1. The
Manaiakalani
Project
Making 1:1
achievable
for all the
children in
your region
http://www.manaiakalani.org/
2.
3. The
Manaiakalani
Project NOW
7 schools
Tamaki Primary,
Tamaki Intermediate,Tamaki College,
St Pius X, Pt England, Glenbrae,
Panmure Bridge
Age 5 years to 18 years
2,000+ students
4. The
Manaiakalani
Project 2013
11 schools
All Schools in the
Tamaki Area
Age 5 years to 18 years
3,000 students
5. • personal voice
• authentic audience
• creators of content,
not merely consumers
• raising student
achievement
• lifting engagement &
employability
blending schooling improvement & elearning
12. What’s our education problem?
What must our device deliver?
What must our network enable?
The drivers must be pedagogical
13. •cluster + MOE alone
FAIL
•we need
FRIENDS
•developers
•providers
•financiers
•MOE & other agencies
•a Trust
•community partnerships
14. Manaiakalani Education Trust
•Getting the Wireless built
•Getting the Backhaul
•Getting funding and
support
•Holding the Netbook Lease
•Supplying Resources
15. OperatingTeacher Dasboard
System
Hackers Hapara Device Procurement
finance EdTech
Manaiakalani
Manaiakalani
Equico wireless Lead School
research
Fusion Networks Facilitator
Learning Edge Co-ordinator
28. 4 Classes at Tamaki in 2011
650+ 1:1 students College
19 Year 5-8 Classes
29. Facebook helps you
connect and share
with the people in
your life.
Broadcast Yourself
2005
b e b o
Where friends
share their lives
30. “Schools should explore not
only how ICT can
supplement traditional ways
of teaching but also how it
can open up new and
different ways of learning”
The New Zealand Curriculum 2007
62. Research Question 1:
How does The Manaiakalani Netbook
Project impact on the teaching and
learning of literacy in netbook
classrooms?
Research Question 2:
How does The Manaiakalani Netbook
Project impact on student learning of
literacy in netbook classrooms?
98. 1:1 Network Requirements
1) 1:1 Wifi Connectivity Inside Every Classroom (30+ Netbooks)
2) Link Schools Together to Share Resources (3 initially)
3) Allow Students to Connect from Home in the Community (pilot)
99. 1) 1:1 Wifi Connectivity In the Classroom
Challenges
1. Traditional technology not suitable
!<=<2)4
>"=<.$?< 9""+);):- 9""+)6):-
C""@(5(2(C.&"@@.#D.D(@"*#$,#;(?"&%$,"#
2. Buildings vary
C""@(5(2(H%$%(!"##.&$,U,$:(N*$?.$(T"0(F&&.++(A",#$
3. Wireless Interference
4. School network and cabling
!<=<2)6
5. School internet speed
>"=<.$?<
C""@(7(2(C.&"@@.#D.D(@"*#$,#;(?"&%$,"#
@"%<A(
6. Security
=Q B.0U.0(!%I,#.$(<%+(=3R=33(+/,$&<,#;(.V*,9@.#$(W=(X(F>(6PY3MZ([(=(X(P!"@(55Y3(B)A(/,$<(=3R=33R=333(M,;%I,$(&%9%I?.(*9]?,#1(
9"0$+QJ$(,+(0.&"@@.#D.D($<.+.(*9]?,#1(9"0$+(I.(*$,?,+.D(T"0(FA(!"##.&$,U,$:^(90"U,D.D($<.+.(%0.(#"$(&*00.#$?:(,#(*+.Q
5Q F0.%+("T("U.0?%99,#;(FA(&"U.0%;.(.#+*0.(%(<,;<(?.U.?("T(0.D*#D%#&:(%#D(,#&0.%+.D(/,0.?.++(&?,.#$(+*99"0$(&%9%&,$:Q C""@(7(2(H%$%(!"##.&$,U,$:(N*$?.$(T"0(F&&.++(A",#$
>,$?.'(>%@%1,(A0,@%0:(B&<""?(2 C.&"@@.#D.D(C*&1*+(E,0.?.++(F&&.++(A",#$(G%:"*$
!"#$%&"'())*$+$,&)-.&+$./)0#1""2)345678
H0%/#(I:'()*+,"#(-.$/"01+
BJKL HF>L HEM(-N CLO
!"#$%&$'()*+,"#(-.$/"01+(2 34(563(7883
7. User training / support
FP 5(F90,?(53=3 HCE=3= =Q3
!"9:0,;<$'()*+,"#(-.$/"01+(53=3 B!FGL -RF BSLL> =("T(=
101. 3) Connecting From Home
Challenges
1.Partnerships and sponsorship
2.Physical Installation
3.Art of RF planning
4.Expectations
102. 1) 1:1 Wifi Connectivity in the Classroom
Outcomes / Lessons Learnt
1.Simple / Performing Technology Costs
2.As device count increased so must your investment in wireless
3.It won’t all work 100% day one - perseverance
4.When things go wrong the impact is larger – have the right support
5.Everyone blames the wireless first (go POE)
103. 2) Linking Schools
Outcomes / Lessons Learnt
1.Sharing resources is easy if you link schools
2.Standardise on providers to reduce complexity and cost
3.Clustered schools need less internet connections
4.Clustered schools can share support
104. 3) Connect From Home
Outcomes / Lessons Learnt
1.Performance and simplicity will cost
2.RF Planning is not an exact science
3.Plan security carefully
4.Management and Monitoring is important
5.Don’t install on houses
109. )0"&$#2-!"#"$"%"&"#$
• this cannot be done by a simple MOE/
School arrangement
• we have to describe a new community,
commercial, volunteer, philanthropic,
govt partnership
• community/school leaders must desire
this
• must be co-constructed with each
community/school district
110. 3455(#$*,-34604#)*/(0*$4#
• seeing is believing
• must see strong evidence
• parents need to be invited into an
investment in their child’s education
• replicable elements of the project are
offered to other communities to
contextualise.
111. The
Manaiakalani
Project
Sustainable
and
Scaleable
given:
•quality leadership
•effective partnerships
•contextualised practice
•maximised replication
•customised financial modelling
112. “Be willing to be transformed:
How dare we think we can
transform school or the lives of
kids if we will not be transformed
ourselves”.
Chris Lehman
Charter School, Science Leadership Academy
practicaltheory.org