Presentación de Borland en Solo Pruebas 2009

1. Profiling the Economic Value of Lifecycle Quality Management David Reo

3. The Borland Focus © 2008 Borland Software Corporation Open ALM Vision To transform software delivery into a managed business process leveraging your methods and your tools

4. Borland Framework for ALM Transformation Already Achieved Value Received What it’s Worth How to Get There Software Delivery Managed Business Process ALM Value Path ALM Value Lower Costs Higher Quality Faster Time to Market Better Alignment ALM Capability Transparent Effective Analytical Quality-Drive n Where You Want To Be

6. ALM Capability Roadmap Managed Business Process Management Decisions Practitioner Activities Information Demand Management Project Management Measurement Quality Management Change Management Requirements Management

7. Capability Stages Managed Business Process Foundation Visibility Control Predictability Basics Demand Management Project Management Measurement Quality Management Change Management Requirements Management

9. Software Cost and Value Model Development Costs Maintenance Costs Application Lifecycle Time Line Maintenance Costs Value of Application Lost Value Value of Application Development Costs Failed Projects Release Start of Project Actual Release Planned Release End of Use

10. Lower Costs Development Costs Maintenance Costs Application Lifecycle Time Line Maintenance Costs Value of Application Lost Value Value of Application Development Costs Failed Projects Release Start of Project Actual Release Planned Release End of Use Reduced Rework Higher Developer Productivity Higher Management Productivity

11. Higher Quality Development Costs Maintenance Costs Application Lifecycle Time Line Maintenance Costs Value of Application Lost Value Value of Application Development Costs Failed Projects Release Start of Project Actual Release Planned Release End of Use Reduced Maintenance Costs Reduced Support Costs More Satisfied Customers

12. Faster Time to Market Development Costs Maintenance Costs Application Lifecycle Time Line Maintenance Costs Value of Application Lost Value Value of Application Development Costs Failed Projects Release Start of Project Actual Release Planned Release End of Use Earlier Delivery

13. Better Business Alignment Development Costs Maintenance Costs Application Lifecycle Time Line Maintenance Costs Value of Application Lost Value Value of Application Development Costs Failed Projects Release Start of Project Actual Release Planned Release End of Use Higher Priority Projects More Reliable Schedules More Successful Projects

16. Economic Value of CBI Gaps Economic Value of CBI Gaps App Dev Costs $100,000 - $200,000 Correct Applications $100,000 - $200,000 Responsive Applications $100,000 - $200,000 App Dev Delays $100,000 - $200,000 Customer Satisfaction $100,000 - $200,000 App Dev Predictability $50,000 - $100,000 Reliable Applications $50,000 - $100,000 Regulations & Compliance $50,000 - $100,000 Time To Market $50,000 - $100,000 Visibility and Transparency $0,000 - $50,000 Total $700,000 - $1,450,000

18. Staged Improvement Approach Improvement Value Phase 1 $141,307 Phase 2 $160,212 Phase 3 $188,410 Phase 4 $148,036 Total $637,965 Remaining Value to be Gained Automated Testing Test Management Operational LQM Enterprise LQM 70% 60% 80% 80% Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4

19. Sources of Value

20. Why Do an ALM Value Profile - 1 What Progress Have You Made? How Do You Compare With Others? What Is the Business Value of the Long-Term Strategy? Where Should You Focus Initially? What Are Your Critical Business Issues? What Is the Economic Impact of Your CBIs? What Is the Business Value of the First Phase?

21. Why Do an ALM Value Profile - 2 What Parameters Drive the Model? How Do Your Parameters Compare with the Norm? What Are the Sources of Business Value? What Is the Relative Value of Different Disciplines/Stages? What Is the Value of ALM Capability?

22. Why Do an ALM Value Profile - 3 What Is Your Long-Term Strategy? What Is the Business Value of the Strategy? How Does the Strategy Address the CBIs?

23. Why Do an ALM Value Profile - 4 Albert Einstein (1879 - 1955) “ Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results. ” What’s the cost of maintaining the status quo, the cost of doing nothing?

24. Questions Copyright © 2007 Borland Software Corporation.

25. Thank You David A. Reo Consulting Services Manager Spain, Portugal & Italy C/ Ribera del Loira, 46 28042 – MADRID (Spain) t +34 915 030 632 m +34 659 756 165 f +34 946 773 729 [email_address]

26. Back up Slides Copyright © 2007 Borland Software Corporation.

28. Discipline Categories Basics Foundations Visibility Control Predictability MBP Demand Management Categorized Work Requests Resource-Based Decisions Business-Based Decisions Strategy-Based Decisions Project Management Reactive Project Management Proactive Project Management Cross-Functional Project Management Managed Business Process Measurement Validated Measurement Focused Measurement Predictive Measurement Quality Management Automated Testing Test Management Operational LQM Enterprise LQM Change Management Source Code Management Build Management Artifact Management Artifact Quality Control Defect Management Requirements Management Requirements Repository Requirements Traceability Scope Management Requirements Quality Control

31. Improvement Parameters Customer Inputs Normative Value Range Source Current rework level 40% 10%-40%% CMMI Study Potential rework level 10% 0%-10% CMMI Study Post-Release Defect reduction 75% 50%-90% CMMI Study Potential Success Rate 90% 80%-100% Gain from Project Alignment 10% 10%-30% Forrester PMM Study Gain from better staff utilization 10% 10%-30% Forrester PMM Study Reduction in actual support costs 20% 10%-40% Forrester PMM Study Reduction in reporting/communication effort 30% 20%-50% Borland Case Study We have normative values for all of the improvement parameters

32. Normative Calculation This is the “Total ALM Value” – assuming the customer goes from nothing to full ALM in one step ALM Value Factor Normative Calculation Lower Costs Reduced Rework 30.0% Higher Developer Productivity 8.0% Higher Management Productivity 3.0% Subtotal 41.0% Higher Quality Reduced Maintenance Costs 18.8% Reduced Support Costs 2.0% More Satisfied Customers - Subtotal 20.8% Faster Time to Market Earlier Software Delivery 15.6% Subtotal 15.6% Greater Alignment More Reliable Schedules - More Successful Projects 7.8% Higher Priority Projects 10.0% Subtotal 17.8% Total (% of Annual Development Budget) 95%