2. Learning Goal:
To help students recall the steps used
when performing an experiment.
3. Activity:
Students will be designing their own experiment to
be able to support or reject their hypothesis.
Standard:
To assess the reliability of information according to
the strict standards of scientific investigation by
using critical thinking and problem solving skills
(SC.912.N.1.4)
4.
5. Steps to the Scientific Method
1. Identify the problem/question
2. Form a Hypothesis
3. Perform an experiment
4. Collect and analyze the data
5. Modify the experiment if the data was not reliable
or flawed.
6. Report results by publishing your findings.
6. 6 Important vocabulary words
Hypothesis
Theory
Law
Control group
Constant variables
8. Scientific Theory
It’s the most powerful explanation of a
natural phenomenon.
Supported by considerable evidence.
Tested over a long period of time.
*** Often scientists form theories to explain laws **
*Theories do NOT turn into laws or laws into theories*
Ex. Theory of Gravity
9. Scientific Law
Well supported descriptions.
Can be reduced to a mathematical
statement, Example: E = mc²
Based on empirical data.
Empirical data means data that can be verifiable or provable by means of
observation or experiment. Laws are generally confined to a certain set of conditions
10. Control group:
Used for comparison reasons.
It’s outcome is already known
from previous observations.
11. Constant Variables:
all things in an experiment
that are kept the same.
Allow for a “fair test”
<<end of notes>>
13. Parts of a Lab Report:
1. Title
2. Introduction & Purpose (includes hypothesis)
3. Materials
4. Procedures (numbered)
5. Data (including graphs)
6. Conclusion should address the following:
Was the hypothesis supported or rejected?
Describe possible errors.
Improvements to the lab
Applications in the real world.
14. Class Activity – Practicing
Title of Lab Activity: Paper Towel Lab
15. Brainstorming:
Come up with the following parts
of the lab:
Hypothesis
Variables
List of materials
Procedures
Data Chart
17. Date:
Title: Paper Towel Absorbency Lab
Purpose: To test whether there is any
difference in paper towel absorbency.
<<<Research Question: Will there be a difference in the absorbency
capabilities of three different paper towels?>>>
Hypothesis - <<<try to answer the experimental question by
writing a statement that tries to answer the research question. Do not
use personal pronouns (“I” “we”)>>>
18. Materials <you won’t be needing all of these>
3 diff. types of
towels
Scissors
Rulers
Beaker 250ml size
w/ water
Pan
Graduate cylinder
Balance/scale
timer
Dropper
Rubber band
19. Procedure:
1.
2.
3.
4.
….
<<HINT: Do not introduce any bias into your experiment.
Be consistent. Use precise measurements. Use metric
system! (cm, ml, g). Think about what will be your
independent and dependent variable. Pick the best tool to
measure the difference in absorbency.>>
20. Data:
<<Directions: Make sure you have a chart/table on
where to record your data/info. Please make graph on
graph paper or excel.>>
21. Conclusion: (pg 14)
<<You need to address the following points in your conclusion>>
a)Describe what happened in your experiment
b) Is your hypothesis supported or rejected by the
data that was collected?
c) How can you improve your lab/experiment
design?
d) List 2-3 human errors that could have made your
data unreliable/inaccurate.
e) Discuss applications of your findings in the real
world.
22. Color Key used in PPT:
Black – indicates notes & Main Headings
Blue – indicates titles/cue words, place in margins.
Red – instructions or detailed info (don’t need to
copy – optional)
Green – page numbers and date
Notas do Editor
measure= quantitative data
observe=qualitative data
Independent Variable (define in the Graphing PPT)
Dependent Variable (define in the Graphing PPT)
DATA: Information gathered during an experiment, Organized in charts/tables.
Scientific theory is the culmination of many scientific investigations drawing together all the current evidence concerning a substantial range of phenomena; thus, a scientific theory represents the most powerful explanation scientists have to offer.
Nothing new is tested on this group so we do not expect any new information.