Mais conteúdo relacionado Semelhante a @DavidMihm @SLCSEM Local Search Ranking Factors 2012 (20) Mais de Utah Digital Marketing Collective (20) @DavidMihm @SLCSEM Local Search Ranking Factors 20121. Local Ranking Factors SLCSEM
ca. Early June, 2012 June 12 2012
© David Mihm / GetListed.org, Inc. 2012
7. We haven’t quite gotten there…
…but we’re pretty close!
© David Mihm / GetListed.org, Inc. 2012
9. ―We want to show everything we
know about a business.‖
--Paraphrase of Joel Headley
Local University Edmonton
May 1 2012
© David Mihm / GetListed.org, Inc. 2012
16. 2008 vs 2012
1 Individually Owner-verified Place Page (PLACE PAGE)
2 Physical Address in City of Search (PLACE PAGE)
3 Proper Category Associations (PLACE PAGE)
4 Product / Service Keyword in Business Title (PLACE PAGE)
5 Proximity of Address to Centroid (PLACE PAGE)
6 Quantity of Structured Citations (IYPs, Data Aggregators)
(OFF-SITE)
7 Quantity of Inbound Links to Domain (OFF-SITE)
8 Location Keywords in Anchor Text of Inbound Links to Domain
(OFF-SITE)
9 Quantity of Native Google Places Reviews (w/text)
(REVIEWS)
10 Product / Service Keyword in Place Page Description
(PLACE PAGE)
© David Mihm / GetListed.org, Inc. 2012
17. Many of the Fundamentals are still the same.
• Having a physical location in the right city is
paramount.
• Categories are huge.
• Citations and location data are still critical.
• Quantity of reviews are still way more important
than quality.
…and yes, proximity to centroid still has influence.
© David Mihm / GetListed.org, Inc. 2012
19. Citations
- Importance of Local Ecosystem is NOT
changing anytime soon
- Exclusive focus on Places is pure folly
- You MUST fix your data at upstream data providers
- AND at Google Mapmaker
© David Mihm / GetListed.org, Inc. 2012
23. +
© David Mihm / GetListed.org, Inc. 2012
29. Centroid Bias
Some factors may
be country or
region-specific
depending on the
quality of Google's
data.
© David Mihm / GetListed.org, Inc. 2012
35. Remember this? (~October 2007)
© David Mihm / GetListed.org, Inc. 2012
40. But we HAVE come a long way!
© David Mihm / GetListed.org, Inc. 2012
41. What’s new?
Blended Search.
It’s now critical that Google is able to
associate your website with your
location(s).
And for you large corporations…the ball is
now in your court.
© David Mihm / GetListed.org, Inc. 2012
43. Blended Search for Large Companies
• Optimized, indexable store locator & location
pages
• Utilize Schema.org and KML*
• Put some thought into your data strategy
• Submit individual location URLs to +Local and
aggregators
*not so much for ranking but to let your other factors work for you!
© David Mihm / GetListed.org, Inc. 2012
44. What Else Is New?
© David Mihm / GetListed.org, Inc. 2012
45. What Else Is New?
© David Mihm / GetListed.org, Inc. 2012
46. What Else Is New?
(#31)
(#24)
(#18)
Every single one of these is interesting (to me at least).
© David Mihm / GetListed.org, Inc. 2012
47. !
© David Mihm / GetListed.org, Inc. 2012
51. What Else Is New?
© David Mihm / GetListed.org, Inc. 2012
52. What Else Is New?
© David Mihm / GetListed.org, Inc. 2012
53. +Local less reliant on the link
graph than Google.com?
“It appears that sites, for which the
backlinks anchor text style is mostly
“converting keywords”-rich, are regarded
with much lesser value in the Google+
Local search results, compared to sites
whose backlink anchor text profile consists
mostly of “branded” keywords (domain
name, business name).”
@nyagoslav
© David Mihm / GetListed.org, Inc. 2012
54. „There seems to be a trend (and it is not just in
local search) towards decreasing the importance
of “keyword” anchor text, and increasing the
importance of “branded” anchor text.‟
@nyagoslav
© David Mihm / GetListed.org, Inc. 2012
55. „There seems to be a trend (and it is not just in
local search) towards decreasing the importance
of “keyword” anchor text, and increasing the
importance of “branded” anchor text.‟
???
© David Mihm / GetListed.org, Inc. 2012
56. What Else Is New?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Debutante-dress.jpg
© David Mihm / GetListed.org, Inc. 2012
57. What Else Is New?
1 Individually Owner-verified Place Page (PLACE PAGE)
2 Physical Address in City of Search (PLACE PAGE)
3 Proper Category Associations (PLACE PAGE)
4 Product / Service Keyword in Business Title (PLACE PAGE)
5 Proximity of Address to Centroid (PLACE PAGE)
6 Quantity of Structured Citations (IYPs, Data Aggregators)
(OFF-SITE)
7 Quantity of Inbound Links to Domain (OFF-SITE)
8 Location Keywords in Anchor Text of Inbound Links to Domain
(OFF-SITE)
9 Quantity of Native Google Places Reviews (w/text)
(REVIEWS)
10 Product / Service Keyword in Place Page Description
(PLACE PAGE)
© David Mihm / GetListed.org, Inc. 2012
65. Putting It All into Perspective
© David Mihm / GetListed.org, Inc. 2012
67. The First Critical Period
Citations / First
10-Packs.
© David Mihm / GetListed.org, Inc. 2012
68. Early Adulthood
Generic 10-Packs
-> Hotpot.
Citations start to become a “sine qua non”
Reviews start to become a differentiating factor
1 Review volume
2 Keywords in reviews
© David Mihm / GetListed.org, Inc. 2012
69. Recent History
- Links
Mostly domain level for SMBs
Volume of linking domains
Strength of top links
- Citations
Volume
Particular sources
- Reviews
Volume
Particular sources
© David Mihm / GetListed.org, Inc. 2012
72. Where We’re Headed
What are the features / business evolutions where we haven’t seen
[semi-permanent] interface changes yet?
Sentiment
Plus
Social Proximity
Authority Influencers
Offers
Mobile/Checkins
Wallet
The pace of evolution just continues to increase.
© David Mihm / GetListed.org, Inc. 2012
73. Putting It All into Perspective
Visually
© David Mihm / GetListed.org, Inc. 2012
75. Title Tags
+ Links
© David Mihm / GetListed.org, Inc. 2012
79. Social / Offline / +Local???
Reviews
Citations +
Location Data
Title Tags
+ Links
© David Mihm / GetListed.org, Inc. 2012
81. Vs.
© David Mihm / GetListed.org, Inc. 2012
83. The Bottom Line
SEO’s like to focus on easy, discrete, technical items they can
“check off their lists.”
Title tags with geo-keywords
Data syndication
KML / Geositemaps
hCard / Schema.org
Etc.
There is still plenty of value in these items, especially in
less competitive markets. But…
© David Mihm / GetListed.org, Inc. 2012
84. The Bottom Line
The algorithm is getting
frighteningly complex.
The reality is that you [will]
need a holistic marketing
strategy in order to ensure
long-term success.
© David Mihm / GetListed.org, Inc. 2012
86. The dust still has not settled
(at least for me).
© David Mihm / GetListed.org, Inc. 2012
87. The good news:
More complex algorithm
+ Frequent change
Job security FTW!
© David Mihm / GetListed.org, Inc. 2012
Notas do Editor If you time is limited stop here If you time is limited stop here But location prominence was not the only ranking routine. …. Google also ranks by distance. They would normalize the two ranking schemes So in a typical search result you would see the top results ranked by prominence but the lower ranked ones by distance… this is still the case But location prominence was not the only ranking routine. …. Google also ranks by distance. They would normalize the two ranking schemes So in a typical search result you would see the top results ranked by prominence but the lower ranked ones by distance… this is still the case