SlideShare uma empresa Scribd logo
1 de 22
Baixar para ler offline
patent’s law-patent war a new 
age of competition. apple vs 
samsung patent battle.
patent the definition 
A patent is a set of exclusive rights granted by a sovereign state 
to an inventor or their assignee for a limited period of time, in 
exchange for the public disclosure of the invention. 
...is a form of intellectual property. 
PATENT 
...application must include 
one or more claims that 
define the invention. 
...term of protection available should be a minimum of 20 years.
the first patent agreement was in 
500bc,in the greek city of sybaris. 
1790 • in the U.S. the first Congress adopted a Patent Act. 
1624 • Statue of Monopolies, which declared that patents could only be 
granted for “...projects of new invention”. 
1474 • patents in the modern sense originated. 
1449 • King Henry VI granted the first English patent with a license of 20 
years 
1421 • a florence architect received a three year patent. 
• the profits were secured to the inventor by patent for the space of a 
year. 500 BC
patent law by countries 
and regions 
Australian Law 
Canadian Law 
South African Law 
European Law 
member state of the 
World Intellectual 
Property Organization 
(WIPO). 
standard patent 
with a term of 20 
years. 
innovation patent with faster 
approval process, lower fees 
and a maximum term of 8 years. 
the granting of Canadian patents is within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Canadian federal 
government. 
a patent provides legal protection for a new and industrially applicable invention. 
patents having effect in European states may be obtained either nationally or at the European 
Patent Office (EPO). 
shaped by international agreements such as TRIPs Agreement and the Patent Law Treaty(PLT).
united states patent law was established 
to promote the Progress of science and 
useful arts. 
Companies have used patents to obtain monopoly rights in certain inventions. 
The importance of granting monopolies for new inventions has been recognized in the U.S. since 
the adoption of the U.S. Constitution. 
The term of patent is 20 years from the earliest claimed filling date (can be extended). 
Section 101 of the U.S. 
Patent Act. 
Whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, 
manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful 
improvements thereof, may obtain a patent, subject to the conditions and 
requirements of this title.
for an invention to be patentable 
there must be four requirements. 
Statutory Requirement 
U.S. Patent Statute states that processes, machines, articles of 
manufacture and compositions of matter are patentable. 
Novelty Requirement 
This novelty requirement states that an invention cannot 
be patented if certain public disclosures of the invention 
have been made. 
Useful Requirement 
Term useful refers to the condition that the subject matter has 
a useful purpose and also include operativeness. 
Non-Obviousness Requirement 
An invention to be patentable, it must not only be novel, but 
it must also be a non-obvious improvement over the prior art.
A u.s. patent application must be made 
in writing by the individual 
inventor(s). 
Only the inventor may apply for a patent with certain exceptions. 
If an inventor is employed as an inventor, the employer will usually be the owner of any patent or 
invention made by the inventor. 
The specification portion of a patent application is a written description of the invention and also 
explains how to make and use the invention. 
The two primary requirements of the specification is that it must be “enabling” and it must describe 
the “best mode” of the invention. 
The patent application must include one or more claims, which form the heart of any patent. Claims 
are brief descriptions of the subject matter of the invention. 
The examiner of a patent application uses the claims to compare the application with the prior art. 
The patent application include one or more drawings of the invention, whenever is required. Most 
applications, for software patents include a drawing to describe the crucial features of the 
invention. 
The inventor must make an oath or declaration that she/he believes herself/himself to be the 
original and first inventor of the subject matter of the application.
A notice of allowance will be sent to 
the applicant’s patent attorney, when a 
patent application met the requirements. 
Applicant need only be 
concerned about... 
payment of the issue fee. 
3 months will be given for the fee 
to be paid. 
patent marking. 
the word patent and the number 
of the patent. 
maintenance fees. 
failure to pay may result in 
expiration of the patent. 
The rights granted by a patent... 
are the rights to exclude others from 
commercial exploitation. 
the patent holder is the one who make, use, or 
sell the invention. 
others may do so with the authorization of 
the patent holder. 
are very different than rights granted under 
copyright law.
is the unauthorized 
making, using, or selling of the 
patented invention . 
The Government may use any patented invention without permission. 
The patent holder may sue in the appropriate Federal court. 
The patent holder may ask for an injunction to prevent the continued infringement. 
Ask the court for an award of damages. 
Suits for infringement of patents follow the rules of procedure of the Federal courts.
patently apple 
Individual technologies stands out as key indicators of what the future of 
Since 2007 
Apple has filed more than 
1300 mobile patents. 
Apple has entered into 479 
lawsuits to protect the 
intellectual property behind 
the technology. 
smartphone design may hold. 
Noteworthy Patents 
Fuel Cell System to Power a 
Portable Computing Device. 
Assist Features for Content 
Display Device.
in 2010 Apple had the most powerful 
patent portfolio in consumer 
electronics. 
How does Apple’s comparatively small portfolio come out on top? 
2010 
70% cited as “prior art” more frequently than average (Pipeline Impact). 
37 % more generally applicable than average (Pipeline Generality). 
Quality not quantity counts when it comes to patent portfolios. 
Pipeline Impact 
This metric is based 
on citations both from 
the organization itself 
and from other 
organizations. 
Pipeline Generality 
Measures the variety of 
technologies that build 
upon an organization’s 
patents. 
Pipeline Originality 
Measures the variety of 
technologies upon which 
an organization’s patent 
build, based on the 
concept and inventions.
apple’s patent portfolio 
showing its strategy. 
Since 2000, Apple has filed 
1298 patents addressing hand 
held mobile radio telephone 
technologies. 
2000 
2007 
Vast majority of patents have 
been filled following the 
launch of the iPhone. 
Apple has the most powerful 
patent portfolio in consumer 
electronics. 
2010 
2011 
Apple’s Virtual 
University patent 
known as iTunes U. 
iPhone’s 5 integrated 
Touch Technology is 
granted a Patent. 
As part of a consortium, Apple 
participated in the acquisition 
of Nortel’s patent portfolio. 
Apple contributed $2.6 billion 
from $4.5 billion. 
Apple Patents Point 
to Advancing the 
Quality of iDevices 
2013 
cameras. 
23 April 2013 
Apple Granted a Whopping 
54 Patents Covering smart 
instruments, smart business 
cards, magnetic port covers 
& more.
patent war: a new age of competition. 
Past Timeline
the 
war 
has 
just 
begun
in april 2011 apple filed form patent 
infringement, claiming that samsung 
copied its iPhone and iPad designs. 
How Evolution 
becomes A War
a glance to the market and to the 
consequences of this battle.
key facts of the lawsuit which began in 
april 2011 
In the original lawsuit Apple stated that the South-Korean firm had ripped off the design and technology 
of Apple products. 
The actual terms that used: Apple alleges that Samsung “slavishly” copied its designs. 
In response, Samsung counter-sued, saying that Apple had infringed a number of patents to do with 3G. 
Apple pushed on, stating Samsung copied the “look and feel” of the Apple IOS range of devices, namely 
the Galaxy line of smartphones and tablets. 
The lawsuit had spread to over 30 courts across four continents, and after negotiations failed, landed in 
front of a judge for the true showdown in July 2012. 
Apple is seeking $2.5 billion in damages, and Samsung is also seeking financial restitution.
the timeline of the trial 
of the century. 
July 2011 August 2011 
Apple sued Samsung for patent 
infringement and named Samsung galaxy 
tab 10.1 . 
Samsung says that the iPhone 4, 4s and iPad 
2 infringe 3G patents. 
Samsung Galaxy 10.1 tablet was put on 
hold in Australia. 
Apple won a victory in a German court, 
for a preliminary injunction against the 
sale of the Galaxy Tab 10.1. 
September 2011 
Apple says Samsung's tablet infringes design 
patents, and Samsung says that iPhones and 
iPads infringe 3G patents. 
October 2011 
Australian ban on Galaxy Tab 
continues. 
November 2011 
Samsung’s victory against Apple in 
Australia is announced. However the 
physical design of the tablet changed. 
December 2011 
Apple’s legal requests to block Samsung 
from selling certain 4G-enabled products 
to consumers based in the U.S. failed. 
March 2012 April 2012 May 2012 
Original agreement between 
Samsung and Apple concerning the 
handover of mobile device models 
inspection. 
U.S. District Judge Lucy Koh, 
orders the two sides to talk. 
Apple didn’t succeed to ban Galaxy 
Tab in the U.S. until a trial held. 
June 2012 July 2012 August 2012 
The talks failed and tablet makers will 
see each other in the court. 
On July 22, the trial officially begins. 
Apple releases new iPad and iPhone, and 
Samsung Tab 10.1 and Galaxy S III enter 
the market. 
Closing arguments: Apple relied on 
Samsung’s documents to try and prove patent 
infringement, whereas Samsung argued that 
siding with the rival firm will change “the 
way competition works in this country”.
24 august 2012 
the verdict 
Samsung had infringed 
on Apple’s intellectual 
property and should pay 
at least $1.049 billion 
in damages. 
The nine jurors decided 
Apple had not 
committed a single 
count of infringement. 
Utility Patents Infringed Design Patents Infringed 
Bounce back patent Yes D‘677 patent Yes 
Covering scrolling patent Yes D‘087 patent Yes 
Two finger gestures patent Yes D‘880 patent Yes 
Tap-to-zoom patents Yes iPad patents Yes
the verdict: what it 
really means? 
Definite Victory for Apple. 
Infringements were “willful”. 
UI behaviors across Android 
will change. 
A lot of litigations will follow between Apple and other 
Android phone makers. 
Maybe this case will force Google to sign a blanket 
license for Android.
who wins and who loses 
from the decision? 
Dealing a billion dollar (chopped to $598 million) from Samsung. 
Infringements will disrupt Samsung’s manufacturing and supply chain. 
Other manufacturers of Android devices. 
Telecommunications companies that sell mobile plans. 
(Apple has enormous leverage in its negotiations with operators.) 
Customers. 
Microsoft. 
Its Windows Phone operating system hasn’t gained traction in the marketplace. 
Some group of stakeholders to turn away from Android. 
Too few users to make it attractive for developers. 
Nokia. 
Microsoft’s key partner on Windows Phone is a double winner. 
Boost of the Windows ecosystem-Owns a lot of potentially relevant patents.
key insights from the 
apple vs samsung case. 
Develop products and services in this space that focus on the total user experience. 
Create clusters of IP protection that capture the total user experience. 
Develop a robust interactive brand that supports your overall TUX strategy. 
Practice tighter integration between legal and development teams. 
Focus on “mobile-first” design strategy. 
Do not rely on specific software operating systems or platforms for user experience design IP innovations. 
To the extent possible secure trade dress rights through litigation. 
Use design patents to secure visual design protection on UX design solutions.

Mais conteúdo relacionado

Mais procurados

Emba ipmi final_presentation_oakwood group_v8.2
Emba ipmi final_presentation_oakwood  group_v8.2Emba ipmi final_presentation_oakwood  group_v8.2
Emba ipmi final_presentation_oakwood group_v8.2Indah Maryani
 
compulsory license: natco vs bayer case
compulsory license: natco vs bayer casecompulsory license: natco vs bayer case
compulsory license: natco vs bayer caseHelal Uddin Mullah
 
A Report On The Patents Act, 1970 [Case Study : Apple Vs Samsung]
A Report On The Patents Act, 1970 [Case Study : Apple Vs Samsung]A Report On The Patents Act, 1970 [Case Study : Apple Vs Samsung]
A Report On The Patents Act, 1970 [Case Study : Apple Vs Samsung]Navitha Pereira
 
Toy Industry Analysis
Toy Industry AnalysisToy Industry Analysis
Toy Industry AnalysisOliviah Cook
 
Process of patent filling,patent infringement & its issues (1)
Process of patent filling,patent infringement & its issues (1)Process of patent filling,patent infringement & its issues (1)
Process of patent filling,patent infringement & its issues (1)Ankit Puri
 
Bajaj vs tvs patent infringement - case study
Bajaj vs tvs   patent infringement - case studyBajaj vs tvs   patent infringement - case study
Bajaj vs tvs patent infringement - case studyAltacit Global
 
Crash course on claim drafting (with exercises)
Crash course on claim drafting (with exercises)Crash course on claim drafting (with exercises)
Crash course on claim drafting (with exercises)Caezar Angelito E Arceo
 
non-obviousness and the patenting process
non-obviousness and the patenting processnon-obviousness and the patenting process
non-obviousness and the patenting processwelcometofacebook
 
Applevssamsung 121018065326-phpapp01
Applevssamsung 121018065326-phpapp01Applevssamsung 121018065326-phpapp01
Applevssamsung 121018065326-phpapp01Sonali Pandey
 
Intellectual Property Rights : Indian Perspective
Intellectual Property Rights : Indian PerspectiveIntellectual Property Rights : Indian Perspective
Intellectual Property Rights : Indian PerspectiveHarsh Kishore Mishra
 
Types of patent
Types of patent Types of patent
Types of patent anjsur28
 
Company analysis of Samsung ppt
Company analysis of Samsung pptCompany analysis of Samsung ppt
Company analysis of Samsung pptMarketerBoard
 
Freedom to Operate FTO
Freedom to Operate FTOFreedom to Operate FTO
Freedom to Operate FTOspkowalski
 

Mais procurados (20)

Emba ipmi final_presentation_oakwood group_v8.2
Emba ipmi final_presentation_oakwood  group_v8.2Emba ipmi final_presentation_oakwood  group_v8.2
Emba ipmi final_presentation_oakwood group_v8.2
 
compulsory license: natco vs bayer case
compulsory license: natco vs bayer casecompulsory license: natco vs bayer case
compulsory license: natco vs bayer case
 
Registration and grant of Patent
Registration and grant of PatentRegistration and grant of Patent
Registration and grant of Patent
 
Apple vs samsung
Apple vs samsungApple vs samsung
Apple vs samsung
 
Freedom To Operate
Freedom To OperateFreedom To Operate
Freedom To Operate
 
A Report On The Patents Act, 1970 [Case Study : Apple Vs Samsung]
A Report On The Patents Act, 1970 [Case Study : Apple Vs Samsung]A Report On The Patents Act, 1970 [Case Study : Apple Vs Samsung]
A Report On The Patents Act, 1970 [Case Study : Apple Vs Samsung]
 
Toy Industry Analysis
Toy Industry AnalysisToy Industry Analysis
Toy Industry Analysis
 
Patent Law 101
Patent Law 101Patent Law 101
Patent Law 101
 
Process of patent filling,patent infringement & its issues (1)
Process of patent filling,patent infringement & its issues (1)Process of patent filling,patent infringement & its issues (1)
Process of patent filling,patent infringement & its issues (1)
 
Bajaj vs tvs patent infringement - case study
Bajaj vs tvs   patent infringement - case studyBajaj vs tvs   patent infringement - case study
Bajaj vs tvs patent infringement - case study
 
Crash course on claim drafting (with exercises)
Crash course on claim drafting (with exercises)Crash course on claim drafting (with exercises)
Crash course on claim drafting (with exercises)
 
The patent act
The patent actThe patent act
The patent act
 
non-obviousness and the patenting process
non-obviousness and the patenting processnon-obviousness and the patenting process
non-obviousness and the patenting process
 
Applevssamsung 121018065326-phpapp01
Applevssamsung 121018065326-phpapp01Applevssamsung 121018065326-phpapp01
Applevssamsung 121018065326-phpapp01
 
Apple inc
Apple incApple inc
Apple inc
 
Intellectual Property Rights : Indian Perspective
Intellectual Property Rights : Indian PerspectiveIntellectual Property Rights : Indian Perspective
Intellectual Property Rights : Indian Perspective
 
Types of patent
Types of patent Types of patent
Types of patent
 
Company analysis of Samsung ppt
Company analysis of Samsung pptCompany analysis of Samsung ppt
Company analysis of Samsung ppt
 
Unfair competition
Unfair competitionUnfair competition
Unfair competition
 
Freedom to Operate FTO
Freedom to Operate FTOFreedom to Operate FTO
Freedom to Operate FTO
 

Semelhante a Patents war Apple vs Samsung

Patent Disputes in IT Industry
Patent Disputes in IT IndustryPatent Disputes in IT Industry
Patent Disputes in IT IndustryAbhishek Jain
 
Making a Patent Infringement Trial Understandable 2-23-12
Making a Patent Infringement Trial Understandable 2-23-12Making a Patent Infringement Trial Understandable 2-23-12
Making a Patent Infringement Trial Understandable 2-23-12Robert Waterman
 
Patents and intellectual Property Rights
Patents and intellectual Property RightsPatents and intellectual Property Rights
Patents and intellectual Property RightsPatel Abdul Waheed
 
Patenting in Mobile Application and Technology
Patenting in Mobile Application and TechnologyPatenting in Mobile Application and Technology
Patenting in Mobile Application and TechnologyIndicThreads
 
00 - patenting for technologists - v1
00  - patenting for technologists - v100  - patenting for technologists - v1
00 - patenting for technologists - v1Uny Cao
 
Patentable and Non Patentable Inventions
Patentable and Non Patentable InventionsPatentable and Non Patentable Inventions
Patentable and Non Patentable Inventionsegoistic_ek
 
The Patent Box: Introduction to Patents
The Patent Box: Introduction to PatentsThe Patent Box: Introduction to Patents
The Patent Box: Introduction to PatentsJane Lambert
 
Intellectual property rights
Intellectual property rightsIntellectual property rights
Intellectual property rightsVENKATESH BADAVE
 
Intellectual property - patent rights.pdf
Intellectual property - patent rights.pdfIntellectual property - patent rights.pdf
Intellectual property - patent rights.pdfEr. Rahul Jarariya
 
10 famous patent infringements since year 2000
10 famous patent infringements since year 200010 famous patent infringements since year 2000
10 famous patent infringements since year 2000Boolean IP Consulting
 
Intellectual Property Rights [Patent]
Intellectual Property Rights [Patent]Intellectual Property Rights [Patent]
Intellectual Property Rights [Patent]Anil Kumar
 

Semelhante a Patents war Apple vs Samsung (20)

Patent Disputes in IT Industry
Patent Disputes in IT IndustryPatent Disputes in IT Industry
Patent Disputes in IT Industry
 
New Patent System
New Patent SystemNew Patent System
New Patent System
 
Making a Patent Infringement Trial Understandable 2-23-12
Making a Patent Infringement Trial Understandable 2-23-12Making a Patent Infringement Trial Understandable 2-23-12
Making a Patent Infringement Trial Understandable 2-23-12
 
Foundation of patent law
Foundation of patent lawFoundation of patent law
Foundation of patent law
 
Patent act 1970
Patent act 1970Patent act 1970
Patent act 1970
 
Patent law in_u.s
Patent law in_u.sPatent law in_u.s
Patent law in_u.s
 
Patents and intellectual Property Rights
Patents and intellectual Property RightsPatents and intellectual Property Rights
Patents and intellectual Property Rights
 
Patenting in Mobile Application and Technology
Patenting in Mobile Application and TechnologyPatenting in Mobile Application and Technology
Patenting in Mobile Application and Technology
 
Cyber Security
Cyber SecurityCyber Security
Cyber Security
 
Patents
Patents Patents
Patents
 
00 - patenting for technologists - v1
00  - patenting for technologists - v100  - patenting for technologists - v1
00 - patenting for technologists - v1
 
Patentable and Non Patentable Inventions
Patentable and Non Patentable InventionsPatentable and Non Patentable Inventions
Patentable and Non Patentable Inventions
 
The Patent Box: Introduction to Patents
The Patent Box: Introduction to PatentsThe Patent Box: Introduction to Patents
The Patent Box: Introduction to Patents
 
Patent
PatentPatent
Patent
 
Intellectual property rights
Intellectual property rightsIntellectual property rights
Intellectual property rights
 
Intellectual property - patent rights.pdf
Intellectual property - patent rights.pdfIntellectual property - patent rights.pdf
Intellectual property - patent rights.pdf
 
USPTO Patent
USPTO PatentUSPTO Patent
USPTO Patent
 
10 famous patent infringements since year 2000
10 famous patent infringements since year 200010 famous patent infringements since year 2000
10 famous patent infringements since year 2000
 
Us Patent Basics
Us Patent BasicsUs Patent Basics
Us Patent Basics
 
Intellectual Property Rights [Patent]
Intellectual Property Rights [Patent]Intellectual Property Rights [Patent]
Intellectual Property Rights [Patent]
 

Último

Ensuring Technical Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 365
Ensuring Technical Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 365Ensuring Technical Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 365
Ensuring Technical Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 3652toLead Limited
 
Designing IA for AI - Information Architecture Conference 2024
Designing IA for AI - Information Architecture Conference 2024Designing IA for AI - Information Architecture Conference 2024
Designing IA for AI - Information Architecture Conference 2024Enterprise Knowledge
 
DevEX - reference for building teams, processes, and platforms
DevEX - reference for building teams, processes, and platformsDevEX - reference for building teams, processes, and platforms
DevEX - reference for building teams, processes, and platformsSergiu Bodiu
 
Nell’iperspazio con Rocket: il Framework Web di Rust!
Nell’iperspazio con Rocket: il Framework Web di Rust!Nell’iperspazio con Rocket: il Framework Web di Rust!
Nell’iperspazio con Rocket: il Framework Web di Rust!Commit University
 
New from BookNet Canada for 2024: BNC CataList - Tech Forum 2024
New from BookNet Canada for 2024: BNC CataList - Tech Forum 2024New from BookNet Canada for 2024: BNC CataList - Tech Forum 2024
New from BookNet Canada for 2024: BNC CataList - Tech Forum 2024BookNet Canada
 
Unleash Your Potential - Namagunga Girls Coding Club
Unleash Your Potential - Namagunga Girls Coding ClubUnleash Your Potential - Namagunga Girls Coding Club
Unleash Your Potential - Namagunga Girls Coding ClubKalema Edgar
 
Unraveling Multimodality with Large Language Models.pdf
Unraveling Multimodality with Large Language Models.pdfUnraveling Multimodality with Large Language Models.pdf
Unraveling Multimodality with Large Language Models.pdfAlex Barbosa Coqueiro
 
Human Factors of XR: Using Human Factors to Design XR Systems
Human Factors of XR: Using Human Factors to Design XR SystemsHuman Factors of XR: Using Human Factors to Design XR Systems
Human Factors of XR: Using Human Factors to Design XR SystemsMark Billinghurst
 
The Future of Software Development - Devin AI Innovative Approach.pdf
The Future of Software Development - Devin AI Innovative Approach.pdfThe Future of Software Development - Devin AI Innovative Approach.pdf
The Future of Software Development - Devin AI Innovative Approach.pdfSeasiaInfotech2
 
"Subclassing and Composition – A Pythonic Tour of Trade-Offs", Hynek Schlawack
"Subclassing and Composition – A Pythonic Tour of Trade-Offs", Hynek Schlawack"Subclassing and Composition – A Pythonic Tour of Trade-Offs", Hynek Schlawack
"Subclassing and Composition – A Pythonic Tour of Trade-Offs", Hynek SchlawackFwdays
 
Story boards and shot lists for my a level piece
Story boards and shot lists for my a level pieceStory boards and shot lists for my a level piece
Story boards and shot lists for my a level piececharlottematthew16
 
Training state-of-the-art general text embedding
Training state-of-the-art general text embeddingTraining state-of-the-art general text embedding
Training state-of-the-art general text embeddingZilliz
 
Dev Dives: Streamline document processing with UiPath Studio Web
Dev Dives: Streamline document processing with UiPath Studio WebDev Dives: Streamline document processing with UiPath Studio Web
Dev Dives: Streamline document processing with UiPath Studio WebUiPathCommunity
 
DevoxxFR 2024 Reproducible Builds with Apache Maven
DevoxxFR 2024 Reproducible Builds with Apache MavenDevoxxFR 2024 Reproducible Builds with Apache Maven
DevoxxFR 2024 Reproducible Builds with Apache MavenHervé Boutemy
 
Developer Data Modeling Mistakes: From Postgres to NoSQL
Developer Data Modeling Mistakes: From Postgres to NoSQLDeveloper Data Modeling Mistakes: From Postgres to NoSQL
Developer Data Modeling Mistakes: From Postgres to NoSQLScyllaDB
 
SAP Build Work Zone - Overview L2-L3.pptx
SAP Build Work Zone - Overview L2-L3.pptxSAP Build Work Zone - Overview L2-L3.pptx
SAP Build Work Zone - Overview L2-L3.pptxNavinnSomaal
 
Vector Databases 101 - An introduction to the world of Vector Databases
Vector Databases 101 - An introduction to the world of Vector DatabasesVector Databases 101 - An introduction to the world of Vector Databases
Vector Databases 101 - An introduction to the world of Vector DatabasesZilliz
 
My Hashitalk Indonesia April 2024 Presentation
My Hashitalk Indonesia April 2024 PresentationMy Hashitalk Indonesia April 2024 Presentation
My Hashitalk Indonesia April 2024 PresentationRidwan Fadjar
 

Último (20)

Ensuring Technical Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 365
Ensuring Technical Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 365Ensuring Technical Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 365
Ensuring Technical Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 365
 
DMCC Future of Trade Web3 - Special Edition
DMCC Future of Trade Web3 - Special EditionDMCC Future of Trade Web3 - Special Edition
DMCC Future of Trade Web3 - Special Edition
 
Designing IA for AI - Information Architecture Conference 2024
Designing IA for AI - Information Architecture Conference 2024Designing IA for AI - Information Architecture Conference 2024
Designing IA for AI - Information Architecture Conference 2024
 
DevEX - reference for building teams, processes, and platforms
DevEX - reference for building teams, processes, and platformsDevEX - reference for building teams, processes, and platforms
DevEX - reference for building teams, processes, and platforms
 
E-Vehicle_Hacking_by_Parul Sharma_null_owasp.pptx
E-Vehicle_Hacking_by_Parul Sharma_null_owasp.pptxE-Vehicle_Hacking_by_Parul Sharma_null_owasp.pptx
E-Vehicle_Hacking_by_Parul Sharma_null_owasp.pptx
 
Nell’iperspazio con Rocket: il Framework Web di Rust!
Nell’iperspazio con Rocket: il Framework Web di Rust!Nell’iperspazio con Rocket: il Framework Web di Rust!
Nell’iperspazio con Rocket: il Framework Web di Rust!
 
New from BookNet Canada for 2024: BNC CataList - Tech Forum 2024
New from BookNet Canada for 2024: BNC CataList - Tech Forum 2024New from BookNet Canada for 2024: BNC CataList - Tech Forum 2024
New from BookNet Canada for 2024: BNC CataList - Tech Forum 2024
 
Unleash Your Potential - Namagunga Girls Coding Club
Unleash Your Potential - Namagunga Girls Coding ClubUnleash Your Potential - Namagunga Girls Coding Club
Unleash Your Potential - Namagunga Girls Coding Club
 
Unraveling Multimodality with Large Language Models.pdf
Unraveling Multimodality with Large Language Models.pdfUnraveling Multimodality with Large Language Models.pdf
Unraveling Multimodality with Large Language Models.pdf
 
Human Factors of XR: Using Human Factors to Design XR Systems
Human Factors of XR: Using Human Factors to Design XR SystemsHuman Factors of XR: Using Human Factors to Design XR Systems
Human Factors of XR: Using Human Factors to Design XR Systems
 
The Future of Software Development - Devin AI Innovative Approach.pdf
The Future of Software Development - Devin AI Innovative Approach.pdfThe Future of Software Development - Devin AI Innovative Approach.pdf
The Future of Software Development - Devin AI Innovative Approach.pdf
 
"Subclassing and Composition – A Pythonic Tour of Trade-Offs", Hynek Schlawack
"Subclassing and Composition – A Pythonic Tour of Trade-Offs", Hynek Schlawack"Subclassing and Composition – A Pythonic Tour of Trade-Offs", Hynek Schlawack
"Subclassing and Composition – A Pythonic Tour of Trade-Offs", Hynek Schlawack
 
Story boards and shot lists for my a level piece
Story boards and shot lists for my a level pieceStory boards and shot lists for my a level piece
Story boards and shot lists for my a level piece
 
Training state-of-the-art general text embedding
Training state-of-the-art general text embeddingTraining state-of-the-art general text embedding
Training state-of-the-art general text embedding
 
Dev Dives: Streamline document processing with UiPath Studio Web
Dev Dives: Streamline document processing with UiPath Studio WebDev Dives: Streamline document processing with UiPath Studio Web
Dev Dives: Streamline document processing with UiPath Studio Web
 
DevoxxFR 2024 Reproducible Builds with Apache Maven
DevoxxFR 2024 Reproducible Builds with Apache MavenDevoxxFR 2024 Reproducible Builds with Apache Maven
DevoxxFR 2024 Reproducible Builds with Apache Maven
 
Developer Data Modeling Mistakes: From Postgres to NoSQL
Developer Data Modeling Mistakes: From Postgres to NoSQLDeveloper Data Modeling Mistakes: From Postgres to NoSQL
Developer Data Modeling Mistakes: From Postgres to NoSQL
 
SAP Build Work Zone - Overview L2-L3.pptx
SAP Build Work Zone - Overview L2-L3.pptxSAP Build Work Zone - Overview L2-L3.pptx
SAP Build Work Zone - Overview L2-L3.pptx
 
Vector Databases 101 - An introduction to the world of Vector Databases
Vector Databases 101 - An introduction to the world of Vector DatabasesVector Databases 101 - An introduction to the world of Vector Databases
Vector Databases 101 - An introduction to the world of Vector Databases
 
My Hashitalk Indonesia April 2024 Presentation
My Hashitalk Indonesia April 2024 PresentationMy Hashitalk Indonesia April 2024 Presentation
My Hashitalk Indonesia April 2024 Presentation
 

Patents war Apple vs Samsung

  • 1. patent’s law-patent war a new age of competition. apple vs samsung patent battle.
  • 2. patent the definition A patent is a set of exclusive rights granted by a sovereign state to an inventor or their assignee for a limited period of time, in exchange for the public disclosure of the invention. ...is a form of intellectual property. PATENT ...application must include one or more claims that define the invention. ...term of protection available should be a minimum of 20 years.
  • 3. the first patent agreement was in 500bc,in the greek city of sybaris. 1790 • in the U.S. the first Congress adopted a Patent Act. 1624 • Statue of Monopolies, which declared that patents could only be granted for “...projects of new invention”. 1474 • patents in the modern sense originated. 1449 • King Henry VI granted the first English patent with a license of 20 years 1421 • a florence architect received a three year patent. • the profits were secured to the inventor by patent for the space of a year. 500 BC
  • 4. patent law by countries and regions Australian Law Canadian Law South African Law European Law member state of the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). standard patent with a term of 20 years. innovation patent with faster approval process, lower fees and a maximum term of 8 years. the granting of Canadian patents is within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Canadian federal government. a patent provides legal protection for a new and industrially applicable invention. patents having effect in European states may be obtained either nationally or at the European Patent Office (EPO). shaped by international agreements such as TRIPs Agreement and the Patent Law Treaty(PLT).
  • 5. united states patent law was established to promote the Progress of science and useful arts. Companies have used patents to obtain monopoly rights in certain inventions. The importance of granting monopolies for new inventions has been recognized in the U.S. since the adoption of the U.S. Constitution. The term of patent is 20 years from the earliest claimed filling date (can be extended). Section 101 of the U.S. Patent Act. Whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvements thereof, may obtain a patent, subject to the conditions and requirements of this title.
  • 6. for an invention to be patentable there must be four requirements. Statutory Requirement U.S. Patent Statute states that processes, machines, articles of manufacture and compositions of matter are patentable. Novelty Requirement This novelty requirement states that an invention cannot be patented if certain public disclosures of the invention have been made. Useful Requirement Term useful refers to the condition that the subject matter has a useful purpose and also include operativeness. Non-Obviousness Requirement An invention to be patentable, it must not only be novel, but it must also be a non-obvious improvement over the prior art.
  • 7. A u.s. patent application must be made in writing by the individual inventor(s). Only the inventor may apply for a patent with certain exceptions. If an inventor is employed as an inventor, the employer will usually be the owner of any patent or invention made by the inventor. The specification portion of a patent application is a written description of the invention and also explains how to make and use the invention. The two primary requirements of the specification is that it must be “enabling” and it must describe the “best mode” of the invention. The patent application must include one or more claims, which form the heart of any patent. Claims are brief descriptions of the subject matter of the invention. The examiner of a patent application uses the claims to compare the application with the prior art. The patent application include one or more drawings of the invention, whenever is required. Most applications, for software patents include a drawing to describe the crucial features of the invention. The inventor must make an oath or declaration that she/he believes herself/himself to be the original and first inventor of the subject matter of the application.
  • 8. A notice of allowance will be sent to the applicant’s patent attorney, when a patent application met the requirements. Applicant need only be concerned about... payment of the issue fee. 3 months will be given for the fee to be paid. patent marking. the word patent and the number of the patent. maintenance fees. failure to pay may result in expiration of the patent. The rights granted by a patent... are the rights to exclude others from commercial exploitation. the patent holder is the one who make, use, or sell the invention. others may do so with the authorization of the patent holder. are very different than rights granted under copyright law.
  • 9. is the unauthorized making, using, or selling of the patented invention . The Government may use any patented invention without permission. The patent holder may sue in the appropriate Federal court. The patent holder may ask for an injunction to prevent the continued infringement. Ask the court for an award of damages. Suits for infringement of patents follow the rules of procedure of the Federal courts.
  • 10. patently apple Individual technologies stands out as key indicators of what the future of Since 2007 Apple has filed more than 1300 mobile patents. Apple has entered into 479 lawsuits to protect the intellectual property behind the technology. smartphone design may hold. Noteworthy Patents Fuel Cell System to Power a Portable Computing Device. Assist Features for Content Display Device.
  • 11. in 2010 Apple had the most powerful patent portfolio in consumer electronics. How does Apple’s comparatively small portfolio come out on top? 2010 70% cited as “prior art” more frequently than average (Pipeline Impact). 37 % more generally applicable than average (Pipeline Generality). Quality not quantity counts when it comes to patent portfolios. Pipeline Impact This metric is based on citations both from the organization itself and from other organizations. Pipeline Generality Measures the variety of technologies that build upon an organization’s patents. Pipeline Originality Measures the variety of technologies upon which an organization’s patent build, based on the concept and inventions.
  • 12. apple’s patent portfolio showing its strategy. Since 2000, Apple has filed 1298 patents addressing hand held mobile radio telephone technologies. 2000 2007 Vast majority of patents have been filled following the launch of the iPhone. Apple has the most powerful patent portfolio in consumer electronics. 2010 2011 Apple’s Virtual University patent known as iTunes U. iPhone’s 5 integrated Touch Technology is granted a Patent. As part of a consortium, Apple participated in the acquisition of Nortel’s patent portfolio. Apple contributed $2.6 billion from $4.5 billion. Apple Patents Point to Advancing the Quality of iDevices 2013 cameras. 23 April 2013 Apple Granted a Whopping 54 Patents Covering smart instruments, smart business cards, magnetic port covers & more.
  • 13. patent war: a new age of competition. Past Timeline
  • 14. the war has just begun
  • 15. in april 2011 apple filed form patent infringement, claiming that samsung copied its iPhone and iPad designs. How Evolution becomes A War
  • 16. a glance to the market and to the consequences of this battle.
  • 17. key facts of the lawsuit which began in april 2011 In the original lawsuit Apple stated that the South-Korean firm had ripped off the design and technology of Apple products. The actual terms that used: Apple alleges that Samsung “slavishly” copied its designs. In response, Samsung counter-sued, saying that Apple had infringed a number of patents to do with 3G. Apple pushed on, stating Samsung copied the “look and feel” of the Apple IOS range of devices, namely the Galaxy line of smartphones and tablets. The lawsuit had spread to over 30 courts across four continents, and after negotiations failed, landed in front of a judge for the true showdown in July 2012. Apple is seeking $2.5 billion in damages, and Samsung is also seeking financial restitution.
  • 18. the timeline of the trial of the century. July 2011 August 2011 Apple sued Samsung for patent infringement and named Samsung galaxy tab 10.1 . Samsung says that the iPhone 4, 4s and iPad 2 infringe 3G patents. Samsung Galaxy 10.1 tablet was put on hold in Australia. Apple won a victory in a German court, for a preliminary injunction against the sale of the Galaxy Tab 10.1. September 2011 Apple says Samsung's tablet infringes design patents, and Samsung says that iPhones and iPads infringe 3G patents. October 2011 Australian ban on Galaxy Tab continues. November 2011 Samsung’s victory against Apple in Australia is announced. However the physical design of the tablet changed. December 2011 Apple’s legal requests to block Samsung from selling certain 4G-enabled products to consumers based in the U.S. failed. March 2012 April 2012 May 2012 Original agreement between Samsung and Apple concerning the handover of mobile device models inspection. U.S. District Judge Lucy Koh, orders the two sides to talk. Apple didn’t succeed to ban Galaxy Tab in the U.S. until a trial held. June 2012 July 2012 August 2012 The talks failed and tablet makers will see each other in the court. On July 22, the trial officially begins. Apple releases new iPad and iPhone, and Samsung Tab 10.1 and Galaxy S III enter the market. Closing arguments: Apple relied on Samsung’s documents to try and prove patent infringement, whereas Samsung argued that siding with the rival firm will change “the way competition works in this country”.
  • 19. 24 august 2012 the verdict Samsung had infringed on Apple’s intellectual property and should pay at least $1.049 billion in damages. The nine jurors decided Apple had not committed a single count of infringement. Utility Patents Infringed Design Patents Infringed Bounce back patent Yes D‘677 patent Yes Covering scrolling patent Yes D‘087 patent Yes Two finger gestures patent Yes D‘880 patent Yes Tap-to-zoom patents Yes iPad patents Yes
  • 20. the verdict: what it really means? Definite Victory for Apple. Infringements were “willful”. UI behaviors across Android will change. A lot of litigations will follow between Apple and other Android phone makers. Maybe this case will force Google to sign a blanket license for Android.
  • 21. who wins and who loses from the decision? Dealing a billion dollar (chopped to $598 million) from Samsung. Infringements will disrupt Samsung’s manufacturing and supply chain. Other manufacturers of Android devices. Telecommunications companies that sell mobile plans. (Apple has enormous leverage in its negotiations with operators.) Customers. Microsoft. Its Windows Phone operating system hasn’t gained traction in the marketplace. Some group of stakeholders to turn away from Android. Too few users to make it attractive for developers. Nokia. Microsoft’s key partner on Windows Phone is a double winner. Boost of the Windows ecosystem-Owns a lot of potentially relevant patents.
  • 22. key insights from the apple vs samsung case. Develop products and services in this space that focus on the total user experience. Create clusters of IP protection that capture the total user experience. Develop a robust interactive brand that supports your overall TUX strategy. Practice tighter integration between legal and development teams. Focus on “mobile-first” design strategy. Do not rely on specific software operating systems or platforms for user experience design IP innovations. To the extent possible secure trade dress rights through litigation. Use design patents to secure visual design protection on UX design solutions.