Best Practices for Implementing an External Recruiting Partnership
Investor Presentation June 2010
1. CANADIAN ARROW MINES LTD.
CRO.V
This presentation may contain "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of Canadian securities legislation
and the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements are made
as of the date of this presentation and the Company does not intend, and does not assume any obligation, to update
these forward-looking statements.
Forward-looking statements relate to future events or the anticipated performance of the Company and reflect Kenbridge
management’s expectations or beliefs regarding such future events and anticipated performance. In certain cases,
forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of words such as "plans", "expects", "is expected", "budget",
Timmins
"scheduled", "estimates", "forecasts", "intends", "anticipates" or "believes", or variations of such words and phrases
or statements that certain actions, events or results "may", "could", "would", "might" or "will be taken", "occur" or "be
achieved", or the negative of these words or comparable terminology. By their very nature forward-looking
statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual Turtlepond
performance of the Company to be materially different from any anticipated performance expressed or implied by the
forward-looking statements. Such factors include various risks related to the Company’s operations, which are
detailed from time to time in the Company’s interim and annual financial statements and management’s discussion
and analysis of those statements, all of which are filed and available for review on SEDAR at www. sedar.com.
Although the Company has attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual performance to differ
materially from that described in forward-looking statements, there may be other factors that cause its performance
not to be as anticipated. There can be no assurance that forward-looking statements will prove to be accurate, as
actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Accordingly,
readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements.
Corporate Presentation - June 2010
2. Corporate Strategy
Canadian Arrow Mines
Focused on nickel sulphide deposits in Ontario,
Canada
Developing two advanced nickel projects in Ontario,
Flagship Kenbridge project near Kenora, northwestern
Ontario
100 M lb nickel resource (NI 43-101), 97 M lbs in Measured & Indicated
classes
Existing 2,000’ shaft
Leading developer in an under explored greenstone belt with significant
exploration potential
Timmins Alexo and Kelex Mines Alexo/Kelex
Kenbridge
Past producers in east Abitibi nickel mining district: 87,000 tonnes @
3.06% Ni
Closed during metal price downturn in 2005; remaining reserves potential
under evaluation
Permitted. Under review for rapid re-start, early cash-flow
Experienced leadership combining exploration, mine
operations and environmental management
3. Corporate Strategy
Primary Objectives:
• Re-start Alexo/Kelex; access early cash-flow at high metal prices within 6 months to 1yr
• Use Alexo/Kelex cash flow to develop and construct the Kenbridge Nickel Project: 2-3 yrs
• Start up Kenbridge in a 2-3 year timeframe producing
Exploration potential
• Kenbridge deposit is open in all directions; regional geophysics targets remain untested
• Turtlepond projects: 5 separate Ni/Cu occurrences including two new discoveries within 70
km of Kenbridge
• Denmark Lake: 4 Ni/Cu occurrences including one new discovery within 30 km of Kenbridge
• Arrow holds several drill ready Ni-Cu projects in Kenbridge and Timmins area
Interim Corporate Focus
• Complete Timmins evaluation
• Secure capital requirement to recommence Timmins production
• Generate cash-flow from Timmins operations
• Complete feasibility study and permitting on Kenbridge Nickel Project
• Expand Ni-Cu resources at Kenbridge and test regional targets
• Seek out and acquire additional projects
4. Management Team
Dean MacEachern, CEO: President & CEO of Blackstone Ventures. Former
Exploration Manager for Falconbridge Ltd in Canada and Africa..
Kim Tyler, President: Former Mine Manager for Rio Tinto Minerals, Chief Mine
Geologist, Vale Inco, Sudbury, and Chief Mine Geologist, Royal Oak Mines.
Garett Macdonald, VP Operations: VP Operations, Rainy River Resources
Former Project Manager for Suncor Energy and Placer Dome Inc..
Todd Keast, VP Exploration: Former Exploration Manager, Canadian Royalties,
Ungava Region, NE Quebec
George Pirie, Director: Former President and CEO, Breakwater Resources Ltd
Andy Mollison, Technical Advisor: Former Manager Concentrate Sales Xstrata
Nickel
5. Corporate information
Majority Shareholders:
TSX Venture Exchange CRO.V • Mineral Fields 17.1 %
Share price $0.05 • Ravensden (Goodman) 9.9 %
Market capitalization $5.9 M • Mavrix 8.7 %
• Pinetree Capital 8.1 %
• Management 7.8 %
Shares outstanding 117 M
• Blackstone Ventures 2.1 %
Employee share options 5.37 M
Warrants 7.37 M Cash: $0.3 M
Fully Diluted 129.6 M
Outstanding liabilities
52 week high/low $0.04 - $0.12 • $1M to Blackstone Ventures, Dec
31, 2012
• $0.8M debt to 3rd party, due
Jan 31, 2011
7. Kenbridge nickel copper project:
Key Points:
• NI 43-101resource of 80M lbs nickel, 48M lbs copper,
(recoverable)
• Arrow completed PEA: stand alone open pit + u/g,
mill/concentrator facility
• 7 year mine life averaging:
• 34kt/yr Ni concentrate @ 14.1% Ni
• 20kt/yr Cu concentrate @ 27.3% Cu
• Road access within 100 km of either CN or CP
railheads; 1,500 km by rail to Sudbury
• Former Falconbridge project, 60 man camp (1952-58)
• 623m x 3 compartment shaft, (4th compartment at
bottom 2 levels) Kenbridge
• two levels developed, bulk sampled
• metallurgical work completed
• Deposit open at depth and along strike
• Arrow acquired in 2006 and has expended
$10M towards feasibility
8. $11M Expended since Acquisition
2006 2007 2008 2009
New CEO, VP Exploration NI43-101 resource estimate Updated NI43-101 resource Regional exploration targets
refined and prioritized.
$1.1 M financing $7.5 M financing $3.1 M financing $1.85 M financing
CRO options Kenbridge New President, VP Ops Prelim Economic Assessment 1st pass drilling on Turtlepond
targets
10 km access trail
30,000m drilling – open pit 12,000m deep drilling u/g 2010
Environmental baseline studies Formal FN consultations started MOU concluded with FN
Metallurgical testing – Xstrata Advanced exploration permitting 2nd pass drilling on Turtlepond
targets
Discussions with Treaty # 3 Developer of the Year Award Review of Timmins projects
Tailings & Waste storage design Metallurgical Results
Geotech, hydrogeology, ARD Regional Airborne survey
Inter-government agency mtgs Regional exploration commences
Project description to CEAA Updated PEA
Permit to take water received
Permit for road upgrade received
9. Kenbridge – Resources @ US$10/lb
Aug. 2008 NI 43-101
Mine area & class Tonnes % Ni % Cu
Open Pit (M&I) 4.46 Mt 0.42 0.23
Underground (M&I) 2.67 Mt 0.96 0.50
Underground (Inf.) 0.1 Mt 1.38 0.88
7.2% Ni
• @US$10.00/lb Ni, US$2.50/lb Cu /5.5m
• 98 M lbs of contained nickel
• 52 M lbs of contained copper
• Deposit is open at depth in all directions
• High grades at depth, including
• 7.2% Ni over 5.5m (KB-07-180)
• 4.3% Ni / 3.0m (2011)
4.3% Ni/3.0m
10. Preliminary Economic Assessment 2008
@ US$10/lb
Annual 10% Ni, 6%
2008 PEA Update Highlights
Cu in Bulk Concentrate
• 1.0 Mtpy on site concentrator
• 50/50 blend of Open pit and UG ores Year Tonnes Recovered Recovered
• Flexible mine access – pit, decline, shaft Concentrate Nickel Copper
(M lbs) (M lbs)
Economics 1 47,050 12.4 7.0
• Initial capital: $108 M
2 47,050 12.4 7.0
• LOM operating cost: $56/t
• Open pit: $11/t (1.9:1 strip ratio) 3 47,050 12.4 7.0
• Underground: $37/t 4 47,050 12.4 7.0
• Processing: $10.37/t
5 47,050 12.4 7.0
• Smelting/transport $US236/t con
• Refining $0.61/lb Ni, $0.44/lb Cu 6 40,061 10.6 6.0
• US$10.00/lb Ni, $2.50/lb Cu, US$0.90 exch. 7 27,185 7.2 4.3
• LOM C1 cash cost/lb Ni net of Cu: US$3.55/lb
• pre-tax NPV8%: $244 M 8 17,184 4.5 2.7
• pre-tax IRR: 65%
11. Kenbridge - Metallurgy
2007/2008 – CRO contracts Xstrata Process Services to conduct test work including
mineralogy characterization, locked cycle flotation tests and grinding circuit design
Head grade Concentrate Assays Recoveries
% Ni / % Cu %Ni %Cu %S %MgO %Ni %Cu %S
Bulk Ni+Cu
0.88 / 0.37 11.52 5.25 31.4 3.5 89.8 93.3 49.3
Concentrate
Feb. 2010 –XPS concludes test work on separate nickel and copper concentrates
Head grade Concentrate Assays Recoveries
% Ni / % Cu %Ni %Cu %S %MgO %Ni %Cu %S
Nickel
14.07 0.97 34.1 1.4 83.7 13.69 46.9
Concentrate*
0.86 / 0.36
Copper
1.29 27.25 31.7 2.28 1.6 79.9 9.1
Concentrate*
(*plus Co, PGE, Au, Ag credits)
12. Timeline to production
2010 2011 2012 2013
Feasibility
Permitting
Road work
Construction
* Timmins projects offer opportunity to finance
Kenbridge through feasibility and into
production with the Company’s own cash flow
and minimal requirement for equity financing
13. Comparable Emerging Nickel Projects
Pre-production Capital ($M)
$1,600
$1,380
$1,400
$1,200 $1,200
$1,200
$1,000
$800
$600 $517
$400
$286
$200 $125 $150
$107
$-
vik
o
t
a
in
ge
is
e
on
kw
ag
ar
ga
om
a
id
um
pe
in
un
as
na
r
ok
nb
M
es
N
D
M
r
N
Tu
Ke
ak
Sh
14. Regional Exploration Focus:
Atikwa Greenstone Belt
• Nickel/copper
sulphides hosted in
gabbro breccia
intrusives similar to
the Lynn Lake,
Manitoba nickel
camp.
• Atikwa belt: 23
recorded nickel
copper occurrences
in a 220 km ring.
•Under explored
region. No serious
nickel exploration
since 1950’s
15. Lynn Lake, Manitoba Geological Model:
Comparable to Kenbridge Ni District - Multiple Deposits,
mostly sub-surface
Kenbridge, (superimposed)
Lynn Lake, Manitoba (Sherritt Gordon Mines) North America’s 3rd largest
nickel camp (1953-1976):
(Source: Victory Nickel • 22 Mt @ 1% Ni, 0.5% Cu from 12 deposits; 8 of which were sub-surface
Corp.)
18. Timmins Projects: Alexo and Kelex
- History
Kelex
Alexo: Past producer:
(Pre-2005)
Kidd Met
Underground: 57,000t @ 3.6% Ni, Site
(4.5M lbs)
(2004-2005 Arrow operated)
Pit: 30,138t @ 1.93% Ni, (1.3M lbs)
400 km haul to Strathcona mill in
Sudbury
Put on temporary suspension in 2005
when nickel price fell below US$5/lb
• Projects currently under review to
re-start now that nickel at US$9/lb
• Permits remain in place
• Opportunity for rapid re-start, low
capital outlay and quick pay-back
19. NI 43-101 Resource Estimate Commissioned April
2010.
View from below to south east: Mineralized zones in red, mined out pits in grey
20. Kelex Deposit – West Bulk Zone
Section 1280E Section 1272E Section 1265E
21. Kelex Deposit – East Shrinkage Zones
Section 1605E Section 1612E Section 1522E
23. Regional Geology and Production
Alexo & Kelex
Kidd Creek
Minesite
Kidd Creek
Metsite
Past Resource Statistics
Langmuir 1.6mt @ 2.1% Ni
Redstone 1.2 @ 2.4% Ni
Alexo 57,000t @ 3.6% Ni Timmins
24. Tonnage and Grades Mined from Pit
Operations
Alexo:
• 26,224t @ 1.97% Ni, 0.20% Cu
Kelex:
• 3,914t @ 1.68% Ni, 0.18% Cu
Total Mining Operations (2004-2005)
30,138t @ 1.93% Ni, 0.23% Cu
25. Alexo/Kelex Summary points
Adv. Expl’n permits, closure plan and bond in place
Rapid re-start possible
Low capital start-up
Untested conductors – exploration potential
Advance Kenbridge through Timmins cash flow.
26. Corporate Strategy
Primary Objectives:
• Re-start Alexo/Kelex, access early cash-flow at high metal prices: 6 months to 1yr
• Use Alexo/Kelex cash flow to develop and construct the Kenbridge Nickel Project: 2-3 yrs
• Add additional mineral resource inventory through acquisition and modern exploration
Exploration potential
• Kenbridge deposit is open in all directions; regional geophysics targets
• Turtlepond projects: 5 separate nickel-copper occurrences including two new discoveries
within 70 km of Kenbridge
• Denmark Lake: 4 Ni/Cu occurrences including one new discovery within 30 km of
Kenbridge
• Arrow holds several drill ready Ni-Cu projects in Kenbridge and Timmins area
Interim Corporate Focus
• Complete Timmins evaluation
• Secure capital requirement to recommence Timmins production
• Complete feasibility study and permitting on Kenbridge Nickel Project
• Expand Ni-Cu resources at Kenbridge and test regional targets
• Seek out and acquire additional projects