7. Applications
• Challenging robotic research
• Challenging neuroscience and embodiment research
• Entertainment, reception…
721/04/2017 SKOLKOVO ROBOTICS 2017
8. Applications
• Challenging robotic research
• Challenging neuroscience and embodiment research
• Entertainment, reception…
• Services (companion)
– ISO/TS 15066
821/04/2017 SKOLKOVO ROBOTICS 2017
9. Applications
• Challenging robotic research
• Challenging neuroscience and embodiment research
• Entertainment, reception…
• Services (companion)
• Disaster applications
921/04/2017 SKOLKOVO ROBOTICS 2017
10. Applications
1021/04/2017 SKOLKOVO ROBOTICS 2017
• Challenging robotic research
• Challenging neuroscience and embodiment research
• Entertainment, reception…
• Services (companion)
• Disaster applications
• Manufacturing applications
11. Applications
1121/04/2017 SKOLKOVO ROBOTICS 2017
• Challenging robotic research
• Challenging neuroscience and embodiment research
• Entertainment, reception…
– Will not be discussed
• Services (companion)
– Focus on humanoid-human physical interaction
• Disaster applications
• Manufacturing applications
12. Humanoid research challenges
• Basic research
– Mostly common to the general robotics research
• Control, planning, perception, SLAM, etc.
• Anthropomorphism specific issues
– Dynamic walking on any terrains
– Multi-contact motion and manipulation
– Whole-body dynamic control (high dynamics)
– Unilateral contact in under-actuation
– Physical interaction with humans
– Androids (human) appearance and acceptability
– Safe falling and recovering
– Mechatronic design and embedded systems
1221/04/2017 SKOLKOVO ROBOTICS 2017
14. Embodiment of humanoids
• Embodiment
– Body possession: what does my body means (neuroscience)
– Intention recognition (brain waves signal processing)
– Sensory-based embodiment (physiological signal processing)
– Embodiment and consciousness (ethics, philosophy)
– Human-robot interaction, robotic surrogates (robotics)
– Beyond telepresence
• Science of embodiment using humanoid robots
• Thought-based control of humanoid robots
1421/04/2017 SKOLKOVO ROBOTICS 2017
16. Embodiment understanding
• Patients implanted with ECoG
– Prof. Kamada, Neurosurgery
Dpt. Asahikawa MD HP
• The real challenge
– Get the thought not stimulate
responses
– Use shared control and not
dictate space trajectories
– Generate robot motion as
expected by the embodied
person
• Contribution to the
understanding of
– What self means
– Consciousness
– How pertinent is thought-based
control of complex systems
– Brain functions
21/04/2017 SKOLKOVO ROBOTICS 2017 16
17. Human-humanoid pHRI
• Collaborative humanoid robots
– Humanoid robots as helpers
– Social image: assistant not replacing a human
– New kind of closeness
• General issues: beyond anthropomorphic design
– Shared objects / direct touch
– Dynamic role exchange/switching no a priori distribution
– Human intention recognition
• Humanoid additional issues
– Dynamic walking under sustained forces and task postural
constraints
• Synchronization in speed, overall stability, safety.
– Human perception (lateral, behind the humanoid)
1721/04/2017 SKOLKOVO ROBOTICS 2017
19. HH pHRI using combined cues
1921/04/2017 SKOLKOVO ROBOTICS 2017
20. Humanoid for frail persons assistance
2021/04/2017 SKOLKOVO ROBOTICS 2017
http://www.projetromeo.com with ALDEBARAN SoftBank
21. Disaster and rescue humanoids
• Started by the Japanese program after the Fukushima
disaster (11 March 11)
• Boosted by the US DARPA robotics challenge
– 8 tasks to be achieved
– The final competition day shows how far we are still from it
• The scientific and research challenge
– Outdoor / indoor with poor perceptual capabilities
– Non-structured environments
– Manipulating human tools and driving human utility cars
– Climbing ladders and negotiating rubbles
– Robustness and reliability of the planning / control methods
– Software integration
• Probably the biggest and hardest challenge in robotics
2121/04/2017 SKOLKOVO ROBOTICS 2017
23. Manufacturing humanoid robots
• Where and why this is to be considered?
• What are the requirements?
• The Glory factory (Saitama, Japan) case study
• The Airbus Group projects
2321/04/2017 SKOLKOVO ROBOTICS 2017
27. Airbus Group interest
• As can be seen from floor shops
– Mobile robots cannot access Cargo and other areas
– Railed-ported robotic arms not possible
– Robot must work inside product
• Not like in car company
– To go from one level to the other
• Use of stairs/ladders
• Constraint
– Share workspace with human workers
– Share same tools with human workers
21/04/2017 SKOLKOVO ROBOTICS 2017 27
29. The Projects
• 2015-01-01 COMANOID EU project (4 years)
– Show that a humanoid can reach all airplane spots
– Technologies: Multi-contact planning and control, SLAM,
whole-body multi-modal perception and control, safety, falling.
• 2016-01-01 CNRS-AIST-AIRBUS joint research
program (4 years-
– Focus on manipulation in confined spaces
– Investigate the provider of the manufacturing humanoid robot
for Airbus Group
– 4 use cases of increasing complexity
2921/04/2017 SKOLKOVO ROBOTICS 2017
30. JRP: example of confined space
30
All these tasks will be performed where
it is impossible to send a wheeled
robot
For all cases, the operators, the
aircraft and the robot integrity must
be ensured
All these tasks will be performed
in confined spaces where it is
uncomfortable or dangerous
to work
21/04/2017 SKOLKOVO ROBOTICS 2017
31. JRP use cases
Circuit breaker
automation
Hydrofuge
protection &
cleaning
Torqueing
automation
System installation
Robot skills &
capabilities
Robot skills &
capabilities
Robot skills &
capabilities
Robot skills &
capabilities
- Very constrained
environment
- Collision avoidance
- Stability
- Collision avoidance
- In line tool trajectory
re-planning
- Stability
- Collision avoidance
- Torque and force
control
- Stability
- Collision avoidance
- Torque and force
control
- Flexible object
manipulation
21/04/2017 SKOLKOVO ROBOTICS 2017 31