The document summarizes a co-design workshop between automotive hardware and software teams to develop a braking system. The workshop used design thinking tools like empathy mapping and paper prototyping over cross-team sessions. Participants found co-design activities more productive than traditional brainstorming and that prototyping helped refine features and catch issues earlier. The workshop helped restart a stalled development process between the teams.

1. SPLIT SESSION
co-design automotive industry
@giesus #methodcamp
2015

2. UX LEAD-@giesus
etnograph.com

3. context

4. developmentprocessstalled
no designer
braking system development : software + hardware
parallel development: software + hardware

5. useless brainstormings

6. hardware’s team software’s team
Software must be
ready for…….

7. hardware’s team software’s team
Software must be
ready for…….
What kind of data the
software will consume?
Ok, but..constraints?
Is there a risk to
saturate the bus's
band?

8. hardware’s team software’s team
Software must be
ready for…….
What kind of data the
software will consume?
Ok, but..constraints?
Is there a risk to
saturate the bus's
band?
Sorry, but now we
can't answer.

9. and now for something completely different

10. 1. Empathy Map
http://bit.ly/1OcfQmT

11. 2.user interface Co-Design

12. one paper prototype for use case (30minutespersession)

13. crossed test prototype

14. DISCUSSION

15. lessons learned

16. engage clients in co-design activity is awesome
workshop is better then classic brainstorming
the more you prototype the more you leave features behind

17. Grazie
@giesus