Slides from the presentation at OpenEd 2014, 19-11-2014

1. A Reference Model for OER
Robert Schuwer
Pierre Gorissen

2. 2
Not here today: Bert Frissen

3. 3
Agenda
• Why?
• What is available?
• What are we looking for?
• What can this look like?
• Which issues remain?

4. 4
Why?
• Observation:
• Massive information on OER available
• Teacher is not aware
– Cannot find it
– Too difficult

5. Voettekst 5
Problem
• Adoption OER is slowed down:
– Teacher is key
– Experiences no support
– Dropping off
http://cricket2007.deviantart.com/art/I-support-you-209794621

6. Voettekst 6
What is already available?
• A lot!
• What is missing?
• Inspiration

7. 7
Wiki-Educator
http://wikieducator.org/UNESCO_OER_Toolkit_Draft

8. 8
JISC OER Toolkit
https://openeducationalresources.pbworks.com/w/page/24836480/Home

9. 9
OER Africa toolkits
http://www.oerafrica.org/understanding-oer/oer-toolkits

10. 10
OER Africa: Agshare
http://agsharetoolkit.com/qa/stage-3/

11. 11
Open Michigan
http://open.umich.edu/

12. 12
A Basic Guide to OER
http://www.col.org/resources/publications/Pages/detail.aspx?PID=357

13. 13
Open Education Consortium Toolkit
http://www.oeconsortium.org/resources/toolkits/

14. 14
Dutch SIG Open Education
https://www.surfspace.nl/sig/5-open-education/50-kennismaking/

15. Penn State Research Guides on MOOC
15
http://www.libraries.psu.edu/psul/researchguides/MOOC.html

16. Voettekst 16
What are we looking for?
• Lessons learned from examples:
– Addressing either OER or MOOC or…
– Openness is addressed separately
– Hard to search
– No or basic distinction in level of knowledge
– Project or institution based
– Maintenance!

17. 17
Two phases
• Phase 1: get going
• Phase 2: information needed
• Support for both phases
• Match supply and demand
– Content
– Level
• Version 1: focus on reuse

18. 18
Demand and supply
• Level of knowledge needed
– Per OER aspect
• Level of knowledge present
• Refer to human expert available

19. Voettekst 19
OER aspects
• Licenses / copyrights
• Quality
• Pedagogy / didactics
• Cultural aspects
• Sustainability
• Finding OER
• Implementation approach
• Platforms and systems
• Labeling / metadata
• Accessibility
• Production of OER
• Professionalization

20. 20
What could this look like?

21. 21
What could this look like?

22. 22
What could this look like?

23. 23
Which issues remain?
• Who provides the information?
• Maintenance?
• Owner?
– Community?
– Consortium?
• Copyright crucial!
• Website?

24. 24
Thank you!
p.gorissen@fontys.nl r.schuwer@fontys.nl

25. 25