we try to give a biometric secure e voting system and with back end compilations supported by DNA archieves which hav d feature of parallel processing as their inherent nature ...
Repurposing LNG terminals for Hydrogen Ammonia: Feasibility and Cost Saving
Bio Metric-E-Voting
1.
2.
3. Preliminary verification Receives Voter’s choice & Encrypts it. Checks whether the person has the right to vote. Storing, Managing & Decrypting Votes for counting. Counts the Votes.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8. Heavy web users have an average of 21 passwords:81% of users select a common passwords and 30% write their passwords in a file which can be HACKED easily. Identity theft: Identity thieves steal PIN numbers.3.3 million identity thefts in U.S in 2002 ;6.7 millions victims of credit card fraud
9.
10. Step:1-Voter inserts the card Step:2-Camera captures the face of the voter and fingerprint recognizer gets the finger print. Step:3-Checks the unique identification in voters’ card, server and the input obtained from camera and fingerprint recognizer.
15. <Encrypted Message> DNA CHIP ONE –TIME PAD MASK PROTECTION CIPHER TEXT Display complementary of plain data lexicon Data pair annealed to complimentary end Unprotected DNA cleaves between CHIPER and Data
![[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],The main disadvantages in these systems are: ->In case if a voter’s id is lost then someone else can cast their vote ->The steps for authentication is Voter’s ID and Password which can be hacked easily now a days….]()