Toward more ambitious NDCs - Short term mitigation actions and their benefits across countries
•Transferir como PPTX, PDF•
1 gostou•154 visualizações
Lisa Luna presented on "Toward more ambitious NDCs", at the "Increasing mitigation action for 1.5°C" side event at COP24 in December 2018.
Recomendados
Recomendados
Mais conteúdo relacionado
Mais procurados
Mais procurados (20)
Semelhante a Toward more ambitious NDCs - Short term mitigation actions and their benefits across countries
Semelhante a Toward more ambitious NDCs - Short term mitigation actions and their benefits across countries (20)
Mais de NewClimate Institute
Mais de NewClimate Institute (20)
Último
Último (20)
Toward more ambitious NDCs - Short term mitigation actions and their benefits across countries
- 1. Short term mitigation actions and their benefits across countries Hanna Wang-Helmreich (Wuppertal Institute) Lisa Luna (NewClimate Institute) December 3, 2018 | Increasing mitigation action for 1.5°C: Short-term steps and long-term strategies Toward more ambitious NDCs
- 2. Agenda Project goals and introduction Hanna Wang-Helmreich (Research Fellow, Wuppertal Institute) Short-term mitigation actions, benefits, and challenges across countries Lisa Luna (Climate Policy Analyst, NewClimate Institute) Response: Implementing mitigation actions in Georgia Kakhaberi Mdivani (Acting Head of the Climate Change Division, Ministry of Environmental Protection and Agriculture of Georgia) 2
- 3. Project goals and introduction Hanna Wang-Helmreich (Wuppertal Institute) 3
- 4. Long-term target and emissions gap Source: Climate Action Tracker (2017): 2100 Warming Projections. https://climateactiontracker.org/global/temperatures/. For 1.5°C: GHG emissions to reach net-zero around mid- century Current NDCs not stringent enough to limit warming to well below 2°C Fulfillment of pledges + increased efforts are urgently needed – as soon as possible
- 5. Project goals Identification of opportunities to further reduce emissions Colombia, Ethiopia, Georgia, Indonesia, Iran, Kenya, Marshall Islands, Morocco, Peru, and Viet Nam 5
- 6. Country reports • Country context • Country background (general, emissions, energy use) • Institutional set up • MRV • NDC • Climate change mitigation policies • Additional mitigation potential • Three areas of action • Co-benefits • Barriers • Relevance of coal https://www.umweltbundesamt.de/themen/klima- energie/internationale-eu-klimapolitik/zukunft-der- klimapolitik/zehn-laenderstudien-zu-einer-ambitionierteren 6
- 7. 7
- 8. Short-term mitigation actions, benefits, and challenges across countries Lisa Luna (NewClimate Institute) 8
- 9. How do we get there? NDC targets and current level of mitigation action 9 2010 2020 2030 Greenhousegasemissions(MtCO2e) 1. NDC target requires additional action 2010 2020 2030 2. NDC target reached with current action 2010 2020 2030 3. NDC target overachieved with current action
- 10. How do we get there? 10 2010 2020 2030 Greenhousegasemissions(MtCO2e) 1. NDC target requires additional action 2010 2020 2030 2. NDC target reached with current action 2010 2020 2030 3. NDC target overachieved with current action • This relationship does not indicate whether the targets or actions are compatible with the Paris Agreement long-term temperature limit • Paris Agreement long-term temperature limit requires global net-zero CO2 emissions by around 2050 – mitigation actions need to look beyond achieving current NDC
- 11. What options exist? Colombia, Ethiopia, Georgia, Indonesia, Iran, Kenya, Marshall Islands, Morocco, Peru, and Viet Nam 11
- 12. What options exist? Accelerating renewable electricity, especially non-hydro, to avoid fossil-fuel lock in Increasing energy efficiency in demand sectors (industry, transport, buildings) Shifting to low-carbon transportation (electric vehicles, modal shift) Implementing low-carbon agriculture Decreasing deforestation and/or implementing sustainable forest management and agroforestry practices Decreasing direct and process emissions from oil and gas production and industry Reducing methane emissions from waste processing 12
- 13. Common co-benefits Area/Co-benefit Renewable electricity Energy efficiency Low- carbon transport- ation Low-carbon agriculture Decreasing deforestation Decreasing process emissions Reducing methane emissions from waste Economic gains x x x x x x Employment opportunities x x x x x x Environmental benefits x x x x x Climate resiliency x x x Improved air quality x x x x x Positive health benefits x x x x x Food security x Electricity access x Energy security x x x 13Further detail: http://www.ambitiontoaction.net/scan_tool
- 14. Common challenges Institutional/political Example: Institutional coordination and vertical/horizontal integration Financial/economic Example: Financing for upfront investment costs Technical Example: Grid infrastructure Informational/capacities Example: Limited data availability Behavioural Example: Consumer selection of cookstoves 14
- 15. Take home points Seven areas of action are relevant across many countries Action in each of these areas has local co-benefits Challenges are shared between countries, presenting opportunities to learn from others 15
- 16. Contact details: Thank you for your attention! www.newclimate.org Lisa Luna l.luna@newclimate.org Country reports at: https://www.umweltbundesamt.de/themen/klima- energie/internationale-eu-klimapolitik/zukunft-der-klimapolitik/zehn- laenderstudien-zu-einer-ambitionierteren
- 17. Response: Implementing mitigation actions in Georgia Kakhaberi Mdivani (Acting Head of the Climate Change Division, Ministry of Environmental Protection and Agriculture of Georgia) 17
- 18. Mitigation in Georgia 3 December, 2018 COP24 S i d e e v e n t G E O R G I A
- 19. Net Zero Emissions?! 16,391 4,098 Total GHG emissiosn (Gg) Total CO2 removals (Gg) Total GHG emissions excluding LULUCF: 12,293Gg CO2eq. Source 1st BUR 2013
- 20. Mitigation Measures T r a n s p o r t S u b - S e c t o r 2 3 % Vertical Integration Diversification of transport modes Technical Capacity Social Groups Involvement • Harmonisation of mitigation priorities; • Joint implementation. • Updated standards and requirements; • New knowledge and technologies; • Modern management systems. • Incentives for civilians and private sector; • Behavioral changes.
- 21. Challenges T r a n s p o r t S u b - S e c t o r 2 3 % Vertical Integration Technical Capacity Social Groups Involvement • Harmonisation of mitigation priorities; • Joint implementation. • Updated standards and requirements; • New knowledge and technologies; • Modern management systems. • Incentives for civilians and private sector; • Behavioral changes. Platform where cities: Sharing experiences; Assisting technically; Collaborating with technologies.
- 22. Thank you very much for your attention! Ministry of Environmental Protection and Agriculture of Georgia Tel: +995 32 272 72 62 W: mepa.gov.ge Kakhaberi Mdivani E: kakhaber.mdivani@mepa.gov.ge 3 December 2018 Mitigation in Georgia
- 23. Extra slides 23
- 24. 24
- 25. 25
- 26. 26
- 27. 27
Notas do Editor
- Target audience: policy makers + interested public developing countries with which Germany works closely on climate change topics
- to avoid stranded assets
- aim to inform policy makers and the interested public about the implementation of NDCs in individual countries. The choice of countries is based on developing countries with which Germany works closely on climate change topics.
- Will talk about some illustrative country examples as I go through Renewables: Kenya – Lamu Energy efficiency: Morocco – cement industry Low-carbon transportation – Georgia – passenger transport/modal shift Agriculture? Sustainable forest management – Peru (agroforestry/coffee plantations) Process emissions from oil + gas and industry: Iran Waste processing: Georgia
- Will talk about some illustrative country examples as I go through
- Will talk about some illustrative country examples as I go through