Mais conteúdo relacionado 367451. ﻁﺭﻴﻘﺔ ﺒﺄﺴﺘﺨﺩﺍﻡ ﺍﻝﻤﻌﺎﻴﻴﺭ ﺍﻝﻤﺘﻌﺩﺩﺓ ﺍﻝﻘﺭﺍﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﺘﺨﺎﺫ)AHP(
ﺍﻝﺒﺼﺭﺓ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻝﺘﻘﻨﻲ ﺍﻝﻤﻌﻬﺩ ﻓﻲ ﺘﻁﺒﻴﻘﻴﺔ ﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ+
MAKING MULTICRITERIA DICISION BY USING
(AHP)METHOD AN APPLIED STUDY IN AL-BASRAH
TECHINICAL INSTITUTE
ﻫﺎﺸﻡ ﻨﺎﻴﻑ ﻫﺎﺸﻡ*
ﺍﻝﻤﺴﺘﺨﻠﺹ:
ﺍﻝﻘﺭﺍﺭ ﻻﺘﺨﺎﺫ ﺍﻝﻤﺩﺍﺨل ﻤﻥ ﻤﺨﺘﻠﻔﺎﻥ ﻨﻭﻋﺎﻥ ﻫﻨﺎﻝﻙ ﻴﻭﺠﺩ.ﻤﺘﺨﺫ ﻴﻌﺘﻤﺩ ﻭﻫﻨﺎ ﺍﻝﻨﻭﻋﻲ ﺍﻝﻤﺩﺨل ﺃﻭﻝﻬﻤﺎ
ﻗﺭﺍﺭﺍﺘﻪ ﺍﺘﺨﺎﺫ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻝﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﻭﺨﺒﺭﺘﻪ ﺍﻝﺤﺩﺱ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻝﻘﺭﺍﺭ.ﻤﺘﺨﺫ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻴﻌﺘﻤﺩ ﺍﻝﺫﻱ ﺍﻝﻜﻤﻲ ﺍﻷﺴﻠﻭﺏ ﻫﻭ ﻭﺍﻵﺨﺭ
ﻜﺒﻴ ﺃﻫﻤﻴﺔ ﺫﺍ ﺍﻝﻤﺩﺨﻠﻴﻥ ﻜﻼ ﻭﺇﻥ ﺍﻝﺭﻴﺎﻀﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻝﻨﻤﺎﺫﺝ ﺍﻷﺴﺎﻝﻴﺏ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻝﻘﺭﺍﺭﻓﻲ ﻗﺭﺍﺭﺍﺘﻪ ﻻﺘﺨﺎﺫ ﺍﻝﻘﺭﺍﺭ ﻝﻤﺘﺨﺫ ﺭﺓ
ﻤﺨﺘﻠﻔﺔ ﻅﺭﻭﻑ ﻅل.
ﺍﻝﺜﺎﻨﻲ ﺍﻝﻤﺩﺨل ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻋﺘﻤﺩ ﻝﺫﺍ ﺍﻝﻘﺭﺍﺭ ﻤﺘﺨﺫ ﻝﻤﺴﺎﻋﺩﺓ ﺍﻝﺭﻴﺎﻀﻴﺔ ﺍﻻﺴﺎﻝﻴﺏ ﺍﺴﺘﺨﺩﺍﻡ ﺍﻝﻰ ﺍﻝﺒﺤﺙ ﻴﻬﺩﻑ
ﺍﻝﻌﻠﻴﺎ ﺍﻻﺩﺍﺭﺓ ﻗﺒل ﻤﻥ ﺍﻝﻤﻭﻀﻭﻋﺔ ﻝﻠﻤﻌﺎﻴﻴﺭ ﹰﺎﻭﻁﺒﻘ.ﻭﺍﻝﻤﺘﻤﺜل ﺍﻻﻭل ﺍﻝﺒﺩﻴل ﺍﺨﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﺍﻝﻰ ﺍﻝﺒﺤﺙ ﻭﺘﻭﺼل
ﺍ ﺘﻘﻨﻴﺔ ﻜﻠﻴﺔ ﺒﺄﺴﺘﺤﺩﺍﺙﺃﻜﺒﺭ ﻨﺴﺒﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺤﺼل ﻜﻭﻨﻪ ﺩﺍﺭﻴﺔ)٠,٥١٩(ﺍﻝﺜﺎﻨﻲ ﺒﺎﻝﺒﺩﻴل ﻤﻘﺎﺭﻨﺔ.
Abstract:
There are two different approaches to making decisions, first is qualitative
approach , which the decision maker depend on his intuitive and experience to
make decision . Second is a quantitative approach and the decision maker
depend on mathematical models to make decision , both of them is important to
the decision maker to make decision in different situation .
The aim of research is using mathematical models to help decision
maker, for this reason the research depend on second approach according to
the criteria which adopt by top management . the research arrives to the select
the first alternative which is opening technical college of management because its
get a high ratio (0. 519 ) comparable with the second one.
ﺍﻝﻤﻘﺩﻤﺔ:
ﺍﻹﺩﺍﺭﻴﺔ ﻤﺴﺘﻭﻴﺎﺘﻬﻡ ﻋﻥ ﺍﻝﻨﻅﺭ ﺒﻐﺽ ﺍﻝﻤﺩﺭﺍﺀ ﻗﺒل ﻤﻥ ﹰﺎﻴﻭﻤﻴ ﻴﻤﺎﺭﺱ ﹰﺎﺭﺌﻴﺴﻴ ﹰﺎﻨﺸﺎﻁ ﺍﻝﻘﺭﺍﺭ ﺍﺘﺨﺎﺫ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺘﻌﺩ
،ﻤﺴﺘﻭﻴﺎﺘﻬﻡ ﺒﺎﺨﺘﻼﻑ ﺘﺨﺘﻠﻑ ﺍﻝﻘﺭﺍﺭ ﻭﺃﻫﻤﻴﺔ ﺩﺭﺠﺔ ﺃﻥ ﺇﻻ.ﺍﻝﻘﺭﺍﺭﺍﺕ ﺃﻭﻝﻬﻤﺎ ﺍﻝﻘﺭﺍﺭﺍﺕ ﻤﻥ ﻨﻭﻋﺎﻥ ﻭﻫﻨﺎﻝﻙ
ﺍﻝﻤﺒﺭﻤﺠﺔ ﻏﻴﺭ ﻭﻗﺭﺍﺭﺍﺕ ﺘﻜﺭﺍﺭﻱ ﻁﺎﺒﻊ ﺫﺍﺕ ﻭﻫﻲ ﻤﺒﺭﻤﺠﺔﺍﻝﻤﻌﺎﻝﻡ ﻤﺤﺩﺩ ﻭﻏﻴﺭ ﺠﺩﻴﺩ ﻁﺎﺒﻊ ﺫﺍﺕ.ﻭﻴﻭﺠﺩ
ﺍﻝﻤﺩﺍﺨل ﻋﻥ ﹰﻼﻓﻀ ﺍﻝﺘﻨﻅﻴﻤﻴﺔ ﺍﻝﻘﺭﺍﺭﺍﺕ ﻭﻤﺩﺨل ﺍﻝﻔﺭﺩﻴﺔ ﺍﻝﻘﺭﺍﺭﺍﺕ ﻤﺩﺨل ﻫﻤﺎ ﺍﻝﻘﺭﺍﺭﺍﺕ ﻝﺼﻨﺎﻋﺔ ﻤﺩﺨﻼﻥ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ
+
ﺍﻝﺒﺤﺙ ﺍﺴﺘﻼﻡ ﺘﺎﺭﻴﺦ٢٩/٩/٢٠٠٧ﺍﻝﻨﺸﺭ ﻗﺒﻭل ﺘﺎﺭﻴﺦ٢٢/٥/٢٠٠٨
*
ﻤﺩﺭﺱ/ﺍﻝﺘﻘﻨﻲ ﺍﻝﻤﻌﻬﺩ/ﺍﻝﺒﺼﺭﺓ.
2. ﻤﺤﺩﺩﺓ ﻝﻤﻌﺎﻴﻴﺭ ﹰﺎﻭﻓﻘ ﺍﻝﻘﺭﺍﺭﺍﺕ ﺒﺎﺘﺨﺎﺫ ﺍﻝﺨﺎﺼﺔ ﺍﻝﻜﻤﻴﺔ،ﺘﻌ ﺍﻝﻤﺩﺍﺨل ﻫﺫﻩ ﻜل ﻭﺃﻥﻻﺘﺨﺎﺫ ﻝﻘﺭﺍﺭ ﻝﻤﺘﺨﺫ ﻜﻤﺭﺸﺩ ﺩ
ﻭﺼﺎﺌﺏ ﺴﻠﻴﻡ ﺒﺸﻜل ﻗﺭﺍﺭﺍﺘﻪ.
ﺍﻻﻭل ﺍﻝﻤﺤﻭﺭ:ﺍﻝﺒﺤﺙ ﻤﻨﻬﺠﻴﺔ
١-ﺍﻝﺒﺤﺙ ﻤﺸﻜﻠﺔ:
ﻝﻬﺎ ﻝﻤﺎ ﺍﻹﺩﺍﺭﻴﺔ ﻤﺴﺘﻭﻴﺎﺘﻬﻡ ﻜﺎﻓﺔ ﻭﻓﻲ ﻝﻠﻤﺩﺭﺍﺀ ﺍﻷﻭﻝﻰ ﺍﻝﻤﺴﺅﻭﻝﻴﺔ ﺘﻤﺜل ﺯﺍﻝﺕ ﻻ ﺍﻝﻘﺭﺍﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﺘﺨﺎﺫ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺃﻥ
ﻤﻨﻅﻤﺎﺘﻬﻡ ﺃﺩﺍﺀ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻤﺒﺎﺸﺭ ﺘﺄﺜﻴﺭ ﻤﻥ،ﺍﻝﻘﺭﺍﺭ ﺘﻠﻙ ﹰﺎﺨﺼﻭﺼﻝﻤﻨﻅﻤﺎﺘﻬﻡ ﺍﻹﺴﺘﺭﺍﺘﻴﺠﻴﺔ ﺒﺎﻷﻫﺩﺍﻑ ﺘﺘﺼل ﺍﻝﺘﻲ ﺍﺕ،
ﺨﺒﺭﺍﺘﻬﻡ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻤﺒﺎﺸﺭ ﺒﺸﻜل ﻴﻌﺘﻤﺩﻭﻥ ﺯﺍﻝﻭﺍ ﻻ ﺍﻝﻤﺩﺭﺍﺀ ﻫﺅﻻﺀ ﺃﻏﻠﺏ ﺃﻥ ﻨﺠﺩ ﺍﻷﻫﻤﻴﺔ ﻫﺫﻩ ﻤﻥ ﺍﻝﺭﻏﻡ ﻭﻋﻠﻰ
ﻭﺍﻝﺤﺩﺱ ﺍﻝﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ)intuitive(ﺍﻝﻘﺭﺍﺭﺍﺕ ﻝﺘﻠﻙ ﺍﺘﺨﺎﺫﻫﻡ ﻓﻲ.ﺇﺘﺒﺎﻉ ﻋﺩﻡ ﻤﻥ ﺍﻝﺒﺤﺙ ﻤﺸﻜﻠﺔ ﺘﺒﺭﺯ ﻫﻨﺎ ﻤﻥ
ﺍﻝﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﻝﻸﺴﺎﻝﻴﺏ ﺍﻝﻤﺩﺭﺍﺀ)ﺍﻝﻜﻤﻴﺔ(ﺍﻝﻘﺭﺍﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﺘﺨﺎﺫ ﻓﻲ.ﻁﺭﻴﻘﺔ ﺘﻁﺒﻴﻕ ﺇﻤﻜﺎﻨﻴﺔ ﺍﻝﺒﺎﺤﺙ ﻭﺠﺩ ﻝﺫﺍ)AHP(
ﺍﻝﻘﺭﺍﺭﺍﺕ ﺃﻓﻀل ﺍﺘﺨﺎﺫ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻝﻤﺩﺭﺍﺀ ﻝﻤﺴﺎﻋﺩﺓ.
٢-ﺍﻝﺒﺤﺙ ﻫﺩﻑ:
ﺍﻝﻬﺭﻤﻲ ﺍﻝﺘﺤﻠﻴل ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﻁﺭﻴﻘﺔ ﺍﺴﺘﺨﺩﺍﻡ ﺇﻝﻰ ﺍﻝﺒﺤﺙ ﻴﻬﺩﻑ)Analytical Hierarchy process(
ﺒـ ﻝﻬﺎ ﻴﺭﻤﺯ ﻭﺍﻝﺘﻲ)AHP(،ﺍﻝﻤﺩ ﻝﻤﺴﺎﻋﺩﺓﺍﻝﻤﻘﺎﺭﻨﺔ ﺇﺠﺭﺍﺀ ﺨﻼل ﻤﻥ ﺍﻝﻘﺭﺍﺭﺍﺕ ﺃﻓﻀل ﺍﺘﺨﺎﺫ ﻓﻲ ﺭﺍﺀ
ﻝﻤﻌﺎﻴﻴﺭ ﹰﺎﻭﻓﻘ ﺍﻝﺒﺩﺍﺌل ﻤﻥ ﻋﺩﺩ ﺒﻴﻥ ﺍﻝﻤﻭﻀﻭﻋﻴﺔ)ﺃﻫﺩﺍﻑ(ﹰﺎﻤﺴﺒﻘ ﻤﻌﺩﺓ.
٣-ﺍﻝﺒﺤﺙ ﺃﺴﻠﻭﺏ:
ﺃﺴﺎﺴﻴﻴﻥ ﻤﺤﻭﺭﻴﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻝﺒﺤﺙ ﻴﺴﺘﻨﺩ،ﺍﻝﻘﺭﺍﺭ ﺒﺎﺘﺨﺎﺫ ﺍﻝﺨﺎﺹ ﺍﻝﻨﻅﺭﻱ ﺍﻝﻤﻔﻬﻭﻡ ﺍﻷﻭل ﻴﺘﻀﻤﻥ
ﺍﻝﻘﺭﺍﺭﺍﺕ ﻭﻤﺩﺍﺨل ﻭﺃﻨﻭﺍﻉ،ﺍﻝ ﺃﻤﺎﻁﺭﻴﻘﺔ ﺘﻁﺒﻴﻕ ﻓﻬﻭ ﺍﻝﺜﺎﻨﻲ ﻤﺤﻭﺭ)AHP(ﺍﻝﻤﻌﺎﻴﻴﺭ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺒﺎﻻﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ
ﺍﻝﻤﺘﺎﺤﺔ ﺍﻝﺒﺩﺍﺌل ﻤﻥ ﻋﺩﺩ ﺒﻴﻥ ﺍﻝﻤﻔﺎﻀﻠﺔ ﺇﺠﺭﺍﺀ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻝﻘﺭﺍﺭ ﻤﺘﺨﺫﻱ ﻗﺒل ﻤﻥ ﺍﻝﻤﻭﻀﻭﻋﺔ.
٤-ﺍﻝﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ ﻤﺠﺎل:
ﺃ-ﺯﻤﺎﻨﻲ ﻤﺠﺎل:ﺴﻨﺔ ﺍﺨﺘﺒﺭﺕ٢٠٠٦ﺍﻝﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ ﻓﻲ ﻻﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩﻫﺎ.
ﺏ-ﻤﻜﺎﻨﻲ ﻤﺠﺎل:ﺒﺼﺭﺓ ﺍﻝﺘﻘﻨﻲ ﺍﻝﻤﻌﻬﺩ.
ﺍﻝﻤﺤﻭﺭﺍﻝﺜﺎﻨﻲ:ﺍﻝﻘﺭﺍﺭ ﻻﺘﺨﺎﺫ ﻭﺍﻝﻤﺭﺘﻜﺯﺍﺕ ﺍﻻﺴﺱ
ﹰﻻﺃﻭ:-ﺍﻝﻘﺭﺍﺭ ﺍﺘﺨﺎﺫ ﻤﻔﻬﻭﻡConcept of decision making
ﺍﻝﺘﻨﻔﻴﺫ ﺒﻌﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻝﺘﻌﻬﺩ ﻤﻊ ﺃﻜﺜﺭ ﺃﻭ ﺒﺩﻴﻠﻴﻥ ﺒﻴﻥ ﺍﻻﺨﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺃﻨﻬﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻝﺘﻨﻅﻴﻤﻲ ﺍﻝﻘﺭﺍﺭ ﺼﻨﺎﻋﺔ ﺘﻌﺭﻑ]
1. [ﻭﺤﻠﻬﺎ ﺍﻝﻤﺸﺎﻜل ﺘﺤﺩﻴﺩ ﺃﻨﻬﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺘﻌﺭﻑ ﻜﻤﺎ،ﺍﻝ ﻫﺫﻩ ﻭﺘﺸﻤلﻤﺭﺤﻠﺔ ﻫﻤﺎ ﺭﺌﻴﺴﻴﺘﻴﻥ ﻤﺭﺤﻠﺘﻴﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻌﻤﻠﻴﺔ
ﺤﻠﻬﺎ ﻭﻤﺭﺤﻠﺔ ﺍﻝﻤﺸﻜﻠﺔ ﺘﺤﺩﻴﺩ]2. [ﺍﻝﺒﻴﺌﻴﺔ ﺍﻝﻅﺭﻭﻑ ﺤﻭل ﺍﻝﻤﻌﻠﻭﻤﺎﺕ ﻤﺭﺍﻗﺒﺔ ﺘﺘﻡ ﺍﻷﻭﻝﻰ ﺍﻝﻤﺭﺤﻠﺔ ﻓﻌﻨﺩ
ﺍﻝﻀﻌﻑ ﻨﻘﺎﻁ ﻭﺘﺸﺨﻴﺹ ﹰﺎﻤﺭﻀﻴ ﺍﻷﺩﺍﺀ ﻜﺎﻥ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﻤﺴﺄﻝﺔ ﺘﺤﺩﻴﺩ ﺒﻬﺩﻑ ﻭﺍﻝﺘﻨﻅﻴﻤﻴﺔ.ﺍﻝﻤﺸﻜﻠﺔ ﺤل ﻤﺭﺤﻠﺔ ﺃﻤﺎ
ﺍﻻﻋ ﺒﻨﻅﺭ ﺍﻷﺨﺫ ﻴﺘﻡ ﻋﻨﺩﻤﺎ ﻓﻬﻲﺍﻝﺒﺩﺍﺌل ﺘﻠﻙ ﺃﺤﺩ ﻭﺘﻨﻔﻴﺫ ﺍﺨﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﻭﻴﺘﻡ ﺍﻝﻌﻤل ﻤﺴﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﻤﻥ ﻤﻌﻴﻨﺔ ﺒﺩﺍﺌل ﺘﺒﺎﺭ.
ﺍﻝﻤﺒﺭﻤﺠﺔ ﺍﻝﻘﺭﺍﺭﺍﺕ ﻫﻤﺎ ﺍﻝﻘﺭﺍﺭﺍﺕ ﻤﻥ ﻨﻭﻋﺎﻥ ﻫﻨﺎﻝﻙ ﺘﻭﺠﺩ،ﻭﺫﺍﺕ ﺍﻝﻤﻌﺎﻝﻡ ﻭﻭﺍﻀﺤﺔ ﺘﻜﺭﺍﺭﻱ ﻁﺎﺒﻊ ﺫﺍﺕ ﺘﻜﻭﻥ
ﺍ ﺘﺤﺩﻴﺩ ﻭﺴﻬﻭﻝﺔ ﺍﻝﺤﺎﻝﻲ ﺍﻷﺩﺍﺀ ﺤﻭل ﺍﻝﻤﻌﻠﻭﻤﺎﺕ ﺘﻭﻓﺭ ﻤﻊ ﻭﺍﻀﺤﺔ ﺍﻷﺩﺍﺀ ﻤﻌﺎﻴﻴﺭ ﻜﻭﻥ ﺒﺴﺒﺏ ﺠﻴﺩﺓ ﻫﻴﻜﻠﻴﺔﻝﺒﺩﺍﺌل.
3. ﻝﺤل ﻤﻌﻴﻨﺔ ﺇﺠﺭﺍﺀﺍﺕ ﻭﺠﻭﺩ ﻤﻊ ﺍﻝﻤﻌﺎﻝﻡ ﻤﺤﺩﺩﺓ ﻭﻏﻴﺭ ﺠﺩﻴﺩ ﻁﺎﺒﻊ ﺫﺍﺕ ﻓﺘﻜﻭﻥ ﺍﻝﻤﺒﺭﻤﺠﺔ ﻏﻴﺭ ﺍﻝﻘﺭﺍﺭﺍﺕ ﺃﻤﺎ
ﻜﻴﻔﻴﺔ ﺘﻌﺭﻑ ﻻ ﺭﺒﻤﺎ ﺃﻭ ﻗﺒل ﻤﻥ ﻤﻌﻴﻨﺔ ﻤﺸﻜﻠﺔ ﺸﻬﺩﺕ ﻗﺩ ﺍﻝﻤﻨﻅﻤﺔ ﺘﻜﻥ ﻝﻡ ﻋﻨﺩﻤﺎ ﺍﻝﻘﺭﺍﺭﺍﺕ ﻫﺫﻩ ﻭﺘﺴﺘﺨﺩﻡ ﺍﻝﻤﺸﻜﻠﺔ
ﺍﻝﻘﺎﺌﻡ ﻝﻠﻤﻭﻗﻑ ﺍﻻﺴﺘﺠﺎﺒﺔ،ﻝﻠﻘﺭﺍ ﻭﺍﻀﺤﺔ ﻤﻌﺎﻴﻴﺭ ﺘﻭﺠﺩ ﻻ ﻭﻫﻨﺎﻭﺠﻭﺩ ﻤﻊ ﻭﻏﺎﻤﻀﺔ ﻤﺸﻭﺸﺔ ﺍﻝﺒﺩﺍﺌل ﻭﺘﻜﻭﻥ ﺭ
ﻻ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻝﻤﺸﻜﻠﺔ ﻴﺤل ﺴﻭﻑ ﺍﻝﻤﻘﺘﺭﺡ ﺍﻝﺒﺩﻴل ﻜﺎﻥ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﻤﺴﺄﻝﺔ ﺤﻭل ﺍﻝﺘﺄﻜﺩ ﻋﺩﻡ ﻤﻥ ﺤﺎﻝﺔ[ 2 ].
ﺜﺎﻨﻴﺎ:-ﺍﻝﻘﺭﺍﺭﺍﺕ ﺼﻨﺎﻋﺔ ﻤﺩﺍﺨلdecision making approaches
ﺍﻝﻘﺭﺍﺭﺍﺕ ﻝﺼﻨﺎﻋﺔ ﻤﺩﺨﻼﻥ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻴﻭﺠﺩ،ﻭﻫﻲ]2[
ﺃ-ﺍﻝ ﺍﻝﻘﺭﺍﺭﺍﺕ ﺼﻨﺎﻋﺔﻔﺭﺩﻴﺔ:Individual decision making
ﺒﻁﺭﻴﻘﺘﻴﻥ ﻭﺼﻔﻬﺎ ﻴﻤﻜﻥ ﺍﻝﻤﺩﺭﺍﺀ ﻗﺒل ﻤﻥ ﺍﻝﻔﺭﺩﻴﺔ ﺍﻝﻘﺭﺍﺭﺍﺕ ﺼﻨﺎﻋﺔ ﺃﻥ:
١-ﺍﻝﻤﻨﻁﻘﻲ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻝﻌﻘﻠﻲ ﺍﻝﻤﺩﺨل:rational approach
ﺍ ﺫﻝﻙ ﻭﻴﻠﻲ ﻝﻠﻤﺸﻜﻠﺔ ﺍﻝﻨﻅﺎﻤﻲ ﺍﻝﺘﺤﻠﻴل ﺇﻝﻰ ﺍﻝﺤﺎﺠﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻝﻤﺩﺨل ﻫﺫﺍ ﻴﺅﻜﺩﺘﺴﻠﺴل ﻭﻤﻥ ﻭﺍﻝﺘﻨﻔﻴﺫ ﻻﺨﺘﻴﺎﺭ
ﻤﻨﻁﻘﻲ ﺘﺩﺭﻴﺠﻲ،ﻷﻨﻪ ﺫﻝﻙ ﻭ ﺍﻝﻔﺭﺩﻴﺔ ﺍﻝﻘﺭﺍﺭﺍﺕ ﻝﺼﻨﺎﻋﺔ ﻜﻤﻭﺠﻪ ﺍﻝﻌﻤل ﺃﺠل ﻤﻥ ﺍﻝﻤﺩﺨل ﻫﺫﺍ ﻅﻬﺭ ﻭﻗﺩ
ﺍﻝﻤﺩﺨل ﻫﺫﺍ ﺍﻥ ﻝﺫﺍ ﻝﻠﻘﺭﺍﺭﺍﺕ ﻤﺩﺨﻠﻬﻡ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻋﺘﺒﺎﻁﻲ ﻁﺎﺒﻊ ﻭﺫﻭ ﻨﻅﺎﻤﻴﻴﻥ ﻏﻴﺭ ﺍﻝﻤﺩﺭﺍﺀ ﻤﻥ ﺍﻝﻜﺜﻴﺭ ﺒﺄﻥ ﻝﻭﺤﻅ
ﺃﻜ ﻭﺒﻤﻨﻁﻘﻴﺔ ﺃﻜﺜﺭ ﺒﻭﻀﻭﺡ ﺍﻝﺘﻔﻜﻴﺭ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻝﻤﺩﺭﺍﺀ ﻴﺴﺎﻋﺩﺜﺭ.ﺼﻨﺎﻋﺔ ﺘﻘﺴﻴﻡ ﻴﻤﻜﻥ ﺍﻝﻤﺩﺨل ﻝﻬﺫﺍ ﹰﺍﻭﺍﺴﺘﻨﺎﺩ
ﻫﻲ ﺨﻁﻭﺍﺕ ﺜﻤﺎﻥ ﺇﻝﻰ ﺍﻝﻘﺭﺍﺭ[ 3 ]:
oﺍﻝﻘﺭﺍﺭ ﺒﻴﺌﺔ ﻤﺭﺍﻗﺒﺔ:ﺘﺅﺸﺭ ﺴﻭﻑ ﺍﻝﺘﻲ ﻭﺍﻝﺨﺎﺭﺠﻴﺔ ﺍﻝﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻝﻤﻌﻠﻭﻤﺎﺕ ﺒﻤﺭﺍﻗﺒﺔ ﺍﻝﻤﺩﺭﺍﺀ ﻴﻘﻭﻡ
ﺍﻝﻤﻘﺒﻭل ﺃﻭ ﺍﻝﻤﺨﻁﻁ ﺍﻝﺴﻠﻭﻙ ﻋﻥ ﺍﻻﻨﺤﺭﺍﻓﺎﺕ.
oﺍﻝﻘﺭﺍﺭ ﻤﺸﻜﻠﺔ ﺘﺤﺩﻴﺩ:ﺨﻼ ﻤﻥ ﻝﻼﻨﺤﺭﺍﻓﺎﺕ ﺍﻝﻤﺩﻴﺭ ﻴﺴﺘﺠﻴﺏﺍﻷﺴﺎﺴﻴﺔ ﺍﻝﺘﻔﺎﺼﻴل ﺘﺤﺩﻴﺩ ل
ﻝﻠﻤﺸﻜﻠﺔ.
oﺍﻝﻘﺭﺍﺭ ﺃﻫﺩﺍﻑ ﺘﺤﺩﻴﺩ:ﺨﻼل ﻤﻥ ﺘﺤﻘﻴﻘﻬﺎ ﻴﺠﺏ ﺍﻝﺘﻲ ﺍﻷﺩﺍﺀ ﻤﺤﺼﻼﺕ ﻨﻭﻉ ﺍﻝﻤﺩﻴﺭ ﻴﺤﺩﺩ
ﺍﻝﻘﺭﺍﺭ.
oﺍﻝﻤﺸﻜﻠﺔ ﺘﺸﺨﻴﺹ:ﺍﻝﻤﺸﻜﻠﺔ ﺴﺒﺏ ﺘﺤﻠﻴل ﺒﻬﺩﻑ ﺍﻷﻋﻤﺎﻕ ﺇﻝﻰ ﺍﻝﻤﺩﻴﺭ ﻴﺒﺤﺭ ﺍﻝﺨﻁﻭﺓ ﻫﺫﻩ ﻓﻲ.
oﺍﻝﺒﺩﻴﻠﺔ ﺍﻝﺤﻠﻭل ﺘﻁﻭﻴﺭ:ﺤﺎﺴﻤﺔ ﻋﻤل ﺒﺨﻁﺔ ﺍﻝﻤﺩﻴﺭ ﻴﺸﺭﻉ ﺃﻥ ﻗﺒل،ﻓﻬﻡ ﻝﺩﻴﺔ ﻴﻜﻭﻥ ﺃﻥ ﻻﺒﺩ
ﺍﻝﻤﺭﻏﻭﺒﺔ ﺍﻷﻫﺩﺍﻑ ﺘﺤﻘﻴﻕ ﺃﺠل ﻤﻥ ﺃﻤﺎﻤﻪ ﺍﻝﻤﺘﻭﻓﺭﺓ ﺍﻝﻤﺘﻨﻭﻋﺔ ﺍﻝﺨﻴﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﻋﻥ ﻭﺍﻀﺢ.
oﺍﻝﺒﺩﺍﺌل ﺘﻘﻴﻴﻡ:ﺍﺤﺘﻤﺎﻝﻴﺔ ﺘﻘﻴﻴﻡ ﻝﻐﺭﺽ ﺍﻝﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﺃﻭﺍﻝﺨﺒﺭﺓ ﺍﻹﺤﺼﺎﺌﻴﺔ ﺍﻷﺴﺎﻝﻴﺏ ﺍﺴﺘﺨﺩﺍﻡ ﺃﻱ
ﺍﻝﻨﺠﺎﺡ.
oﺍﻷﻓﻀل ﺍﻝﺒﺩﻴل ﺍﺨﺘﻴﺎﺭ:ﺍﻝﻘﺭﺍﺭ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺠﻭﻫﺭ ﺘﻤﺜل ﺍﻝﺨﻁﻭﺓ ﻫﺫﻩ،ﻴﺴﺘ ﺤﻴﺙﺍﻝﻤﺩﻴﺭ ﺨﺩﻡ
ﻓﺭﺼﺔ ﺃﻓﻀل ﻋﻠﻴﺔ ﺘﺘﺭﺘﺏ ﻭﺍﺤﺩ ﺒﺩﻴل ﺍﺨﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﺃﺠل ﻤﻥ ﻭﺍﻝﺒﺩﺍﺌل ﻭﺍﻷﻫﺩﺍﻑ ﻝﻠﻤﺸﻜﻠﺔ ﺘﺤﻠﻴﻠﻪ
ﻝﻠﻨﺠﺎﺡ.
oﺍﻝﻤﺨﺘﺎﺭ ﺍﻝﺒﺩﻴل ﺘﻨﻔﻴﺫ:ﺍﻝﺘﻭﺠﻴﻬﺎﺕ ﻭﻴﻌﻁﻲ ﻭﺍﻻﻗﻨﺎﻋﻴﺔ ﺍﻹﺩﺍﺭﻴﺔ ﻗﺩﺭﺍﺘﻪ ﺍﻝﻤﺩﻴﺭ ﻴﺴﺘﺨﺩﻡ ﹰﺍﺃﺨﻴﺭ
ﺍﻝﻘﺭﺍﺭ ﺘﻨﻔﻴﺫ ﻝﻀﻤﺎﻥ.
٢-ﺍﻝﻤﻘﻴﺩﺓ ﺍﻝﻌﻘﻼﻨﻴﺔ ﻤﻨﻅﻭﺭ:Bounded rationality perspective
ﺍﻝﺘﻨﺎﻓﺴﻴﺔ ﺍﻝﺒﻴﺌﺔ،ﺍﻝﻭﻗﺕ ﻀﻐﻁ،ﺍﻝﻘﺭﺍﺭ ﺼﻨﺎﻋﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻝﻤﺅﺜﺭﺓ ﻭﺍﻝﺨﺎﺭﺠﻴﺔ ﺍﻝﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻝﻌﻭﺍﻤل ﻜﺜﺭﺓ،ﻋﺩﻡ
ﺘﺤﻘﻴﻕ ﻓﺄﻥ ﻭﺒﺎﻝﺘﺎﻝﻲ ﻤﻤﻜﻥ ﻏﻴﺭ ﺍﻝﻨﻅﺎﻤﻲ ﺍﻝﺘﺤﻠﻴل ﺘﺠﻌل ﺍﻷﻤﻭﺭ ﻫﺫﻩ ﻜل ﺍﻝﻤﺸﺎﻜل ﻤﻥ ﺍﻝﻌﺩﻴﺩ ﻁﺒﻴﻌﺔ ﻭﻀﻭﺡ
4. ﻤﺤﺩ ﺃﻭ ﻤﻘﻴﺩﺓ ﺘﻜﻭﻥ ﺍﻝﻌﻘﻼﻨﻴﺔ ﺤﺎﻝﺔﺍﻝﻤﺸﺎﻜل ﻤﻥ ﻝﻠﻜﺜﻴﺭ ﺍﻝﻜﺒﻴﺭ ﺒﺎﻝﺘﻌﻘﻴﺩ ﺩﺓ،ﻤﺎ ﹰﺎﻏﺎﻝﺒ ﺍﻝﻤﻨﻅﻭﺭ ﻫﺫﺍ ﺃﻥ ﺇﺫ
ﻭﺍﻥ ﻭﺍﻝﺤﻜﻡ ﻭﺍﻝﺨﺒﺭﺓ ﻭﺍﻻﺘﻔﺎﻕ ﻭﺍﻝﻘﺒﻭل ﺍﻻﺠﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﺍﻝﺩﻋﻡ ﻴﺘﻁﻠﺏ ﺤﻴﺙ ﺍﻝﺒﺩﻴﻬﻴﺔ ﺍﻝﻘﺭﺍﺭ ﺒﻌﻤﻠﻴﺎﺕ ﻴﺭﺘﺒﻁ
ﺍﻝﺘﻨﻅﻴﻤﻴﺔ ﺒﺎﻝﻘﻀﺎﻴﺎ ﺍﻝﻁﻭﻴﻠﺔ ﺍﻝﺨﺒﺭﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺘﺴﺘﻨﺩ ﺒل ﺍﻋﺘﺒﺎﻁﻲ ﺸﻲﺀ ﻝﻴﺴﺕ ﺍﻝﺒﺩﺍﻫﺔ.
ﺏ-ﺍﻝﺘ ﺍﻝﻘﺭﺍﺭﺍﺕ ﺼﻨﺎﻋﺔﻨﻅﻴﻤﻴﺔ:Organizational decisions making
ﺤﺩﺩ ﻗﺩ ﺍﻝﻤﻨﻅﻤﺔ ﻤﺴﺘﻭﻯ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻝﻘﺭﺍﺭﺍﺕ ﺼﻨﺎﻋﺔ ﺃﻥﺕﺍﻝﺘﻨﻅﻴﻤﻲ ﺍﻝﻘﺭﺍﺭ ﺼﻨﺎﻋﺔ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺎﺕ ﻤﻥ ﺃﻨﻭﺍﻉ ﺒﺄﺭﺒﻌﺔ
ﻭﻫﻲ:
١-ﺍﻹﺩﺍﺭﺓ ﻋﻠﻡ ﻤﺩﺨل:management science approach
ﻴﻌﺩﺍﻝﻤﺩﺭﺍﺀ ﻗﺒل ﻤﻥ ﺍﻝﻤﻨﻁﻘﻲ ﺍﻝﻌﻘﻠﻲ ﻝﻠﻤﺩﺨل ﻤﻤﺎﺜﻼ ﺍﻝﺘﻨﻅﻴﻤﻲ ﺍﻝﻘﺭﺍﺭ ﻝﺼﻨﺎﻋﺔ ﺍﻝﻤﺩﺨل ﻫﺫﺍ.ﻭﻗﺩ
ﺍﻝﺜﺎﻨﻴﺔ ﺍﻝﻌﺎﻝﻤﻴﺔ ﺍﻝﺤﺭﺏ ﺨﻼل ﺍﻝﻭﺠﻭﺩ ﺤﻴﺯ ﺇﻝﻰ ﺍﻹﺩﺍﺭﺓ ﻋﻠﻡ ﻅﻬﺭ،ﺍﻝﺭﻴﺎﻀﻴﺔ ﺍﻷﺴﺎﻝﻴﺏ ﻜﺎﻨﺕ ﺇﺫ
ﺼﻨﺎﻉ ﻗﺩﺭﺓ ﺘﺘﺠﺎﻭﺯ ﺍﻝﺘﻲ ﻭﺍﻝﻜﺒﻴﺭﺓ ﺍﻝﻌﺎﺠﻠﺔ ﺍﻝﻌﺴﻜﺭﻴﺔ ﺍﻝﻤﺸﺎﻜل ﻝﺤل ﺘﺴﺘﺨﺩﻡ ﺁﻨﺫﺍﻙ ﻭﺍﻹﺤﺼﺎﺌﻴﺔﺍﻝﻘﺭﺍﺭ
ﺍﻷﻓﺭﺍﺩ.ﻝﻠﺘﺤﻠﻴل ﻗﺎﺒﻠﺔ ﺍﻝﻤﺸﺎﻜل ﺘﻜﻭﻥ ﻋﻨﺩﻤﺎ ﺍﻝﺘﻨﻅﻴﻤﻲ ﺍﻝﻘﺭﺍﺭ ﻝﺼﻨﺎﻋﺔ ﻤﻤﺘﺎﺯﺓ ﻭﺴﻴﻠﺔ ﺍﻹﺩﺍﺭﺓ ﻋﻠﻡ ﻭﻴﻌﺘﺒﺭ
ﺍﻝﻤﺘﻐﻴﺭﺍﺕ ﻭﻗﻴﺎﺱ ﺘﺤﺩﻴﺩ ﺒﺎﻹﻤﻜﺎﻥ ﻭﻴﻜﻭﻥ[ 2 ].
٢-ﻜﺎﺭﻨﻴﺠﻲ ﻤﺩﺨل:Carnegie model
ﺍﻝ ﻝﺼﻨﺎﻋﺔ ﻜﺎﺭﻨﻴﺠﻲ ﻨﻤﻭﺫﺝ ﺃﻥﻤ ﻜل ﻋﻤل ﻋﻠﻰ ﻴﺴﺘﻨﺩ ﺍﻝﺘﻨﻅﻴﻤﻲ ﻘﺭﺍﺭـﻥ)Simon(،)
March(،)Richard(ﺠﺎﻤﻌﺔ ﻓﻲ ﺯﻤﻼﺀ ﺠﻤﻴﻌﺎ ﻜﺎﻨﻭﺍ ﺍﻝﺫﻴﻥ)Carnegie – mellon(ﺴﺎﻋﺩ ﻭﻗﺩ
ﺍﻝﻔﺭﺩﻱ ﺍﻝﻘﺭﺍﺭ ﻝﺼﻨﺎﻋﺔ ﺍﻝﻤﻘﻴﺩﺓ ﺍﻝﻌﻘﻼﻨﻴﺔ ﻤﺩﺨل ﺼﻴﺎﻏﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺒﺤﺜﻬﻡ،ﺠﺩﻴﺩﺓ ﺘﺒﺼﺭﺍﺕ ﺘﻭﻓﻴﺭ ﻋﻥ ﹰﻼﻓﻀ
ﺍﻝﻤﻨﻅﻤﺔ ﻗﺭﺍﺭﺍﺕ ﺤﻭل.ﺃﺸﺎ ﻭﻗﺩﺃﺴﺎﺱ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺘﻘﻭﻡ ﺍﻝﻤﻨﻅﻤﺔ ﻤﺴﺘﻭﻯ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻝﻘﺭﺍﺭﺍﺕ ﺃﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﺅﻻﺀ ﺭ
ﺍﻝﻤﺩﺭﺍﺀ ﺒﻴﻥ ﻤﺎ ﻤﻌﻴﻥ ﺃﺌﺘﻼﻑ،ﺍﻝﻤﺸﺎﻜل ﺃﻭﻝﻭﻴﺎﺕ ﺤﻭل ﻴﺘﻔﻘﻭﻥ ﻤﺩﺭﺍﺀ ﻋﺩﺓ ﺒﻴﻥ ﻤﺎ ﺍﻝﺘﺤﺎﻝﻑ ﻴﻌﻨﻲ ﻭﺍﻷﺌﺘﻼﻑ
ﺒﺸﺅﻭﻥ ﻭﺍﻝﻤﺨﺘﺼﻴﻥ ﺍﻝﺨﻁﻭﻁ ﺃﻗﺴﺎﻡ ﻤﺩﺭﺍﺀ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻴﺸﺘﻤل ﺃﻥ ﻴﻤﻜﻥ ﺍﻝﺘﺤﺎﻝﻑ ﻭﻫﺫﺍ ﺍﻝﺘﻨﻅﻴﻤﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻷﻫﺩﺍﻑ
ﺍﻝﻌﺎﻤﻠﺔ ﺍﻝﻜﻭﺍﺩﺭ.ﺃﻤﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﻝﺘﻨﻅﻴﻤﻲ ﺍﻝﻘﺭﺍﺭ ﻝﺴﻠﻭﻙ ﻋﺩﺓ ﻤﻀﺎﻤﻴﻥ ﺍﻷﺌﺘﻼﻑ ﺘﺸﻜﻴل ﻝﻌﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﻥ[ 2 ]:
-ﺍﻝﻜﻔﺎﻑ ﺤﺎﻝﺔ ﻭﺃﻥ ﺃﻤﺜﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻝﻤﺸﺎﻜل ﺤﻠﻭل ﺠﻌل ﻭﻝﻴﺱ ﺍﻝﻜﻔﺎﻑ ﺤﺎﻝﺔ ﺘﺤﻘﻴﻕ ﺃﺠل ﻤﻥ ﺍﻝﻘﺭﺍﺭ ﺼﻨﺎﻋﺔ ﺃﻥ
)satisficing(ﺍﻷﺩﺍﺀ ﻤﺴﺘﻭﻯ ﺃﻋﻠﻰ ﻤﻥ ﹰﻻﺒﺩ ﻝﻸﺩﺍﺀ ﺍﻝﻤﺭﻀﻲ ﺒﺎﻝﻤﺴﺘﻭﻯ ﺍﻝﻤﻨﻅﻤﺎﺕ ﻗﺒﻭل ﺘﻌﻨﻲ.
-ﺍﻝ ﻴﻬﺘﻡﻴﺴﻤﻴﻪ ﻤﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻴﺅﻜﺩﻭﻥ ﺃﻨﻬﻡ ﺤﻴﺙ ﺍﻝﻤﺩﻯ ﺍﻝﻘﺼﻴﺭﺓ ﻭﺍﻝﺤﻠﻭل ﺍﻝﻤﺒﺎﺸﺭﺓ ﺒﺎﻝﻤﺸﺎﻜل ﻤﺩﺭﺍﺀ)March ,
Richard(ﺍﻹﺸﻜﺎﻝﻲ ﺍﻝﺒﺤﺙ ﺒﺎﺴﻡ)problemistic search(ﺇﻝﻰ ﻴﻨﻅﺭﻭﻥ ﺍﻝﻤﺩﺭﺍﺀ ﺒﺄﻥ ﻴﻌﻨﻲ ﻭﻫﺫﺍ
ﺴﺭﻴﻊ ﺒﺸﻜل ﺍﻝﻤﺸﻜﻠﺔ ﻴﺤﺴﻡ ﺤل ﺇﻝﻰ ﺍﻝﺘﻭﺼل ﺃﺠل ﻤﻥ ﺍﻝﻤﺒﺎﺸﺭﺓ ﺍﻝﺒﻴﺌﺔ ﻓﻲ ﺤﻭﻝﻬﻡ ﻤﺎ
-ﺍﻝ ﻴﻌﺘﺒﺭﺍﻝﻘﺭﺍﺭ ﺼﻨﺎﻋﺔ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻝﻤﺸﻜﻠﺔ ﺘﺤﺩﻴﺩ ﻤﺭﺤﻠﺔ ﻓﻲ ﺨﺎﺼﺔ ﺃﻫﻤﻴﺔ ﺫﺍﺕ ﻭﺍﻝﻤﺴﺎﻭﻤﺔ ﻨﻘﺎﺵ،ﻴﻜﻥ ﻝﻡ ﻓﻤﺎ
ﻤﻌﻴﻥ ﻨﺸﺎﻁ ﺃﻭ ﻗﺭﺍﺭ ﺃﻱ ﺍﺘﺨﺎﺫ ﻴﺘﻡ ﻝﻥ ﺍﻷﺌﺘﻼﻑ ﺃﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﻗﺒل ﻤﻥ ﻝﻠﻤﺸﻜﻠﺔ ﺇﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﻫﻨﺎﻝﻙ.
٣-ﺍﻝﺘﺩﺭﻴﺠﻲ ﺍﻝﻘﺭﺍﺭ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﻨﻤﻭﺫﺝIncremental decision process model
ﺍﻝﺫﻱ ﺍﻝﻨﻤﻭﺫﺝ ﻫﺫﺍ ﺃﻥﺒﻪ ﺠﺎﺀ)Henry Mintzberg(ﺍﻝﻌﻭﺍﻤل ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻗل ﹰﺍﺘﺄﻜﻴﺩ ﻴﻀﻊ ﻭﺯﻤﻼﺀﻩ
ﻨﻤﻭﺫﺝ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻝﻤﻭﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﻭﺍﻻﺠﺘﻤﺎﻋﻴﺔ ﺍﻝﺴﻴﺎﺴﻴﺔ)Carnegie(ﺍﻝﻤﻬﻴﻜل ﺍﻝﺘﺘﺎﺒﻊ ﺤﻭل ﺍﻝﻜﺜﻴﺭ ﻴﻭﻀﺢ ﺃﻨﻪ ﻏﻴﺭ
ﺤﻠﻬﺎ ﺇﻝﻰ ﺍﻝﻭﺼﻭل ﻭﺤﺘﻰ ﺍﻝﻤﺸﻜﻠﺔ ﺍﻜﺘﺸﺎﻑ ﻨﻘﻁﺔ ﻤﻥ ﺘﺘﺨﺫ ﺍﻝﺘﻲ ﻝﻠﻨﺸﺎﻁﺎﺕ،ﺍﻝﻘﺭﺍﺭ ﺍﺘﺨﺎﺫ ﺨﻁﻭﺍﺕ ﻭﺃﻥ
ﺍ ﻫﺫﺍ ﻭﻓﻕﻫﻲ ﺭﺌﻴﺴﻴﺔ ﻤﺭﺍﺤل ﺜﻼﺙ ﻓﻲ ﺘﺤﺩﺙ ﻝﻨﻤﻭﺫﺝ] :1[]2[.
5. ﺍﻝﺘﺤﺩﻴﺩ ﻤﺭﺤﻠﺔ:Identification phase
ﺒﺎﻝﺘﻤﻴﻴﺯ ﺍﻝﺘﺤﺩﻴﺩ ﻤﺭﺤﻠﺔ ﺘﺒﺩﺃ)recognition(ﺒﺎﻝﻤﺸﻜﻠﺔ ﺃﻜﺜﺭ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻝﻤﺩﺭﺍﺀ ﺃﺤﺩ ﻤﻌﺭﻓﺔ ﻭﻴﻌﻨﻲ
ﺍﻝﻘﺭﺍ ﺼﻨﺎﻋﺔ ﺇﻝﻰ ﻭﺍﻝﺤﺎﺠﺔﺭ.ﻤﻭﻗﻑ ﺘﺤﺩﻴﺩ ﺇﻝﻰ ﺍﻝﺤﺎﺠﺔ ﻋﻨﺩ ﺍﻝﻤﻌﻠﻭﻤﺎﺕ ﻤﻥ ﺍﻝﻤﺯﻴﺩ ﺠﻤﻊ ﻴﺘﻡ ﻭﻋﻨﺩﻫﺎ
ﺍﻝﻤﺸﻜﻠﺔ.ﺍﻝﻤﺸﻜﻠﺔ ﺤﺩﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩﺍ ﻭﺫﻝﻙ ﹰﺎﺭﺴﻤﻴ ﻏﻴﺭ ﺃﻭ ﹰﺎﻨﻅﺎﻤﻴ ﺃﻤﺎ ﺍﻝﺘﺸﺨﻴﺹ ﻴﻜﻭﻥ ﺃﻥ ﻭﻴﻤﻜﻥ،
ﻋﻜﺱ ﹰﺎﻭﺴﺭﻴﻌ ﹰﺍﻤﺒﺎﺸﺭ ﺍﻝﺭﺩ ﻴﻜﻭﻥ ﺃﻥ ﻻﺒﺩ ﺇﺫ ﺍﻝﻤﻜﺜﻑ ﺍﻝﺘﺸﺨﻴﺹ ﻝﻌﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﹰﺎﻭﻗﺘ ﺘﺘﺤﻤل ﻻ ﺍﻝﺸﺩﻴﺩﺓ ﻓﺎﻝﻤﺸﺎﻜل
ﺍﻝﻤﺸﺃﻜﺜﺭ ﻨﻅﺎﻤﻲ ﺒﺄﺴﻠﻭﺏ ﺘﺸﺨﻴﺼﻬﺎ ﻴﺘﻡ ﻤﺎ ﹰﺎﻏﺎﻝﺒ ﻭﺍﻝﺘﻲ ﺍﻝﺒﺴﻴﻁﺔ ﺎﻜل[1].
-ﺍﻝﺘﻁﻭﻴﺭ ﻤﺭﺤﻠﺔ:Development phase
ﺍﻻﻭﻝﻰ ﺍﻝﻤﺭﺤﻠﺔ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻝﻤﺤﺩﺩﺓ ﻝﻠﻤﺸﻜﻠﺔ ﻤﻌﻴﻥ ﺤل ﺼﻴﺎﻏﺔ ﺘﺘﻡ ﻋﻨﺩﻤﺎ ﺍﻝﺘﻁﻭﻴﺭ ﻤﺭﺤﻠﺔ ﺘﺒﺩﺃ.ﺘﻁﻭﻴﺭ ﻭﺃﻥ
ﺍﺘﺠﺎﻫﻴﻥ ﺃﺤﺩ ﻴﺘﺨﺫ ﻤﻌﻴﻥ ﺤل،ﹰﺎﺴﻌﻴ ﺍﻝﺒﺤﺙ ﺇﺠﺭﺍﺀﺍﺕ ﺍﺴﺘﺨﺩﺍﻡ ﺍﻻﻭلﺤﻠﻭل ﺠﻌﺒﺔ ﻀﻤﻥ ﺍﻝﺒﺩﺍﺌل ﻭﺭﺍﺀ
ﺍﻝﻤﻨﻅﻤﺔ.ﺠﺩﻴﺩ ﺤل ﺘﺼﻤﻴﻡ ﻫﻭ ﺍﻝﺜﺎﻨﻲ ﺃﻤﺎ،ﺘﻜﻭﻥ ﻻ ﺒﺤﻴﺙ ﺤﺩﻴﺜﺔ ﺍﻝﻤﺸﻜﻠﺔ ﺘﻜﻭﻥ ﻋﻨﺩﻤﺎ ﺫﻝﻙ ﻭﻴﺤﺩﺙ
ﺘﺫﻜﺭ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﺃﻱ ﺍﻝﺴﺎﺒﻘﺔ ﻝﻠﺨﺒﺭﺓ[ 2 ].
ﺝ-ﺍﻻﺨﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﻤﺭﺤﻠﺔ:Selection phase
ﺍﻝﺤل ﺍﺨﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﻴﺘﻡ ﻋﻨﺩﻤﺎ ﺘﺤﺩﺙ،ﻤﺴﺄ ﹰﺎﺩﺍﺌﻤ ﻝﻴﺴﺕ ﻫﻲ ﺍﻝﻤﺭﺤﻠﺔ ﻭﻫﺫﻩﻤﻥ ﺍﻝﻭﺍﻀﺢ ﺍﻻﺨﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﺃﺠﺭﺍﺀ ﻝﺔ
ﺍﻝﺒﺩﺍﺌل ﺒﻴﻥ.ﺍﻝﺘﻘﻴﻴﻡ ﺤﺎﻝﺔ ﺘﻭﻓﻴﺭ ﻤﻥ ﻻﺒﺩ ﺇﺫ.ﻁﺭﻕ ﺒﺜﻼﺙ ﻭﺍﻻﺨﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﺍﻝﺘﻘﻴﻴﻡ ﺤﺎﻝﺘﻲ ﺘﺤﻘﻴﻕ ﻭﻴﻤﻜﻥ:ﺤﻴﺙ
ﻭﺍﻝﻤﺴﺎﻭﻤﺔ ﺍﻝﺘﻔﺎﻭﺽ ﺒﻭﺍﺴﻁﺔ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻝﻨﻅﺎﻤﻲ ﺍﻝﺘﺤﻠﻴل ﻁﺭﻴﻕ ﻋﻥ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻝﺨﺒﺭﺓ ﺃﺴﺎﺱ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻝﺤﻜﻡ ﻁﺭﻴﻘﺔ ﺘﺴﺘﺨﺩﻡ
.
٤-ﺍﻝﻘﻤﺎﻤﺔ ﺴﻠﺔ ﻨﻤﻭﺫﺝ:Garbage can model
ﻤﻊ ﻤﻘﺎﺭﻨﺘﻪ ﻴﻤﻜﻥ ﻭﻻ ﺍﻝﺘﻨﻅﻴﻤﻲ ﺍﻝﻘﺭﺍﺭ ﻝﺼﻨﺎﻋﺔ ﺍﻝﻤﻭﺍﺼﻔﺎﺕ ﻭﺃﻫﻡ ﺃﺤﺩﺙ ﺍﻝﻨﻤﻭﺫﺝ ﻫﺫﺍ ﻴﻌﺩ
ﺍﻝﻤﻨﻅﻤﺎﺕ ﻀﻤﻥ ﺍﻝﻤﺘﻌﺩﺩﺓ ﺍﻝﻘﺭﺍﺭﺍﺕ ﺘﺩﻓﻕ ﺃﻭ ﻨﻤﻁ ﻤﻊ ﻴﺘﻌﺎﻤل ﻷﻨﻪ ﻭﺫﻝﻙ ﺍﻝﺴﺎﺒﻘﻴﻥ ﺍﻝﻨﻤﻭﺫﺠﻴﻥ،ﺃﻥ ﺤﻴﻥ ﻓﻲ
ﻤﻨﻔﺭﺩ ﻗﺭﺍﺭ ﺼﻨﺎﻋﺔ ﻜﻴﻔﻴﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻴﺭﻜﺯﺍﻥ ﺍﻝﺴﺎﺒﻘﻴﻥ ﺍﻝﻨﻤﻭﺫﺠﻴﻥ.ﻴﺴ ﺍﻝﻨﻤﻭﺫﺝ ﻓﻬﺫﺍﺒﻜﺎﻤل ﺍﻝﺘﻔﻜﻴﺭ ﻓﻲ ﺎﻋﺩ
ﺍﻝﻤﻨﻅﻤﺔ ﺠﻭﺍﻨﺏ ﻜل ﻓﻲ ﺍﻝﻤﺩﺭﺍﺀ ﻴﺼﻨﻌﻬﺎ ﺍﻝﺘﻲ ﺍﻝﻤﺘﻜﺭﺭﺓ ﻭﺍﻝﻘﺭﺍﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﻝﻤﻨﻅﻤﺔ.
ﻤﻥ ﻤﺘﻌﺎﻗﺒﺔ ﻜﺴﻠﺴﺔ ﺘﻌﺘﺒﺭ ﻻ ﺍﻝﻘﺭﺍﺭ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺃﻥ ﻫﻲ ﺍﻝﻨﻤﻭﺫﺝ ﻫﺫﺍ ﺒﻬﺎ ﻴﺘﻤﻴﺯ ﺍﻝﺘﻲ ﺍﻝﻔﺭﻴﺩﺓ ﺍﻝﺨﺎﺼﻴﺔ ﺇﻥ
ﺒﺎﻝﺤل ﻭﺘﻨﺘﻬﻲ ﺒﺎﻝﻤﺸﻜﻠﺔ ﺘﺒﺩﺃ ﺍﻝﺘﻲ ﺍﻝﺨﻁﻭﺍﺕ،ﻭﺤﻠ ﺍﻝﻤﺸﻜﻠﺔ ﺘﺤﺩﻴﺩ ﻓﺄﻥ ﻭﺒﺎﻝﻔﻌلﺍﻝﻭﺍﺤﺩ ﻴﺭﺘﺒﻁﺎﻥ ﻻ ﻝﺭﺒﻤﺎ ﻬﺎ
ﺒﺎﻵﺨﺭ.ﻤﺸﻜﻠﺔ ﺃﻱ ﻫﻨﺎﻝﻙ ﻴﻜﻭﻥ ﻻ ﻋﻨﺩﻤﺎ ﻤﻌﻴﻥ ﻜﺤل ﻤﻌﻴﻨﺔ ﻓﻜﺭﺓ ﺍﻗﺘﺭﺍﺡ ﻴﺘﻡ ﻓﻠﺭﺒﻤﺎ.ﻫﻨﺎﻝﻙ ﺘﻜﻭﻥ ﻭﺭﺒﻤﺎ
ﻝﻬﺎ ﺤل ﺘﻭﻝﻴﺩ ﹰﺍﺃﺒﺩ ﻴﺘﻡ ﻭﻻ ﻤﺸﻜﻠﺔ.ﺩﺍﺨل ﺍﻝﻤﺴﺘﻘﻠﺔ ﺍﻷﺤﺩﺍﺙ ﻤﺠﺭﻴﺎﺕ ﻤﺤﺼﻠﺔ ﺃﻭ ﻨﺘﻴﺠﺔ ﺘﻤﺜل ﻓﺎﻝﻘﺭﺍﺭﺍﺕ
ﺍﻝﻤﻨﻅﻤﺔ.ﺫﺍ ﺍﻷﺭﺒﻌﺔ ﺍﻝﻤﺠﺭﻴﺎﺕ ﻴﺄﺘﻲ ﻭﻓﻴﻤﺎﺍﻝﺘﻨﻅﻴﻤﻲ ﺍﻝﻘﺭﺍﺭ ﺒﺼﻴﺎﻏﺔ ﺍﻝﻌﻼﻗﺔ ﺕ[ 3 ]:
-ﺍﻝﻤﺸﻜﻠﺔ:ﺍﻝﺤﺎﻝﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻝﻨﺸﺎﻁﺎﺕ ﺍﻷﺩﺍﺀ ﻋﻥ ﺍﻝﺭﻀﺎ ﻋﺩﻡ ﻨﻘﺎﻁ ﻫﻲ ﺍﻝﻤﺸﺎﻜل،ﺍﻷﺩﺍﺀ ﺒﻴﻥ ﻤﺎ ﻓﺠﻭﺓ ﺘﻤﺜل ﻓﻬﻲ
ﺍﻝﺤﺎﻝﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻝﻨﺸﺎﻁﺎﺕ ﺍﻝﻤﺭﻏﻭﺏ.
-ﺍﻝﻜﺎﻤﻨﺔ ﺍﻝﺤﻠﻭل:ﺘ ﺘﺸﻜل ﺍﻷﻓﻜﺎﺭ ﻫﺫﻩ ﻤﺜل ﻭﺃﻥ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩﻫﺎ ﻝﻐﺭﺽ ﻤﻌﻴﻥ ﺸﺨﺹ ﻴﻘﺘﺭﺤﻬﺎ ﻓﻜﺭﺓ ﻫﻭ ﺍﻝﺤلﹰﺎﺩﻓﻘ
ﺍﻝﻤﻨﻅﻤﺔ ﺨﻼل ﺍﻝﺒﺩﻴﻠﺔ ﺒﺎﻝﺤﻠﻭل.
-ﺍﻝﻤﺸﺎﺭﻜﻭﻥ:ﺍﻝﻤﻨﻅﻤﺔ ﺠﻭﺍﻨﺏ ﻓﻲ ﻭﻴﺫﻫﺒﻭﻥ ﻴﺎﺘﻭﻥ ﻋﺎﻤﻠﻭﻥ ﻫﻡ،ﺍﺩﺭﺍﻜﻬﻡ ﻭﻓﻲ ﺍﻓﻜﺎﺭﻫﻡ ﻓﻲ ﻫﺅﻻﺀ ﻭﻴﺨﺘﻠﻑ
ﻭﺘﺩﺭﻴﺒﻬﻡ ﻭﻗﻴﻤﻬﻡ ﺨﺒﺭﺘﻬﻡ ﻭﻓﻲ ﻝﻠﻤﺸﺎﻜل،ﺘﺨﺘﻠﻑ ﺴﻭﻑ ﻤﻌﻴﻥ ﻤﺩﻴﺭ ﻴﻤﻴﺯﻫﺎ ﺍﻝﺘﻲ ﻭﺍﻝﺤﻠﻭل ﺍﻝﻤﺸﺎﻜل ﻓﺎﻥ ﻝﺫﻝﻙ
ﻴﻤﻴ ﺍﻝﺘﻲ ﻭﺍﻝﺤﻠﻭل ﺍﻝﻤﺸﺎﻜل ﺘﻠﻙ ﻋﻥﺍﺨﺭ ﻤﺩﻴﺭ ﺯﻫﺎ.
6. -ﺍﻻﺨﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﻓﺭﺹ:ﻫﺫﻩ ﺘﺤﺩﺙ ﺤﻴﺙ ﻤﻌﻴﻥ ﻗﺭﺍﺭ ﺒﺼﻨﺎﻋﺔ ﺍﻝﻤﻨﻅﻤﺔ ﺒﻬﺎ ﺘﻘﻭﻡ ﻤﺎ ﻋﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻝﺘﻲ ﺍﻝﺤﺎﻻﺕ ﻭﻫﻲ
ﺍﻷﻓﺭﺍﺩ ﻴﺸﻐل ﺃﻭ ﺍﻝﻌﻘﻭﺩ ﺘﻭﻗﻊ ﻋﻨﺩﻤﺎ ﺍﻝﻔﺭﺹ،ﺠﺩﻴﺩ ﺒﻤﻨﺘﻭﺝ ﺍﻝﺘﺼﺭﻴﺢ ﻴﺘﻡ ﺃﻭ،ﻴﻭﺠﺩ ﻋﻨﺩﻤﺎ ﺘﺤﺩﺙ ﺃﻨﻬﺎ ﻜﻤﺎ
ﻭﺍﻝﻤﺸﺎﻜل ﻭﺍﻝﺤﻠﻭل ﺍﻝﻤﺸﺎﺭﻜﻴﻥ ﻤﻥ ﻤﻨﺎﺴﺏ ﺨﻠﻴﻁ ﻫﻨﺎﻝﻙ[ 3 ].
ﹰﺎﺜﺎﻝﺜ/ﺍﻝﻘﺭﺍﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﺘﺨﺎﺫ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻝﻌﻤﻠﻴﺎﺕ ﺒﺤﻭﺙ ﺍﺴﺘﺨﺩﺍﻡ:Using operation Research to decision
making
ﺍﻝﻘﺭﺍﺭﺍﺕ ﻻﺘﺨﺎﺫ ﻜﻤﻲ ﺒﺄﺴﺎﺱ ﺍﻝﻤﺩﺭﺍﺀ ﺘﺯﻭﺩ ﺍﻝﻌﻤﻠﻴﺎﺕ ﺒﺤﻭﺙ،ﻭﻀﻊ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻗﺩﺭﺘﻬﻡ ﻤﻥ ﺘﻌﺯﺯ ﻭﻜﺫﻝﻙ
ﺍﻝﻴﻭﻤﻴﺔ ﻝﻤﺸﺎﻜﻠﻬﻡ ﺍﻝﺤﻠﻭل ﺃﻓﻀل ﻭﺇﻴﺠﺎﺩ ﺍﻝﻤﺩﻯ ﺍﻝﺒﻌﻴﺩﺓ ﺍﻝﺨﻁﻁ.ﺯﺍﺩﺕ ﻭﻗﺩﹰﺎﺨﺼﻭﺼ ﺍﻝﺘﺨﺼﺹ ﻫﺫﺍ ﺇﻝﻰ ﺍﻝﺤﺎﺠﺔ
ﺍﻝﻤﻌﻠﻭﻤﺎﺕ ﺘﻜﻨﻭﻝﻭﺠﻴﺎ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻝﺴﺭﻴﻊ ﻭﺍﻝﺘﻁﻭﺭ ﺍﻝﺒﻴﺌﻲ ﺍﻝﺘﻌﻘﻴﺩ ﻭﺯﻴﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻝﻤﻨﻅﻤﺎﺕ ﺤﺠﻡ ﺍﺘﺴﺎﻉ ﺒﻌﺩ،ﻤﻥ ﺠﻌل ﻫﺫﻩ ﻜل
ﻤﻤﻜﻥ ﻏﻴﺭ ﺃﻤﺭ ﺍﻝﻤﻨﻅﻤﺎﺕ ﺇﺩﺍﺭﺓ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻝﺘﻘﻠﻴﺩﻴﺔ ﺍﻝﻁﺭﻕ ﺍﺴﺘﺨﺩﺍﻡ،ﺍﻝﻜﻤﻴﺔ ﺍﻝﻨﻤﺎﺫﺝ ﻤﻥ ﺍﻝﻌﺩﻴﺩ ﻫﻨﺎﻝﻙ ﺘﻭﺠﺩ ﻝﺫﺍ
ﺍﻝﻘﺭﺍﺭﺍﺕ ﺒﺎﺘﺨﺎﺫ ﺍﻝﺨﺎﺼﺔ ﻭﺍﻝﻁﺭﻕﺍﻝﻬﺭﻤﻲ ﺍﻝﺘﺤﻠﻴل ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﻁﺭﻴﻘﺔ ﻫﻭ ﺃﻫﻤﻬﺎ ﻭﻤﻥﺍﻝﺒﺎﺤﺙ ﻁﻭﺭﻫﺎ ﺍﻝﺘﻲ
)Thomas Saaty(ﻝﻬﺎ ﻴﺭﻤﺯ ﻭﺍﻝﺘﻲ)AHP] (4. [ﺜﻡ ﻭﻤﻥ ﺍﻝﻘﺭﺍﺭ ﺒﺩﺍﺌل ﺘﺭﺘﻴﺏ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻝﻁﺭﻴﻘﺔ ﻫﺫﻩ ﻭﺘﺴﺘﻨﺩ
ﺍﻝﻤﺤﺩﺩﺓ ﺍﻝﻤﻌﺎﻴﻴﺭ ﻤﻥ ﻋﺩﺩ ﻀﻭﺀ ﻓﻲ ﻤﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﻷﻓﻀل ﺍﺨﺘﻴﺎﺭ.ﺍﻝﺘﺎﻝﻲ ﺍﻝﻤﺜﺎل ﻨﺄﺨﺫ ﺍﻝﻁﺭﻴﻘﺔ ﻫﺫﻩ ﻋﻤل ﻭﻝﺘﻭﻀﻴﺢ:
ﻤﺨﺘﻠﻔﺔ ﻤﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻝﺴﻜﻨﻴﺔ ﺍﻝﺩﻭﺭ ﻤﻥ ﺍﻝﻌﺩﻴﺩ ﺃﻤﺎﻤﻪ ﺘﻭﺠﺩ ﺴﻜﻥ ﺩﺍﺭ ﺒﺸﺭﺍﺀ ﻤﺎ ﺸﺨﺹ ﻴﺭﻏﺏ ﻋﻨﺩﻤﺎ،
ﻴﻀﻌﻬﺎ ﺍﻝﺘﻲ ﻝﻠﻤﻌﺎﻴﻴﺭ ﹰﺎﻭﻓﻘ ﻤﻨﻬﺎ ﻝﻜل ﺍﻝﻤﻭﻀﻭﻋﻴﺔ ﺍﻝﻤﻘﺎﺭﻨﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺒﺎﻻﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﺒﻴﻨﻬﺎ ﻤﻥ ﺍﻷﻓﻀل ﻴﺨﺘﺎﺭ ﺃﻥ ﻭﻋﻠﻴﻪ.
ﺍﻻﺨﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻝﻤﻌﺎﻴﻴﺭ ﻤﻥ ﻋﺩﺩ ﻝﺩﻴﻪ ﻜﺎﻥ ﻓﻠﻭﺍﻝﻨﻘل ﻜﻜﻠﻔﺔ،ﺍﻻ ﻤﻥ ﺍﻝﻘﺭﺏﺴﻭﺍﻕ،ﺍﻝﻘﺍﻝﻤﻭﺍﺼﻼﺕ ﻁﺭﻕ ﻤﻥ ﺭﺏ
....ﺍﻝﺦ.ﹰﺎﺴﻠﻔ ﻭﻀﻌﻬﺎ ﺍﻝﺘﻲ ﻤﻌﺎﻴﻴﺭﻩ ﻴﻁﺎﺒﻕ ﺍﻝﺫﻱ ﺍﻝﺒﺩﻴل ﺍﻝﻘﺭﺍﺭ ﻤﺘﺨﺫ ﻴﺨﺘﺎﺭ ﺍﻝﻤﻌﺎﻴﻴﺭ ﻫﺫﻩ ﻀﻭﺀ ﻓﻲ.ﻓﺄﻥ ﻝﺫﺍ
ﻁﺭﻴﻘﺔ)AHP(ﺘﺤﻘﻴﻕ ﻓﻲ ﻤﺴﺎﻫﻤﺘﻪ ﻤﻘﺩﺍﺭ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺒﺎﻻﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﺒﺩﻴل ﻜل ﻝﺘﺭﺘﻴﺏ ﺭﻗﻤﻴﺔ ﻨﻘﺎﻁ ﺘﺨﺼﻴﺹ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺘﻌﺩ
ﺍﻝﻘﺭﺍﺭ ﻤﺘﺨﺫ ﻤﻌﺎﻴﻴﺭ.ﺒﻁ ﺴﻤﻴﺕ ﻭﻗﺩﻤﺴﺘﻭﻴﺎﺕ ﻋﺩﺓ ﻤﻥ ﺘﺘﻜﻭﻥ ﻜﻭﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﻝﻬﺭﻤﻲ ﺍﻝﺘﺤﻠﻴل ﺭﻴﻘﺔ،ﺍﻝﻬﺩﻑ ﻤﺜﺎﻝﻨﺎ ﻓﻔﻲ
ﺍﻝﻬﺭﻡ ﻤﻥ ﺍﻷﻭل ﺍﻝﻤﺴﺘﻭﻯ ﻋﻨﺩ ﺍﻝﻬﺩﻑ ﻫﺫﺍ ﻭﺴﻴﻜﻭﻥ ﺴﻜﻥ ﺩﺍﺭ ﺃﻓﻀل ﺸﺭﺍﺀ ﻫﻭ،ﻤﻥ ﺍﻝﺜﺎﻨﻲ ﺍﻝﻤﺴﺘﻭﻯ ﻭﻋﻨﺩ
ﺍﻝﻬﺩﻑ ﺘﺤﻘﻴﻕ ﻓﻲ ﺘﺴﺎﻫﻡ ﺍﻝﺘﻲ ﺍﻝﻤﻌﺎﻴﻴﺭ ﺘﺤﺩﺩ ﺴﻭﻑ ﺍﻝﻬﺭﻡ،ﻜل ﺃﻥ ﻜﻴﻑ ﻨﺤﺩﺩ ﻭﺍﻷﺨﻴﺭ ﺍﻝﺜﺎﻝﺙ ﺍﻝﻤﺴﺘﻭﻯ ﻭﻓﻲ
ﻤ ﺒﺩﻴلﺍﻝﻤﻌﺎﻴﻴﺭ ﻫﺫﻩ ﻤﻥ ﻜل ﻓﻲ ﺘﺴﻬﻡ ﺍﻝﺒﺩﺍﺌل ﻫﺫﻩ ﻥ[ 5 ].
ﺍﻷﻓﻀﻠﻴﺔ ﺘﺤﻘﻴﻕ ﻫﻭ ﺍﻝﻁﺭﻴﻘﺔ ﻫﺫﻩ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻝﻤﺴﺘﺨﺩﻤﺔ ﺍﻝﺭﻴﺎﻀﻴﺔ ﺍﻝﻌﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺃﻥ)preferences(ﻜل ﻋﻨﺩ
ﺍﻝﻬﺭﻡ ﻤﺴﺘﻭﻴﺎﺕ ﻤﻥ ﻤﺴﺘﻭﻯ.ﻤﻭﻗﻊ ﻝﻜل ﺍﻷﻓﻀﻠﻴﺔ ﻨﻘﺎﻁ ﺒﺈﻋﻁﺎﺀ ﻭﺫﻝﻙ)ﺒﺩﻴل. (ﻋﻠﻰ ﻴﺤﺼل ﺍﻝﺫﻱ ﻭﺍﻝﺒﺩﻴل
ﺍﻷﻓﻀل ﻫﻭ ﺴﻴﻜﻭﻥ ﺍﻝﻨﻘﺎﻁ ﺃﻜﺒﺭ،ﻭﺍﺤﺩ ﻝﻤﻌﻴﺎﺭ ﹰﺎﻁﺒﻘ ﺒﺩﻴﻠﻴﻥ ﺒﻴﻥ ﺍﻝﺯﻭﺠﻴﺔ ﺍﻝﻤﻘﺎﺭﻨﺔ ﺃﺠﺭﺍﺀ ﺨﻼل ﻤﻥ ﺫﻝﻙ ﻭﻴﺘﻡ
ﻝﻠـ ﺍﻷﻓﻀﻠﻴﺔ ﻤﻘﻴﺎﺱ ﺒﺎﺴﺘﺨﺩﺍﻡ ﺍﻷﻓﻀل ﺍﻝﺒﺩﻴل ﻨﺅﺸﺭ ﻭﺒﻌﺩﻫﺎSaatyﻝﻤﺴﺘﻭﻴﺎﺕ ﺭﻗﻤﻴﺔ ﻗﻴﻡ ﻴﺨﺼﺹ ﻭﺍﻝﺫﻱ
ﺍﻷﻓﻀﻠﻴﺔ ﻤﻥ ﻤﺨﺘﻠﻔﺔ]٦[ﺭﻗﻡ ﺒﺎﻝﺠﺩﻭل ﻤﻭﻀﺢ ﻭﻜﻤﺎ( 1 ).
ﺭﻗﻡ ﺠﺩﻭل)1(ﻝﻠـ ﺍﻷﻓﻀﻠﻴﺔ ﻤﻘﻴﺎﺱSaaty
Numeric valuePreference level
ﻤﺘﺴﺎﻭﻴﺔ ﺃﻓﻀﻠﻴﺔequal preference1
ﻤﻌﺘﺩﻝﺔ ﺃﻭ ﻤﺘﻭﺴﻁﺔ ﺃﻓﻀﻠﻴﺔmoderately preference3
ﻗﻭﻴﺔ ﺃﻓﻀﻠﻴﺔstrong preference5
ﹰﺍﺠﺩ ﻗﻭﻴﺔ ﺃﻓﻀﻠﻴﺔvery strong preference7
7. ﻤﻁﻠﻘﺔ ﺃﻓﻀﻠﻴﺔabsolute preference9
ﺃﻋﻼﻩ ﺍﻝﻘﻴﻡ ﺒﻴﻥ ﻤﺘﻭﺴﻁﺔ ﻗﻴﻡinter mediate values between them2 , 4 , 6 , 8
ﻭﺤﺩﺘﻴﻥ ﺒﻴﻥ ﺍﻝﻤﻘﺎﺭﻨﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻴﻌﺘﻤﺩ ﺍﻷﻓﻀﻠﻴﺔ ﻤﻘﻴﺎﺱ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺘﻘﺩﻴﺭ ﺃﻱ ﻭﺃﻥ)ﺒﺩﻴﻠﻴﻥ. (ﻤﺜﺎﻝﻨﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﹰﺓﻭﻋﻭﺩ
ﻫﻤﺎ ﺒﺩﻴﻼﻥ ﻤﻭﻗﻌﺎﻥ ﺃﻤﺎﻤﻨﺎ ﻭﻜﺎﻥ ﺍﻝﺴﺎﺒﻕ)A,B(ﻤﻌﺎﻴﻴﺭ ﻭﺜﻼﺙﻫﻤﺎ ﺒﻴﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﺍﻻﺨﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﻝﻌﻤﻠﻴﺔ)Z,Y,X(
ﺍﻝﺒﺩﻴﻠﻴﻥ ﻫﺫﻴﻥ ﺒﻴﻥ ﺍﻝﻤﻔﺎﻀﻠﺔ ﻭﺍﻝﻤﻁﻠﻭﺏ.ﺍﻝﻤﻭﻗﻊ ﻜﺎﻥ ﻓﺈﺫﺍ)A(moderately preferredﻝﻠﻤﻭﻗﻊ ﺒﺎﻝﻨﺴﺒﺔ)
B(ﺍﻝﻤﻌﻴﺎﺭ ﻀﻭﺀ ﻋﻠﻰ)X(،ﺍﻝﻘﻴﻤﺔ ﻓﺈﻥ)3(ﻝﻠﻤﻭﻗﻊ ﺘﺨﺼﺹ ﺴﻭﻑ)A(،ﺒﻤﺜﺎﺒﺔ ﺴﻴﻜﻭﻥ ﻭﻫﺫﺍ
ﺍ ﻤﻊ ﻝﻤﻘﺎﺭﻨﺘﻪ ﺍﻝﻘﺭﺍﺭ ﻝﻤﺘﺨﺫ ﻤﻘﻴﺎﺱﺍﻷﺨﺭﻯ ﻝﺒﺩﺍﺌل،ﺇﺠﺭﺍﺀ ﺒﺎﻝﻀﺭﻭﺭﺓ ﻝﻴﺱ ﻓﺄﻨﻪ ﺇﻝﻴﻪ ﺍﻹﺸﺎﺭﺓ ﺘﺠﺩﺭ ﻭﻤﻤﺎ
ﺒﻴﻥ ﺍﻝﻤﻘﺎﺭﻨﺔ)B(،)A(ﺍﻝﻤﻭﻗﻊ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﻷﻥ)B(ﺇﻝﻰ)A(ﺃﻓﻀﻠﻴﺔ ﻤﻌﻜﻭﺱ ﺴﻴﻜﻭﻥ)A(ﺇﻝﻰ)B(
inverse of the preferenceﺍﻝﻘﻴﻤﺔ ﺴﺘﻜﻭﻥ ﺃﻱ)1/3. (ﺍﻝﻤﻌﺎﻴﻴﺭ ﻝﺒﻘﻴﺔ ﺒﺎﻝﻨﺴﺒﺔ ﺍﻝﻌﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺘﺠﺭﻱ ﻭﻫﻜﺫﺍ
ﺍﻷﺍﻝﻘﺭﺍﺭ ﻤﺘﺨﺫ ﻗﺒل ﻤﻥ ﺍﻝﻤﻤﻨﻭﺤﺔ ﺍﻷﻓﻀﻠﻴﺔ ﻀﻭﺀ ﻓﻲ ﺨﺭﻯ.ﺃﻭ ﺍﻝﺘﻘﺩﻴﺭﺍﺕ ﻫﺫﻩ ﻭﺘﻭﻀﻊ)ﺍﻷﻓﻀﻠﻴﺔ(ﻓﻲ
ﺍﻝﻘﺭﺍﺭ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺘﺄﺜﻴﺭﻩ ﻭﻤﺩﻯ ﺍﻝﻤﻌﺎﻴﻴﺭ ﻫﺫﻩ ﻤﻥ ﻤﻌﻴﺎﺭ ﻜل ﺃﻫﻤﻴﺔ ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻝﻤﺠﺎل ﻫﺫﺍ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻹﺩﺍﺭﺓ ﺨﺒﺭﺓ ﻀﻭﺀ.ﻭﻓﻴﻤﺎ
ﻁﺭﻴﻘﺔ ﻋﻤل ﺒﺨﻁﻭﺍﺕ ﻤﻭﺠﺯ ﻤﻠﺨﺹ ﻴﻠﻲAHP]٤[]٦[[ 7 ]:
ﺃ-ﺒﺎﻝﻨﺴﺍﻝﺒﺩﺍﺌل ﻝﻤﺼﻔﻭﻓﺎﺕ ﺒﺔ:
١-ﺍﻝﺒﺩﺍﺌل ﺃﻋﻤﺩﺓ ﻤﻥ ﻋﻤﻭﺩ ﻜل ﻨﺠﻤﻊ.
٢-ﺍﻝﻌﻤﻭﺩ ﻤﺠﻤﻭﻉ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﻤﻭﺩ ﻜل ﻓﻲ ﺍﻝﻘﻴﻤﺔ ﺒﻘﺴﻤﺔ ﺍﻝﻤﺌﻭﻴﺔ ﺍﻝﻨﺴﺒﺔ ﻨﺴﺘﺨﺭﺝ.
٣-ﻭﺍﺤﺩﺓ ﻤﺼﻔﻭﻓﺔ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻝﺠﺩﻴﺩ ﺍﻷﻋﻤﺩﺓ ﻨﺠﻤﻊ.
٤-ﻋﺩﺩﻫﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻭﻨﻘﺴﻤﻬﺎ ﺍﻝﺼﻔﻭﻑ ﻨﺠﻤﻊ.
ﺏ-ﺍﻝﻤﻌﺎﻴﻴﺭ ﻝﻤﺼﻔﻭﻓﺔ ﺒﺎﻝﻨﺴﺒﺔ:
١-ﺍﻝﻤﺼﻔﻭﻓ ﻓﻲ ﻋﻤﻭﺩ ﻜل ﺠﻤﻊﺔ.
٢-ﺍﻝﻌﻤﻭﺩ ﻤﺠﻤﻭﻉ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﻤﻭﺩ ﻜل ﻓﻲ ﺍﻝﻘﻴﻤﺔ ﻗﺴﻤﺔ.
٣-ﺼﻑ ﻜل ﻓﻲ ﺍﻝﻘﻴﻡ ﻨﺠﻤﻊ.
٤-ﺍﻝﺼﻔﻭﻑ ﻋﺩﺩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻝﻤﺠﻤﻭﻉ ﻨﻘﺴﻡ.
ﺝ-ﺭﻗﻡ ﺍﻝﺨﻁﻭﺓ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻝﻤﺴﺘﺨﺭﺠﺔ ﺍﻝﻤﺌﻭﻴﺔ ﺍﻝﻨﺴﺏ ﻨﻀﺭﺏ)4(ﻤﻥ)ﺃ(ﺍﻝﺨﻁﻭﺓ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻝﻤﺴﺘﺨﺭﺠﺔ ﺍﻝﻤﺌﻭﻴﺔ ﺍﻝﻨﺴﺒﺔ ﻤﻊ
)4(ﻤﻥ)ﺏ. (
ﺩ-ﺍﻝﻤﻌﺎﻴﻴﺭ ﺃﺴﺒﻘﻴﺎﺕ ﻨﻀﺭﺏ)ﺍﻝﻤﺌﻭﻴﺔ ﺍﻝﻨﺴﺏ(ﻓﻲ ﺍﻝﻤﺴﺘﺨﺭﺠﺔ ﺍﻝﺒﺩﺍﺌل ﺃﺴﺒﻘﻴﺎﺕ ﻓﻲ)4(ﻤﻥ)ﺃ. (
ﻫـ-ﺍﻝﻤﻘﺎﺭﻨﺔ ﺴﺘﺠﺭﻱ ﺍﻝﺘﻲ ﺍﻝﻨﺴﺏ ﺍﺴﺘﺨﺭﺍﺝ ﻝﻐﺭﺽ ﺍﻝﻤﻌﺎﻴﻴﺭ ﻜﺎﻓﺔ ﻀﻤﻥ ﺍﻝﻤﻌﻨﻲ ﺒﺎﻝﺒﺩﻴل ﺍﻝﻤﺘﻌﻠﻘﺔ ﺍﻝﻨﺴﺏ ﻨﺠﻤﻊ
ﺃﺴﺎﺴﻬﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ.
ﺍﻝﺍﻝﺜﺎﻝﺙ ﻤﺤﻭﺭ:-ﺍﻝﺘﻁﺒﻴﻘﻲ ﺍﻝﺠﺎﻨﺏ:
ﻨﺸﺎﻁ ﻓﻲ ﺘﻭﺴﻊ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺇﺠﺭﺍﺀ ﺍﻝﺘﻘﻨﻲ ﺍﻝﻤﻌﻬﺩ ﻋﻤﺎﺩﺓ ﺘﺭﻏﺏﺒﺩﻴﻼﻥ ﺃﻤﺎﻤﻬﺎ ﻓﻜﺎﻥ ﺍﻝﻌﻠﻤﻲ ﻬﺎ)
Alternatives(ﺍﻹﺩﺍﺭﺓ ﻜﻠﻴﺔ ﻓﻲ ﻤﺘﻭﻓﺭﺓ ﻏﻴﺭ ﺠﺩﻴﺩﺓ ﺍﺨﺘﺼﺎﺼﺎﺕ ﺘﺘﻀﻤﻥ ﺃﺩﺍﺭﻴﺔ ﺘﻘﻨﻴﺔ ﻜﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﺴﺘﺤﺩﺍﺙ ﺃﻭﻝﻬﻤﺎ
ﻭﺍﻻﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ–ﺍﻝﺒﺼﺭﺓ ﺠﺎﻤﻌﺔ–ﻝﺴﺩ ﻭﺫﻝﻙ ﺍﻝﻤﻌﻠﻭﻤﺎﺕ ﻭﺘﻜﻨﻭﻝﻭﺠﻴﺎ ﻭﺍﻝﻤﺤﺎﺴﺒﻴﺔ ﺍﻹﺩﺍﺭﻴﺔ ﺍﻝﻤﻌﻠﻭﻤﺎﺕ ﻝﻨﻅﻡ ﻜﺄﻗﺴﺎﻡ
ﺍﻝﺠﻨﻭﺒ ﻭﺍﻝﻤﺤﺎﻓﻅﺎﺕ ﺍﻝﻤﺤﺎﻓﻅﺔ ﺤﺎﺠﺔﺍﻝﻤﻬﻤﺔ ﺍﻻﺨﺘﺼﺎﺼﺎﺕ ﻫﺫﻩ ﻤﻥ ﻴﺔ.ﻓﻲ ﺍﻝﺘﻭﺴﻊ ﻓﻬﻭ ﺍﻝﺜﺎﻨﻲ ﺍﻝﺒﺩﻴل ﺃﻤﺎ
ﺍﻝﻤﺼﺎﺭﻑ ﺇﺩﺍﺭﺓ ﻭﻗﺴﻡ ﺍﻝﺘﺴﻭﻴﻕ ﺇﺩﺍﺭﺓ ﻗﺴﻡ ﻜﺄﺴﺘﺤﺩﺍﺙ ﺍﻝﺤﺎﻝﻴﺔ ﺍﻹﺩﺍﺭﻴﺔ ﺃﻗﺴﺎﻤﻬﺎ،ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺘﻜﻭﻥ ﺃﻥ ﻭﻷﺠل
8. ﺩﻗﻴﻘﺔ ﻭﻤﻌﺎﻴﻴﺭﻋﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﺃﺴﺱ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻝﻘﺭﺍﺭ ﻴﺒﻨﻰ ﺃﻥ ﻴﻔﺘﺭﺽ ﻭﺩﻗﻴﻘﺔ ﺼﺎﺌﺒﺔ ﺍﻝﺒﺩﻴﻠﻴﻥ ﻫﺫﻴﻥ ﺒﻴﻥ ﺍﻻﺨﺘﻴﺎﺭ،ﻭﺠﺩ ﻝﺫﺍ
ﻤﻌﺎﻴﻴﺭ ﺜﻼﺜﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﺃﻤﻜﺎﻨﻴﺔ ﺍﻝﺒﺎﺤﺙ)criterias(ﻤﻥ ﻜل ﺭﺃﻱ ﻭﻫﻤﺎ ﺍﻝﻤﻔﺎﻀﻠﺔ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﻓﻲ ﺭﺌﻴﺴﻴﺔ
ﺍﻷﺴﺎﺘﺫﺓ،ﺍﻝﻁﻠﺒﺔ،ﺍﻝﻤﻌﻬﺩ ﻤﺠﻠﺱ)ﺍﻝﻌﻠﻴﺎ ﺍﻻﺩﺍﺭﺓ. (ﻤﻥ ﻜﺒﻴﺭ ﻋﺩﺩ ﻤﻊ ﺍﻝﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﺍﻝﻤﻘﺎﺒﻼﺕ ﺨﻼل ﻭﻤﻥ ﻭﻋﻠﻴﻪ
ﺍﻝﺒﺎﺤ ﺘﻤﻜﻥ ﻓﻘﺩ ﺍﻝﻤﻌﻬﺩ ﻤﺠﻠﺱ ﺒﺭﺃﻱ ﻭﺍﻻﺴﺘﺌﻨﺎﺱ ﻭﺍﻷﺴﺎﺘﺫﺓ ﺍﻝﻁﻠﺒﺔﹰﺎﻭﻓﻘ ﻝﻠﺒﺩﺍﺌل ﺍﻝﺯﻭﺠﻴﺔ ﺍﻝﻤﻘﺎﺭﻨﺔ ﺇﺠﺭﺍﺀ ﻤﻥ ﺙ
ﺍﻝﺒﺩﺍﺌل ﻤﺼﻔﻭﻓﺔ ﻓﻲ ﻭﺭﺩﺕ ﻭﻜﻤﺎ ﺒﺩﻴل ﻜل ﺃﻓﻀﻠﻴﺔ ﺘﻌﻜﺱ ﻭﺍﻝﺘﻲ ﻤﻌﻴﺎﺭ ﻝﻜل،ﻤﺼﻔﻭﻓﺔ ﺘﺼﻤﻴﻡ ﻋﻥ ﹰﻼﻓﻀ
ﺍﻝﺜﻼﺜﺔ ﻝﻠﻤﻌﺎﻴﻴﺭ ﺍﻷﻓﻀﻠﻴﺔ:
١-ﺍﻝﺒﺩﺍﺌل ﻤﺼﻔﻭﻓﺔ:
StudentsTeachers
New DeptNew
college
New DeptNew college
21New college1/91New college
11/2New Dept.19New Dept.
Top management
New Dept.New college
51New college
11/5New Dept.
٢-ا:
Top manag.StudentsTeachersCriterion
51/31Teachers
713Students
11/71/5Top manag.
ﺍﻝﺤل/ﹰﻻﺃﻭ/ﺍﻝﺒﺩﺍﺌل ﺒﻤﺼﻔﻭﻓﺎﺕ ﻨﺒﺩﺃﻭﺤﺴﺏﺍﻝﺫﻜﺭ ﺍﻝﺴﺎﺒﻘﺔ ﺍﻝﺤل ﺨﻁﻭﺍﺕ.
ﻤﻼﺤﻅﺔ:
*ﺍﻷﻭل ﻝﻠﺒﺩﻴل ﻨﺭﻤﺯ ﺍﻝﺘﺒﺴﻴﻁ ﻝﻐﺭﺽ)New college(ﺒﺎﻝﺤﺭﻑ)A. (
ﻭ= =ﺍﻝﺜﺎﻨﻲ)New Dept.(ﺒﺎﻝﺤﺭﻑ)B. (
Teachers Teachers
A B A B Average
0.10.0990.1A1/91A
9. 0.90.9000.9B19B
1.01.11110
Students Students
A B A B Average
0.6670.6670.667A21A
0.3330.3330.333B11/2B
1.00031.5
Top Manag. Top Manag.
A B A B Average
0.8330.8330.833A51A
0.1670.1670.166B11/5B
1.00061.2
ﹰﺎﺜﺎﻨﻴ/ﺍﻝﻤﻌﺎﻴﻴﺭ ﻤﺼﻔﻭﻓﺔ:
Top manag.Stud.Teach.Criterion
51/31Teachers
713Students
11/71/5Top manag.
131.4754.2
AverageTop manag.StudentsTeach.Criterion
0.2830.3850.2260.238Teachers
0.6440.5380.6780.714Students
0.0730.0760.0960.047Top manag.
1.000
ﹰﺎﺜﺎﻝﺜ/ﺍﻝﻤﻌﺎﻴﻴﺭ ﺃﺴﺒﻘﻴﺎﺕ ﻨﻀﺭﺏ)ﺍﻝﻤﺌﻭﻴﺔ ﺍﻝﻨﺴﺏ(ﺍﻝﺒﺩﺍﺌل ﺃﺴﺒﻘﻴﺎﺕ ﻓﻲ.
Top manag.StudentsteachersCriteria
Alternative
10. 0.8330.6670.1A
0.1670.3330.9B
0.0730.6440.283
ﹰﺎﺭﺍﺒﻌ/ﺃﺴﺒﻘﻴﺎﺕ ﻨﻀﺭﺏ)ﺍﻝﻤﺌﻭﻴﺔ ﺍﻝﻨﺴﺏ(ﺍﻝﺒﺩﺍﺌل ﺃﺴﺒﻘﻴﺎﺕ ﻓﻲ.
Teachers = 0.283
B = 0.9 × 0.283 = 0.255
A = 0.1 × 0.283 = 0.028
Students = 0.644
A = 0.667 × 0.644 = 0.430
B = 0.333 × 0.644 = 0.214
Top manag = 0.073
A = 0.833 × 0.073 = 0.061
B = 0.167 × 0.073 = 0.012
ﹰﺎﺨﺎﻤﺴ/ﺍﻝﻤﻘﺎﺭﻨﺔ ﺃﺴﺎﺱ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺴﺘﺠﺭﻱ ﺍﻝﺘﻲ ﺍﻝﻨﺴﺏ ﺍﺴﺘﺨﺭﺍﺝ ﻝﻐﺭﺽ ﺒﺩﻴل ﺒﻜل ﺍﻝﻤﺘﻌﻠﻘﺔ ﺍﻝﻨﺴﺏ ﺘﺠﻤﻊ.
Alternatives =
A = 0.028 + 0.430 + 0.061 = 0.519
B = 0.255 + 0.214 + 0.012 = 0.481
ﺍﻝﺒﺩﻴل ﺍﺨﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﺍﻝﻘﺭﺍﺭ ﺴﻴﻜﻭﻥ ﺍﻝﻨﺘﻴﺠﺔ ﻫﺫﻩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﹰﺍﺍﺴﺘﻨﺎﺩ)A(ﻜﻭﻨﻪ ﺇﺩﺍﺭﻴﺔ ﺘﻘﻨﻴﺔ ﻜﻠﻴﺔ ﺒﺎﺴﺘﺤﺩﺍﺙ ﺍﻝﻤﺘﻤﺜل
ﺍﻝﻨﻘﺎﻁ ﻤﻥ ﻋﺩﺩ ﺃﻜﺒﺭ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺤﺼل.
ﻁﺭﻴﻘﺔ ﺇﻥ ﻭﺒﻤﺎ)AHP(ﺍﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻭﻝﻲ ﺒﺸﻜل ﺘﻌﺘﻤﺩﺍﻝﺒﺩﺍﺌل ﺒﻴﻥ ﺍﻷﻓﻀﻠﻴﺔ ﺘﺤﻘﻴﻕ ﺃﺠل ﻤﻥ ﺍﻝﺯﻭﺠﻴﺔ ﻤﻘﺎﺭﻨﺔ
ﻤﺤﺩﺩﺓ ﻝﻤﻌﺎﻴﻴﺭ ﹰﺎﻭﻓﻘ ﺍﻝﻤﺘﺎﺤﺔ.ﺍﻝﻤﻘﺎﺒل ﺍﺴﺘﻨﺒﺎﻁ ﻫﻭ ﺍﻷﻓﻀﻠﻴﺔ ﻝﺘﺤﻘﻴﻕ ﺍﻝﻁﺒﻴﻌﻲ ﺍﻹﺠﺭﺍﺀ ﻓﺈﻥ ﻝﺫﺍ)interviewer
(ﺍﻷﻓﻀﻠﻴﺔ ﺠﺩﻭل ﺒﺎﺴﺘﺨﺩﺍﻡ ﻭﺫﻝﻙ ﺍﻝﻘﺭﺍﺭ ﻤﺘﺨﺫ ﻤﻥ ﺍﻷﻓﻀﻠﻴﺔ ﻝﻤﺘﻐﻴﺭﺍﺕ.ﻤﺘﺨﺫ ﺃﻤﺎﻡ ﺍﻷﺤﻴﺎﻥ ﺒﻌﺽ ﻴﺤﺩﺙ ﻭﻝﻜﻥ
ﻋ ﺍﻝﻘﺭﺍﺭﺭﺒﻤﺎ ﺍﻝﻤﻌﺎﻴﻴﺭ ﻤﻥ ﻜﺒﻴﺭ ﺩﺩ)4(ﺍﻻﺴﺘﺠﺎﺒﺎﺕ ﻫﺫﻩ ﻤﻥ ﺒﻌﺽ ﻴﺨﺴﺭ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻝﻤﻤﻜﻥ ﻤﻥ ﻓﺄﻨﻪ ﺃﻜﺜﺭ ﺃﻭ،ﻭﻷﻥ
ﺍﻝﺜﺒﺎﺕ ﻤﻥ ﺒﺩﺭﺠﺔ ﺍﻻﺴﺘﺠﺎﺒﺎﺕ ﻫﺫﻩ ﺘﺘﻤﺘﻊ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻝﻀﺭﻭﺭﻱ ﻤﻥ ﻓﺈﻨﻪ ﺍﻻﺴﺘﺠﺎﺒﺎﺕ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺘﻌﺘﻤﺩ ﺍﻝﻁﺭﻴﻘﺔ ﻫﺫﻩ،ﻭﻜﺫﻝﻙ
ﺍﻝﺜﺒﺎﺕ ﻤﻥ ﺩﺭﺠﺔ ﺇﻝﻰ ﺘﺤﺘﺎﺝ ﻤﻌﻴﻨﺔ ﻝﻤﺠﻤﻭﻋﺔ ﺍﻝﺯﻭﺠﻴﺔ ﻝﻠﻤﻘﺎﺭﻨﺔ ﺒﺎﻝﻨﺴﺒﺔ ﺍﻝﺤﺎلﺃﺨﺭﻯ ﻤﺠﻤﻭﻋﺔ ﻤﻊ ﻤﻘﺎﺭﻨﺘﻬﺎ ﻋﻨﺩ
.ﺍﻝﺜﺒﺎﺕ ﻤﺅﺸﺭ ﺤﺴﺎﺏ ﻴﻤﻜﻥ ﺫﻝﻙ ﺘﺤﻘﻴﻕ ﻭﻷﺠل)consistency index(ﻝﻠﻤﻌـﺎﻴﻴﺭ ﺍﻝﺯﻭﺠﻴـﺔ ﻝﻠﻤﻘﺎﺭﻨـﺔ
ﻭﻜﺎﻵﺘﻲ ﺍﻝﺜﻼﺜﺔ:
CriteriaTop manag.StudentsTeachers
0.28351/31Teachers
0.644٧13Students
0.073
X
١1/71/5Top manag.
11. (1) ( 0.283) + (1/3)(0.644) + (5)(0.073) = 0.862
(3) (0.283) + (1) (0.644) + (7) (0.073) = 2.004
(1/5) (0.283 ) + (1/7) ( 0.644) + (1) (0.073 ) = 0.220
ﺍﻷﻓﻀﻠﻴﺔ ﻤﻌﺎﻴﻴﺭ ﻤﻥ ﺍﻝﻤﺘﻨﺎﻅﺭﺓ ﺃﻭﺯﺍﻨﻬﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻝﻘﻴﻡ ﻫﺫﻩ ﻤﻥ ﻜل ﻨﻘﺴﻡ ﺒﻌﺩﻫﺎ
0.682/ 0.283 = 3.045
2.004 / 0.644 = 3.111
0.220 / 0.073 = 3.013
9.169
ﺘﺴﺎﻭﻱ ﺍﻝﻨﺴﺏ ﺘﻠﻙ ﻤﻥ ﻨﺴﺒﺔ ﻜل ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﻜﺎﻨﺕ ﺇﺫﺍ)3(ﺍﻝﺘﺎﻡ ﺍﻝﺜﺒﺎﺕ ﺩﺭﺠﺔ ﺘﺤﻘﻕ ﻴﻌﻨﻲ ﻫﺫﺍ ﻓﺈﻥ.ﻭﻝﻴﺱ
ﻫﻨﺎﻝﻙﺍﺩﻨﻰﺍﻝﻘﺭﺍﺭ ﻤﺘﺨﺫ ﺃﻤﺎﻡ ﺸﻙ.ﺍﻝﻭﺤﺩﺍﺕ ﻋﺩﺩ ﺃﻥ ﻭﺒﻤﺎ)ﺍﻝﻤﻌﺎﻴﻴﺭ(ﻫ ﻤﻘﺎﺭﻨﺘﻬﺎ ﺘﻡ ﺍﻝﺘﻲﻲ)3(ﻤﻌﺩل ﻓﺈﻥ
ﻜﺎﻵﺘﻲ ﺴﻴﻜﻭﻥ ﺍﻝﻘﻴﻡ ﺘﻠﻙ:
9.169 = ٣ ٠٥٦
٣
ﺍﻝﺜﺒﺎﺕ ﻤﺅﺸﺭ ﻓﺄﻥ ﻭﻋﻠﻴﻪ)C I(ﺍﻝﺘﺎﻝﻴﺔ ﺍﻝﻤﻌﺎﺩﻝﺔ ﻭﻓﻕ ﻴﺤﺴﺏ:
ﺃﻥ ﺤﻴﺙ
n=ﺍﻝﻭﺤﺩﺍﺕ ﻋﺩﺩ)ﺍﻝﻤﻌﺎﻴﻴﺭ(ﻤﻘﺎﺭﻨﺘﻬﺎ ﺘﻡ ﺍﻝﺘﻲ
ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﻜﺎﻨﺕ ﺇﺫﺍ( )ﺼﻔﺭ ﺘﺴﺎﻭﻱ.ﺍﻝﻘﺭﺍﺭ ﻤﺘﺨﺫ ﻝﺩﻯ ﺘﺎﻡ ﺜﺒﺎﺕ ﻴﻌﻨﻲ ﻓﻬﺫﺍ.
ﻭﺍﻝﻨﺘﻴﺠﺔ)0.028(ﺍﻝﺩﺭﺍﺴﻴﺔ ﺤﺎﻝﺘﻨﺎ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻝﻘﺭﺍﺭ ﻤﺘﺨﺫ ﻝﺩﻯ ﺘﺎﻡ ﺜﺒﺎﺕ ﻭﺠﻭﺩ ﻋﺩﻡ ﺘﻌﻨﻲ.ﻫﻲ ﻤﺎ ﻭﻝﻜﻥ
ﺍﻝﻤﻘﺒﻭﻝﺔ ﺍﻝﺜﺒﺎﺕ ﻋﺩﻡ ﺩﺭﺠﺔ.ﺘﻤﻘﺎﺭﻨﺔ ﺨﻼل ﻤﻥ ﺍﻝﺩﺭﺠﺔ ﻫﺫﻩ ﺤﺩﺩ)CI(ﺍﻝﻌﺸﻭﺍﺌﻴﺔ ﻤﺅﺸﺭ ﻤﻊ)Random
index(ﻝﻪ ﻭﻴﺭﻤﺯ)RI(ﺍﻝﻭﺤﺩﺍﺕ ﻋﺩﺩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺘﻌﺘﻤﺩ ﻗﻴﻡ ﺍﻝﻤﺅﺸﺭ ﻭﻝﻬﺫﺍ)ﺍﻝﻤﻌﺎﻴﻴﺭ(ﻤﻘﺎﺭﻨﺘﻬﺎ ﺘﻡ ﺍﻝﺘﻲ.ﻭﻜﻤﺎ
ﺍﻝﺘﺎﻝﻲ ﺍﻝﺠﺩﻭل ﻓﻲ( 2 ).
ﺠﺩﻭل)2(:ﺍﻝﻤﺅﺸﺭ ﻗﻴﻡ)RI(ﻝـnﺍﻝﻭﺤﺩﺍﺕ ﻤﻥ
1098765432N
1.511.451.411.321.241.120.900.580RI
=C I
n–3.056
1–n
CI
CI
=
= =
3–3.056
1–3
0.056 2
CI
0.028/
12. ﻓﺈﻥ ﻝﺫﺍﺩﺭﺠﺔﻨﺴﺒﺔ ﺤﺴﺎﺏ ﺨﻼل ﻤﻥ ﺘﺤﺩﺩ ﺍﻝﻘﺭﺍﺭ ﻤﻌﺎﻴﻴﺭ ﻤﺼﻔﻭﻓﺔ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻝﺯﻭﺠﻴﺔ ﻝﻠﻤﻘﺎﺭﻨﺔ ﺍﻝﺜﺒﺎﺕCI
RI/.ﻝﺩﻴﻨﺎ ﺃﻨﻪ ﻭﺒﻤﺎ)3(ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﻓﺈﻥ ﻤﻌﺎﻴﻴﺭn=3ﺍﻝﻌﺸﻭﺍﺌﻴﺔ ﻤﺅﺸﺭ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﺴﺘﻜﻭﻥ ﻭﻋﻠﻴﺔ)RI(ﻫﺫﻩ ﻤﻘﺎﺒل
ﻫﻭ ﺍﻝﻘﻴﻤﺔ)0.58(ﻭﻜﻤﺎﺍﻝﺠﺩﻭل ﻓﻲ ﻤﺒﻴﻨﻪ)2(ﻓﺈﻥ ﻭﻋﻠﻴﻪ:
0.048=
ﻤﻘﻨﻌﺔ ﻫﻲ ﺍﻝﻘﻴﻤﺔ ﻝﻬﺫﻩ ﹰﺎﻭﻓﻘ ﺍﻝﺜﺒﺎﺕ ﺩﺭﺠﺔ ﻓﺈﻥ ﻭﻋﻠﻴﻪ)Satisfactory. (ﻗﻴﻤـﺔ ﻜﺎﻨـﺕ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻭﺫﻝـﻙRI / CI
ﻤﻥ ﺃﺼﻐﺭ0.10ﻓﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﻜﺎﻨﺕ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻭﺃﻤﺎ ﻤﻘﺒﻭﻝﺔ ﻬﻲCIRI/ﻤﻥ ﺃﻜﺒﺭ0.10ﻋـﺩﻡ ﻤﻥ ﺴﻠﺴﻠﺔ ﺍﺤﺘﻤﺎل ﻫﻨﺎﻝﻙ ﻓﺈﻥ
ﻁﺭﻴﻘﺔ ﻭﺇﻥ ﺍﻝﺜﺒﺎﺕ)AHP(ﺠﺩﻭﻯ ﺫﻱ ﻏﻴﺭ ﺴﺘﻜﻭﻥ ﻋﻨﺩﻫﺎ]٤] [٨.[
ﺘﻘﻨﻴـﺔ ﻜﻠﻴـﺔ ﺍﺴﺘﺤﺩﺍﺙ ﻭﻫﻭ ﺍﻷﻭل ﺍﻝﺒﺩﻴل ﺍﺨﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﻝﻘﺭﺍﺭ ﺍﺘﺨﺎﺫﻨﺎ ﺼﺤﺔ ﺘﺅﻜﺩ ﺍﻝﻨﺘﻴﺠﺔ ﻫﺫﻩ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺫﻝﻙ ﻋﻠﻰ ﹰﺎﻭﺘﺄﺴﻴﺴ
ﺇﺩﺍﺭﻴﺔ.
ﺍﻝﻤﺍﻝﺭﺍﺒﻊ ﺤﻭﺭ:ﻭﺍﻝﺘﻭﺼﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻻﺴﺘﻨﺘﺎﺠﺎﺕ
ﺍﻻﺴـﺘﻨﺘﺎﺠﺎﺕ ﻤـﻥ ﺠﻤﻠﺔ ﺇﻝﻰ ﺍﻝﺒﺎﺤﺙ ﺘﻭﺼل ﻭﺍﻝﻌﻤﻠﻲ ﺍﻝﻨﻅﺭﻱ ﺍﻝﺒﺤﺙ ﺠﺎﻨﺒﻲ ﻓﻲ ﻋﺭﻀﻪ ﺘﻡ ﻤﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺀﺒﻨﺎ
ﺍﻵﺘﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻝﺘﻭﺼﻴﺎﺕ:-
ﺃﻭﻻ:-ﺍﻻﺴﺘﻨﺘﺎﺠﺎﺕ:
١–ﺍ ﺘﺭﺸﻴﺩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺘﺴﺎﻋﺩ ﻭﺍﻝﺘﻲ ﺍﻝﻜﻤﻴﺔ ﺍﻻﺴﺎﻝﻴﺏ ﺘﺒﻨﻲ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻝﻤﻌﻬﺩ ﺍﺩﺍﺭﺓ ﻗﺒل ﻤﻥ ﻭﺍﻀﺢ ﻀﻌﻑ ﻫﻨﺎﻙﻝﻘـﺭﺍﺭﺍﺕ
ﺍﻝﻌﻠﻤﻲ ﺍﻻﺴﻠﻭﺏ ﺍﻝﻰ ﺘﺴﺘﻨﺩ ﻻ ﻭﺍﻝﺘﻲ ﺍﻝﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﺍﻝﺨﺒﺭﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻭﺍﻀﺢ ﺒﺸﻜل ﻭﺍﻻﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ.
٢-ﺍﻝﻌﻼﻗـﺔ ﺫﺍﺕ ﺍﻝﻤﻌﺎﻴﻴﺭ ﺘﺤﺩﻴﺩ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻝﻭﺍﻀﺢ ﻭﺍﻝﻀﻌﻑ ﺍﻝﻤﻨﺎﺴﺏ ﺒﺎﻝﻭﻗﺕ ﺍﻝﻘﺭﺍﺭ ﺍﺘﺨﺎﺫ ﺘﻌﻁﻴل ﺍﺴﺒﺎﺏ ﺍﻫﻡ ﺍﺤﺩ
ﺍﻝﻘﺭﺍﺭ ﺍﺘﺨﺎﺫ ﻭﺘﺭﺸﻴﺩ ﺩﻋﻡ ﻓﻲ ﻴﺴﻬﻡ ﻤﺘﻜﺎﻤل ﻤﻌﻠﻭﻤﺎﺕ ﻨﻅﺎﻡ ﺍﻝﻰ ﺍﻝﻤﻌﻬﺩ ﺍﻓﺘﻘﺎﺭ ﻫﻭ.
٣–ﻭﻭﻀﻊ ﺍﻝﻤﻌﺎﻴﻴﺭ ﺒﺘﺤﺩﻴﺩ ﺍﻝﻤﺴﺎﻋﺩﺓ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻝﻜﻤﻴﺔ ﺍﻻﺴﺎﻝﻴﺏ ﻤﺎﺩﺓ ﻤﺩﺭﺴﻲ ﺒﻌﺽ ﺍﻤﻜﺎﻨﻴﺎﺕ ﻤﻥ ﺍﻻﺴﺘﻔﺎﺩﺓ ﻀﻌﻑ
ﺍﻝﻘﺭﺍﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﺘﺨﺎﺫ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﻝﺘﺭﺸﻴﺩ ﺍﺨﺘﻴﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﻭﺍﺴﻠﻭﺏ ﺍﻭﺯﺍﻨﻬﺎ.
ﹰﺎﺜﺎﻨﻴ:-ﺍﻝﺘﻭﺼﻴﺎﺕ:
١-ﻭﺨﺼﻭﺼ ﺍﻝﻘﺭﺍﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﺘﺨﺎﺫ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻝﻜﻤﻴﺔ ﺍﻷﺴﺎﻝﻴﺏ ﺒﺎﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﺍﻝﻌﻠﻴﺎ ﺍﻹﺩﺍﺭﺓ ﻝﺩﻯ ﺍﻝﻘﻨﺎﻋﺔ ﺘﻭﻓﺭ ﻀﺭﻭﺭﺓﺍﻝﻘﺭﺍﺭﺍﺕ ﹰﺎ
ﻤﻨﻅﻤﺘﻬﻡ ﺃﺩﺍﺀ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻝﻤﺒﺎﺸﺭ ﺍﻝﺘﺄﺜﻴﺭ ﺫﺍﺕ.
٢-ﺫﺍﺕ ﻭﺍﻝﻤﻌﻠﻭﻤﺎﺕ ﺍﻝﺤﺎﺴﺒﺎﺕ ﺘﻭﻓﻴﺭ ﻤﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﻻﺴﺎﺴﻴﺔ ﺍﻝﻤﺴﺘﻠﺯﻤﺎﺕ ﺘﻭﻓﻴﺭ ﺨﻼل ﻤﻥ ﻤﺘﻜﺎﻤل ﻤﻌﻠﻭﻤﺎﺕ ﻨﻅﺎﻡ ﺒﻨﺎﺀ
ﻭﺨﺎﺼﺔ ﺍﻝﻤﻌﻠﻭﻤﺎﺕ ﺘﻜﻨﻭﻝﻭﺠﻴﺎ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻝﺤﺎﺼل ﺍﻝﺘﻁﻭﺭ ﻤﻊ ﻴﺘﻨﺎﺴﺏ ﺒﻤﺎ ﻭﺘﺄﻫﻴﻠﻬﺎ ﺍﻝﻤﻌﻬﺩ ﻤﻼﻜﺎﺕ ﻭﺘﺩﺭﻴﺏ ﺍﻝﻌﻼﻗﺔ
ﺍﻝ ﺩﻋﻡ ﺃﻨﻅﻤﺔﻭﻫﻲ ﻘﺭﺍﺭﺍﺕDSS.
٣-ﻀﻤﻨﻬﺎ ﻤﻥ ﺍﺨﺭﻯ ﺭﻴﺎﻀﻴﺔ ﻭﻁﺭﻕ ﺍﺴﺎﻝﻴﺏ ﺘﺒﻨﻲ ﺒﺎﻻﻤﻜﺎﻥAHPﺍﻭ ﺍﻻﻫـﺩﺍﻑ ﺫﺍﺕ ﺍﻝﻘـﺭﺍﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﺘﺨﺎﺫ ﻓﻲ
ﺍﻝﻤﺘﻌﺩﺩﺓ ﺍﻝﻤﻌﺎﻴﻴﺭ.
ﺍﻝﻤﺼﺎﺩﺭ:
CI
RI
= 0.028
0.58
13. 1- Noorderhaven , Niels , Decisions Making , Great Britain at Biddles of Guildford
, 1995 .
2- Daft , Richard L . , Organization Theory and Design, 7th_
Edition , USA ,
2001 .
3- Hatch, Mary Jo, Organization Theory Modern, symbolic and postmodern
perspectives, Oxford Univercity, 1997.
4- Taylor III , Bemard W. , Introduction to Management Science , Canada , 2007 .
5- Winston, Waynel& Albright,Christian S., Management Science Modeling, Canda,
2007.
6- Winston , Waynel . , operations Research , Applications and Algorithms " Third
Edition , USA , 1994 .
7- Taha, Hamdy A. Operation Research, An Introduction, Eight Edition, New Jersey,
2007.
8- Stutzke, Richard D. , Tools For Decision Analysis and Resolution, Colorado,
2004.