Premium Call Girls Bangalore Call Girls Service Just Call 🍑👄6378878445 🍑👄 Top...
Household Income, Demand, and Saving: Deriving Macro Data with Micro Data Concepts
1. Household Income, Demand, and
Saving: Deriving Macro Data with
Micro Data Concepts
Barry Cynamon and Steve Fazzari
Post Keynesian Conference
Kansas City, September, 2014
2. Acknowledgment
• Co-authored work with Barry Cynamon
• Thanks to the Institute for New Economic
Thinking for generous financial support
3. Motivation – Part 1
• Demand effects of household sector
• Consumption drives much of the economy
• PCE vs. what households actually spend
• Prime example: residential construction
vs. imputed rent on owner-occupied
housing
4. Motivation – Part 2
• Disaggregation of household flows using
household micro data
• Example: recent work with Barry on rising inequality
and consumption
• Need disaggregated data
• Inconsistency between representative
surveys and macro measures
• Not just sampling error; important conceptual
differences
5. Objectives: Measure Actual Cash Flows
• Eliminate imputed value of services in
consumption
• Spending versus some concept of “utility”
• Eliminate spending not controlled by
households
• Example: Medicare
• Cash flow concept of disposable income
• Flow of funds under household control
• Concept likely to correspond better with
flows households report on surveys
• Household financial flows the way households actually see
these flows
6. Key Identity
• Accounting identity maintained before and after
adjustments:
Disposable Household Personal Financial
Income = Consumption + Investment + Transfers + Saving
• Identity holds in NIPA
• Household investment not distinguished from financial saving
• Adjustments to consumption or income require
balancing change elsewhere
• HH Demand = Cons. + HH Investment
7. Housing Example (2011 $billions)
Disp.
Income
Cons. HH Invest. Pers.
Trans.
Fin.
Saving
Implicit Rent -1236 -1236
Intermediate Inputs + 197 + 197
Mortgage Interest + 469 + 469
Depreciation + 209 + 209
New Construction
+ 283 - 283
Single-Family Homes
• Eliminate “rent home to yourself” business
• Effect on household demand:
-1236 + 197 + 283 = -756
• Effect on disp. income = -361 (but transfer
expenditure up by 469)
8. Other Important Categories
• About 40 (!) separate adjustments
• Remove “NPISH” sector
• Free financial services
• Medical care
• Employer and government, not households
• “Other” demand
• Retirement accounting
• Exclude payments by employers and government
• Include benefits from plans