O slideshow foi denunciado.
Utilizamos seu perfil e dados de atividades no LinkedIn para personalizar e exibir anúncios mais relevantes. Altere suas preferências de anúncios quando desejar.
Próximos SlideShares
Ethereum toronto pdf jan 7 2014
Avançar
Transfira para ler offline e ver em ecrã inteiro.

2

Compartilhar

Baixar para ler offline

State of Ethereum, and Mining

Baixar para ler offline

BitcoinConfHK

Livros relacionados

Gratuito durante 30 dias do Scribd

Ver tudo

State of Ethereum, and Mining

  1. 1. State of Ethereum And Mining
  2. 2. ● People want features ○ Issue coins ○ Decentralized exchange ○ Financial contracts ● Solution: feature coins ● Problem: what if people want to do more? Cryptocurrency in 2013
  3. 3. ● Generalized cryptoledger ● Built-in programming language ● Create any feature that you want ● Also supports DACs/DAOs/DAs Ethereum
  4. 4. ● Special type of account ● Has: ○ Code ○ Ether ○ Storage (key/value database) Contracts
  5. 5. ● Idea: when a message is sent to a contract, code executes ● Code can: ○ Read/write storage ○ Send ether ○ Send other messages (ie. recursive VM) Contracts
  6. 6. Name registry: Currency: Examples
  7. 7. The Ethereum Blockchain
  8. 8. Ethereum in 2014 ● Decentralized applications (Đapps) ● More than just money
  9. 9. ● HTML/JS webpage, ETH JS API Đapps: contracts with GUIs
  10. 10. ● Whitepaper ● Protocol fully implemented ● 4 clients (Go, C++, Py, Java) ● 2 clients compatible for 1900 blocks ● Serpent, LLL, Mutan ● Basic browser ● Fully functional third-party dapps Progress so far (technical)
  11. 11. ● Financial ○ Kickstarter (38 LoC) ○ Denny’s Lotto ● Academic Publishing ○ CryptoSwartz ● Governance ○ People’s Republic of ĐOUG ○ Project Eris ○ BitVote Third-Party Development
  12. 12. Progress so far (non-technical) ● CCRG prelim (Toronto, Waterloo, Texas, Nicosia) ● Regulatory (Swiss, almost US) ● Sale website, cold storage policy (almost) ● 40+ meetup groups
  13. 13. What needs to be done (technical) ● EtherBrowser ○ Likely Chromium-based ● Efficiency upgrades ○ JIT compilation ● Security audits ● Light client implementation ● Mobile implementation
  14. 14. What needs to be done (non-technical) ● Finalize pre-sale tasks ● CCRG formal setup ● Education resources ● Translation ● 960 more meetup groups?
  15. 15. Conclusion ● Ethereum at halfway point ● Current version theoretically near- viable but buggy (eg. 2009 BTC) ● “Hard” work still remains (we’re only half-done…)
  16. 16. Decentralization, n. The security assumption that a nineteen year old in Hangzhou and someone maybe in the UK, and maybe not, have not yet decided to collude with each other. Mining
  17. 17. ● I have 100 BTC ○ Tx 1 sends 100 BTC to A ○ Tx 2 sends 100 BTC to B ● Both are published, which one confirms? ● Correct answer: the one that appears first ● Problem: need distributed timestamp ● Solution: blockchain Blockchain
  18. 18. Mining ● Miners attempt to produce blocks ● Each block references previous block ● Block making function 1/1020 success rate ● One random miner succeeds every 10 min ● Longest blockchain (one with most PoW) wins
  19. 19. 51% Attacks ● Problem: one entity has >50% hashpower ● Attack 1: reverse transactions ● Attack 2: exclude others, monopolize ○ Weaker version at 25%: selfish-mining ● Attack 3: censor transactions
  20. 20. Pools ● Mining is a lottery ● One ASIC has 15% chance of success ● Pools: mine for me, I pay you 0.00025 BTC per block ● Problem: pool centralization
  21. 21. Pools
  22. 22. ● Bad argument: no, majority miner has aligned incentives ● Better argument: users can quit pools ○ Unknown: will they? Is centralization bad?
  23. 23. ● Problem: centralized pools allow mining without validation ● Idea: protocol requires blockchain accesses ● Goal: make P2Pool economically viable Solution 1: force blockchain storage
  24. 24. ● Problem: small pools have high variance ● Idea: users mine into multiple pools simultaneously ● Goal: allow even small pools to fully absorb variance Solution 2: Multi-PPS
  25. 25. ● Original intent: mining decentralized, democratic ● Problem: specialized hardware ● Now: mining hardware all produced by a few centralized firms ASICs
  26. 26. ● 25% of hashpower made in one factory in Shenzhen ● First floor: 25% of Litecoin hashpower How bad?
  27. 27. ● Argument: CPU production very centralized too ● Counterpoint: CPU usage and control still local ● ASIC production now centralized, usage still decentralized ● Will this change? Is this a problem?
  28. 28. The First Grand Equation
  29. 29. ● Centralized maintenance, storage cheaper ● Decentralized energy free… up to a point ASIC Decentralization: The Argument
  30. 30. ● 2011: Scrypt ○ Problem: memory-hard to verify ● 2013 Oct: Momentum ○ Problem: Pollard cycle finding algo ● 2013 Dec: Dagger ○ Problem: shared memory ● Now: Cuckoo (length-42 cycles) Anti-ASIC 1: Memory-Hardness
  31. 31. ● Strategy: randomly generate a mining function every block ● Idea: optimal ASIC for “any function” IS a CPU ● Problem: how ● Problem 2: some specialization always possible ○ But: does that matter? Anti-ASIC 2: Generalized Computation
  32. 32. The Second Grand Equation ● Idea: use of computer hardware free… up to a point
  33. 33. End
  • rsarres

    Jul. 7, 2016
  • adamburan

    Jul. 20, 2014

BitcoinConfHK

Vistos

Vistos totais

1.504

No Slideshare

0

De incorporações

0

Número de incorporações

3

Ações

Baixados

25

Compartilhados

0

Comentários

0

Curtir

2

×