties. While numbers of those with dementia will rise, targeted interventions may help alleviate associated problems like eating.
This document provides tips for organizing a manuscript. It recommends including sections for the title, abstract, introduction/background, methods, results, discussion, and conclusion, followed by references. The abstract should be structured and summarize the aims, background, design, methods, results, and conclusions. Keywords should match the title and abstract. The introduction should place the study in context and state the problem and research questions. The methods should describe the design, sample, data collection, and analysis in enough detail to allow replication. The results should report findings without interpretation. The discussion should interpret the results in relation to the research questions and implications. The conclusion should briefly summarize key findings and implications for future research.
This document provides guidance for supervisors on best practices for supporting PhD candidates. It outlines criteria for good supervision, including: recruiting and selecting candidates; developing strong supervisory relationships; supporting candidates' research projects and writing; keeping the research on track; and helping candidates develop professionally and disseminate their research. The document emphasizes establishing clear expectations, providing feedback on written work, dealing constructively with challenges, and reflecting on one's practice to continually enhance supervision skills.
This document discusses key considerations for clinical research design such as having a clear research question, selecting an appropriate design that best answers the question, considering feasibility factors, ensuring the work is interesting, relevant, novel, and ethical. It provides examples of common research designs like randomized controlled trials, surveys, qualitative research, and systematic reviews. It highlights common mistakes like having an overly ambitious project or deciding on methods before the research question. The conclusion emphasizes having a clear research question to guide design, methods, and getting necessary support and approvals.
The document discusses various alternative experimental designs for clinical research studies, including quasi-experiments, cohort studies, case control studies, pragmatic trials, non-inferiority trials, and studies of complex interventions. Traditional randomized controlled trials are described as well as their key features of randomization, control groups, blinding, and intention-to-treat analysis. Cluster randomized trials and differences from individual randomized trials are also covered.
Clinical research ethics and regulationRoger Watson
This document discusses several topics related to clinical research ethics and regulation, including ethical principles, privacy and confidentiality, research data management, research ethics, research misconduct, publication ethics, and informed consent. The four main ethical principles discussed are beneficence, nonmaleficence, autonomy, and justice. The document also covers topics such as anonymization, conflicts of interest, the Committee on Publication Ethics, and regulations around informed consent.
Instrument development and psychometric validation 030222Roger Watson
This document discusses instrument development and validation. It covers questionnaire design, including response formats and standardizing questions. It also discusses establishing validity through content validity, including item-content validity index and scale-content validity index. Other topics covered include reliability, criterion validity, construct validity, and factorial validity. The document also discusses screening questionnaires, sensitivity and specificity, receiver operating characteristic curves, and how they are used to optimize diagnostic accuracy when developing screening tools.
The document outlines the key steps in the research process, including developing the research project, reviewing literature, creating a research proposal, conducting a pilot study, and project management. It discusses developing a research question and aims, reviewing background literature and gaps, designing methodology, and plans for analysis, reporting, and writing up results. Methods of searching literature systematically using databases and evaluating sources are also covered. The importance of a pilot study and a clear timetable for the research proposal and project are emphasized.
The document discusses effective online teaching. It begins by defining online learning as courses offered over the internet that are 100% virtual, excluding MOOCs. It states online learning should be innovative, granular, varied, interactive, and interesting. Blended learning combines online and in-person elements. The document outlines synchronous learning, which occurs in real-time, and asynchronous learning, which is flexible and self-paced. It provides strategies for asynchronous learning and notes online teaching requires front-loading work and new skills from instructors.
Global nursing aims to promote sustainable planetary health and equity for all people through an evidence-based nursing process. It considers social determinants of health and includes individual, population-level care, research, education, leadership, advocacy and policy initiatives. Global nurses engage ethically and respect human dignity, rights and diversity, partnering with communities and other providers.
Inexperienced writers often struggle with presenting simple concepts clearly. They tend to use sentences that are too long with too many ideas, poor grammar, and sentence structure. As a result, the point is lost by the time the reader reaches the end of the sentence. They also make mistakes using single sentence paragraphs. Effective writing requires using shorter, clearer sentences and varying paragraph length.
This document provides guidance on organizing a manuscript for publication. It discusses key elements like the title, abstract, introduction, methods, results, discussion and conclusion sections. For the title, it recommends being short and clearly related to the topic. The abstract should be structured with aims, background, design, methods, results and conclusions. It also discusses writing clear research questions or hypotheses in the introduction. The methods section should describe the design, sample, data collection and analysis. The results section states the findings without discussion. The discussion section interprets the results in relation to the research questions and implications. The conclusion briefly summarizes the key points and implications.
This document provides guidance on writing for publication. It discusses common motivations for writing such as career progression or sharing research findings. It emphasizes that the main barriers to writing are a lack of reading and writing. To overcome these barriers, the document recommends reading widely from various genres and writing regularly and frequently. It also suggests setting word count targets, seeking feedback, and treating rejections as opportunities to improve for future submissions. The overall message is that regular writing and revising are essential skills for any writer.
The document discusses the publishing process for the journal Nurse Education in Practice. It provides information about the journal's international editorial board, publication frequency, and impact factor. It outlines what types of papers are most likely to contribute to the journal's impact factor, such as review papers, methodological papers, and original research. The document also discusses the aims and scope of the journal, the double-blind peer review process, guidelines for enhancing quality and transparency in health research, authorship standards, and reasons for article retraction such as plagiarism or duplicate publication.
This document discusses effective use of social media, particularly Twitter and blogging. It provides tips for using Twitter productively, such as including links, pictures, hashtags, and retweeting interesting material while avoiding trivia and offensive posts. Regarding blogging, it defines blogs and differentiates them from websites and pages. It also describes common blog post types and who typically blogs. Habits of effective bloggers are outlined as well, such as being prolific, concise, analytical, and lifelong learners who plan ahead. The document stresses developing a strategy for social media and promoting work professionally and responsibly.
The document discusses different types of writing such as academic, scientific, journalistic, and literary. It provides tips for clear writing such as using simple words and active verbs. George Orwell's five rules for effective writing are presented which include using short words, cutting unnecessary words, using the active voice, and avoiding foreign phrases.
Hiranandani Hospital in Powai, Mumbai, is a premier healthcare institution that has been serving the community with exceptional medical care since its establishment. As a part of the renowned Hiranandani Group, the hospital is committed to delivering world-class healthcare services across a wide range of specialties, including kidney transplantation. With its state-of-the-art facilities, advanced medical technology, and a team of highly skilled healthcare professionals, Hiranandani Hospital has earned a reputation as a trusted name in the healthcare industry. The hospital's patient-centric approach, coupled with its focus on innovation and excellence, ensures that patients receive the highest standard of care in a compassionate and supportive environment.
share - Lions, tigers, AI and health misinformation, oh my!.pptxTina Purnat
• Pitfalls and pivots needed to use AI effectively in public health
• Evidence-based strategies to address health misinformation effectively
• Building trust with communities online and offline
• Equipping health professionals to address questions, concerns and health misinformation
• Assessing risk and mitigating harm from adverse health narratives in communities, health workforce and health system
Integrating Ayurveda into Parkinson’s Management: A Holistic ApproachAyurveda ForAll
Explore the benefits of combining Ayurveda with conventional Parkinson's treatments. Learn how a holistic approach can manage symptoms, enhance well-being, and balance body energies. Discover the steps to safely integrate Ayurvedic practices into your Parkinson’s care plan, including expert guidance on diet, herbal remedies, and lifestyle modifications.
Travel vaccination in Manchester offers comprehensive immunization services for individuals planning international trips. Expert healthcare providers administer vaccines tailored to your destination, ensuring you stay protected against various diseases. Conveniently located clinics and flexible appointment options make it easy to get the necessary shots before your journey. Stay healthy and travel with confidence by getting vaccinated in Manchester. Visit us: www.nxhealthcare.co.uk
- Video recording of this lecture in English language: https://youtu.be/Pt1nA32sdHQ
- Video recording of this lecture in Arabic language: https://youtu.be/uFdc9F0rlP0
- Link to download the book free: https://nephrotube.blogspot.com/p/nephrotube-nephrology-books.html
- Link to NephroTube website: www.NephroTube.com
- Link to NephroTube social media accounts: https://nephrotube.blogspot.com/p/join-nephrotube-on-social-media.html
Clinic ^%[+27633867063*Abortion Pills For Sale In Tembisa Central19various
Clinic ^%[+27633867063*Abortion Pills For Sale In Tembisa Central Clinic ^%[+27633867063*Abortion Pills For Sale In Tembisa CentralClinic ^%[+27633867063*Abortion Pills For Sale In Tembisa CentralClinic ^%[+27633867063*Abortion Pills For Sale In Tembisa CentralClinic ^%[+27633867063*Abortion Pills For Sale In Tembisa Central
8 Surprising Reasons To Meditate 40 Minutes A Day That Can Change Your Life.pptxHolistified Wellness
We’re talking about Vedic Meditation, a form of meditation that has been around for at least 5,000 years. Back then, the people who lived in the Indus Valley, now known as India and Pakistan, practised meditation as a fundamental part of daily life. This knowledge that has given us yoga and Ayurveda, was known as Veda, hence the name Vedic. And though there are some written records, the practice has been passed down verbally from generation to generation.
Rasamanikya is a excellent preparation in the field of Rasashastra, it is used in various Kushtha Roga, Shwasa, Vicharchika, Bhagandara, Vatarakta, and Phiranga Roga. In this article Preparation& Comparative analytical profile for both Formulationon i.e Rasamanikya prepared by Kushmanda swarasa & Churnodhaka Shodita Haratala. The study aims to provide insights into the comparative efficacy and analytical aspects of these formulations for enhanced therapeutic outcomes.
1. Roger Watson PhD FRCN FAAN
Editor-in-Chief, JAN
Editor, Nursing Open
@jadvnursing
@NursingOpen
2. BEWARE!
• I am writing to seek for an advise for my friend. He was a
victim of a hijacked journal. The name of the journal is
XXXXXXXX Review. He paid US$600 as an APC. He later
learned that the journal is a hijacked journal. He has emailed
the journal requesting to retract the paper and to possibly
refund the publication fee. However, until now, he got no
response.
9. If you are concerned about a journal
• CHECK:
– Medline
– PubMed
– Clarivate
– Emerging Sources Citation Index
– Scopus
– Directory of Open Access Journals
10.
11.
12. Predatory Publishing Quick Check
Has the publisher started dozens of new open access
titles all at once?
Do the published titles have very few papers (if any)?
Does the publisher send emails asking for manuscript
submissions or to serve on editorial board?
Does the publisher fail to disclose the
names/qualifications of
editorial board members or editors?
Is the publisher’s address NOT verifiable?
Is there very little evidence of peer review?
Crawford (2011)