nr 506 week 3 your policy priority issue vaccination rates for children in ingham county michigan new,nr 506 week 3 discussion effective coalition leadership new,nr 506 week 3 your policy priority issue new,nr 506,chamberlain college of nursing nr 506 week 3 tutorial,nr 506 week 3 assignment,chamberlain college of nursing nr 506 week 3 help
This PowerPoint helps students to consider the concept of infinity.
Chamberlain college of nursing nr 506 week 3 your policy priority issue
1. Chamberlain College Of Nursing NR 506 Week 3
Your Policy Priority Issue ( Bicycle Helmet Policy )
NEW
http://www.assignmentcloud.com/nr-506-
chamberlain-college-of-nursing/nr-506-week-
3-your-policy-priority-issue-bicycle-helmet-
policy-new
For more classes visit
http://www.assignmentcloud.com
Your Policy Priority Issue Guidelines and Grading
Rubric
Purpose
The purpose of this assignment is to: a) identify
and reflect upon key concepts related to your
planning a policymaker call b) provide empirical
evidence to support new insights gained regarding
your healthcare policy issue and the policymaking
process, and c) present ideas in a clear, succinct,
and scholarly manner.
Course Outcomes
This assignment enables the student to meet the
following course outcomes:
2. (CO#1) Analyze application of theories to the
development of policies that affect nursing and
health care. (PO 9, 10)
(CO#3) Communicate with policymakers to
advocate for effective policies that affect nurses
and nursing, consumers, or the health care system.
(PO 2, 3, 10)
(CO#4) Analyze the historical, ethical, and political
contexts of healthcare policy and the
consequences of policy implementation. (PO 6, 10)
(CO#6) Investigate the interrelationship between
policy decisions and evidence-based practice.
(PO4, 7, 10)
Due DateSunday 11:59 p.m. MT at the end of Week
3
Total Points:175 points
Requirements
Assignment Criteria for Presentation:
1. Provide an introduction to your healthcare
policy-priorityissue and the title or name of your
legislator.
2. Articulate key points under each of the
Formulating a Healthcare Policy Ungraded
Worksheet #1 sections.
3. Provide a critique of empirical evidence that
supports your chosen healthcare policy-priority
issue and analysis.
3. 4. Demonstrate the importance and impact of the
chosen healthcare policy-priority issue to nursing.
5. Provide concluding statements summarizingthe
content.
6. The paper will be a minimum of 4 pages and a
maximum offive pages in length,in APA format 6th
edition,excluding the title and reference page.
Preparing the Paper
After completing Formulating a Healthcare Policy
Ungraded Worksheet #1, address all areas on the
worksheet in the body of a scholarly paper.
Include a minimum of five (5) classic or current
references published within the past 5 years.
Category Points % Description
Introduction and Conclusion 35 20 Introduction
clearly introduces your healthcare policy- priority
issue and the title or name of your designated
legislator.
Concluding statements summarizing content.
Key Points 40 23 Identification of all key points of
your healthcare policy-priority issue (review
sections of Healthcare Policy Ungraded
Worksheet) are clearly analyzed and fully
articulated.
Empirical Evidence 40 23 Provide a critique of
empirical evidence thatsupports your chosen
healthcare policy issue and analysis.
4. Impact and Importance to Nursing 35 20
Demonstrate the importance and impact of the
chosen healthcare policy issue to nursing.
APA Format 10 6 Text, title page, and references
are consistent with APA format.
Writing Quality 15 8 Rules of grammar, word
usage, sentence, and paragraph format and
punctuation.
Total 175 100 A quality assignment will meet or
exceed all of the above requirements.
Grading Rubric
Assignment Criteria Exceptional
(100%)
Outstanding or highest level of performance
Exceeds
(88%)
Very good or high level of performance Meets
(80%)
Competent or satisfactory level of performance
Needs Improvement
(38%)
Poor or failing level of performance Developing
(0)
Unsatisfactory level of performance
ContentPossible Points = 150 Points
Introduction clearly introduces your healthcare
policy-priority issue. Concluding statements
5. summarizing content are present.
35 Points 31 Points 28 Points 13 Points 0 Points
Introduction clearly introduces your healthcare
policy-priority issue and the title or name of your
designated legislator. Concluding statements
summarizing content are present, clear, and well
written.
Introduction introduces your healthcare policy-
priority issue and the name or title of your
designated legislator. Concluding statements
summarizing content are present. Minor clarity or
detail issues.
Introduction and conclusion are included; could
include more details such as a specific healthcare
policy-priority issue that a legislator could act
upon or the name or title of the legislator; clarity
or improvement of format.
Lacking introduction or conclusion.
No attempt made at introduction or conclusion.
Identification of all key points of your healthcare
policy-priority issue are clearly analyzed and fully
articulated.
40 Points 35 Points 32 Points 15 Points 0 Points
Key points are well described, and analysis is fully
articulated.
Key points are described with some lack of clarity,
and/or analysis is lacking detail or clarity.
6. Key points are not well described, and/or analysis
is lacking detail or clarity.
Key points or analysis is missing.
Key points and analysis is missing.
Empirical evidence supporting your healthcare
policy-priority issue is clearly critiqued.
40 Points 35 Points 32 Points 15 Points 0 Points
Empirical evidence supporting your healthcare
policy- priority issue is clearly critiqued in a
comprehensive and accurate manner.
Empirical evidence supporting your healthcare
policy- priority issue is critiqued but lacking
clarity or not substantive.
Empirical evidence supporting your healthcare
policy- priority issue is noted but not critiqued.
Empirical evidence supporting your healthcare
policy priority issue is lacking.
No attempt made at providing empirical evidence.
Your healthcare policy- priority issue clearly
demonstrates the impact and or importance of
your issue to nursing or the intended impact to
patient outcomes.
35 Points 31 Points 28 Points 13 Points 0 Points
Impact to patient outcomes or nursing practice is
thoroughly discussed.
Impact to patient outcomes or nursing practice has
rare inaccuracy.
7. Impact to patient outcomes or nursing practice
lacks occasional important elements or specificity.
Impact to patient outcomes or nursing practice has
multiple instances of inaccuracies.
Impact to patient outcomes or nursing practice has
multiple instances of inaccuracies and is vague.
Content Subtotal_____of 150 points
Format Possible Points = 25 Points
APA Format: Text, title page, and reference page(s)
are completely consistent with APA format
6thedition.
10 Points 9 Points 8 Points 4 Points 0 Points
Paper is free from APA errors throughout.
There are 1-2 APA format errors in the text, title
page, and/or reference page(s) There are 3-4 APA
format errors in the text, title page, and/or
reference page(s) There are 5 APA format errors
in the text, title page, and/or reference page(s)
There are 6 or more APA format errors in the text,
title page, and/or reference page(s)
Writing Quality: Paper is appropriate in length.
References include a minimum of 5 scholarly
references excluding the course text. Rules of
grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation
are consistent with formal written work.
15 Points 13 Points 12 Points 6 Points 0 Points
Paper is appropriate in length. References include
8. more than the minimum number of scholarly
references, excluding the course text. Rules of
grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation
are consistent with formal written work.
Paper is short/long in length and/or contains a
minimum of scholarly references excluding course
text, or references utilized are not scholarly. Rules
of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation
are consistent with formal written work with1-2
exceptions.
Paper is short/long in length and contains only 1
scholarly reference. Additional references are not
scholarly. Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage,
and punctuation are consistent with formal
written work with 3-4 exceptions.
Paper is short/long two or more pages in length
and does not contain scholarly references.
References utilized are not scholarly. Rules of
grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation
are not followed with 5 errors.
Paper is short/long two or more pages in length
and does not contain scholarly references.
References utilized are not scholarly. Rules of
grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation
are not followed with 6 or more errors.