1. 1. What is the primary idea of the content in the document?
The primary idea of this article is about how to duplicate DVD movies. I read it from the title of this
article. This article is separated into two section, DVD Decrypter and DVD Shrink and DVD-Burning
Software. DVD Decrypter is state about how to convert DVD data to movie data. Another one is
explain about how to burn data to DVD media.
2. Do you think the individual sections and headings in the document clearly represent the idea that
was communicated. Explain the reasons behind your comments.
In headings, the writer explain about ripping and about what has state in this article. In individual
sections. One of it explain about DVD Decrypter. Another is about DVD Shrink and DVD-Burning
Software. Finally it explains about Easy DVD Clone. It is easy to read because heading and individual
section is communicated good.
3. What details are included in the document?
At first in document the writer state about ripping and duplicate. In summary writer explain about
overall article. In DVD Decrypter section explains how to decrypter DVD data use DVD Decrypter.
Then in DVD Shrink and DVD-Burning Software states about how to use DVD Shrink and DVD-
Burning Software. Finally in last section, it says how to use similar tool Easy DVD Clone.
4. Was there anything that was confusing? If so, what is it?
This article made three explanation about three same purpose tools. I think it is too sticky. There are
no use to state many times about main idea. This would make reader tire. It should be more simple
and clearly about only one tool. It should write difference among three if want to explain all tool.
5. What is good about the writing? Why is it good?
This is incompatible with above question. But I think this article is good at detail. In this article writer
explain about three tools. Like this, reader can find more information from this than a article that don't
explain about several tools.
6. Are there any errors that need to be corrected?
These sentences states too minute. Among these sentences, there is no relationship. There are three
same contents. No use made so many same contents. There should be only one section which explain
about only one tool.
7. What specific suggestions for improving the document can you make?
This article should be more simple. There are no use made so many same contents. It should write
more difference among three section if want to write three section about all tools. This article is too
minute. It is no use too many words to explain this idea. So it should be more specially.
8. Identify three basic differences between how your group would author a similar document and how

2. this author authored it (as you see it in the link).
1. We want write it more simple and more specially. There is no use to write so minute.
2. We want write out it difference among three tools. No use to write three same contents.
3. We want write more tips about this idea. This article is too narrow to readers.