Unacceptable practises in industrial food production systems: Close confinement of pigs and poultry in cages; Barren environments with no enrichment; Routine mutilations; and Use of antibiotics for growth promotion and cover-up cruelty
Introduction to Prompt Engineering (Focusing on ChatGPT)
Food Systems: a 21st century One Health challenge
1. FoodSystems:a21st centuryOneHealthchallenge
One HealthDay 2020, AFROHUN
Dr Kelvin Momanyi, BVM, MSc
Campaigns Officer (Animals in Farming)
World Animal Protection, Africa
3rd November2020|Mobile:0727739772|Email|KelvinMomanyi@worldanimalprotection.org
2. Presentation
outline• Warming up –(alumni insights and inspiration)
• Food systems a 21st century OneHealth problem:
• Complex food systems
• Surveillance
• A focus on animal welfare and public health
• Conclusion and recommendations
4. Warming up: your purpose
Reflect on the promise you made to yourself
5. Warming up: life in campus
Network and update knowledge e.g. conferences,
workshops, short trainings
Oct. 2009
6. Warming up: dare yourself
Pioneered One HealthClub, University of Nairobi to
catalyze One Health skillsamong students across
Kenya:
• Expert speaker invitations
• CSR events e.g. tree planting
• Community outreaches
7. Warming up: your net worth
Your network is your net worth (start from home –
lecturers, fellow classmates)
8. Warming up: volunteer
Volunteering and community work to:
• Learn and build new skills
• Explore different cultures to appreciate their
challenges
9. Warming up: finding oneself
• Finding yourself isa process and not anevent
• Finding opportunities (a challenge) e.g.
o http://onehealthhorn.net/
o https://ilri.simplicant.com/
o https://www.onehealthcommission.org/en/resources_
_services/oh_opportunities_bulletin_board/
o https://www.onehealthconsult.com/
o https://www.kenyavetassociation.com/info-
hub/opportunities/
10. Warming up: fall forward
• Don't give up when you fall - fall forward
• Scholarship journey
• Lessons from my MScapplication:
o Cover letter
o References matter
o Tell your story
11. Warming up: stay in the job
It is not enough to get the job (the challengeis to stay in
the joband continuallygrow yourself)
14. Integrated (animal, human) surveillance systems–
ZooLinK project• Goal was to pilot an integrated system for 15
animaland human zoonoses
• Surveillance systems are criticalto inform policy and
decision making
• Technology is an important tool to sensitize and
educate the public andfarmers -case of iCow
• Highlighted important animal welfare issues along
the animalfood chain (some that could potential
lead to spillover of diseases across species)
• Culture can inform our solutions
http://www.zoonotic-diseases.org/project/zoolink-project/
16. Who is World Animal
Protection
• Weareaglobalorganization
• Wehavemovedtheworldtoprotectanimalsfor
morethan50years
• WorktomakeHigherWelfarefarmingnormal
• Webaseourworkontheinternationallyrecognized
5animalwelfarefreedoms 1 Australia
2 Brazil
3 Canada
4 Costa Rica
5 China
6 Denmark
7 India
8 Kenya
9 Netherlands
10 New Zealand
11 Sweden
12 Thailand
13 UK
14 USA
Our offices
17. What we do: our farming
campaign areas
Engaging largest world´s retailers1.
Engaging largest pork and poultry producers2.
Corporate and consumer engagement3.
Engaging stakeholders along the value chain4.
18. Billions of factory farmed animals
globally
The problem:
Industrial farming (focus on chicken
& pigs)
Fast growth, barren and cramped
environments
Severe physical and mental impacts
Use of cages
Painful procedures
Food safety and superbug crisis
19. Good
Acceptable
Unacceptable
Global Pig and Broiler
WelfareFrameworks
Pig and poultry welfare practice in
indoor systems
Producers& Retailers
Howwebringchangeforanimals:ourworkisbasedonscience
◦ Technicalresources
◦ Research
◦ Globalbusinesscases
20. •Close confinement of pigs and poultry in cages
•Barren environments with no enrichment
•Routine mutilations
•Use of antibiotics for growth promotion and cover up cruelty
Unacceptable practises
21. Allpigs and chicken are able to live in stable, social groups in comfortable environments with
opportunities to express naturalbehaviours
High welfare practises
22. We have worked with some of the world’s largest pig producers like BRF, JBS, Betagro, CP
Foods as wellas leadingChineseproducers likeQinglian,Dexingand Da Bei Nong
Whatare they doing:
◦ Keeping sows in social groups
◦ Using comfortable floors
◦ Offering enrichment
◦ Decreasing mutilations
Our work with producers
23. Global trend: Enriched group sow
housing
Sow group housing canbe established for similar or less cost thansow stallsystems
24. • Enrichment = safe, chewable,
rootable, destructive and ideally edible
• Enrichment for pigs can reduce losses
due to tail and vulva biting, fighting
and carcass condemnation, and gastric
ulcers while improving growth and
meat quality
Global trend:
enrichment benefits
25. • Teeth clipping does not solve the real problem
• Teeth reduction is not needed if sow comfort is ensured
• Staff have more time to focus on the most important areas of
husbandry, (such as sow body condition, water availability,
improving lactating sow´s feeding and piglet care during the
first three days of life)
Lessons learnt:
avoiding teeth reduction
26. Tailbiting is aconsequence of inadequate
management
Main causes:
• Barren environments
• Early weaning
• Over-crowded conditions
Global trend:
avoiding tail docking
Avoidingtail dockinghasbeencorrelatedwith significant reductionofantibiotics
27. More active
Healthier footpads
Global trend:
Slow growth, lower
stocking densities and
enrichment in poultry
Less hock burns
Lower mortality
Reduced usage of
antibioticsReduced meat quality losses
28. Lessons learnt: cost
efficiencies of higher welfare
(poultry)
Cost of rejection (Kshs 80, 934)
Downgrade losses (Kshs 48, 415)
Mortality losses (Kshs 24,002)
Total Welfare losses (Kshs 153,351)
Implementation of welfare practices would
contribute to reduction of this level of loss
to society.
29. More than
of chicken consumers surveyed globally said they would
pay more for better-quality, higher-welfare products
(across 14 countries between 2016-2018)
Global trend: consumer
awareness
30. Consumers were ambivalent when it
came to issues such as: animal
welfare standards, how animals are
raised, chemical free foods and
non-GMO foods, why?:
• there is no quality assurance mark
on the food
• there is no opportunity to access
this information in the restaurant
Consumer perspectives:
East Africa
Provision of quality assurance marks and access
to this information in fast food restaurants,
supermarkets and producers to be paid a premium
for antibiotic-free products
Healthy meals that are
chemical free
Pay more for humanely
reared animals and
animal products
Buy more meat and
products if it is safer
Buy more locally
produced meat/products
if animals were raised
in an environmentally
sustainable way
Pay more if they are
assured that the meat
is free of antibiotics.
Consumers want:
32. “Today you cannot produce without animal welfare”
Fabricia da Silva Delgado Vice President of
Quality from BRF
Industrycommitments:Producervoices(BRF)
33. “We’re doing this because…it’s the right thing to do…Our business
depends on the health, sustainability and reputation of chicken farming
and, our customers care”
Paula MacKenzie, General manager, KF
UK & Ireland
Industrycommitments:Producervoices(KFC)
34. “[Rabobank] strongly encourage[s] all of our clients to have transitione
to cage-free housing systems for laying hens and group housing for sow
by 2025.”
Rabobank 2018 ‘Sustainability
Policy’
Industrycommitments:Investorvoices(Rabobank)
35. Presentations are communication tools that
can be used as demonstrations, lectures,
speeches, reports, and more. Most of the
time, they’re presented before an
audience.
Howweare
supporting
companies
Clearguidanceonthecompanyassessmentandhowtoimprove
Providetimetomakethenecessaryimprovements
Repeatassessment,usinginformationtohighlightprogress
https://www.bbfaw.com/
36. ◦ Industry worldwide is changing and realizing the
importance of animal welfare and the benefits it brings to
theproductionsystems
◦ Consumers are more conscious and they are expecting
higheranimalwelfareproducts
◦ Momentum for public commitments to good animal
welfarestandardsisincreasinglyglobal
◦ Implementing animal welfare is not only good for
animals, it is proven that is also good for people,
businessandenvironment
Conclusions:
Thechangeispossible,andworthforpeople,animals,theenvironment
andbusiness
37. • Poor welfare of birds impact negatively on performance
andproductquality
• Low welfare systems, use more antibiotics as props (risk
ofantibioticresistance)
• Animal welfare is inextricably linked with animal health,
andhumanhealthandwelfare
Conclusions:
Publichealth and animalwelfare
Example: stress and poorwelfare in farm animals increases the transmission and virulence of a number of zoonotic diseases.
Protecting the welfare of farm animals can therefore be an important factorin decreasing the spread of disease and antibiotic
usage.
38. ◦ Develop an overarching animal welfare policy aligned
with the 5 Domains Model and phase in procurement
requirements in line with the FARMS animal welfare
requirementsasaminimum
◦ Require suppliers to commit to using antibiotics
responsiblyinfarming
◦ Increase the proportion of plant-based protein options
available to customers to support an average global
reduction in meat production and consumption of 50% by
2040.
◦ Publish annual reports on their progress towards
implementing higher welfare commitments in conjunction
with antibioticuse data on supplier farms; and progress on
humaneandsustainableproteindiversification.
Recommendationsandcalltoaction:
Forretailers
39. ◦ Develop an overarching animal welfare policy aligned with
the 5 Domains Model and phase in procurement
requirements in line with the FARMS animal welfare
requirementsasaminimum
◦ Committousingantibioticsresponsiblyinfarming
◦ Increase the proportion of plant-based protein options
available to customers to support an average global reduction
inmeatproductionandconsumptionof50%by2040.
◦ Publish annual reports on their progress towards
implementing higher welfare commitments in conjunction
with antibiotic use data on supplier farms; and progress on
humaneandsustainableproteindiversification.
Recommendationsandcalltoaction:Globalanimal
proteinproduction
40. ◦ Introduce and enforce regulations in line with FARMS
animalwelfarerequirementsasaminimum
◦ Introduce and enforce regulations ending the routine
useof antibiotics including to promote fast growth and to
preventdiseaseacrossgroups
◦ Commit to national surveillance and public reporting of
antibiotic use at farm level in conjunction with reporting
onwelfarepracticesonfarms
◦ Redirect subsidies and financial incentives to higher
welfare systems that align with the 5 Domains Model
and in support of an average global reduction in meat
productionandconsumptionof50%by2040
Recommendationsandcalltoaction:Governments
andintergovernmentalorganisations
Source: https://www.farms-initiative.com/
41. ◦ Require companies to meet FARMS animal welfare requirements as a
minimum. Phase in requirements for companies towards systems that
alignwiththe5DomainsModel
◦ Requirecompaniestocommittousingantibioticsresponsiblyinfarming
◦ Increase the proportion of plant-based protein in the investment portfolio
to support an average global reduction in meat production and
consumptionof50%by2040
◦ Influence policy such as supporting regulations on stricter animal welfare
requirements, antibiotic use, mandatory disclosures, and due diligence
processes
◦ Participate in efforts to accurately measure and assess climate risks
throughoutagriculturalsupplychains,tomeettheParisAgreement
Recommendationsandcalltoaction:financial
investorsinfoodsystems
This is our agenda for today’s presentation (run through points)
And then it’s over to you, to ask any questions you might have. And this isn’t the end of the conversation of course – please do get in touch with us over email (there’s a link at the end of the presentation).
Everyone muted…
This is our agenda for today’s presentation (run through points)
And then it’s over to you, to ask any questions you might have. And this isn’t the end of the conversation of course – please do get in touch with us over email (there’s a link at the end of the presentation).
Everyone muted…
This is our agenda for today’s presentation (run through points)
And then it’s over to you, to ask any questions you might have. And this isn’t the end of the conversation of course – please do get in touch with us over email (there’s a link at the end of the presentation).
Everyone muted…
This is our agenda for today’s presentation (run through points)
And then it’s over to you, to ask any questions you might have. And this isn’t the end of the conversation of course – please do get in touch with us over email (there’s a link at the end of the presentation).
Everyone muted…
This is our agenda for today’s presentation (run through points)
And then it’s over to you, to ask any questions you might have. And this isn’t the end of the conversation of course – please do get in touch with us over email (there’s a link at the end of the presentation).
Everyone muted…
This is our agenda for today’s presentation (run through points)
And then it’s over to you, to ask any questions you might have. And this isn’t the end of the conversation of course – please do get in touch with us over email (there’s a link at the end of the presentation).
Everyone muted…
This is our agenda for today’s presentation (run through points)
And then it’s over to you, to ask any questions you might have. And this isn’t the end of the conversation of course – please do get in touch with us over email (there’s a link at the end of the presentation).
Everyone muted…
This is our agenda for today’s presentation (run through points)
And then it’s over to you, to ask any questions you might have. And this isn’t the end of the conversation of course – please do get in touch with us over email (there’s a link at the end of the presentation).
Everyone muted…
This is our agenda for today’s presentation (run through points)
And then it’s over to you, to ask any questions you might have. And this isn’t the end of the conversation of course – please do get in touch with us over email (there’s a link at the end of the presentation).
Everyone muted…
This is our agenda for today’s presentation (run through points)
And then it’s over to you, to ask any questions you might have. And this isn’t the end of the conversation of course – please do get in touch with us over email (there’s a link at the end of the presentation).
Everyone muted…
This is our agenda for today’s presentation (run through points)
And then it’s over to you, to ask any questions you might have. And this isn’t the end of the conversation of course – please do get in touch with us over email (there’s a link at the end of the presentation).
Everyone muted…
Improve the level of animal welfare within the poultry and porcine production systems by mobilizing consumers and the public to demand higher welfare produced chicken and pig products from the outlets where they source their meats.
Robert Lawrence, a professor emeritus of environmental health at Johns Hopkins University, has said, “We have abundant evidence documenting the fact that when you put animals in crowded, unsanitary conditions and use low-dose antibiotics for disease prevention, you set up a perfect incubator for spontaneous mutations in the DNA of the bacteria […] With more spontaneous mutations, the odds increase that one of those mutations will provide resistance to the antibiotic that’s present in the environment.”
We base our work on a solid, scientific basis. Our global pig and poultry welfare frameworks outline what is unacceptable, acceptable and good welfare practice for indoor pig and poultry farms
World Animal Protection has produced a range of technical resources, research and global business cases which highlight profitable higher welfare practices implemented by major businesses.
Leading the Way and Sharing Success demonstrate in producers’ own words and experiences how they have initiated and scaled up transitions to group housing for sows, phasing out painful piglet procedures and implementing enrichment.
3 out of 4 sows remain in cages during pregnancy globally
Pigs are sentience beings
Why is a problem?
They experience pain, suffering, and are bored in to the close confinement systems.
To meet consumer and supplier demand for high welfare products some of world’s biggest pig producers are successfully swapping sow stalls for enriched group sow housing. They are rapidly finding that keeping sows in social groups, using comfortable floors and offering enrichment is hugely beneficial to both the animals and their businesses.
Often sow group housing can be established for similar or less cost than sow stall systems (eg. Brazil, US and Thailand) = World Animal Protection economic case study for Brazil, other reports and personal comments relate to the US and Thailand respectively.
To be effective, enrichment needs to be safe, chewable, destructive and ideally edible. Straw and similar substrates are ideal. Providing straw at least once a day can reduce tail biting tenfold. As little as 100g/day/pig and 0.9sqm space per pig
Provides behavioural benefits and significant reduction in tail biting
Enrichment for pigs can reduce losses due to tail and vulva biting, fighting and carcass condemnation, and gastric ulcers while improving growth and meat quality
A survey revealed fewer injurious tail biting outbreaks on farms using larger amounts of straw. Increasing the straw amount up to 300 or 400g per pig and day had the following positive effects:
• reduced tail injuries and stomach ulcers
• increased growth rate
• increased the number of pigs, and time spent, engaging in straw-directed behaviour
• reduced the time spent in redirected behaviours towards other pigs.
These systems deal with small amounts of straw that fall down the slats using large pipes and regular flushing.
When straw is not available: chewable materials provided before (and after) weaning also reduce tail bitingmm. For example, jute sacks, knotted rope and local edible plants replenished daily or fresh wood work well, placed in the activity area of pens. Some exploration feeding (on the ground) can also reduce tail bitingand other fighting.
Finland banned tail docking.
Originally, Finnish farms experienced 5–20% tail biting. Tail biting average rates in Finland are now less than 2.5% and this farm experiences less than 1%.
Betagro phased out tail docking in 2016, while introducing enrichment for growing and finishing pigs. Betagro’s responsible antibiotic use policy further demands improved growing pig management. They use enrichment as an important tool to reduce stress, improve immunity and reduce fighting, biting, disease and antibiotic need. They also provide a space allowance of 1.2mt2 per pig nursery to finishing.
By the end of 2018, Betagro had ensured that 2.3 million finisher pigs (at high risk times as a start) and 260,000 pigs with long tails had enrichment. This was made possible by the company’s pig welfare trained staff supporting company or contract farms to extend enrichment use.
In broiler production, higher welfare systems offer benefits for chickens, producers, and consumers alike. Slower-growing chickens raised at lower stocking densities in enriched environments have been found to be more active, have better welfare outcomes, for example healthier footpads, less hockburns, and lower mortality.
For producers, farm losses associated with sudden death, leg deformities, walking and skin problems are reduced, and capital costs of cages are also avoided through higher welfare practices.
Higher welfare production also helps cut losses at the processing stage by reducing meat quality issues including woody breast and white striping.
Higher welfare chicken practices can also reduce the need for routine antibiotics, which is a growing concern for consumers.
Reservations around the increased cost of production of higher welfare chicken may hinder the adoption of and progress on welfare commitments. Some of you may be familiar with research on the economics of higher welfare production, which we released last year in partnership with researchers at Wageningen University.
About the study:
We commissioned researchers from the University of Wageningen, who used a tested, peer-reviewed model. The model calculates the increase in cost of switching from conventional production systems to higher welfare systems in line with World Animal Protection’s Global Broiler Welfare Framework.
For this study, we selected five key markets based on volume production. These markets were the United States, Brazil, The Netherlands, China, and Thailand. They represented a combined production output of 26 billion chickens per year, or close to 50% of global broiler production.
Researchers conducted an extensive literature review and consulted country-based experts and production companies when possible.
The welfare level of each system is calculated using the Welfare Quality® protocol. The ratio of cost increase relative to quantifiable welfare improvement is the welfare cost-efficiency.
To supplement this research, we used consumer polling commissioned by World Animal Protection from 2016 to 2018 across 14 countries, finding that consumer interest in higher welfare chicken continues to increase
More than 160 companies have committed to the Better Chicken Commitment, most recently KFC in 6 major markets, some supplied by Thai producers. In the US, some major chicken processors like Perdue are making progress on improving welfare; for example, they have committed to have natural light in 75 percent of their chicken houses by 2020.
https://thepoultrysite.com/news/2019/07/kfc-signs-up-to-the-better-chicken-commitment
As mentioned before, KFC signed up to the BCC in six European countries: UK, Ireland, Germany, the Netherlands, Sweden and Belgium – becoming the first major fast food chain to commit in Europe.
What is not measured cannot be managed – as part of this commitment KFC will independently audit their progress and publicly report on it. This follows the company's work to increase transparency in the UK and Ireland b developing new software that also it o publish welfare data.
KFC will also fund research into better chicken welfare to find ways to accelerate its transition to higher welfare systems.
The company estimates the commitment will impact 72 million chickens.
World Animal Protection has worked closely with KFC to support them in making this commitment. Our work does not end here – we continue to work with them in their implementation of actions to realize their commitment and we are encouraging similar actions in other markets where the company operates.
As mentioned before, KFC signed up to the BCC in six European countries: UK, Ireland, Germany, the Netherlands, Sweden and Belgium – becoming the first major fast food chain to commit in Europe.
What is not measured cannot be managed – as part of this commitment KFC will independently audit their progress and publicly report on it. This follows the company's work to increase transparency in the UK and Ireland b developing new software that also it o publish welfare data.
KFC will also fund research into better chicken welfare to find ways to accelerate its transition to higher welfare systems.
The company estimates the commitment will impact 72 million chickens.
World Animal Protection has worked closely with KFC to support them in making this commitment. Our work does not end here – we continue to work with them in their implementation of actions to realize their commitment and we are encouraging similar actions in other markets where the company operates.
As mentioned before, KFC signed up to the BCC in six European countries: UK, Ireland, Germany, the Netherlands, Sweden and Belgium – becoming the first major fast food chain to commit in Europe.
What is not measured cannot be managed – as part of this commitment KFC will independently audit their progress and publicly report on it. This follows the company's work to increase transparency in the UK and Ireland b developing new software that also it o publish welfare data.
KFC will also fund research into better chicken welfare to find ways to accelerate its transition to higher welfare systems.
The company estimates the commitment will impact 72 million chickens.
World Animal Protection has worked closely with KFC to support them in making this commitment. Our work does not end here – we continue to work with them in their implementation of actions to realize their commitment and we are encouraging similar actions in other markets where the company operates.
The Business Benchmark for Farm Animal Welfare is also a key reference for investors. Founded in 2012, with an independent secretariat and supported by World Animal Protection, the Benchmark offers a respected annual ranking of the world’s biggest food companies’ animal welfare policy and performance reporting.
In the end, good animal welfare is good for business, people and animals.