Chapple, R. M. 2014 ‘Oh, Margaret the lapping waves are licking quietly at our ankles’ | The fall of commercial archaeology in Northern Ireland. Blogspot post

1. ‘Oh, Margaret the lapping waves are licking quietly at our ankles’ | The fall of
commercial archaeology in Northern Ireland
Originally posted online on 20 February 2014 at rmchapple.blogspot.com
(http://rmchapple.blogspot.co.uk/2014/02/oh-margaret-lapping-waves-are-licking.html)
Looking back on that time in my life where I attempted to make a living from archaeology, I
see that I went through a regular cycle. About once a year, from when I was awarded my MA
in 1998 up until I finally left field archaeology in 2011, I would convince myself that I was going
to do a PhD. I’d get deeply entranced by a single subject and decide that – this time – finally
– I was going to settle on a subject that I could work on for several years and emerge as the all-
knowing expert on. That’s how it started. Invariably, something would happen along the way
to put a halt to these grand plans. Sometimes it was my realisation that I just couldn’t afford
the time and money at that point in my life. At other times it was the feeling that the topic
wasn’t sufficiently interesting to sustain me over the long-haul. On the few occasions I had
sufficient motivation to approach a university department, it was them who though the topic
wasn’t sufficiently interesting. The worst one was always when I got so far, only to discover
that I’d been beaten to the topic and all I thought I could potentially add to the discussion was
already said, and generally with deeper thought and more eloquence than I could have
managed.
One of my worst experiences in this regard was around 2000 when I was working in the
Drogheda region. I spent an awful lot of time commuting on the train between there and
Belfast. The frequent journeys gave me ample time to read and reflect and I decided that this
was definitely the year I was going to start on a PhD. No doubt about it! I had been reading a
little about Bronze Age burials and thinking that it was an area that could do with a serious re-
examination and I was going to be the guy to do just that. I got pretty far before I encountered
the writings of Charles Mount [Website | Academia.edu | Blog | LinkedIn | Twitter]. The short
version of the story is that pretty much every avenue I thought might make an interesting
research pathway, Mount had been there first. I was horrified. I was desolated. I was
remarkably annoyed with him! I’d like to say I learned a valuable lesson about creating
impressive research proposals without being fully aware of the current research landscape, but
subsequent events have proven otherwise. The one salient point I did take from this experience
was that Charles Mount bears watching! To this day, if I see something written by him, I know
it’s worth taking the time to engage with. In recent years I’ve followed his blog posts with great
interest. They’re invariably educational, entertaining, and well researched. In recent times he’s
developed an interesting series of posts chronicling the decline (and slight rise) of the
archaeological profession through a series of proxy data sets.
As far as I can ascertain, his earliest post on this topic was in October 2011 when he
published Archaeological Licenses: a Real-time Indicator of Construction Output. In this he
correlated the decline in excavation licences issued from 2008 against the Production in
Building and Construction Index, produced by the Irish Central Statistics Office. In this piece
he concludes that: ‘The correlation between archaeological licenses and construction output
suggests that any future increase in the latter will be preceded by an increase in the numbers
of the former. By keeping an eye on the relative numbers of licenses issued and making quarter
on quarter comparisons economy watchers may be able to pick up an early signal of a return
to construction growth.’ In January 2012 he returned to the theme with Excavation Licenses
indicate continued reduction in archaeological and construction activity in 2011. Here, based
on the number of excavation licences issued, he correctly predicted ‘a further decrease in
archaeological activity during 2012’. An update in April 2012 (Early indicators suggest that
activity in the Irish archaeological and construction sectors continued to decline in the first
quarter of 2012: updated) confirmed the trend. Further results along the same lines were

2. posted in June, July, October, and December 2012. March 2013 brought a return to the topic
in Continuing decline in Irish archaeological activity outstrips the decline in construction. In
this he noted that ‘A worrying trend is that the rate of decline in archaeological activity has
barely slowed and is now running at more than twice the rate of the decline in construction
activity. This may indicate that there are other factors causing the decline of archaeological
activity other than just the aggregate decline in construction activity.’ In two posts in April
2013 [here | here] Mount argued that there were reasons to be hopeful, if not for recovery,
then that the recession was slowing. By July 2013 he was confident enough to publish the self-
explanatory post: The decline inarchaeological excavation in Ireland has stopped! Again, his
data was based on the numbers of archaeological excavation licences issued, along with
information from Ulster Bank Construction PMI Report, and the Irish Central Statistics Office.
In October of that year, this was followed up with: After a stable year recovery appears on
the horizon for Irish archaeology; followed by Irish archaeology turns the corner in 2013 in
December. Admittedly, it is only the most modest of recoveries, being marginally better than
the egregious previous year. For anyone wishing to pour over these rather brilliantly written
and researched, but quite depressing, posts I have created a comprehensive Charles Mount
bibliography at the end.
But …
I’ve followed these posts from the beginning and devoured each as it was posted. In my
post Empire of Dirt: time to call time on commercial archaeology in Northern Ireland? I used
the same form of data (reports on archaeological licences published in the annual Excavations
Bulletin) from Northern Ireland to examine how excavation rates do not match publication
rates. At the same time, as a means of examining the health of commercial archaeology, I’ve
never been happy with it. The biggest problem I find with this form of data is that all excavation
licences are not created equal. It’s a simple point, but deserves stating. One licence can cover
a huge excavation that lasts several months and employs dozens of archaeological staff – think
of the scale of the Drumclay crannog, for example. At the other end of the scale, I’ve done more
than enough jobs where the same licence covered a just me watching a mechanical excavator
trenching for half a day. Don’t get me wrong, I am in no way criticising Mount for using this
proxy data. As the best available measure it has functioned well as a means of recording the
vicissitudes in the profession. In conjunction with other data, he has even used it as a
predictive tool. It’s just that I’ve had a nagging suspicion that there must be a better way to see
the true scale of the recession and how it has impacted on commercial archaeology in Northern
Ireland … if only I could find it!
Turns out there is!
Annual Returns for each company in the UK must be lodged with Companies House in Belfast.
Quite a lot of that data is available on the internet – for free – if you just know where and how
to look. I’ve been able to examine outline accounts from the four main Northern Ireland based
commercial archaeological companies from 2007 – before the beginning of the recession –
until 2013. True, the data lacks the immediacy of Mount’s interrogation of the licencing data,
but it does have the advantage that it sets out the positions of each individual company with
actual pound signs attached. My initial intention was to anonymise the data, so that it could
not be linked back to any specific company. However, on the basis of legal advice received, I
have taken on board the need to prove that the data presented is verifiable and correct. For
this reason, though I will not name any company directly, I will refer to each by their year of
incorporation. Anyone wishing to examine my baseline data and interrogate it for themselves
will find an Appendix where the companies are listed by date of incorporation and linked to
their current records in CompanyCheck [here].
I’m going to start with the oldest archaeological consultancy in Northern Ireland. They were
founded in 1990 and have two registered directors. From the graph and corresponding data

3. table we can see that they went from closing 2007 with just £69 in the bank to £8.7k the
following year. In the years since, this has dropped to £109 (2009) and £115 (2010), before
falling to a zero balance in 2011 – the last year that accounts are available. The Current Assets
for this company go from £706k in 2007 to just a shade over £1.9m the following year. This
value dropped to £1.4m in 2009 and £381k in 2010, before making a light recovery in 2011 to
£526k. This represents a high to low drop of 80%, or a 72% drop to the 2011 level. A similar
tale is told by the Current Liabilities. These go from £625k in 2007, to a peak of £1.7m in 2008,
falling back to £737k and £511k in the two years following. This increased to £590k in 2011.
Again, this represents a high to low fall of 70%, or a 66% drop to the 2011 figure. However, the
real story is told by the valued Net Worth of the company. In 2007 this was listed as £128k,
increasing to a maximum of £329k in 2009. This plummeted to -£105k in 2010, recovering
only slightly in 2011 to -£37k. This represents a maximum to minimum drop of 132%, and a
drop of 111% from the maximum to the 2011 figure.
1990 Company 2007-2011
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Cash at Bank £69 £8,719 £109 £115 £0
Net Worth £128,146 £231,231 £329,155
-
£104,541 -£37,190
Current
Liabilities £625,202 £1,719,715 £738,270 £511,421 £590,987
Current Assets £705,774 £1,900,282 £1,040,469 £381,245 £526,497

4. The next company tells a relatively similar story. This outfit were founded in 1997 and have
three registered directors. This company and those following have data available for the period
from 2008 to 2012. Their Cash a Bank was at a high in 2008 with £33k, plunging to £155 in
2010 and a mere £12 in 2011. By 2012 they had made a modest recovery to the dizzying heights
of almost £9k. In terms of highest to lowest, this represents a 2008 to 2011 fall of 99.96%. The
Current Assets tell a broadly similar story, with a 2008 high of almost £260k, reduced to a
mere £81k by 2012, and a 2011 trough of £62k. This represents a highest to lowest decline of
76%. Current Liabilities started at £88k in 2008, falling to £62k the following year, and ending
at £34k in 2012. In between these points liabilities hit £97k in 2010, and remained steady at
£94k in 2011. From its peak in 2010 to the most recent available accounts, this represents a
reduction in liabilities of 64%. Where the truly shocking story lies with this company in in
terms of its Net Worth. It goes from a 2008 high of £188k – not an inconsiderable sum – to
£104k in 2009. By the following year this had reduced to a paltry £7k, before plunging to a
staggering -£24k in 2011. 2012 saw a modest recovery to just over £14k. All told, the high to
low plunge for this company was a decrease of 113%.
1997 Company 2008-2012
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Cash at Bank £33,217 £14,080 £155 £12 £8,735
Net Worth £187,796 £103,530 £6,604 -£23,735 £14,221
Current
Liabilities £87,689 £62,650 £96,646 £94,232 £34,451
Current Assets £259,949 £150,960 £91,286 £61,900 £80,876
The third company operational in Northern Ireland was founded in 2002 and has two
directors. In terms of Cash at Bank, their low point was in 2008, when they had a mere £1.5k.

5. This increased the following year to £51k, but by 2012 had dropped back to £10k, a fall of just
over 80%. Current Assets dropped from a high of £376k in 2008 to an all-time low of £113k in
2012, a depletion of 72%. Throughout this period Current Liabilities fell from £145k in 2008
to £93k in 2009, remaining relatively steady in the period since, closing at £113k in 2012.
Thus, in the period from 2008 to 2012 liabilities dropped by 36%. Like with the previous
example, the most shocking aspect of the information is the steep decline in company Net
Worth. In 2008 it was at an all-time high of £269k, eventually depreciating to a mere £1.7k in
2012, a fall of 99.32%.
2002 Company 2008-2012
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Cash at Bank £1,568 £50,812 £4,800 £15,366 £10,126
Net Worth £258,932 £257,938 £72,760 £60,279 £1,759
Current
Liabilities £144,995 £93,341 £100,768 £116,569 £113,209
Current Assets £376,007 £330,339 £154,890 £162,794 £104,428
The last company to be examined was founded in 2005 and has two registered directors. Since
I began this project, the available company data has been updated to include 2013 accounts,
but the 2008 data has been dropped. They ended the 2008 financial year with a Cash at Bank
balance of £43k, increasing this to £70k the following year. This has fallen year on year until
2012 when the balance was a mere £4.6k. This has made an impressive recovery to £86k in
2013. Altogether, this represents a low to high increase of over £81k. The Current Assets were
valued at £133k in 2008, falling to an all-time low of £17k in 2011, before making a very modest
recovery in 2012 to £25k, and increasing again to £152k in 2013. Current Liabilities were listed
at £47k in 2008, falling to a minimum of £6.5k in 2010, and rising steadily to £12k in 2012,
and £91k in 2013. The final measure, Net Worth, was listed in 2008 as £90k, falling to a low

6. of £9.9k in 2011, again making a modest recovery in 2012 to just over £12k, and increasing
markedly to £61k in 2013.
2005 company 2008-2013
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Cash at Bank £48,388 £70,056 £19,163 £11,199 £4,643 £85,858
Net Worth £90,548 £90,382 £50,997 £9,945 £12,557 £61,611
Current
Liabilities £47,392 £18,951 £6,587 £7,685 £12,217 £90,585
Current Assets £133,168 £100,117 £49,295 £16,639 £25,293 £151,755
While there are many caveats, graphing the averages of these individual company
totals should give us some idea of the relative year-on-year financial health of commercial
archaeology in Northern Ireland over the seven years from 2007 to 2013. Unfortunately, data
points at either end – 2007 and 2013 – are less robust than we would like, as they are each
supported by a single data point. If we confine our observations to the core data from 2008 to
2012, a number of observations may be made. The first thing we observe is that the average
Cash at Bank value starts at £23k in 2008, rising to £33k by 2009, falling off thereafter, to just
over £6k in both 2010 and 2011, before improving marginally to just under £8k in 2012. With
the exception of a slight resurgence in 2011, the average value of Current Assets falls every year
from £667k in 2008 to £70k in 2012. This is mirrored in the average Current Liabilities which,
despite a minor resurgence in 2011, fell steadily from £500k in 2008 to £53k in 2012. Finally,
the average Net Worth metric shows a minor increase in 2009 to £195k from £192k the
previous year. However, thereafter it falls sharply to under £6.5k in 2010, £2.3k in 2011, before
making a modest return to £9.5k in 2012. However, these figures are heavily influenced by
significant negative Net Worth recorded for the 1990 company in 2010 and 2011, and by the
1997 company in 2011.

7. Average graph 2007-2013
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Cash at Bank £69 £22,973 £33,764 £6,058 £6,644 £7,835 £85,858
Net Worth £128,146 £192,127 £195,251 £6,455 £2,325 £9,512 £61,611
Current
Liabilities £625,202 £499,948 £228,303 £178,856 £202,368 £53,292 £90,585
Current
Assets £705,774 £667,352 £405,471 £169,179 £191,958 £70,199 £151,755
As I have noted above, the significant upturn in all of these metrics for 2013 is based on the
returns of a single company. Nonetheless, I’ve no reason to believe that when other data
becomes available it will not show a similar increase for the 2013 financial year as seen by
Mount for the Republic of Ireland. Even if my data does eventually show this slight return to
health, I find myself unable to cheer at the thought of a few additional low-paid jobs in poor
conditions for highly-trained professionals. Big whoop! True, I have the ‘advantage’ of no
longer being in the profession – but it is an advantage I didn’t want and never asked for. Maybe
if I was still drinking the company-approved kool-aid I’d feel differently about it, but that’s not
where I am anymore. In the Empire of Dirt post, I wrote about the lack of value that
commercial archaeology in Northern Ireland was actually contributing to our shared
knowledgebase. In these figures I think we can see the true fragility and ephemerality of the
enterprise – a few poor years have drastically reduced the commercial viability of all of these
companies. They’ve all seen a vast reduction in their worth; two companies in particular
finished 2010 and 2011 with a negative net worth. They survived into the following year, but
(and I’m guessing here) had their banks taken a different view, they could have been forced to
close for good.
Broadly speaking, I bear these people no personal ill will. My concern here is solely with the
implications that these harsh financial times may yet have on the physical remains of our
shared heritage resource. What happens if the going gets too tough for any one of these
companies? In all likelihood they’ll have the option to file for bankruptcy, liquidate their assets
and all that process. Once that happens I could easily foresee the vast majority of archives –
physical and digital – heading for the skip. When you’re selling of the assets of a broke
company, what value are the banks and sundry creditors going to put on a warehouse full of

8. broken pottery, flint bits ‘n’ pieces, the odd piece of twisted metal, and half a tonne of animal
bone, when they’ve got their hands on the remaining company assets and any property used
to secure their business loans? – I truly doubt that they’ll care about the artefacts and the
endless rolls of smelly permatrace … as for the ring binders full of slightly muddy context
sheets? … into the skip, the lot of it! That’s the harsh reality here – if the ‘archaeology is
business’ model is followed to its logical conclusion I think that’s how it’s going to end up. I
don’t for a moment suggest that the NIEA should be so intimately knowledgeable about the
financial minutia of any of these companies, but I would like to think that they’ve formulated
a coherent strategy for what to do in the event of one or more of these enterprises folding. I
would love to be proven wrong on this and find out that the NIEA have a robust set of plans in
place to rescue and preserve the heritage assets of these companies should any of them be
forced into bankruptcy. [I emailed the NIEA on Feb 16th, and received a response on Feb 27th.
I intend to publish a follow-up post in the near future]
Where do we go from here? I’m not sure. Removing the commercial companies from the scene,
and returning all archaeological excavation to the realm of the state bodies will lead to
numerous sites being bulldozed without record. It’s a horrifying thought for anyone who cares
about our heritage in any way … but it is no different from the situation as it stands, where site
after site is excavated to increasingly poor standards, with little or no prospect that they will
be written up to Final Report (grey literature) standard, much less see the light of day as
published work. In Empire of Dirt I argued that “Even if the commercial archaeological
consultancies were swept away, it would not be the end of the world. True, there would be
fewer excavations carried out, but the chances of those excavations actually being published
and contributing to knowledge – i.e. doing what archaeology is actually about – would be much
higher.” At that time I proposed that the track record The Centre for Archaeological Fieldwork
(CAF) [Website | Facebook] at QUB shows that there is a viable model already in existence for
high-quality excavation, public outreach, and dissemination of results to both specialist and
general audiences. In the intervening period, I have seen nothing to dissuade me from this
view.
In the time frame I’ve been able to examine, it is clear from the figures that these companies
have suffered huge declines in terms of profitability, though their liabilities have also
decreased at the same rate. Even if the 2013 results of a single company are representative of
the whole sector, they still represent only a modest increase in profitability. But here’s the
thing – they have all come pretty close to the edge of financial viability. Had they crossed over
and been forced into administration and eventual bankruptcy, they could have taken a sizable
portion of the excavated heritage assets of Northern Ireland (and some sites in the Republic
of Ireland) with them. A paper by Hull (2011) for the Research and Information Service,
commissioned for the use of The Northern Ireland Assembly, estimates that some 1.4 million
archaeological artefacts were held by commercial archaeological companies at that time.
That’s an awful lot of archaeology.
The day we drive by one of these businesses and see artefacts and paper archives being treated
as useless junk, hefted into skips, and taken to the dump – it’s too late. The fate of commercial
archaeology in Northern Ireland is still in the balance. It is time to decide if allowing a profit-
based model is the best way to serve our heritage needs. If it is, then we need to be prepared
for the possibility of negative outcomes where companies collapse and their financial assets
are sold off and our shared cultural assets are placed in peril. We still have time – if we act
now – to ensure that that measures are put in place as a safety net to protect our excavated
heritage. Be under no illusion - Eden is quite definitely burning, but there’s still time to save
the tree of knowledge.
A Charles Mount Bibliography:

9. Mount, C. 2011 Archaeological Licenses: a Real-time Indicator of Construction Output. The
Charles Mount Blog, October 12, 2011. http://charles-mount.ie/wp/?p=605
Mount, C. 2011 Excavation Licenses indicate continued reduction in archaeological and
construction activity in 2011. The Charles Mount Blog, January 12, 2012. http://charles-
mount.ie/wp/?p=700
Mount, C. 2012 Early indicators suggest that activity in the Irish archaeological and
construction sectors continued to decline in the first quarter of 2012. The Charles Mount Blog,
4 April 2012. http://charles-mount.ie/wp/?p=773
Mount, C. 2012 Indicators suggest that archaeological activity in Ireland continued to
decline in the first half of 2012. The Charles Mount Blog, 9 July 2012. http://charles-
mount.ie/wp/?p=862
Mount, C. 2012 Analysis of excavation licensing figures for 2011 correctly predicted
reduction in constriction output. The Charles Mount Blog, 27 June 2012. http://charles-
mount.ie/wp/?p=872
Mount, C. 2012 Indicators suggest that archaeological activity in Ireland continued to
decline in the third quarter of 2012. The Charles Mount Blog, 4 October 2012. http://charles-
mount.ie/wp/?p=960
Mount, C. 2012 Excavation Licenses indicate continued reduction in archaeological and
construction activity in 2012. The Charles Mount Blog, 21 December 2012. http://charles-
mount.ie/wp/?p=974
Mount, C. 2013 Continuing decline in Irish archaeological activity outstrips the decline in
construction. The Charles Mount Blog, 22 March 2013. http://charles-mount.ie/wp/?p=990
Mount, C. 2013 New data is good news for Irish archaeology indicating the decline in
excavation is slowing. Charles Mount’s Blog, 4 April 2013. http://charles-
mount.ie/wp/?p=1004
Mount, C. 2013 Is there a future for development-led Archaeology in Ireland? Charles
Mount’s Blog, 18 April 2013. http://charles-mount.ie/wp/?p=1018
Mount, C. 2013 The decline in archaeological excavation in Ireland has stopped! Charles
Mount’s Blog, 3 July 2013. http://charles-mount.ie/wp/?p=1068
Mount, C. 2013 Irish archaeology turns the corner in 2013. Charles Mount’s Blog, 19
December 2013. http://charles-mount.ie/wp/?p=1330
Notes:
I am not in a position to independently verify that the figures quoted here are an accurate
reflection of the data submitted to Companies House. However, this is the data as made
publically available by CompanyCheck, the largest source for data on UK companies. For those
who wish to verify my figures, I have provided a separate Appendix to this post, explicitly
linking the largely-anonymised companies discussed here with their actual names and
data: Appendix I
The title of this post is taken from ‘The Hazardsof Love 4’, from the remarkable album, The
Hazards of Love, by Portland-based indie folk-rock geniuses The Decemberists. Go check
them out!

10. I would also point out that I’m still in search of a PhD and any enquiries from University
departments wishing to honour me for a lifetime in archaeology would be greeted most
warmly.