An automated optical tweezers system was designed and constructed for biomolecular investigations. Key aspects included automation and control of the tweezers, calibration of stiffness and sensitivity, and DNA sample preparation and experiments. Results showed DNA overstretching and unzipping experiments in both water and heavy water. Future work will focus on further automation and investigating DNA-protein interactions.
Polkadot JAM Slides - Token2049 - By Dr. Gavin Wood
An automated and user-friendly optical tweezers for biomolecular investigations (PhD Defense)
1. An automated and user-friendly optical
tweezers for biomolecular
investigations.
By
Pranav Rathi
2. Acknowledgments
Dr. Larry Herskowitz Dr. Andy Maloney
Dr. Anthony Salvagno
Dr. Steven Koch
Collaborations
Susan Atlas—Lead of the DTRA project
UNM Physics / Cancer Center / Director of CARC
Haiqing Liu (G. Mantano lab)—Microdevice applications of kinesin
LANL & Center for Integrated Nanotechnology (CINT)
Funding DTRA—DTRA CB Basic Research Program under Grant No. HDTRA1-09-1-008
3. Outline
• Introduction to optical tweezers
• Design and construction
• Automation and control
• Optical tweezers calibration
• DNA sample preparation
• Results
12. Some problems with the design!
• Accessibility to optomechanical controls of Z lens,
QPD and microscope
• Temperature hike inside enclosure
• Mechanical vibration nose
13. Accessibility problem was solved by extending
optomechanical controls
Z-lens controls QPD controls
Microscope focus control
24. The parameters we calibrate!
Z
F = −Kx X
Trap center
Kx is the stiffness in x direction
X
Zb X is displacement of bead center
Beam waist from the trap center
Zb is the distance between beam
waist and the trap center.
Surface
25. Calibration of stiffness Kx
We use Brownian noise to map the stiffness
Equation of motion for trapped bead
Power spectrum
m(t ) = − β x(t ) − K x x(t ) + f (t )
x
2
m(t ) = 0; β = 6πηr ; f (ω ) = 4 β k BT
x
After Fourier transformation
~ (ω) 2 ( K 2 + 4π 2ω 2 β 2 ) = 4 βK T
x x B
~ (ω) 2 = K BT
Cutoff frequency fc x
K
π 2 β ( x ) + ω 2
2πβ
Kx
fc =
2πβ
6πη r
β= 3 4 5
9 r 1 r 45 r 1 r
1− + − −
16 h 8 h 256 h 16 h
26. Trap center determination
At 1.2r (bead radius) from surface fc≈1/2 of bulk
• Trap center offset for big beads is 186 and small bead is 367 nm
• Big bead is 1.96 times the small bead and small bead is 1.97 times farther then big bead
27. Corner frequency vs bead center height from surface (H2O)
Corner frequency (Hz)
Corner frequency (Hz)
Bead center height (multiples of r=520 nm from surface)
Bead center height (multiples of r=520 nm from surface)
28. Corner frequency vs bead center height from surface
H2O vs D2O
Corner frequency (Hz)
Corner frequency (Hz)
Bead center height (multiples of r=265 nm from surface)
Bead center height (multiples of r=265 nm from surface)
29. Stiffness vs bead center height from surface
H2O vs D2O
Perceived stiffness (pN/nm/W)
Perceived stiffness (pN/nm/W)
Bead center height (multiples of r=520 nm from surface)
Bead center height (multiples of r=520 nm from surface)
Stiffness does not depend on height but corner frequency does
30. Stiffness calibration results
Big beads (1.04µm; diameter)
Estimated stiffness (H2O) .038(7) pN/nm
Average variance (H2O) 12300+/-800 mV2
Estimated stiffness (D2O) .04(2) pN/nm
Average variance (D2O) 12500+/800 mV2
Small beads (.530µm; diameter)
Estimated stiffness (H2O) .011(5) pN/nm
Average variance (H2O) 2100+/-200 mV2
Estimated stiffness (D2O) .012(5) pN/nm
Average variance (D2O) 2000+/-300 mV2
32. Calibration of detector sensitivity (DOG)
DOG scan and linear-fit on left and sensitivity extracted from slope of
linear-fit vs bead position relative to beam waist on right from
DOG scans from one edge to another of bead
33. X (mV)
X (mV) DOG at different bead heights (big beads)
Piezo (nm)
Piezo (nm)
34. X sensitivity vs bead position relative to beam waist
X Sensitivity (mV/nm)
X Sensitivity (mV/nm)
Big beads
Bead position relative to beam waist (nm)
Bead position relative to beam waist (nm)
35. Sensitivity calibration results
Sensitivity for big beads at trap center 10.8+/-.5 mV/nm
Sensitivity for small beads at trap center 2.4+/-.2mV/nm
Comparison
Sensitivity of small bead is 4.5 times the big bead and
the stiffness of big bead is 4.3 times the small bead
36. X (mV)
X (mV) Trap center verification (big beads)
Piezo (nm)
Piezo (nm)
37. X (mV)
X (mV) Trap center verification (small beads)
Piezo (nm)
Piezo (nm)
43. Force (pN)
DNA unzipping
Force (pN)
Piezo (nm)
Piezo (nm)
44. Future work
• Automate Z piezo using camera to find the surface
• Automate Z lens and QPD controls
• DNA unzipping in D2O
• Investigate DNA protein interactions in H2O and D2O
• Develop touch screen controlled automation for
optical tweezers
52. Dichroic holder stage assembly
Mirror holder
Lens tube
holder
L4 Top view
Holder stage
Clip
Dichroic holder stage
X Z platform
Z
Y
Before reflection X Y
After reflection