2. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I do not own the copyright of any of the images in this
presentation. I hereby acknowledge the original
copyright and licensing regime of every image used. All
the images used in this presentation have been sourced
from Google, Pixabay and Flickr and were labeled for
non-commercial reuse.
This work (excluding the images goverened by their
original licencing) is licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
3. Pictures tap into a different vocabulary and offer a different
lens on a phenomenon as experienced by the narrator
(Shinebourne & Smith, 2010).
Pictures, like metaphors, are not neutral but chosen, they
are ideologically laden, immersed in fluid meanings, flowing
from and perpetuating a particular social imaginary.
Pictures also disturb, disrupt, challenge and, hopefully, slow
down the discourses on graduate supervision, allow us to
ask new questions, and, enable us “to comprehend partially
what cannot be comprehended totally”
(Lakoff & Johnson, 1980, p. 193).
5. An elephant in the
learning analytics
room –
the obligation to act
By Paul Prinsloo (University of South Africa) &
Sharon Slade (Open University, UK)
Image credit:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/lollyman/4941417146
Image credit: Canadian Gunners in the Mud, Passchendaele by Lieutenant Alfred Bastien, 1917, oil on canvas. Retrieved from,
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military_art
Higher education/graduate supervision as a battlefield of
contesting claims– whether disciplinary, institutional,
student and/or claims arising from our macro context.
7. What follows is a reflection on how I describe
the field I am playing on as supervisor…
Imagecredit:http://www.artrix.co.uk/whats-on/cinema/i-daniel-blake
8. An elephant in the
learning analytics
room –
the obligation to act
By Paul Prinsloo (University of South Africa) &
Sharon Slade (Open University, UK)
Image credit:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/lollyman/4941417146
Shall I speak, or how shall I speak of …
• Being a supervisor where everything is measured, counted and where
numbers on spreadsheets are more important than the lives they
represent
• The (oc)cult of auditing, accountability, innovation and excellence --
where everyone signs oaths of transparency and ethics in often empty
rituals of fake fraternisation
• Increasing and contesting workloads
• Students who are increasingly underprepared for scholarly
engagement on graduate level
• Supervisors who are underprepared to ask new questions and let go of
answers and processes that may have been appropriate and effective
in the past
• Supervision is outsourced to the highest (or is it any available?) bidder
• Being a supervisor where offline is no longer an option and where
even when you are offline, you are “onlife” (The Onlife Manifesto, Floridi, 2015)
13. Postgraduate supervision: a question of ‘fit’
• ‘Fit’ between the student and his/her chosen focus, methodology,
discipline, institution, research expertise of the supervisor
• ‘Fit’ between the student and his or her supervisor - interpersonal
• ‘Fit’ between the supervisor and the amount and foci of students
allocated to him or her
• ‘Fit’ between the student aspirations and time-management with
the workload, aspirations and time-management of supervisors
• ‘Fit’ of students and supervisors within the broader disciplinary
networks of inclusion and exclusion
• ‘Fit’ between students and supervisors in a particular political,
social, economic, technological, legal and environmental context
• ‘Fit’ between the supervisor and institutional policy frameworks,
processes, networks of inclusion and exclusion, tacit knowledge and
contacts (Adapted from Subotzky and Prinsloo, 2011; Prinsloo, 2017)
16. An elephant in the
learning analytics
room –
the obligation to act
By Paul Prinsloo (University of South Africa) &
Sharon Slade (Open University, UK)
Image credit:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/lollyman/4941417146
Image credit:
http://thesociologicalcinema.tumblr.com/post/142531355075/youre
-playing-monopoly-one-player-is-given-all
The idea of habitus was born
from trying to make sense of
choices we have and make ,
considering our context, our
past and present, our
behaviors, our capital and
dispositions, and our
gendered and raced role(s),
relations and positions in a
particular context/field and
time - as embodied, as
‘structured and structuring
structure’
(Bourdieu, 1994, p. 170).
17. An elephant in the
learning analtics room
–
the obligation to act
By Paul Prinsloo (University of South Africa) &
Sharon Slade (Open University, UK)
Image credit:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/lollyman/4941417146
[(habitus) (capital)] + field = practice/agency
(Bourdieu 1984, p. 101).
18. An elephant in the
learning analytics
room –
the obligation to act
By Paul Prinsloo (University of South Africa) &
Sharon Slade (Open University, UK)
Image credit:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/lollyman/4941417146
Image credit: https://pixabay.com/en/grass-green-football-football-field-1176417/
So... when you change my position --whether
as student or as supervisor--
on the field, or change the field, or change the
rules or change the requirements and skills
required by the new field, role or rules, you
impact on my agency or, at least, my
perception thereof...
20. Image credit:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/lollyman/4941417146
Image credit: http://www.pixnio.com/fauna-animals/fishes/roach-fish-on-dry-land
The phenomenon of a misfit between an individual’s
habitus and capital in a particular context is described
as the ‘hysteresis effect’ and a cleft in habitus or
habitus clivé
(Bourdieu & Passeron, 1977, p. 78)
Hysteresis //alienation (Marx in Fowler, 2003)//
anomie (Durkheim in Naudet, 2008)//torpor (Prinsloo, 2016)
21. An elephant in the
learning analytics
room –
the obligation to act
By Paul Prinsloo (University of South Africa) &
Sharon Slade (Open University, UK)
Image credit:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/lollyman/4941417146
Image credit: https://pixabay.com/en/bird-death-dead-829242/
Torpor as metaphor …
“It somehow gave me a handle, a way of making sense of my
own experiences of shutting down, Ctrl-Alt-Del, of playing
dead, of stop-the-world-I-want-to-get-off feelings”
(Prinsloo, 2016 – https://opendistanceteachingandlearning.wordpress.com/2016/10/24/a-blog-on-not-blogging/)
22. Image credit: https://www.flickr.com/photos/cgpgrey/5023794412
Habitus clivé :When individuals move ‘upwards’,
individuals become class ‘transfuges’ -- caught in a
‘painful’ position of social limbo, of ‘double isolation’,
from both their origin and destination class
(Friedman, 2013, p. 10; Bourdieu, 1998b).
Becoming nomad/refugee -- ‘torn by contradiction
and internal division’ (Bourdieu, 2004 in Friedman, 2013, p. 11).
24. Processes - Inter & intra-personal domains
Attribution, locus of control, self-efficacy
Processes – Academic, operational, social
Attribution, locus of control, self-efficacy
THE STUDENT AS AGENT
IDENTITY, ATTRIBUTES, CAPITAL
& HABITUS
Success
Graduateness
Doctorateness
THE SUPERVISOR AS AGENT
IDENTITY, ATTRIBUTES, CAPITAL
& HABITUS
SHAPING CONDITIONS: (predictable as well as uncertain)
SHAPING CONDITIONS: (predictable as well as uncertain)
Choice,
Admission
Learning/supervision activities
THE SUPERVISION JOURNEY
Multiple, mutually constitutive
interactions between student,
institution & networks
F
I
T
FIT
F
I
T
FIT
F
I
T
F
I
T
F
I
T
F
I
T
F
I
T
F
I
T
F
I
T
F
I
T
THE INSTITUTION AS AGENT
IDENTITY, ATTRIBUTES, CAPITAL &
HABITUS
F
I
T
F
I
T
F
I
T
F
I
T
Adapted from: Subotzky, G., & Prinsloo, P. (2011). Turning the tide: a socio-critical model and framework for improving student success in open
distance learning at the University of South Africa. Distance Education, 32(2): 177-19.
25. Image credit:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/lollyman/4941417146
Pointers for a supervision contract between
institution-supervisors-students
Construct 1: Students, supervisors and the institution are situated
agents – [(habitus)(capital)] + field = agency/practice
-> How do we assess student and supervisor habitus/capital in a
particular field/context before admitting students and assigning
students to supervisors?
-> What are the processes and criteria for recognising the habitus
of students/supervisors and what do we consider ‘capital’?
-> How do we support students/supervisors when they experience
hysteresis/habitus clivé?
Adapted from Subotzky and Prinsloo (2011); Prinsloo, 2017)
26. Image credit:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/lollyman/4941417146
Pointers for a supervision contract between
institution-supervisors-students (cont.)
Construct 2: The supervision walk or “third space”– the
intersecting, mutually constitutive and often competing variables
in the nexus between student, supervisor, institution and macro-
societal context
-> How do we support this walk?
-> What are the co-responsibilities of students, supervisors and the
institution?
-> How can we assure that supervisors and students are not to
blame for systemic failures?
-> How do we assure that supervisors and students don’t hide
behind systemic failures – loci of control/self-efficacy?
Adapted from Subotzky and Prinsloo (2011); Prinsloo, 2017)
27. Image credit:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/lollyman/4941417146
Pointers for a supervision contract between
institution-supervisors-students (cont.)
Construct 3: The notion of ‘fit’ is a constitutive, layered element in
supervision success and intersect with the reality and impact of
hysteresis, and habitus clivé on the supervision process
Adapted from Subotzky and Prinsloo (2011); Prinsloo, 2017)
28. How do we facilitate/ensure the ‘fit’ between
• The student and his/her chosen focus, methodology, discipline,
institution, research expertise of the supervisor
• A student and his or her supervisor – interpersonal
• The supervisor and the amount and foci of students allocated to
him or her
• Student aspirations and time-management with the workload,
aspirations and time-management of supervisors
• Students and supervisors within the broader disciplinary networks
of inclusion and exclusion
• Students and supervisors in a particular political, social, economic,
technological, legal and environmental context
• A supervisor and institutional policy frameworks, processes,
networks of inclusion and exclusion, tacit knowledge and contacts
33. Image credit: https://pixabay.com/en/empty-abandoned-messy-grunge-scene-863118/
THANK YOU
Paul Prinsloo
Research Professor in Open Distance Learning (ODL)
College of Economic and Management Sciences,
Office number 3-15, Club 1, Hazelwood, P O Box 392
Unisa, 0003, Republic of South Africa
T: +27 (0) 12 433 4719 (office)
T: +27 (0) 82 3954 113 (mobile)
prinsp@unisa.ac.za
Skype: paul.prinsloo59
Personal blog: http://opendistanceteachingandlearning.wordpress.com
Twitter profile: @14prinsp
34. An elephant in the
learning analytics
room –
the obligation to act
By Paul Prinsloo (University of South Africa) &
Sharon Slade (Open University, UK)
Image credit:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/lollyman/4941417146
References and additional reading
Altbach, P.G., Reisberg, L., & Rumbley, L.E. (2009). Trends in global higher education: Tracking an academic revolution. Retrieved from
http://www.researchgate.net/profile/Philip_Altbach/publication/225084084_Trends_in_Global_Higher_Education_Tracking_an_
Academic_Revolution/links/551ac4020cf251c35b4f5d0d.pdf
Attwood, M. (2010, November 18). Digital 'deviants' and the spirit of '68. Times Higher Education. Retrieved from
https://www.timeshighereducation.com/features/digital-deviants-and-the-spirit-of-68/414268.article
Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway. Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. London, UK: Duke
University Press.
Beer, D. (2015). When ‘special measures’ become ordinary. [Web log post]. Retrieved from
https://www.opendemocracy.net/ourkingdom/david-beer/when-%E2%80%98special-measures%E2%80%99-become-ordinary
Beer, D. (2016). Is neoliberalism making you anxious? Metrics and the production of uncertainty. [Web log post]. Retrieved from
http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/politicsandpolicy/55395-2/
Biesta, G. J. (2015). Good education in an age of measurement: Ethics, politics, democracy. Routledge.
Blackman, L. (2012). Immaterial bodies: affect, embodiment, mediation. London: Sage.
Blackmore, J. (2001). Universities in crisis? Knowledge economies, emancipatory pedagogies, and the critical intellectual, Educational
Theory, 51(3), 353-370.
Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. London, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: a social critique of the judgement of taste. Richard Nice (Trans), Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1988). Homo Academicus. ((P. Collier, Trans). Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1994). In other words: essays towards a reflexive sociology. (M. Adamson, Trans). Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1996). The rules of art. (S. Emmanuel, Trans). Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1998a). Practical reason. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing.
Bourdieu, P. (1998b). The state nobility: elite schools in the field of power. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1999). The weight of the world. London, UK: Polity Press.
Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J-C. (1977). Reproduction in education, society and culture. (R. Nice, Trans). London, UK: Sage.
Bowles, K. (2014, March 5). Walking and learning. [Web log post]. Retrieved from
http://musicfordeckchairs.wordpress.com/2014/03/05/walking-and-learning/
35. An elephant in the
learning analytics
room –
the obligation to act
By Paul Prinsloo (University of South Africa) &
Sharon Slade (Open University, UK)
Image credit:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/lollyman/4941417146
Bowles, K. (2015, July 24). Weighted time. [Web log post]. Retrieved from http://musicfordeckchairs.com/blog/2015/07/24/weighted-
time/
Bowles, K. (2016, June 6). Networked professionals. [Web log post]. Retrieved from
http://musicfordeckchairs.com/blog/2016/06/06/networked-professionals/
Citron, D. K., & Pasquale, F. A. (2014). The scored society: due process for automated predictions. Washington Law Review, 89, 1-33.
Danaher, J. (2016, July 3). Does self-tracking promote autonomy? An initial argument. [Web log post]. Retrieved from
http://philosophicaldisquisitions.blogspot.co.za/2016/06/does-self-tracking-promote-autonomy.html
de Oliveira Andreotti, V., Stein, S., Pashby, K., & Nicolson, M. (2016). Social cartographies as performative devices in research on higher
education. Higher Education Research & Development, 35(1), 84-99.
Diefenbach, T. (2007). The managerialistic ideology of organisational change management, Journal of Organisational Change
Management, 20(1), 126-144.
Eggers, D. (2003). The circle. London, UK: Penguin.
Eliot, T.S. (1998). The waste land, and other poems. [Dover Thrift editions]. Mineola, N.Y: Dover Publications Inc.
Floridi, L. (Ed.) (2015). The onlife manifesto - being human in a hyperconnected era. Retrieved from
https://www.academia.edu/9742506/The_Onlife_Manifesto_-_Being_Human_in_a_Hyperconnected_Era
Fowler, B. (2003). Reading Pierre Bourdieu's masculine domination: notes towards an intersectional analysis of gender, culture and
class. Cultural Studies, 17(3-4), 468-494.
Friedman, S. (2013). The price of the ticket: Rethinking the experience of social mobility. Sociology, 0(0), 1-17. DOI:
10.1177/0038038513490355.
Friedman, S. (2015). Habitus clivé and the emotional imprint of social mobility. The Sociological Review. DOI: 10.1111/1467-954X.12280
Fullick, M. (2012). Failure, crisis, disruption: The (perpetual) end of higher ed. Retrieved from
http://www.universityaffairs.ca/opinion/speculative-diction/failure-crisis-disruption-the-perpetual-end-of-higher-ed/
Gerrard, J. (2015). The limits of learning: homelessness and educating the employable self. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of
Education,36(1), 69-80.
Gill, R. (2016). Breaking the silence: The hidden injuries of neo-liberal academia. Feministische Studien, 34(1), 39-55.
Goodier, S., & Czerniewicz, L. (2014). Academic online presence. A four-step guide to taking control of your visibility. Retrieved from
http://openuct.uct.ac.za/sites/default/files/Online%20Visibility%20Guidelines.pdf
36. An elephant in the
learning analytics
room –
the obligation to act
By Paul Prinsloo (University of South Africa) &
Sharon Slade (Open University, UK)
Image credit:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/lollyman/4941417146
Green, B., & Hopwood, N. (2015). The body in professional practice, learning and education: a question of corporeality. In B. Green
and N. Hopwood (Eds.), The body in professional practice, learning and education (pp. 15-33). New York, NY: Springer.
Hall, R. (2014a, March 5). On academic labour and performance anxiety. [Web log post]. Retrieved from http://www.richard-
hall.org/2014/03/05/on-academic-labour-and-performance-anxiety/
Hall, R. (2014b, August 22). On chronic fatigue and being increasingly anxiety-hardened. [Web log post]. Retrieved from
http://www.richard-hall.org/2014/08/22/on-chronic-fatigue-and-being-increasingly-anxiety-hardened/
Hall, R. (2016, March 14). Notes on academic overwork. [Web log post]. Retrieved from http://www.richard-
hall.org/2016/03/14/notes-on-academic-overwork/
Hardy, C. (2012). Hysteresis. In M. Grenfell (Ed.), Pierre Bourdieu. Key concepts (pp. 126-145). Second edition. Durham, UK: Acumen.
Harris, M.J. (2015). The end of absence: reclaiming what we’ve lost in a world of constant connection. New York, NY: Penguin.
Hartley, D. (1995). The ‘McDonaldization’ of higher education: Food for thought? Oxford Review of Education, 21(4), : 409–23.
Hildebrandt, K., & Couros, A. (2016). Digital selves, digital scholars: theorising academic identity in online spaces. Journal of Applied
Social Theory, 1(1), 87-100.
Hine, P. (2010, March 23). Theorising practice II: habitus/hexis. [Web log post]. Retrieved from http://enfolding.org/theorising-
practice-ii-habitushexis/
Ivana, G. I. (2016). Fake it till you make it: imagined social capital. The Sociological Review. Doi: 10.1111/1467-954X.12368
Kaiser, B.M. & Thiele, K. (2014). Diffraction: onto-epistemology, quantum physics and the critical humanities. Parallax, 20(3), pp. 165-
167. Doi: 10.1080/13534645.2014.927621
Kitchen, R. (2013). Big data and human geography: opportunities, challenges and risks. Dialogues in Human Geography, 3, 262-267.
doi: 10.1177/2043820613513388
Krasnova, H., Veltri, N. F., & Günther, O. (2012). Self-disclosure and privacy calculus on social networking sites: The role of
culture. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 4(3), 127-135.
Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lee, A., & Dunston, R. (2011). Practice, learning and change: towards a re-theorisation of professional education. Teaching in Higher
Education, 16(5), 483-494.
Lupton, D. (2013, October 14). The academic quantified self. [Web log post]. Retrieved from
https://simplysociology.wordpress.com/2013/10/14/the-academic-quantified-self/
Lupton, D. (2014a) Feeling Better Connected’: Academics’ Use of Social Media. Canberra: News & Media Research Centre. Retrieved
from http://www.canberra.edu.au/research/faculty-research-centres/nmrc/publications/documents/Feeling-Better-Connected-
report-final.pdf
37. An elephant in the
learning analytics
room –
the obligation to act
By Paul Prinsloo (University of South Africa) &
Sharon Slade (Open University, UK)
Image credit:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/lollyman/4941417146
Lupton, D. (2014b). Self-tracking modes: Reflexive self-monitoring and data practices. Available at SSRN 2483549.
Manca, S., & Ranieri, M. (2016). “Yes for sharing, no for teaching!”: Social Media in academic practices. The Internet and Higher
Education, 29, 63-74.
Maguire, M.H. (2006). Autoethnography: answerability/responsibility in authoring self and others in the social sciences/humanities.
Forum: Qualitative Social Research 7(2), March. Retrieved from http://www.qualitative-
research.net/index.php/fqs/article/viewArticle/106/221
Maritz, J., & Prinsloo, P. (2015). A Bourdieusian perspective on becoming and being a postgraduate supervisor: the role of
capital. Higher Education Research & Development, 34(5), 972-985.
Maton, K. (2012). Habitus. In M. Grenfell (Ed.), Pierre Bourdieu. Key concepts (pp. 48-64). Second edition. Durham, UK: Acumen.
McDonough, P., & Polzer, J. (2012). Habitus, hysteresis, and organisational change in the public sector. Canadian Journal of
Sociology/Cahiers Canadiens de Sociologie, 27(4), 357-379.
McGuire, H. (2015, April 22). Why don’t we read anymore? Medium. Retrieved from https://medium.com/@hughmcguire/why-can-t-
we-read-anymore-503c38c131fe#.qd8vlcrjo
McMillan, B. (2016, April 18). Think like an impostor, and you'll go far in academia. Times Higher Education. Retrieved from
https://www.timeshighereducation.com/blog/think-impostor-and-youll-go-far-academia
Merry, S.E. (2016). The seductions of quantification: measuring human rights, gender violence, and sex trafficking. Chicago, Ill:
University of Chicago Press.
Miltgen, C. L., & Smith, H. J. (2015). Exploring information privacy regulation, risks, trust, and behaviour. Information &
Management, 52(6), 741-759.
Murphy, A. (2014). Auditland. Portal. Journal of Multidisciplinary International Studies, 11(2), 1-41. doi: 10.5130/portal.v11i2.3407
Murphy, M. (2011). Troubled by the past: history, identity and the university. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management,
22(5), 509-517. DOI: 10.1080/1360080x.2011.605225
Murphy, K. (2014, October 4). We want privacy, but can’t stop sharing. The New York Times. Retrieved from
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/10/05/sunday-review/we-want-privacy-but-cant-stop-
sharing.html?partner=rss&emc=rss&smid=tw-nytopinion
Naudet, J. (2008). ‘Paying back to society.’ Upward social mobility among Dalits. Contributions to Indian sociology, 42(3), 413-441.
Nel, L. (2015). Technological utopia, dystopia and ambivalence: Teaching with social media at a South African university. British
Journal of Educational Technology, 46(3), 629-648.
Olssen, M. (2006). Understanding the mechanisms of neoliberal control: Lifelong learning, flexibility and knowledge
capitalism. International Journal of lifelong education, 25(3), 213-230.
38. An elephant in the
learning analytics
room –
the obligation to act
By Paul Prinsloo (University of South Africa) &
Sharon Slade (Open University, UK)
Image credit:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/lollyman/4941417146
O'Shea, S. (2011). Nomads in diaspora space: exploring women's identity work in the University. Studies in the Education of Adults, 43(1),
61-77.
Pifer, M., & Baker, V. (2013). Identity as a theoretical construct in research about academic careers. Theory and Method in Higher
Education Research (International Perspectives on Higher Education Research, Volume 9) Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 9, 115-
132.
Pitt, R., & Mewburn, I. (2016). Academic superheroes? A critical analysis of academic job descriptions. Journal of Higher Education Policy
and Management, 38(1), 88-101. Doi: 10.1080/1360080X.2015.1126896
Plantin, J-C. (2016, April 25). Algorithmic accountability in scholarship: what we can learn from #DeleteAcademiaEdu. [Web log post].
Retrieved from http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/66698/
Prinsloo, P. (2014, October 22). Mene, mene, tekel, upharsin: researcher identity and performance. Inaugural University of South Africa
(Unisa). Retrieved from
http://www.researchgate.net/profile/Paul_Prinsloo/publication/267395307_Mene_mene_tekel_upharsin_researcher_identity_an
d_performance/links/544f2f200cf29473161bf642.pdf
Prinsloo, P. (2015). (Further) reflections on scholarly identities: From quantified selves to self-qualifying selves. Presentation at TAU –
Kievitskroon, Pretoria, 12 July. Retrieved from http://www.slideshare.net/prinsp/prinsloo-tau-scholarly-identities-12-july
Prinsloo, P. (2016). (Re)considering distance education: exploring its relevance, sustainability and value contribution. Distance Education.
Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/01587919.2016.1188445 …
Prinsloo, P. (2016, October 24). A blog on (not) blogging. [Web log post]. Retrieved from
https://opendistanceteachingandlearning.wordpress.com/2016/10/24/a-blog-on-not-blogging/
Shinebourne, P., & Smith, J.A. (2010). The communicative power of metaphors: An analysis and interpretation of metaphors in accounts
of the experience of addiction. Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 83, 59–73.
Smith, G. J. (2016). Surveillance, data and embodiment on the work of being watched. Body & Society, 1-31. doi: 1357034X15623622
Smith, J., Rattray, J., Peseta, T., & Loads, D. (Eds.). (2016). Identity work in the contemporary university. Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense
Publishers.
Stewart, B. (2015). Open to influence: what counts as academic influence in scholarly networked Twitter participation. Learning, Media
and Technology, 40(3), 287-309.
Taylor, C. (2002). Modern social imaginaries. Public Culture, 14(1): 91-124.
The Smart Casual. (2015, July 15). Employment (in)security and shame: Working hard on soft money [Web log post].Retrieved from
https://thesmartcasual.wordpress.com/2015/07/15/employment-insecurity-and-shame-working-hard-on-soft-money/
39. An elephant in the
learning analytics
room –
the obligation to act
By Paul Prinsloo (University of South Africa) &
Sharon Slade (Open University, UK)
Image credit:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/lollyman/4941417146
Thompson, P. (2013). Field. In M. Grenfell: Pierre Bourdieu key concepts (pp. 65-80). (2nd ed). Durnham: ACUMEN.
Throop, C.J., & Murphy, K.M. (2002). Bourdieu and phenomenology: a critical assessment. Anthropological Theory, 2, 185-207. Doi:
10:1177/1469962002002002630
Tobin, T.J., Mandernach, B.J., Taylor, A.H. (2015). Evaluating online teaching: implementing best practices. San Francisco, CA: John
Wiley.
Veletsianos, G. (2016). Social Media in Academia: Networked Scholars. New York, NY: Routledge.
Watters, A. (2016, July 13). Memory machines: learning, knowing, and technological change [Web log post]. Retrieved from
http://hackeducation.com/2016/07/13/memory-machines