These slides are from Adam Babajee-Pycroft's talk at the October 2016 Digital Gaggle Conference in Bristol. Adam is Managing Director and Head of UX at Natural Interaction in Bristol.
Talk summary: Involving users in the design process is critical to digital success but how many times have you been told things like: we don’t have time, we can’t afford it, we’ll do it after the site is built. You needed to get the feature live yesterday, but there’s no reason that user research should suffer. The solution? Remote user research. In this talk Adam will share what he’s learnt having executed hundreds of hours of remote research on a variety of projects including: common mistakes and issues, how to find the right participants and the advantages of disadvantages of certain tools.
5. Remote user research can include
anything from self-moderated or
remotely moderated usability testing,
to idea validation, to card sorts, to
depth interviews to tree-tests.
5 : Overview > Definition
Definition
@adam_ux
#DigitalGaggle
6. Simply put, it means conducting the
same research we always have, but
doing it remotely.
6 : Overview > Definition
Definition
@adam_ux
#DigitalGaggle
7. 7 : Overview > I used to be a skeptic
I used to be a skeptic
@adam_ux
#DigitalGaggle
8. Speed
● Quicker to arrange
● Multiple tests can happen simultaneously
● You don’t have to sit there during the tests
8 : Overview > Advantages
Advantages
@adam_ux
#DigitalGaggle
9. Cost
● Self-moderated sessions don’t consume your time
● Participants are cheaper to recruit as they don’t
have to travel
9 : Overview > Advantages
Advantages
@adam_ux
#DigitalGaggle
10. Participant location
● Removes the temptation to intervene
● You can recruit participants from anywhere
10 : Overview > Advantages
Advantages
@adam_ux
#DigitalGaggle
11. See users in their natural habitat
11 : Overview > Advantages
Advantages
@adam_ux
#DigitalGaggle
12. Harder to build relationships
● This specifically applies to self moderated
Not impossible:
● Remotely moderated or Skype calls, Hangouts
etc could help bridge the gap
12 : Overview > Disadvantages
Disadvantages
@adam_ux
#DigitalGaggle
13. You can’t see their wider context
13 : Overview > Disadvantages
Disadvantages
@adam_ux
#DigitalGaggle
26. First decide what you’re testing
26 : How to do it > Writing Tasks
Writing tasks
@adam_ux
#DigitalGaggle
27. Be succinct
27 : How to do it > Writing Tasks
Writing tasks
@adam_ux
#DigitalGaggle
28. Avoid ambiguity,
you won’t be there to explain it
28 : How to do it > Writing Tasks
Writing tasks
@adam_ux
#DigitalGaggle
29. Don’t use leading questions
29 : How to do it > Writing Tasks
Writing tasks
@adam_ux
#DigitalGaggle
30. Establish a rhythm
30 : How to do it > Writing Tasks
Writing tasks
@adam_ux
#DigitalGaggle
31. Poor screeners
31 : How to do it > Common mistakes
Common mistakes
@adam_ux
#DigitalGaggle
32. Participants too familiar with the process
32 : How to do it > Common mistakes
Common mistakes
@adam_ux
#DigitalGaggle
33. Not testing the test yourself
33 : How to do it > Common mistakes
Common mistakes
@adam_ux
#DigitalGaggle
34. Screeners: Missing the “Country” filter
34 : How to do it > Common mistakes
Common mistakes
@adam_ux
#DigitalGaggle
35. ● Use free trials
● Demonstrate the benefit
● Seek forgiveness not permission
35 : Conclusion > Getting permission
Getting permission
@adam_ux
#DigitalGaggle
36. Too much to fit into this session
● Hold yourself to the same standards of proof
● Show your working out (including video evidence)
● Remember your research objectives
36 : Conclusion > Analysis
Conducting analysis
@adam_ux
#DigitalGaggle
37. 1. Try it at least once, overcome preconceptions
1. Use the same budgets to do more rounds of
research, don’t use this as an excuse to spend
less
1. Ensure instructions are easily understood
1. Use the right tool for the job
1. Be rigorous in your analysis
37 : Conclusion > Takeaways
Takeaways
@adam_ux
#DigitalGaggle
I’m not going to go into the commercials as they tend to vary depending on your ability to negotiate. Validately primarily works on a subscription basis, WUD needs you to purchase credits per test and a minimum amount to do the “Bring Your Own”, UT make you buy a certain number of credits per year, UserZoom are more “enterprisey” in their pricing and I can never get a price out of them but a financial services client used to use them and in my opinion they were eye wateringly expensive. Loop11 are quite new but charge on business size or per project which means they’re either really good or really bad value depending on your perspective.
I’m not going to go into the commercials as they tend to vary depending on your ability to negotiate. Validately primarily works on a subscription basis, WUD needs you to purchase credits per test and a minimum amount to do the “Bring Your Own”, UT make you buy a certain number of credits per year, UserZoom are more “enterprisey” in their pricing and I can never get a price out of them but a financial services client used to use them and in my opinion they were eye wateringly expensive. Loop11 are quite new but charge on business size or per project which means they’re either really good or really bad value depending on your perspective.
I’m not going to go into the commercials as they tend to vary depending on your ability to negotiate. Validately primarily works on a subscription basis, WUD needs you to purchase credits per test and a minimum amount to do the “Bring Your Own”, UT make you buy a certain number of credits per year, UserZoom are more “enterprisey” in their pricing and I can never get a price out of them but a financial services client used to use them and in my opinion they were eye wateringly expensive. Loop11 are quite new but charge on business size or per project which means they’re either really good or really bad value depending on your perspective.
I’m not going to go into the commercials as they tend to vary depending on your ability to negotiate. Validately primarily works on a subscription basis, WUD needs you to purchase credits per test and a minimum amount to do the “Bring Your Own”, UT make you buy a certain number of credits per year, UserZoom are more “enterprisey” in their pricing and I can never get a price out of them but a financial services client used to use them and in my opinion they were eye wateringly expensive. Loop11 are quite new but charge on business size or per project which means they’re either really good or really bad value depending on your perspective.
I’m not going to go into the commercials as they tend to vary depending on your ability to negotiate. Validately primarily works on a subscription basis, WUD needs you to purchase credits per test and a minimum amount to do the “Bring Your Own”, UT make you buy a certain number of credits per year, UserZoom are more “enterprisey” in their pricing and I can never get a price out of them but a financial services client used to use them and in my opinion they were eye wateringly expensive. Loop11 are quite new but charge on business size or per project which means they’re either really good or really bad value depending on your perspective.
I’m not going to go into the commercials as they tend to vary depending on your ability to negotiate. Validately primarily works on a subscription basis, WUD needs you to purchase credits per test and a minimum amount to do the “Bring Your Own”, UT make you buy a certain number of credits per year, UserZoom are more “enterprisey” in their pricing and I can never get a price out of them but a financial services client used to use them and in my opinion they were eye wateringly expensive. Loop11 are quite new but charge on business size or per project which means they’re either really good or really bad value depending on your perspective.
Jared Spool:
Years ago, we helped with a study of Ikea.com, looking at how people found products on the site. When we got there, they’d already started the testing process and were using tasks like “Find a bookcase.” Interestingly, every participant did exactly the same thing: they went to the search box and typed “bookcase”.
Upon our suggestion, the team made a subtle change to the instructions they were giving their participants: “You have 200+ books in your fiction collection, currently in boxes strewn around your living room. Find a way to organize them.”
We instantly saw a change in how the participants behaved with the design. Most clicked through the various categories, looking for some sort of storage solution. Few used Search, typing in phrases like “Shelves” and “Storage Systems”. And, nobody searched on “bookcase”.