![Content ,[object Object]]()
Recomendados
Recomendados
Mais conteúdo relacionado
Semelhante a Position Statements
Semelhante a Position Statements (20)
Último
Último (20)
Position Statements
- 1. Knowledge Technologies in Cultural Heritage Position Statement brought to you by
- 3. Questions
- 4. Statements
- 5. Discussion
- 8. involving all kinds of complex data
- 10. We are not alone
- 12. support searching at a semantic level but are unaware of the semantics associated with the 3D content itself.
- 18. CH scholars, scientists and practitioners (archaeologists, restorators, …)
- 19. The public (democratization of heritage) We have questions for every group!
- 22. Other standards (shape representations)
- 24. Semantic search is becoming popular (and feasible)
- 25. Other paradigms like narrative concepts and reasoning are emerging
- 28. Questions: A long list Do the various virtual heritage tools have any particular characteristics? ...
- 31. 3D objects
- 33. or the combination of the above.
- 37. one can be guided & supported with a knowledge-based platform for performing the single steps involved:
- 39. archiving & retrieval (classification of data, storage of 3D content and metadata, and retrieval of data from a repository)
- 40. virtual presentation (level-of-detail-driven simplification, association of material properties, texturing, and viewing);
- 41. virtual reconstruction & restoration (composition /assembling of parts, data conversion, modification/deformation of models, and morphing between two different objects);
- 42. prototyping & replication (fairing, generation of a uniform polygonal mesh);
- 43. deformation monitoring (comparison of geometric deviation of artifacts or buildings over time).
- 45. Be pragmatic. Consider cases where knowledge technologies have the potential to be used to build robust real-life solutions.
Notas do Editor
- distributed semantic application, developed with the aim of presenting contextualised cultural heritage information - in our case the archaeological finds, or artefacts, of Etruscan Italy. Through the use of ontologies, the system presents a unified view of heterogeneous datasets and supports searching at a semantic level. Within the cultural heritage sphere, much work is being carried out on furnishing artefacts with appropriate “context”. However, a platform built upon the distributed search paradigm, although useful in many respects, does not convey how an artefact sits within a broader setting. Instead, we propose narrative concepts as a way of reconciling artefacts with this context. A community of domain experts (e.g. archaeologists) is supported in contributing their knowledge through a comprehensive authoring process. In our TARCHNA system, annotated narrative content, buttressed by references to real world artefacts, is disseminated to a variety of platforms through a semantic web service. The entire approach is developed upon a multi-tiered architecture, allowing for the separation of functionality, yet supporting an open approach to interoperability.