Presentation slides from a session for the ARA Section for Business Records April 2015, understanding archive service accreditation for business archives
The workplace ecosystem of the future 24.4.2024 Fabritius_share ii.pdf
Business archives and accreditation
1. Melinda Haunton
Autumn 2013
Archive Service
Accreditation
Introductory Workshops
Introduction to
Archive Service
Accreditation
Melinda Haunton/Jane Shillaker
2. Introduction to Archive Service Accreditation:
Aims
• By the end of the session, participants should:
- Understand the role and potential benefits of archive
service accreditation for business archives
- Understand the Standard and its structure
- Understand the accreditation programme in outline and
know where more information can be found
- Be familiar with the tools, guidance and support for action
planning available when they begin their own applications
- Feel encouraged to address some of the less familiar
elements of the Standard in their own service
But not
- Reading out the Standard and the guidance very, very
slowly from start to finish
3. About the scheme
• A UK-wide partnership to develop and deliver accreditation
• Supported by coalition of partners (ACE, ARA, ARCW, NRS,
PRONI, SCA, TNA, Welsh Government)
• Live scheme is maintained by a governing Committee
• Replaces The National Archives Standard
• Supports ongoing relationships with statutory schemes like
Places of Deposit, Acceptance in Lieu
• Developed through co-creation with the sector and tested through
a pilot with 20 highly varied archive services
• Planning, Performance, Profile, Patronage, Partnerships, People
and Professionalism: what museum accreditation has supported,
according to its applicants
4. What changed and why?
• Change within sector: digital transformation, changes to
established delivery models, integrated heritage/info services
• Localism: importance of co-creation/sector ownership
• New-style national ‘standards’ in place: PAS197, PAS198,
PD5454: emphasis on professional judgement
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
• More flexibility on applicant types: broader eligibility
• Scaled requirements for different types of service
• Broadening understanding of collections and access to include
digital as business as usual
• Greater emphasis on responding to the service’s community –
internal/external – and particular role of service
• Above all, developmental, not a single-point assessment
5. Accreditation mission statement
“To improve the viability and the visibility
of UK archives”
•Archive services are sustainable, effectively managed,
collections are safe
•Archive services are well recognised, and meet their
communities’ needs
•To do this… archive services plan effectively for future
challenges and developments
6. Understanding the standard
• Three modules:
- 1. Organisational Health
- 2. Collections
- 3. Stakeholders and their experience
• Requirements under each module:
- 1. Mission, governance, planning and resources (premises,
finance and workforce)
- 2. Collections management approach, policies, plans and
procedures for collections (development, information and care)
- 3. Access and engagement with the service’s identified
community
• Requirements are phrased with outcomes: explaining the why as
well as the what
7. Understanding the process
• Eligibility
• Scalability
• Application system (online)
• Guidance and case studies
• Submit responses with supporting documentation
----------------------------------------------------------------------
• Assessment by home nations assessor bodies
• Validation visits in some cases – role of peer review
• Panels make awards
• Feedback and ongoing development
8. Understanding eligibility
Setting the scope: to be eligible for accreditation, a service must:
- Hold archives
- Of a reasonably significant size
- Give some form of external access to those archives
- Hold some archives which are analogue*
- Have identified workforce to manage archives (including
professional staffing in public sector)
- Have dedicated, secure storage for collections
*To review!
9. Understanding scalability
• Gives the scheme its flexibility
• Recognises statutory and institutional drivers/provisions differ
• Sets broad expectations – not an exact science, your service
may cross divisions
• Top level divisions reflect governance/legal position:
Local authority
Other public sector
(National)
Private and third sector most business archives
• Scaled divisions: 1-2(-3) – mission, scale and scope varies,
particularly in terms of audiences reached
10. Understanding how to apply
• Questions
An application form which asks about how the archive service
meets the standard. Largely narrative, following pilot feedback.
Also asks for background information (not assessed).
• Evidence
Documents uploaded to support application and in some cases
shown at validation visits
• Flexibility
Format-blind in most cases. If it fulfils the function effectively for
your service, the name/format is irrelevant.
12. Understanding guidance and
support
• Guidance underpins the standard and application form
• Specific guidance for Accreditation, understanding the Standard
and ways you can respond, referencing related standards
• Scaled guidance, reflecting expectations for different types
• Tools and resources: www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/accreditation
• Support available from assessor national bodies – TNA in
England
• Wider guidance for service development, from key bodies (TNA,
ARA, DPC, BL)
• Ongoing development: specialist templates and support
• Case studies: building evidence and examples
13. Understanding assessment,
validation and award
• Assessment by home nations assessor body (SCA/NRS, PRONI,
CyMAL, TNA) with arrangements for national bodies
• Assessment is at (sub-)requirement, not question, level
• Assessment is scaled: at a level appropriate to service’s mission
• A proportion of applications are validated by site visit (minimum
25%, aim higher in practice) which may involve peer review
• Site visits allow verification of sensitive documents and additional
discussion incl with peers
• Assessments → recommendation to Panel, with feedback
• Scheme is managed by the Committee, who form the Panels
• Panels award accredited or provisionally accredited status (for
set period), or make no award
17. Module 1: Requirement 1.1 Mission statement
• The words ‘purpose’, ‘vision’ and ‘mission’ are applied variously and
often... Collectively, these terms should describe why a service or body
exists; what/where it aspires to long term; and how it plans to get
there.
• Archives Service Accreditation has chosen to use the word ‘Mission’ to
encapsulate these terms
• For the objectives of Archive Service Accreditation, ‘Mission’ is defined
as: ‘A strategic statement (or series of connected statements)
which defines the purpose and direction of the Archive Service, in
relation to the governing body it serves.’
• Archive Service Accreditation recognises that, in most cases, the
archive service is some way removed from the main business of the
organisation it serves. In these cases, the mission statement may be
defined in different layers and in more than one type of document.
• All stakeholders should be aware of the mission of the archive service
and the mission should direct decision making and activity.
18. Community
• “The concept of a community which the archive service is
constituted to serve. In this specific sense the word ‘community’
does not necessarily refer simply to the population of a political
unit or physical area (e.g. a local authority or town).
• “For many archive services the community will extend beyond the
formal boundaries of its responsible body (government,
educational institution, private or voluntary organisation).
• “The archive will probably serve multiple communities: local,
national and international; different communities of researchers
and of other types of direct and indirect users and of non-users.
• “Different elements of the community may attract different
priorities, types and levels of service. The ‘community’ to be
served is defined through the stated purpose of the archive
service.”
29. Question:
What do you (and your service) most want to
get out of working with Archive Service
Accreditation?
Tell your neighbour!
30. Messaging the benefits
• Group exercise: what messages/benefits
would resonate with your service
managers?
31. Benefits of working with accreditation
• The developmental angle: Archive Service Accreditation is an
improvement process, not just a badge
• Reviewing your operation: taking time to step back and think
• Effective, coherent policies and planning support your case to
core and external funders: a bank of evidence
• Requirements scaled to your mission and scope; supporting
quality, professionalism and delivery
• Evidence of external interest in your service: now and in future
• Publicity and celebration opportunities incl press/web coverage
• A mark of service quality, recognising the needs of archives
• Peer support and ongoing professional development
• It’s free! Including all support, advice, feedback and advocacy
32. Support to sell the benefits
• Group exercise: who can help to sell the
benefits of Accreditation, and how?
• What can you do alone/in-service?
• What else would help?
• How can ARA and SBR help?
• Accreditation programme?
• Wider sector?
34. How to use Archive Service
Accreditation
• Developing your application → looking at your available resource,
your stated mission, and how the two can come closer
• Ensuring policies (why we do things), plans (how we get there)
and procedures (how we deliver) all point in the same direction
• Feedback on applications leads to action planning for the future
• Successful applications → good news stories and publicity
opportunities
• Unsuccessful applications or not able to apply? → Use that in
advocacy and planning, work with The National Archives and
home nations to develop
• Use the Standard as a development framework where helpful,
for service and for individuals
35. Action planning
• Planning your service’s response in advance is key to benefiting
• Are you clear about why and how you do things?
• What areas are new? What are you close to meeting?
• When developing plans for the coming year(s), what are priority
actions that bring you closer to Accreditation?
• What will be useful to your service in future?
• Is there an opportunity for profile-raising?
• When could you (realistically) apply? What factors affect this?
• Remember we’re neither expecting perfection nor imposing
specific documentation
• Action planning template available if it helps
36. Lessons from museums (courtesy of @emmachaplin)
Museums understand where regular ways of working fit with Standard
Understand where strengths and weaknesses are and incorporate them
into planning
There is an understanding throughout the museum about what
Accreditation involves
The Forward Plan is a key ‘living’ document for the museum
Staff/volunteers get confidence and skills through work on Accreditation
Museums forget all about Accreditation in between submitting returns
There is a mad panic to ‘tick boxes’
One person in the organisation is given all the responsibility for getting
through Accreditation
Policies/plans only written to fulfill Accreditation needs, not reviewed
Accreditation is seen as a “necessary evil”
38. More information: this is just the
start!
• Scheme homepage:
http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/accreditation
All documentation and guidance specific to the scheme is on this
area of nationalarchives.gov.uk
• You can also find out more supporting information in Developing
Your Archives (
http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/archives-sector/developing-your-a
)
• Case studies on specific areas
(http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/archives-sector/case-
studies.htm)
• If you’re interested in developing model policies and plans for
particular sectors, get in touch
39. So (when) will you apply?
accreditation@
nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk
Notas do Editor
Aim is to support development and planning across the UK and across many different types of service
Piloting included many types from large public sector bodies (PRONI, NLW), business archives (Unilever, Network rail), local authority including small and large and multi site (Southwark, Worcs, TWAM, Cumbria, Glamorgan, Falkirk, Angus), universities and specialist (Lothian Health Services, Bowes Museum, MERL/Reading Special, Exeter Cathedral, Presbyterian Historical Society of Ireland)
Some things have clearly changed in the world since the HMC standard was published, and indeed since it was last extensively reviewed in 2004. Some are obvious – role of digital has been building steadily for decades; expectations around access now go substantially beyond searchroom (but NB we recognise this may not mean public engagement depending on type of archive). There are also new and reviewed standards/guidance – PAS197 Code of Practice for Collections Management has strongly influenced shape and terminology of standard; interaction of PD5454 and PAS198 underpins expectations in collections care – they are about supporting, developing and guiding
Some things have clearly changed in the world since the HMC standard was published, and indeed since it was last extensively reviewed in 2004. Some are obvious – role of digital has been building steadily for decades; expectations around access now go substantially beyond searchroom (but NB we recognise this may not mean public engagement depending on type of archive). There are also new and reviewed standards/guidance – PAS197 Code of Practice for Collections Management has strongly influenced shape and terminology of standard; interaction of PD5454 and PAS198 underpins expectations in collections care – they are about supporting, developing and guiding
A standard which sets out the expectation of a strong, sustainable, effective archive service in C21. The standard mirrors museum accreditation and this structure has also been used as the model for ARA’s framework of competencies. Reviewing the work of the service in three key areas
Understanding the meaning of community - Community: ‘Community’ - the standard is based on the concept of a community which the archive service is constituted to serve. In this specific sense the word ‘community’ does not necessarily refer simply to the population of a political unit or physical area (e.g. a local authority or town). For many archive services the community will extend beyond the formal boundaries of its responsible body (government, educational institution, private or voluntary organisation). The archive will probably serve multiple communities: local, national and international; different communities of researchers and of other types of direct and indirect users and of non-users. Different elements of the community may attract different priorities, types and levels of service. The ‘community’ to be served is defined through the stated purpose of the archive service. Community embraces both 'stakeholders' and 'users'
Looking at a much wider range of archive services than TNA standard
Eligibility is about setting boundaries to the scheme, to ensure good use of resources
4000 items/50 lm/4.2 cu m
*All these criteria are potentially subject to review. But this criterion must be removed in the long term. Currently, we don’t have the standards in place to understand what accrediting a digital only archive means.
Taking the time to review your service, how you think about what you do, whether what you plan to do (honestly) gets you further forward, whether you’re actually able to explain why you do what you do, who you’re there to serve. Building blocks for advocacy, fundraising, sustainability, resource management.
“We run risk of focussing on practice in difficult economic times; more reason to focus on theory to justify practice” – tweet from ARA West Midlands recently
Taking the time to review your service, how you think about what you do, whether what you plan to do (honestly) gets you further forward, whether you’re actually able to explain why you do what you do, who you’re there to serve. Building blocks for advocacy, fundraising, sustainability, resource management.
Being part-way along the improvement road and with plans for the future is a perfectly valid position – don’t feel that excludes you from applying for accredited status
“We run risk of focussing on practice in difficult economic times; more reason to focus on theory to justify practice” – tweet from ARA West Midlands recently