SlideShare uma empresa Scribd logo
1 de 39
SHRM Survey Findings: Workplace Romance

September 24, 2013
Key Findings

• How common is workplace romance? One out of four (24%) employees reported they have been
or are currently involved in a workplace romance. Forty-three percent of HR professionals reported
current incidences of workplace romance at their organizations.
• Do organizations have a policy that addresses workplace romance? Overall, more than onehalf (54%) of organizations do not have a written or verbal policy that addresses workplace
romance. However, in 2013, an increasing number of organizations (42%) indicated having a
written or verbal policy compared with 2005 (25%).
• What types of workplace romance are not permitted? Among organizations that have workplace
romance policies, almost all (99%) indicated that romance between a supervisor and a direct report
is not permitted, followed by romance between employees of a significant rank difference (45%)
and between employees who report to the same supervisor (35%). Consequences for breaking an
organization’s workplace romance policy vary depending on the type of workplace romance and the
rank of employees.
• What consequences have been applied to employees involved in a workplace romance? The
most frequently reported consequence was a transfer of an employee involved in a workplace
romance to another department (34%) and counseling (32%).

Workplace Romance Survey ©SHRM 2013

2
Key Findings

• Why is workplace romance not permitted? When it comes to workplace romance, organizations
are primarily concerned about real or perceived favoritism (84%), potential for claims of sexual
harassment (78%), and potential for retaliation (72%).
» Concerns about potential retaliation increased from 50% in 2005 to 72% in 2013. Concerns
about lowered productivity and about workplace romances being viewed as unprofessional
decreased from 52% and 58% in 2005 to 29% and 29% in 2013.
» In the past five years, 40% of organizations have received complaints of favoritism from coworkers of those involved in a workplace romance; nearly one-fourth (23%) have received
claims of sexual harassment, and 22% have received complaints of retaliation.
• How is workplace romance revealed, and which departments are responsible for taking
action? Suspicions about workplace romance are generally revealed through office gossip (67%)
or through reports to the HR department (61%). Vast majority of organizations (89%) indicated that
the HR department is responsible for taking action when such suspicion or complaint comes to
light.
• What are HR professionals’ opinions about “love contracts”*? Only 5% of organizations ask
employees involved in a workplace romance to sign a “love contract.”* Although the majority (81%)
of HR professionals agree that love contracts can provide a forum for them to talk to employees
about appropriate and inappropriate workplace behavior, 75% view them as ineffective because
employees may be more likely to hide their romantic relationships.
*In this survey, a “love contract” refers to a document affirming that a workplace romantic relationship
is consensual, that employees involved will not engage in favoritism, and that neither will take any legal
action against the employer or each other if the relationship ends.

Workplace Romance Survey ©SHRM 2013
3
What do these findings mean for the HR profession?

• With workplace romance on the rise, HR professionals may need to prepare for more issues related
to managing its impact. For many organizations, the first step is to draft a written policy; more
organizations in 2013 have a written or verbal policy on workplace romance compared with 2005
(42% in 2013 versus 25% in 2005).
• In some cases, HR professionals may need to work with their risk management and/or legal team
colleagues to identify risks involved with workplace romance. The consequences can include
damage to office morale as well as legal claims that result from the relationship in
question. Depending on the business, these risks will influence any written policies.
• Currently, most HR professionals deem a “love contract”—a document that affirms the relationship
and is signed by the couple involved in a workplace romance—as ineffective and say that it actually
encourages workers to hide the relationship from peers. But this approach may be revisited if the
impact of workplace romance is seen as too damaging.

Workplace Romance Survey ©SHRM 2013

4
Incidence of Workplace Romance

Workplace Romance Survey ©SHRM 2013

5
Incidence of workplace romance

HR professionals: Are you aware of any
current incidences of workplace romance
at your organization?

Employees: Have you ever been or are
you currently involved in a workplace
romance?

I have been
involved
before
21%

Yes
43%

No
57%

I am
currently
involved
3%

No
76%

n = 405

Note: n = 5,004 U.S. employees. Employee data were
collected from the 2013 Employee Job Satisfaction
and Engagement Survey.

Workplace Romance Survey ©SHRM 2013

6
In your opinion as an HR professional, have incidences of workplace
romance at your organization increased, stayed the same or decreased
in the past five years?

Increased

12%

Stayed the same

Decreased

67%

21%

n = 299
Workplace Romance Survey ©SHRM 2013

7
Which of the following types of workplace romance are most common at
your organization?

Between employees in different departments

53%

Between employees of the same rank

32%

Between employees who are in the same department but
report to different supervisors

18%

Between employees when one or both have significant others

16%

Between employees who report to the same supervisor

12%

Between a supervisor and a direct report

8%

Between employees of a significant rank difference

8%

Note: n = 522. Percentages do not equal 100% due to multiple response options. Respondents were allowed to select up to three responses for this
question.
Workplace Romance Survey ©SHRM 2013

8
Which of the following types of workplace romance are most common at
your organization? (continued)

Between employees who work on the same projects

8%

Between an employee and a client/customer

Between an employee and a vendor

Between an employee of your organization and an
employee from a competitor organization

Other

*No workplace romance was observed

7%

5%

3%

4%

7%

Note: n = 522. Percentages do not equal 100% due to multiple response options. An asterisk (*) indicates that this response option was developed from
open-ended responses. Respondents were allowed to select up to three responses for this question.
Workplace Romance Survey ©SHRM 2013

9
Policies on Workplace Romance

Workplace Romance Survey ©SHRM 2013

10
Does your organization have a policy that addresses workplace
romance?

36%
A written policy
18%
6%
A verbal policy

2013 (n = 555)

7%

2005 (n = 491)
54%
No written or verbal policy
72%

Don’t know

5%
2%

Note: Percentages may not equal 100% due to rounding.
Workplace Romance Survey ©SHRM 2013

11
Which of the following types of workplace romance are not permitted at
your organization?

Types of workplace romance

2013 (n = 209)

2005 (n = 127)

2001 (n = 78)

Between a supervisor and a direct report

99%

80%

64%

Between employees of a significant rank difference

45%

16%

12%

Between employees who report to the same supervisor

35%

13%

15%

Between an employee and a client/customer

31%

13%

18%

Between employees who work on the same projects

25%

6%

12%

Between employees who work in the same department but
report to different supervisors

22%

24%

31%

Between an employee and a vendor

21%

4%

6%

Between employees in different departments

12%

*

*

Between an employee of our organization and an employee
from a competitor organization

11%

4%

4%

Note: Percentages do not equal 100% due to multiple response options. Respondents whose organizations do not have written or verbal policies on
workplace romance were excluded from this analysis. An asterisk (*) indicates that this response option was only provided in the 2013 survey.
Workplace Romance Survey ©SHRM 2013

12
What consequences do employees face when a supervisor and his or
her direct report break your organization’s policy and are involved in a
workplace romance?

48%

Counseling

41%
44%

A formal written reprimand

29%
41%

Termination

22%
40%

A transfer to another department
within the organization

51%
29%

*Removal from supervisory position

Supervisor (n = 281)
26%

A move to another position
within the department
Suspension

There are no official consequences

Direct report (n = 265)
39%

23%
12%
22%
24%

Note: Percentages do not equal 100% due to multiple response options. An asterisk (*) indicates that this response option was only provided in relation to
supervisors.
Workplace Romance Survey ©SHRM 2013

13
What consequences do employees face when those of a significant rank
difference break your organization’s policy and are involved in a
workplace romance?

56%

A formal written reprimand

36%
48%

Counseling

42%
47%

Termination
Suspension

22%
32%
16%
28%

A transfer to another department
within the organization

45%
25%

A move to another position
within the department
*Demotion

There are no official consequences

33%

Higher-ranking
employee (n = 104)
Lower-ranking
employee (n = 92)

14%
17%
24%

Note: Percentages do not equal 100% due to multiple response options. An asterisk (*) indicates that this response option was only provided in relation to
higher-ranking employees.
Workplace Romance Survey ©SHRM 2013

14
What consequences do employees face when those who report to the
same supervisor break your organization’s policy and are involved in a
workplace romance?

A transfer to another department
within the organization

56%

A formal written reprimand

34%

Counseling

33%

Termination

20%

Suspension

Other

18%

5%

There are no official consequences

27%

Note: n = 98. Percentages do not equal 100% due to multiple response options.
Workplace Romance Survey ©SHRM 2013

15
In the past five years, which of the following consequences have been
applied to any of the employees involved in a workplace romance?

Consequences

2013 (n = 343)

2005 (n = 134)

2001 (n = 108)

A transfer to another department within the organization

34%

42%

55%

Counseling

32%

34%

30%

A formal written reprimand

21%

36%

31%

Termination

20%

27%

35%

A move to another position within the department

20%

*

*

A removal from a supervisory position

12%

7%

7%

Suspension

8%

*

*

Other

6%

18%

11%

None of the above

34%

*

*

Note: Percentages do not equal 100% due to multiple response options. An asterisk (*) indicates that this response option was only included in the 2013 survey.
Workplace Romance Survey ©SHRM 2013

16
Generally, how did employees involved in the romance react to the
consequences?

They accepted the decision

80%

They did not accept the decision and
left the organization

8%

They did not accept the decision and
took legal action against the
organization

3%

They did not accept the decision and
appealed it

2%

Other

7%

n = 219
Workplace Romance Survey ©SHRM 2013

17
Generally, how are suspicions or complaints about workplace romance
revealed at your organization?

Through gossip in the office

67%

Reported to the HR department

61%

Reported to the supervisor of those involved in
the romance

33%

Reported anonymously (e.g., through
organization's ethics hotline)

25%

Reported to the leader of the business unit
under which the romance occurred
Reported to the internal/external legal counsel
Other

23%
3%
4%

n = 392
Workplace Romance Survey ©SHRM 2013

18
If there is a suspicion or a complaint about a workplace romance between
employees at your organization, who is responsible for taking action?

HR department

89%

Supervisor of those involved in the
romance

39%

Leader of the business unit under which
the romance occurred
Internal legal counsel

24%

8%

External legal counsel

5%

Other

4%

n = 411
Workplace Romance Survey ©SHRM 2013

19
If there is a suspicion or a complaint about a possible workplace
romance between employees at your organization, what measures are
taken?

73%

Talk to employees involved

58%

Talk to the supervisor/leader of those involved
in the romance

60%
45%
45%
47%

Look for problematic behavior
Monitor conflict among co-workers

32%
31%

Monitor productivity of employees

28%
33%

Talk to co-workers of those involved in the
romance

23%
19%

Monitor correspondence between suspected
employees (e.g., e-mails, texts)
Support the relationship (e.g., allow common
vacations)
Nothing/no measures taken

18%
13%

Supervisor-direct
report romance
(n = 350)
Other types of
romance (n = 296)

7%
21%
16%
25%

Workplace Romance Survey ©SHRM 2013

20
Does your organization offer training to employees on how to manage
workplace romance?

Yes, for all employees

Yes, for managers only

No

10%

8%

81%

Note: n = 389. Percentages may not equal 100% due to rounding.
Workplace Romance Survey ©SHRM 2013

21
HR Opinions About Workplace Romance

Workplace Romance Survey ©SHRM 2013

22
Why is workplace romance not permitted at your organization?

84%

*Concerns about real or perceived favoritism by
co-workers of those involved in the romance

78%

Potential for claims of sexual harassment

77%
72%

Potential for retaliation if the romance ends

50%
57%

*Potential for legal action taken against the organization

2013 (n = 312)
2005 (n = 103)

56%

*Potential for inappropriate sharing of confidential
information between those involved in the romance
47%

*Concerns about gossip/distraction among co-workers
Concerns about lowered morale of co-workers
of those involved in the romance

30%
44%

Note: Percentages do not equal 100% due to multiple response options. An asterisk (*) indicates that this response option was only provided in the 2013
survey.
Workplace Romance Survey ©SHRM 2013

23
Why is workplace romance not permitted at your organization?
(continued)

30%

*Concerns about lowered productivity of co-workers
of those involved in the romance

29%

Concerns about lowered productivity of those
involved in the romance

52%
29%

Workplace romances are viewed as unprofessional

58%
24%

*Concerns about lowered employee engagement of
co-workers of those involved in the romance

2013 (n = 312)
2005 (n = 103)

19%

*Concerns about public display of affection of
those involved in the romance

18%

*Damage to organization's public image as a result
of exposed romance
Other

6%
8%

Note: Percentages do not equal 100% due to multiple response options. An asterisk (*) indicates that this response option was only provided in the 2013
survey.
Workplace Romance Survey ©SHRM 2013

24
In the past five years, have any of the following occurred at your
organization as a result of a workplace romance between employees?

2013 (n = 327)

2005 (n = 472)

2001 (n = 468)

70%

*

*

51%

62%

66%

40%

44%

46%

Divorce/ending of long-term relationship with significant other

30%

*

*

Decreased productivity by those involved in the romance

24%

26%

41%

Claims of sexual harassment

23%

19%

26%

Complaints of retaliation when the romance ended

22%

15%

26%

20%

*

*

18%

25%

24%

17%

16%

19%

Gossip/distraction among co-workers
Those involved in the romance got married or became
long-term partners
Complaints of favoritism from co-workers of those involved in
the romance

Inappropriate sharing of confidential information between those
involved in the romance
Decreased morale of co-workers of those involved in the
romance
Complaints of stalking when the romance ended

Note: Percentages do not equal 100% due to multiple response options. An asterisk (*) indicates that this response option was only provided in the 2013
survey.
Workplace Romance Survey ©SHRM 2013

25
In the past five years, have any of the following occurred at your
organization as a result of a workplace romance between employees?
(continued)

2013 (n = 327)

2005 (n = 472)

2001 (n = 468)

15%

*

*

14%

*

*

13%

*

*

6%

*

*

6%

6%

7%

3%

*

*

3%

*

*

Increased productivity by those involved in the romance

2%

5%

9%

Increase in workplace violence

2%

3%

4%

Increased productivity by co-workers of those involved in the
romance

1%

*

*

Other

5%

13%

10%

Complaints from co-workers of those involved in the romance
about public display of affection
Decreased productivity by co-workers of those involved in the
romance
Decreased employee engagement of co-workers of those
involved in the romance
Legal action was taken against the organization
Increased morale of co-workers of those involved
in the romance
Increased employee engagement of co-workers of those
involved in the romance
Organization's public image was damaged as a result of
exposed romance

Note: Percentages do not equal 100% due to multiple response options. An asterisk (*) indicates that this response option was only provided in the 2013
survey.
Workplace Romance Survey ©SHRM 2013

26
In your opinion as an HR professional, should employers have the right
to prohibit workplace romance between employees?

Yes
32%
Depends on the
situation
49%

No
18%

Note: n = 385. Percentages do not equal 100% due to rounding. More than one-half of respondents who selected “depends on the situation” indicated
that employers should have the right to prohibit workplace romances between a supervisor and a direct report.
Workplace Romance Survey ©SHRM 2013

27
In your opinion as an HR professional, which types of workplace
romance should be restricted and/or acted upon by organizations?

Romance between a supervisor and a direct report

95%

Romance between employees of a significant
rank difference

54%

Romance between an employee and a client/customer

44%

Romance between an employee and a vendor

33%

Romance between employees in the same department

33%

Romance between employees who report to the
same supervisor
Romance between an employee of our organization and
an employee from a competitor organization
Romance between employees who work on
the same projects
Romance between employees who work in the same
department but report to different supervisors
Romance between employees in different departments
Other

30%
24%
23%
17%
8%
4%

n = 398
Workplace Romance Survey ©SHRM 2013

28
Does your organization ask employees involved in a workplace romance
to sign a “love contract”?

In this survey, a “love contract” refers to a document affirming that a workplace romantic relationship is
consensual, that employees involved will not engage in favoritism, and that neither will take any legal action
against the employer or each other if the relationship ends.

Yes
5%

No
95%

n = 371
Workplace Romance Survey ©SHRM 2013

29
In your opinion as an HR professional, do you agree with the following
statements related to “love contracts”?

Love contracts provide a forum to talk to employees about
appropriate and inappropriate workplace behavior

81%

Love contracts are ineffective because employees may be
more likely to hide their romantic relationships

75%

Love contracts are effective in protecting the organization
against legal action

34%

61%

Love contracts are effective in decreasing risk of sexual
harassment claims

58%
49%

Love contracts are an invasion of employees' privacy
Love contracts are not necessary and create additional
paperwork

Agree

25%

66%

Love contracts put HR professionals in an awkward position

Love contracts are effective in reducing perceived favoritism
by co-workers

19%

46%
41%

39%

42%
51%
54%
59%

Disagree

n = 290
Workplace Romance Survey ©SHRM 2013

30
Demographics

Workplace Romance Survey ©SHRM 2013

31
Demographics: Organization Industry

Percentage
Professional, scientific and technical services

18%

Health care and social assistance

16%

Manufacturing

15%

Government agencies

10%

Finance and insurance

10%

Educational services

7%

Retail trade

7%

Transportation and warehousing

7%

Information

6%

Construction

5%

Utilities

4%

Note: n = 384. Percentages do not equal 100% due to multiple response options.
Workplace Romance Survey ©SHRM 2013

32
Demographics: Organization Industry (continued)

Percentage
Accommodation and food services

3%

Mining, quarrying, and oil and gas extraction

3%

Religious, grant-making, civic, professional and similar organizations

3%

Wholesale trade

3%

Repair and maintenance

2%

Real estate and rental and leasing

2%

Administrative and support and waste management and remediation services

1%

Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting

1%

Arts, entertainment and recreation

1%

Personal and laundry services

1%

Other industry

5%

Note: n = 384. Percentages do not equal 100% due to multiple response options.
Workplace Romance Survey ©SHRM 2013

33
Demographics: Organization Sector

Privately owned for-profit

52%

Nonprofit

22%

Publicly owned for-profit

15%

Government

Other

10%

1%

n = 385
Workplace Romance Survey ©SHRM 2013

34
Demographics: Organization Staff Size

1 to 99 employees

24%

100 to 499 employees

33%

500 to 2,499 employees

21%

2,500 to 24,999 employees

25,000 or more employees

16%

6%

n = 384
Workplace Romance Survey ©SHRM 2013

35
Demographics: Other

Does your organization have U.S.based operations (business units) only,
or does it operate multinationally?
U.S.-based operations only

Multinational operations

74%%

26%

Single-unit organization: An organization in
which the location and the organization are
one and the same.

31%

Multi-unit organization: An organization that
has more than one location.

69%

n = 400

n = 399

What is the HR department/function for
which you responded for throughout this
survey?
Corporate (companywide)

64%

Business unit/division

15%

Facility/location

21%

n = 285

Is your organization a single-unit organization or
a multi-unit organization?

For multi-unit organizations, are HR policies and
practices determined by the multi-unit headquarters,
by each work location or by both?
Multi-unit headquarters determines HR
policies and practices

54%

Each work location determines HR policies
and practices

2%

A combination of both the work location and
the multi-unit headquarters determines HR
policies and practices

44%

n = 283

Workplace Romance Survey ©SHRM 2013

36
SHRM Survey Findings: 2013 Workplace Romance

Survey Methodology
• Response rate = 13%
• 384 HR professionals from a randomly selected sample of SHRM’s membership participated in this
survey
• Margin of error +/- 5%
• Survey fielded July 9-26, 2013

Workplace Romance Survey ©SHRM 2013

37
About SHRM Research

For more survey/poll findings, visit shrm.org/surveys
For more information about SHRM’s Customized Research
Services, visit shrm.org/customizedresearch
Follow us on Twitter @SHRM_Research

Project leader:
Yan Dong, research intern, SHRM Research
Project contributors:
Alexander Alonso, Ph.D., SPHR, vice president, SHRM Research
Evren Esen, manager, Survey Research Center, SHRM Research

Copy editor:
Katya Scanlan, SHRM Knowledge Center

Workplace Romance Survey ©SHRM 2013

38
About SHRM

The Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM) is the world’s largest
association devoted to human resource management. Representing more than
260,000 members in over 140 countries, the Society serves the needs of HR
professionals and advances the interests of the HR profession. Founded in 1948,
SHRM has more than 575 affiliated chapters within the United States and subsidiary
offices in China and India.

Workplace Romance Survey ©SHRM 2013

39

Mais conteúdo relacionado

Mais procurados

Shrm us travel-vacation-benefits-workplace-impact
Shrm us travel-vacation-benefits-workplace-impactShrm us travel-vacation-benefits-workplace-impact
Shrm us travel-vacation-benefits-workplace-impact
shrm
 
2014 employee-financial-stress-final
2014 employee-financial-stress-final2014 employee-financial-stress-final
2014 employee-financial-stress-final
shrm
 
Workplace wellness-initiatives-survey-findings
Workplace wellness-initiatives-survey-findingsWorkplace wellness-initiatives-survey-findings
Workplace wellness-initiatives-survey-findings
shrm
 
Workplace violence final
Workplace violence finalWorkplace violence final
Workplace violence final
shrm
 
The Ongoing Impact of the Recession—California Recruiting and Skill Gaps
The Ongoing Impact of the Recession—California Recruiting and Skill GapsThe Ongoing Impact of the Recession—California Recruiting and Skill Gaps
The Ongoing Impact of the Recession—California Recruiting and Skill Gaps
shrm
 
Leveraging benefits-to-retain
Leveraging benefits-to-retainLeveraging benefits-to-retain
Leveraging benefits-to-retain
shrm
 
2013 benefits strategies communicating benefits
2013 benefits strategies communicating benefits2013 benefits strategies communicating benefits
2013 benefits strategies communicating benefits
shrm
 
SHRM Survey Findings: Social Networking Websites and Recruiting/Selection
SHRM Survey Findings: Social Networking Websites and Recruiting/SelectionSHRM Survey Findings: Social Networking Websites and Recruiting/Selection
SHRM Survey Findings: Social Networking Websites and Recruiting/Selection
shrm
 
Employing People With Disabilities: Practices and Policies Related to Recruit...
Employing People With Disabilities: Practices and Policies Related to Recruit...Employing People With Disabilities: Practices and Policies Related to Recruit...
Employing People With Disabilities: Practices and Policies Related to Recruit...
shrm
 
Shrm health-care-reform-challenges-strategies
Shrm health-care-reform-challenges-strategiesShrm health-care-reform-challenges-strategies
Shrm health-care-reform-challenges-strategies
shrm
 

Mais procurados (20)

Shrm us travel-vacation-benefits-workplace-impact
Shrm us travel-vacation-benefits-workplace-impactShrm us travel-vacation-benefits-workplace-impact
Shrm us travel-vacation-benefits-workplace-impact
 
2014 employee-financial-stress-final
2014 employee-financial-stress-final2014 employee-financial-stress-final
2014 employee-financial-stress-final
 
2015 Strategic Benefits―Flexible Work Arragements
2015 Strategic Benefits―Flexible Work Arragements2015 Strategic Benefits―Flexible Work Arragements
2015 Strategic Benefits―Flexible Work Arragements
 
Workplace wellness-initiatives-survey-findings
Workplace wellness-initiatives-survey-findingsWorkplace wellness-initiatives-survey-findings
Workplace wellness-initiatives-survey-findings
 
Workplace violence final
Workplace violence finalWorkplace violence final
Workplace violence final
 
SHRM Survey Findings: 2013 Employer Perspectives on Disability Benefits--Base...
SHRM Survey Findings: 2013 Employer Perspectives on Disability Benefits--Base...SHRM Survey Findings: 2013 Employer Perspectives on Disability Benefits--Base...
SHRM Survey Findings: 2013 Employer Perspectives on Disability Benefits--Base...
 
SHRM Survey Findings: Smoking in the Workplace
SHRM Survey Findings: Smoking in the WorkplaceSHRM Survey Findings: Smoking in the Workplace
SHRM Survey Findings: Smoking in the Workplace
 
SHRM’s 2014 Strategic Benefits Survey: Communicating Benefits
SHRM’s 2014 Strategic Benefits Survey: Communicating BenefitsSHRM’s 2014 Strategic Benefits Survey: Communicating Benefits
SHRM’s 2014 Strategic Benefits Survey: Communicating Benefits
 
The Ongoing Impact of the Recession—California Recruiting and Skill Gaps
The Ongoing Impact of the Recession—California Recruiting and Skill GapsThe Ongoing Impact of the Recession—California Recruiting and Skill Gaps
The Ongoing Impact of the Recession—California Recruiting and Skill Gaps
 
SHRM Survey Findings: 2013 Employer Perspectives on Disability Benefits--Carr...
SHRM Survey Findings: 2013 Employer Perspectives on Disability Benefits--Carr...SHRM Survey Findings: 2013 Employer Perspectives on Disability Benefits--Carr...
SHRM Survey Findings: 2013 Employer Perspectives on Disability Benefits--Carr...
 
SHRM’s 2014 Strategic Benefits Survey: Leveraging Benefits to Recruit Employees
SHRM’s 2014 Strategic Benefits Survey: Leveraging Benefits to Recruit EmployeesSHRM’s 2014 Strategic Benefits Survey: Leveraging Benefits to Recruit Employees
SHRM’s 2014 Strategic Benefits Survey: Leveraging Benefits to Recruit Employees
 
SHRM’s 2014 Strategic Benefits Survey: Wellness Initiatives
SHRM’s 2014 Strategic Benefits Survey: Wellness InitiativesSHRM’s 2014 Strategic Benefits Survey: Wellness Initiatives
SHRM’s 2014 Strategic Benefits Survey: Wellness Initiatives
 
Leveraging benefits-to-retain
Leveraging benefits-to-retainLeveraging benefits-to-retain
Leveraging benefits-to-retain
 
SHRM/Globoforce Employee Recognition Programs—2015
SHRM/Globoforce Employee Recognition Programs—2015SHRM/Globoforce Employee Recognition Programs—2015
SHRM/Globoforce Employee Recognition Programs—2015
 
Why 7 out of 10 Care Management Professionals Are Looking for New Jobs
Why 7 out of 10 Care Management Professionals Are Looking for New JobsWhy 7 out of 10 Care Management Professionals Are Looking for New Jobs
Why 7 out of 10 Care Management Professionals Are Looking for New Jobs
 
2013 benefits strategies communicating benefits
2013 benefits strategies communicating benefits2013 benefits strategies communicating benefits
2013 benefits strategies communicating benefits
 
SHRM Survey Findings: Social Networking Websites and Recruiting/Selection
SHRM Survey Findings: Social Networking Websites and Recruiting/SelectionSHRM Survey Findings: Social Networking Websites and Recruiting/Selection
SHRM Survey Findings: Social Networking Websites and Recruiting/Selection
 
Employing People With Disabilities: Practices and Policies Related to Recruit...
Employing People With Disabilities: Practices and Policies Related to Recruit...Employing People With Disabilities: Practices and Policies Related to Recruit...
Employing People With Disabilities: Practices and Policies Related to Recruit...
 
Shrm health-care-reform-challenges-strategies
Shrm health-care-reform-challenges-strategiesShrm health-care-reform-challenges-strategies
Shrm health-care-reform-challenges-strategies
 
Online executive coaching skills or leadership essentials
Online executive coaching skills or leadership essentialsOnline executive coaching skills or leadership essentials
Online executive coaching skills or leadership essentials
 

Destaque

Love,attraction,attachment
Love,attraction,attachmentLove,attraction,attachment
Love,attraction,attachment
Ankita Maurya
 
Health care
Health careHealth care
Health care
shrm
 
Shrm economic-conditions-recruiting-skills-gaps
Shrm economic-conditions-recruiting-skills-gapsShrm economic-conditions-recruiting-skills-gaps
Shrm economic-conditions-recruiting-skills-gaps
SHRMRESEARCH
 
Hiring 2013-college-graduates
Hiring 2013-college-graduatesHiring 2013-college-graduates
Hiring 2013-college-graduates
shrm
 
Shrm economic-conditions-financial-health-hiring-ca
Shrm economic-conditions-financial-health-hiring-caShrm economic-conditions-financial-health-hiring-ca
Shrm economic-conditions-financial-health-hiring-ca
SHRMRESEARCH
 
The Ongoing Impact of the Recession—California Financial Health and Hiring
The Ongoing Impact of the Recession—California Financial Health and HiringThe Ongoing Impact of the Recession—California Financial Health and Hiring
The Ongoing Impact of the Recession—California Financial Health and Hiring
shrm
 
Shrm poll military employmentfinal
Shrm poll military employmentfinalShrm poll military employmentfinal
Shrm poll military employmentfinal
shrm
 
Shrm economic-conditions-recruiting-skills-gaps-ca
Shrm economic-conditions-recruiting-skills-gaps-caShrm economic-conditions-recruiting-skills-gaps-ca
Shrm economic-conditions-recruiting-skills-gaps-ca
SHRMRESEARCH
 
Shrm economic-conditions-financial-health-hiring
Shrm economic-conditions-financial-health-hiringShrm economic-conditions-financial-health-hiring
Shrm economic-conditions-financial-health-hiring
SHRMRESEARCH
 
Changing Employee Skills and Education Requirements—Minimum Education Require...
Changing Employee Skills and Education Requirements—Minimum Education Require...Changing Employee Skills and Education Requirements—Minimum Education Require...
Changing Employee Skills and Education Requirements—Minimum Education Require...
shrm
 
Changing Employee Skills and Education Requirements—Education Levels of Today...
Changing Employee Skills and Education Requirements—Education Levels of Today...Changing Employee Skills and Education Requirements—Education Levels of Today...
Changing Employee Skills and Education Requirements—Education Levels of Today...
shrm
 
Recruitment business-it-employment-opportunities
Recruitment business-it-employment-opportunitiesRecruitment business-it-employment-opportunities
Recruitment business-it-employment-opportunities
SHRMRESEARCH
 

Destaque (20)

Love,attraction,attachment
Love,attraction,attachmentLove,attraction,attachment
Love,attraction,attachment
 
Health care
Health careHealth care
Health care
 
Shrm economic-conditions-recruiting-skills-gaps
Shrm economic-conditions-recruiting-skills-gapsShrm economic-conditions-recruiting-skills-gaps
Shrm economic-conditions-recruiting-skills-gaps
 
2015 Strategic Benefits―Health Care
2015 Strategic Benefits―Health Care2015 Strategic Benefits―Health Care
2015 Strategic Benefits―Health Care
 
Hiring 2013-college-graduates
Hiring 2013-college-graduatesHiring 2013-college-graduates
Hiring 2013-college-graduates
 
Shrm economic-conditions-financial-health-hiring-ca
Shrm economic-conditions-financial-health-hiring-caShrm economic-conditions-financial-health-hiring-ca
Shrm economic-conditions-financial-health-hiring-ca
 
The Ongoing Impact of the Recession—California Financial Health and Hiring
The Ongoing Impact of the Recession—California Financial Health and HiringThe Ongoing Impact of the Recession—California Financial Health and Hiring
The Ongoing Impact of the Recession—California Financial Health and Hiring
 
Shrm poll military employmentfinal
Shrm poll military employmentfinalShrm poll military employmentfinal
Shrm poll military employmentfinal
 
Shrm economic-conditions-recruiting-skills-gaps-ca
Shrm economic-conditions-recruiting-skills-gaps-caShrm economic-conditions-recruiting-skills-gaps-ca
Shrm economic-conditions-recruiting-skills-gaps-ca
 
SHRM Health Care Reform 2015 Update
SHRM Health Care Reform 2015 UpdateSHRM Health Care Reform 2015 Update
SHRM Health Care Reform 2015 Update
 
Shrm economic-conditions-financial-health-hiring
Shrm economic-conditions-financial-health-hiringShrm economic-conditions-financial-health-hiring
Shrm economic-conditions-financial-health-hiring
 
SHRM 2016 Holiday Schedules
SHRM 2016 Holiday SchedulesSHRM 2016 Holiday Schedules
SHRM 2016 Holiday Schedules
 
SHRM Survey Findings: 2013 Employer Perspectives on Disability Benefits--Exec...
SHRM Survey Findings: 2013 Employer Perspectives on Disability Benefits--Exec...SHRM Survey Findings: 2013 Employer Perspectives on Disability Benefits--Exec...
SHRM Survey Findings: 2013 Employer Perspectives on Disability Benefits--Exec...
 
Changing Employee Skills and Education Requirements—Minimum Education Require...
Changing Employee Skills and Education Requirements—Minimum Education Require...Changing Employee Skills and Education Requirements—Minimum Education Require...
Changing Employee Skills and Education Requirements—Minimum Education Require...
 
Changing Employee Skills and Education Requirements—Education Levels of Today...
Changing Employee Skills and Education Requirements—Education Levels of Today...Changing Employee Skills and Education Requirements—Education Levels of Today...
Changing Employee Skills and Education Requirements—Education Levels of Today...
 
SHRM Survey Findings: 2015 End-of-Year/Holiday Activities
SHRM Survey Findings: 2015 End-of-Year/Holiday ActivitiesSHRM Survey Findings: 2015 End-of-Year/Holiday Activities
SHRM Survey Findings: 2015 End-of-Year/Holiday Activities
 
Strategic Benefits--Leveraging Benefits to Retain Employees
Strategic Benefits--Leveraging Benefits to Retain EmployeesStrategic Benefits--Leveraging Benefits to Retain Employees
Strategic Benefits--Leveraging Benefits to Retain Employees
 
SHRM 2015 Holiday Schedule
SHRM 2015 Holiday ScheduleSHRM 2015 Holiday Schedule
SHRM 2015 Holiday Schedule
 
2015 Strategic Benefits—Leveraging Benefits to Retain Employees
2015 Strategic Benefits—Leveraging Benefits to Retain Employees2015 Strategic Benefits—Leveraging Benefits to Retain Employees
2015 Strategic Benefits—Leveraging Benefits to Retain Employees
 
Recruitment business-it-employment-opportunities
Recruitment business-it-employment-opportunitiesRecruitment business-it-employment-opportunities
Recruitment business-it-employment-opportunities
 

Semelhante a Shrm workplace-romance-findings update

Shrm 2013 survey findings resume v5
Shrm 2013 survey findings resume v5Shrm 2013 survey findings resume v5
Shrm 2013 survey findings resume v5
shrm
 
Shrm 2013 survey findings resume v5
Shrm 2013 survey findings resume v5Shrm 2013 survey findings resume v5
Shrm 2013 survey findings resume v5
shrm
 
2013 office pool
2013 office pool2013 office pool
2013 office pool
shrm
 
2013 benefits strategies communicating benefits
2013 benefits strategies communicating benefits2013 benefits strategies communicating benefits
2013 benefits strategies communicating benefits
shrm
 
Employee Recognition Survey - Driving Stronger Performance Through Employee R...
Employee Recognition Survey - Driving Stronger Performance Through Employee R...Employee Recognition Survey - Driving Stronger Performance Through Employee R...
Employee Recognition Survey - Driving Stronger Performance Through Employee R...
Elizabeth Lupfer
 
Shrm 2013 survey findings resume v7 (2)
Shrm 2013 survey findings resume v7 (2)Shrm 2013 survey findings resume v7 (2)
Shrm 2013 survey findings resume v7 (2)
shrm
 
GRT16_GlobalRecruiting_100815
GRT16_GlobalRecruiting_100815GRT16_GlobalRecruiting_100815
GRT16_GlobalRecruiting_100815
Arabinda Das
 
GRT16_GlobalRecruiting_100815
GRT16_GlobalRecruiting_100815GRT16_GlobalRecruiting_100815
GRT16_GlobalRecruiting_100815
Will Clarke
 
2016+Global+Recruiting+Trends
2016+Global+Recruiting+Trends2016+Global+Recruiting+Trends
2016+Global+Recruiting+Trends
Douglas Tauro
 
Global Recruiting Trends 2016
Global Recruiting Trends 2016Global Recruiting Trends 2016
Global Recruiting Trends 2016
Shaikh Shahzad
 
GRT16_GlobalRecruiting
GRT16_GlobalRecruitingGRT16_GlobalRecruiting
GRT16_GlobalRecruiting
staffersindia
 

Semelhante a Shrm workplace-romance-findings update (20)

Shrm 2013 survey findings resume v5
Shrm 2013 survey findings resume v5Shrm 2013 survey findings resume v5
Shrm 2013 survey findings resume v5
 
Shrm 2013 survey findings resume v5
Shrm 2013 survey findings resume v5Shrm 2013 survey findings resume v5
Shrm 2013 survey findings resume v5
 
2013 office pool
2013 office pool2013 office pool
2013 office pool
 
2013 Office Pool Survey
2013 Office Pool Survey2013 Office Pool Survey
2013 Office Pool Survey
 
SHRM Poll: Personality Tests for the Hiring and Promotion of Employees
SHRM Poll: Personality Tests for the Hiring and Promotion of EmployeesSHRM Poll: Personality Tests for the Hiring and Promotion of Employees
SHRM Poll: Personality Tests for the Hiring and Promotion of Employees
 
2013 benefits strategies communicating benefits
2013 benefits strategies communicating benefits2013 benefits strategies communicating benefits
2013 benefits strategies communicating benefits
 
Employee Recognition Survey - Driving Stronger Performance Through Employee R...
Employee Recognition Survey - Driving Stronger Performance Through Employee R...Employee Recognition Survey - Driving Stronger Performance Through Employee R...
Employee Recognition Survey - Driving Stronger Performance Through Employee R...
 
Employee Engagement Report 2014/2015
Employee Engagement Report 2014/2015Employee Engagement Report 2014/2015
Employee Engagement Report 2014/2015
 
Shrm 2013 survey findings resume v7 (2)
Shrm 2013 survey findings resume v7 (2)Shrm 2013 survey findings resume v7 (2)
Shrm 2013 survey findings resume v7 (2)
 
GlobalRecruiting Trend 2016
GlobalRecruiting Trend 2016GlobalRecruiting Trend 2016
GlobalRecruiting Trend 2016
 
Global Recruiting Trends 2016
Global Recruiting Trends 2016 Global Recruiting Trends 2016
Global Recruiting Trends 2016
 
Tendance de recrutement 2016
Tendance de recrutement 2016Tendance de recrutement 2016
Tendance de recrutement 2016
 
Global Recruiting Trends 2016
Global Recruiting Trends 2016Global Recruiting Trends 2016
Global Recruiting Trends 2016
 
GRT16_GlobalRecruiting_100815
GRT16_GlobalRecruiting_100815GRT16_GlobalRecruiting_100815
GRT16_GlobalRecruiting_100815
 
Global Recruiting Trend for 2016
Global Recruiting Trend for 2016Global Recruiting Trend for 2016
Global Recruiting Trend for 2016
 
Global recruiting trends 2016 by LinkedIn
Global recruiting trends 2016 by LinkedIn Global recruiting trends 2016 by LinkedIn
Global recruiting trends 2016 by LinkedIn
 
GRT16_GlobalRecruiting_100815
GRT16_GlobalRecruiting_100815GRT16_GlobalRecruiting_100815
GRT16_GlobalRecruiting_100815
 
2016+Global+Recruiting+Trends
2016+Global+Recruiting+Trends2016+Global+Recruiting+Trends
2016+Global+Recruiting+Trends
 
Global Recruiting Trends 2016
Global Recruiting Trends 2016Global Recruiting Trends 2016
Global Recruiting Trends 2016
 
GRT16_GlobalRecruiting
GRT16_GlobalRecruitingGRT16_GlobalRecruiting
GRT16_GlobalRecruiting
 

Mais de shrm

Mais de shrm (15)

Shrm survey findings using competencies to achieve business unit success final
Shrm survey findings using competencies to achieve business unit success finalShrm survey findings using competencies to achieve business unit success final
Shrm survey findings using competencies to achieve business unit success final
 
SHRM Survey Findings: Using Social Media for Talent Acquisition—Recruitment a...
SHRM Survey Findings: Using Social Media for Talent Acquisition—Recruitment a...SHRM Survey Findings: Using Social Media for Talent Acquisition—Recruitment a...
SHRM Survey Findings: Using Social Media for Talent Acquisition—Recruitment a...
 
Policies for Marijuana Use in the Workplace
Policies for Marijuana Use in the WorkplacePolicies for Marijuana Use in the Workplace
Policies for Marijuana Use in the Workplace
 
2015 HR Perspectives on Overtime Exemptions
2015 HR Perspectives on Overtime Exemptions2015 HR Perspectives on Overtime Exemptions
2015 HR Perspectives on Overtime Exemptions
 
2015 Strategic Benefits—Leveraging Benefits to Recruit Employees
2015 Strategic Benefits—Leveraging Benefits to Recruit Employees2015 Strategic Benefits—Leveraging Benefits to Recruit Employees
2015 Strategic Benefits—Leveraging Benefits to Recruit Employees
 
2015 Strategic Benefits―Assessment and Communication of Benefits
2015 Strategic Benefits―Assessment and Communication of Benefits2015 Strategic Benefits―Assessment and Communication of Benefits
2015 Strategic Benefits―Assessment and Communication of Benefits
 
2015 Strategic Benefits—Wellness Initiatives
2015 Strategic Benefits—Wellness Initiatives2015 Strategic Benefits—Wellness Initiatives
2015 Strategic Benefits—Wellness Initiatives
 
SHRM/Ascendo Resources: The Importance of Social Media for Recruiters and Job...
SHRM/Ascendo Resources: The Importance of Social Media for Recruiters and Job...SHRM/Ascendo Resources: The Importance of Social Media for Recruiters and Job...
SHRM/Ascendo Resources: The Importance of Social Media for Recruiters and Job...
 
Shrm healthy foodspoll08152010_final
Shrm healthy foodspoll08152010_finalShrm healthy foodspoll08152010_final
Shrm healthy foodspoll08152010_final
 
The Hiring of 2015 College Graduates
The Hiring of 2015 College GraduatesThe Hiring of 2015 College Graduates
The Hiring of 2015 College Graduates
 
Preparing for an Aging Workforce: A Gap Analysis
Preparing for an Aging Workforce: A Gap AnalysisPreparing for an Aging Workforce: A Gap Analysis
Preparing for an Aging Workforce: A Gap Analysis
 
SHRM’s 2014 Strategic Benefits Survey: Flexible Work Arrangements
SHRM’s 2014 Strategic Benefits Survey: Flexible Work ArrangementsSHRM’s 2014 Strategic Benefits Survey: Flexible Work Arrangements
SHRM’s 2014 Strategic Benefits Survey: Flexible Work Arrangements
 
Strategic Benefits--Communicating Benefits
Strategic Benefits--Communicating BenefitsStrategic Benefits--Communicating Benefits
Strategic Benefits--Communicating Benefits
 
Strategic Benefits--Leveraging Benefits to Recruit Employees
Strategic Benefits--Leveraging Benefits to Recruit EmployeesStrategic Benefits--Leveraging Benefits to Recruit Employees
Strategic Benefits--Leveraging Benefits to Recruit Employees
 
Strategic Benefits--Leveraging Benefits to Retain Employees
Strategic Benefits--Leveraging Benefits to Retain EmployeesStrategic Benefits--Leveraging Benefits to Retain Employees
Strategic Benefits--Leveraging Benefits to Retain Employees
 

Shrm workplace-romance-findings update

  • 1. SHRM Survey Findings: Workplace Romance September 24, 2013
  • 2. Key Findings • How common is workplace romance? One out of four (24%) employees reported they have been or are currently involved in a workplace romance. Forty-three percent of HR professionals reported current incidences of workplace romance at their organizations. • Do organizations have a policy that addresses workplace romance? Overall, more than onehalf (54%) of organizations do not have a written or verbal policy that addresses workplace romance. However, in 2013, an increasing number of organizations (42%) indicated having a written or verbal policy compared with 2005 (25%). • What types of workplace romance are not permitted? Among organizations that have workplace romance policies, almost all (99%) indicated that romance between a supervisor and a direct report is not permitted, followed by romance between employees of a significant rank difference (45%) and between employees who report to the same supervisor (35%). Consequences for breaking an organization’s workplace romance policy vary depending on the type of workplace romance and the rank of employees. • What consequences have been applied to employees involved in a workplace romance? The most frequently reported consequence was a transfer of an employee involved in a workplace romance to another department (34%) and counseling (32%). Workplace Romance Survey ©SHRM 2013 2
  • 3. Key Findings • Why is workplace romance not permitted? When it comes to workplace romance, organizations are primarily concerned about real or perceived favoritism (84%), potential for claims of sexual harassment (78%), and potential for retaliation (72%). » Concerns about potential retaliation increased from 50% in 2005 to 72% in 2013. Concerns about lowered productivity and about workplace romances being viewed as unprofessional decreased from 52% and 58% in 2005 to 29% and 29% in 2013. » In the past five years, 40% of organizations have received complaints of favoritism from coworkers of those involved in a workplace romance; nearly one-fourth (23%) have received claims of sexual harassment, and 22% have received complaints of retaliation. • How is workplace romance revealed, and which departments are responsible for taking action? Suspicions about workplace romance are generally revealed through office gossip (67%) or through reports to the HR department (61%). Vast majority of organizations (89%) indicated that the HR department is responsible for taking action when such suspicion or complaint comes to light. • What are HR professionals’ opinions about “love contracts”*? Only 5% of organizations ask employees involved in a workplace romance to sign a “love contract.”* Although the majority (81%) of HR professionals agree that love contracts can provide a forum for them to talk to employees about appropriate and inappropriate workplace behavior, 75% view them as ineffective because employees may be more likely to hide their romantic relationships. *In this survey, a “love contract” refers to a document affirming that a workplace romantic relationship is consensual, that employees involved will not engage in favoritism, and that neither will take any legal action against the employer or each other if the relationship ends. Workplace Romance Survey ©SHRM 2013 3
  • 4. What do these findings mean for the HR profession? • With workplace romance on the rise, HR professionals may need to prepare for more issues related to managing its impact. For many organizations, the first step is to draft a written policy; more organizations in 2013 have a written or verbal policy on workplace romance compared with 2005 (42% in 2013 versus 25% in 2005). • In some cases, HR professionals may need to work with their risk management and/or legal team colleagues to identify risks involved with workplace romance. The consequences can include damage to office morale as well as legal claims that result from the relationship in question. Depending on the business, these risks will influence any written policies. • Currently, most HR professionals deem a “love contract”—a document that affirms the relationship and is signed by the couple involved in a workplace romance—as ineffective and say that it actually encourages workers to hide the relationship from peers. But this approach may be revisited if the impact of workplace romance is seen as too damaging. Workplace Romance Survey ©SHRM 2013 4
  • 5. Incidence of Workplace Romance Workplace Romance Survey ©SHRM 2013 5
  • 6. Incidence of workplace romance HR professionals: Are you aware of any current incidences of workplace romance at your organization? Employees: Have you ever been or are you currently involved in a workplace romance? I have been involved before 21% Yes 43% No 57% I am currently involved 3% No 76% n = 405 Note: n = 5,004 U.S. employees. Employee data were collected from the 2013 Employee Job Satisfaction and Engagement Survey. Workplace Romance Survey ©SHRM 2013 6
  • 7. In your opinion as an HR professional, have incidences of workplace romance at your organization increased, stayed the same or decreased in the past five years? Increased 12% Stayed the same Decreased 67% 21% n = 299 Workplace Romance Survey ©SHRM 2013 7
  • 8. Which of the following types of workplace romance are most common at your organization? Between employees in different departments 53% Between employees of the same rank 32% Between employees who are in the same department but report to different supervisors 18% Between employees when one or both have significant others 16% Between employees who report to the same supervisor 12% Between a supervisor and a direct report 8% Between employees of a significant rank difference 8% Note: n = 522. Percentages do not equal 100% due to multiple response options. Respondents were allowed to select up to three responses for this question. Workplace Romance Survey ©SHRM 2013 8
  • 9. Which of the following types of workplace romance are most common at your organization? (continued) Between employees who work on the same projects 8% Between an employee and a client/customer Between an employee and a vendor Between an employee of your organization and an employee from a competitor organization Other *No workplace romance was observed 7% 5% 3% 4% 7% Note: n = 522. Percentages do not equal 100% due to multiple response options. An asterisk (*) indicates that this response option was developed from open-ended responses. Respondents were allowed to select up to three responses for this question. Workplace Romance Survey ©SHRM 2013 9
  • 10. Policies on Workplace Romance Workplace Romance Survey ©SHRM 2013 10
  • 11. Does your organization have a policy that addresses workplace romance? 36% A written policy 18% 6% A verbal policy 2013 (n = 555) 7% 2005 (n = 491) 54% No written or verbal policy 72% Don’t know 5% 2% Note: Percentages may not equal 100% due to rounding. Workplace Romance Survey ©SHRM 2013 11
  • 12. Which of the following types of workplace romance are not permitted at your organization? Types of workplace romance 2013 (n = 209) 2005 (n = 127) 2001 (n = 78) Between a supervisor and a direct report 99% 80% 64% Between employees of a significant rank difference 45% 16% 12% Between employees who report to the same supervisor 35% 13% 15% Between an employee and a client/customer 31% 13% 18% Between employees who work on the same projects 25% 6% 12% Between employees who work in the same department but report to different supervisors 22% 24% 31% Between an employee and a vendor 21% 4% 6% Between employees in different departments 12% * * Between an employee of our organization and an employee from a competitor organization 11% 4% 4% Note: Percentages do not equal 100% due to multiple response options. Respondents whose organizations do not have written or verbal policies on workplace romance were excluded from this analysis. An asterisk (*) indicates that this response option was only provided in the 2013 survey. Workplace Romance Survey ©SHRM 2013 12
  • 13. What consequences do employees face when a supervisor and his or her direct report break your organization’s policy and are involved in a workplace romance? 48% Counseling 41% 44% A formal written reprimand 29% 41% Termination 22% 40% A transfer to another department within the organization 51% 29% *Removal from supervisory position Supervisor (n = 281) 26% A move to another position within the department Suspension There are no official consequences Direct report (n = 265) 39% 23% 12% 22% 24% Note: Percentages do not equal 100% due to multiple response options. An asterisk (*) indicates that this response option was only provided in relation to supervisors. Workplace Romance Survey ©SHRM 2013 13
  • 14. What consequences do employees face when those of a significant rank difference break your organization’s policy and are involved in a workplace romance? 56% A formal written reprimand 36% 48% Counseling 42% 47% Termination Suspension 22% 32% 16% 28% A transfer to another department within the organization 45% 25% A move to another position within the department *Demotion There are no official consequences 33% Higher-ranking employee (n = 104) Lower-ranking employee (n = 92) 14% 17% 24% Note: Percentages do not equal 100% due to multiple response options. An asterisk (*) indicates that this response option was only provided in relation to higher-ranking employees. Workplace Romance Survey ©SHRM 2013 14
  • 15. What consequences do employees face when those who report to the same supervisor break your organization’s policy and are involved in a workplace romance? A transfer to another department within the organization 56% A formal written reprimand 34% Counseling 33% Termination 20% Suspension Other 18% 5% There are no official consequences 27% Note: n = 98. Percentages do not equal 100% due to multiple response options. Workplace Romance Survey ©SHRM 2013 15
  • 16. In the past five years, which of the following consequences have been applied to any of the employees involved in a workplace romance? Consequences 2013 (n = 343) 2005 (n = 134) 2001 (n = 108) A transfer to another department within the organization 34% 42% 55% Counseling 32% 34% 30% A formal written reprimand 21% 36% 31% Termination 20% 27% 35% A move to another position within the department 20% * * A removal from a supervisory position 12% 7% 7% Suspension 8% * * Other 6% 18% 11% None of the above 34% * * Note: Percentages do not equal 100% due to multiple response options. An asterisk (*) indicates that this response option was only included in the 2013 survey. Workplace Romance Survey ©SHRM 2013 16
  • 17. Generally, how did employees involved in the romance react to the consequences? They accepted the decision 80% They did not accept the decision and left the organization 8% They did not accept the decision and took legal action against the organization 3% They did not accept the decision and appealed it 2% Other 7% n = 219 Workplace Romance Survey ©SHRM 2013 17
  • 18. Generally, how are suspicions or complaints about workplace romance revealed at your organization? Through gossip in the office 67% Reported to the HR department 61% Reported to the supervisor of those involved in the romance 33% Reported anonymously (e.g., through organization's ethics hotline) 25% Reported to the leader of the business unit under which the romance occurred Reported to the internal/external legal counsel Other 23% 3% 4% n = 392 Workplace Romance Survey ©SHRM 2013 18
  • 19. If there is a suspicion or a complaint about a workplace romance between employees at your organization, who is responsible for taking action? HR department 89% Supervisor of those involved in the romance 39% Leader of the business unit under which the romance occurred Internal legal counsel 24% 8% External legal counsel 5% Other 4% n = 411 Workplace Romance Survey ©SHRM 2013 19
  • 20. If there is a suspicion or a complaint about a possible workplace romance between employees at your organization, what measures are taken? 73% Talk to employees involved 58% Talk to the supervisor/leader of those involved in the romance 60% 45% 45% 47% Look for problematic behavior Monitor conflict among co-workers 32% 31% Monitor productivity of employees 28% 33% Talk to co-workers of those involved in the romance 23% 19% Monitor correspondence between suspected employees (e.g., e-mails, texts) Support the relationship (e.g., allow common vacations) Nothing/no measures taken 18% 13% Supervisor-direct report romance (n = 350) Other types of romance (n = 296) 7% 21% 16% 25% Workplace Romance Survey ©SHRM 2013 20
  • 21. Does your organization offer training to employees on how to manage workplace romance? Yes, for all employees Yes, for managers only No 10% 8% 81% Note: n = 389. Percentages may not equal 100% due to rounding. Workplace Romance Survey ©SHRM 2013 21
  • 22. HR Opinions About Workplace Romance Workplace Romance Survey ©SHRM 2013 22
  • 23. Why is workplace romance not permitted at your organization? 84% *Concerns about real or perceived favoritism by co-workers of those involved in the romance 78% Potential for claims of sexual harassment 77% 72% Potential for retaliation if the romance ends 50% 57% *Potential for legal action taken against the organization 2013 (n = 312) 2005 (n = 103) 56% *Potential for inappropriate sharing of confidential information between those involved in the romance 47% *Concerns about gossip/distraction among co-workers Concerns about lowered morale of co-workers of those involved in the romance 30% 44% Note: Percentages do not equal 100% due to multiple response options. An asterisk (*) indicates that this response option was only provided in the 2013 survey. Workplace Romance Survey ©SHRM 2013 23
  • 24. Why is workplace romance not permitted at your organization? (continued) 30% *Concerns about lowered productivity of co-workers of those involved in the romance 29% Concerns about lowered productivity of those involved in the romance 52% 29% Workplace romances are viewed as unprofessional 58% 24% *Concerns about lowered employee engagement of co-workers of those involved in the romance 2013 (n = 312) 2005 (n = 103) 19% *Concerns about public display of affection of those involved in the romance 18% *Damage to organization's public image as a result of exposed romance Other 6% 8% Note: Percentages do not equal 100% due to multiple response options. An asterisk (*) indicates that this response option was only provided in the 2013 survey. Workplace Romance Survey ©SHRM 2013 24
  • 25. In the past five years, have any of the following occurred at your organization as a result of a workplace romance between employees? 2013 (n = 327) 2005 (n = 472) 2001 (n = 468) 70% * * 51% 62% 66% 40% 44% 46% Divorce/ending of long-term relationship with significant other 30% * * Decreased productivity by those involved in the romance 24% 26% 41% Claims of sexual harassment 23% 19% 26% Complaints of retaliation when the romance ended 22% 15% 26% 20% * * 18% 25% 24% 17% 16% 19% Gossip/distraction among co-workers Those involved in the romance got married or became long-term partners Complaints of favoritism from co-workers of those involved in the romance Inappropriate sharing of confidential information between those involved in the romance Decreased morale of co-workers of those involved in the romance Complaints of stalking when the romance ended Note: Percentages do not equal 100% due to multiple response options. An asterisk (*) indicates that this response option was only provided in the 2013 survey. Workplace Romance Survey ©SHRM 2013 25
  • 26. In the past five years, have any of the following occurred at your organization as a result of a workplace romance between employees? (continued) 2013 (n = 327) 2005 (n = 472) 2001 (n = 468) 15% * * 14% * * 13% * * 6% * * 6% 6% 7% 3% * * 3% * * Increased productivity by those involved in the romance 2% 5% 9% Increase in workplace violence 2% 3% 4% Increased productivity by co-workers of those involved in the romance 1% * * Other 5% 13% 10% Complaints from co-workers of those involved in the romance about public display of affection Decreased productivity by co-workers of those involved in the romance Decreased employee engagement of co-workers of those involved in the romance Legal action was taken against the organization Increased morale of co-workers of those involved in the romance Increased employee engagement of co-workers of those involved in the romance Organization's public image was damaged as a result of exposed romance Note: Percentages do not equal 100% due to multiple response options. An asterisk (*) indicates that this response option was only provided in the 2013 survey. Workplace Romance Survey ©SHRM 2013 26
  • 27. In your opinion as an HR professional, should employers have the right to prohibit workplace romance between employees? Yes 32% Depends on the situation 49% No 18% Note: n = 385. Percentages do not equal 100% due to rounding. More than one-half of respondents who selected “depends on the situation” indicated that employers should have the right to prohibit workplace romances between a supervisor and a direct report. Workplace Romance Survey ©SHRM 2013 27
  • 28. In your opinion as an HR professional, which types of workplace romance should be restricted and/or acted upon by organizations? Romance between a supervisor and a direct report 95% Romance between employees of a significant rank difference 54% Romance between an employee and a client/customer 44% Romance between an employee and a vendor 33% Romance between employees in the same department 33% Romance between employees who report to the same supervisor Romance between an employee of our organization and an employee from a competitor organization Romance between employees who work on the same projects Romance between employees who work in the same department but report to different supervisors Romance between employees in different departments Other 30% 24% 23% 17% 8% 4% n = 398 Workplace Romance Survey ©SHRM 2013 28
  • 29. Does your organization ask employees involved in a workplace romance to sign a “love contract”? In this survey, a “love contract” refers to a document affirming that a workplace romantic relationship is consensual, that employees involved will not engage in favoritism, and that neither will take any legal action against the employer or each other if the relationship ends. Yes 5% No 95% n = 371 Workplace Romance Survey ©SHRM 2013 29
  • 30. In your opinion as an HR professional, do you agree with the following statements related to “love contracts”? Love contracts provide a forum to talk to employees about appropriate and inappropriate workplace behavior 81% Love contracts are ineffective because employees may be more likely to hide their romantic relationships 75% Love contracts are effective in protecting the organization against legal action 34% 61% Love contracts are effective in decreasing risk of sexual harassment claims 58% 49% Love contracts are an invasion of employees' privacy Love contracts are not necessary and create additional paperwork Agree 25% 66% Love contracts put HR professionals in an awkward position Love contracts are effective in reducing perceived favoritism by co-workers 19% 46% 41% 39% 42% 51% 54% 59% Disagree n = 290 Workplace Romance Survey ©SHRM 2013 30
  • 32. Demographics: Organization Industry Percentage Professional, scientific and technical services 18% Health care and social assistance 16% Manufacturing 15% Government agencies 10% Finance and insurance 10% Educational services 7% Retail trade 7% Transportation and warehousing 7% Information 6% Construction 5% Utilities 4% Note: n = 384. Percentages do not equal 100% due to multiple response options. Workplace Romance Survey ©SHRM 2013 32
  • 33. Demographics: Organization Industry (continued) Percentage Accommodation and food services 3% Mining, quarrying, and oil and gas extraction 3% Religious, grant-making, civic, professional and similar organizations 3% Wholesale trade 3% Repair and maintenance 2% Real estate and rental and leasing 2% Administrative and support and waste management and remediation services 1% Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting 1% Arts, entertainment and recreation 1% Personal and laundry services 1% Other industry 5% Note: n = 384. Percentages do not equal 100% due to multiple response options. Workplace Romance Survey ©SHRM 2013 33
  • 34. Demographics: Organization Sector Privately owned for-profit 52% Nonprofit 22% Publicly owned for-profit 15% Government Other 10% 1% n = 385 Workplace Romance Survey ©SHRM 2013 34
  • 35. Demographics: Organization Staff Size 1 to 99 employees 24% 100 to 499 employees 33% 500 to 2,499 employees 21% 2,500 to 24,999 employees 25,000 or more employees 16% 6% n = 384 Workplace Romance Survey ©SHRM 2013 35
  • 36. Demographics: Other Does your organization have U.S.based operations (business units) only, or does it operate multinationally? U.S.-based operations only Multinational operations 74%% 26% Single-unit organization: An organization in which the location and the organization are one and the same. 31% Multi-unit organization: An organization that has more than one location. 69% n = 400 n = 399 What is the HR department/function for which you responded for throughout this survey? Corporate (companywide) 64% Business unit/division 15% Facility/location 21% n = 285 Is your organization a single-unit organization or a multi-unit organization? For multi-unit organizations, are HR policies and practices determined by the multi-unit headquarters, by each work location or by both? Multi-unit headquarters determines HR policies and practices 54% Each work location determines HR policies and practices 2% A combination of both the work location and the multi-unit headquarters determines HR policies and practices 44% n = 283 Workplace Romance Survey ©SHRM 2013 36
  • 37. SHRM Survey Findings: 2013 Workplace Romance Survey Methodology • Response rate = 13% • 384 HR professionals from a randomly selected sample of SHRM’s membership participated in this survey • Margin of error +/- 5% • Survey fielded July 9-26, 2013 Workplace Romance Survey ©SHRM 2013 37
  • 38. About SHRM Research For more survey/poll findings, visit shrm.org/surveys For more information about SHRM’s Customized Research Services, visit shrm.org/customizedresearch Follow us on Twitter @SHRM_Research Project leader: Yan Dong, research intern, SHRM Research Project contributors: Alexander Alonso, Ph.D., SPHR, vice president, SHRM Research Evren Esen, manager, Survey Research Center, SHRM Research Copy editor: Katya Scanlan, SHRM Knowledge Center Workplace Romance Survey ©SHRM 2013 38
  • 39. About SHRM The Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM) is the world’s largest association devoted to human resource management. Representing more than 260,000 members in over 140 countries, the Society serves the needs of HR professionals and advances the interests of the HR profession. Founded in 1948, SHRM has more than 575 affiliated chapters within the United States and subsidiary offices in China and India. Workplace Romance Survey ©SHRM 2013 39