SlideShare uma empresa Scribd logo
1 de 47
Software Testing Basics Elaine Weyuker AT&T Labs – Research Florham Park, NJ November 11, 2002
What is Software Testing? ,[object Object]
Goals of Testing ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Software Testing Difficulties ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Determining the Correctness of Outputs ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Dimensions of Test Case Selection ,[object Object],[object Object]
Stages of Testing ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Unit Testing ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Integration Testing ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Integration Testing ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Integration Testing ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Stages of Testing ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
System Testing ,[object Object],[object Object]
Realities of System Testing ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
More Realities of Software Testing ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Test Selection Strategies Every systematic test selection strategy can be viewed as a way of dividing the input domain into  subdomains , and selecting one or more test case from each. The division can be based on such things as code characteristics (white box), specification details (black box), domain structure, risk analysis, etc.  Subdomains are not necessarily disjoint, even though the testing literature frequently refers to them as  partitions.
The Down Side of Code-Based Techniques ,[object Object],[object Object]
The Down Side of Specification-Based Techniques ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Operational Distributions ,[object Object],[object Object]
How Usage Data Can Be Collected For New Systems ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Operational Distribution-Based Test Case Selection ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
The Down Side of Operational Distribution-Based Techniques ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
The Up Side of Operational Distribution-Based Techniques ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Domain-Based Test Case Selection ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Domain-Based Testing Example ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Random Testing ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Benefits of Random Testing ,[object Object],[object Object]
The Down Side of Random Testing ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Risk-based Testing ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Risk-based Testing ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Risk Priority Table 9 High  = 3  High = 3 Withdraw cash 4 Medium = 2 Medium = 2 Transfer money 1 Low = 1 Low = 1 Read balance 3 High = 3 Low = 1 Make payment 3 Low = 1 High = 3 Buy train ticket 6 High = 3 Medium = 2 Security Priority (L x C) Failure Consequence Occurrence Likelihood Features & Attributes
Ordered Risk Priority Table 1 Low = 1 Low = 1 Read balance 6 High  = 3  Medium = 2 Security 9 High  = 3  High = 3 Withdraw cash 4 Medium = 2 Medium = 2 Transfer money 3 High  = 3  Low = 1 Make payment 3 Low  1 High  = 3  Buy train ticket Priority (L x C) Failure Consequence Occurrence Likelihood Features & Attributes
Acceptance Testing ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Regression Testing ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Prioritizing Test Cases ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Bases for Test Prioritization ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
White-box Testing ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
White-box Testing ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Control Flow and Data Flow Criteria ,[object Object],[object Object]
Issues of White-box Testing ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Test Automation ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Why should tests be automated? ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Test Automation Issues ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Observations on Automated Tests ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Uses of Automated Testing ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Financial Implications of Improved Testing ,[object Object],[object Object]
Estimated Cost of Inadequate Testing *NIST Report: The Economic Impact of Inadequate Infrastructure for Software Testing, 2002.  $22 billion $59 billion Total U.S. Economy $1,510,000,000 $3,340,000,000 Financial Services $589,000,000 $1,800,000,000 Transportation Manufacture Potential Cost Reduction from Feasible Improvements Cost of Inadequate Software Testing

Mais conteúdo relacionado

Destaque

Ct+powerpointz
Ct+powerpointzCt+powerpointz
Ct+powerpointzskrengel
 
Personagens grand chase.
Personagens grand chase.Personagens grand chase.
Personagens grand chase.drGRAGO
 
Modulator p5: Make your Processing Sketches More Dynamic with Modulators
Modulator p5: Make your Processing Sketches More Dynamic with ModulatorsModulator p5: Make your Processing Sketches More Dynamic with Modulators
Modulator p5: Make your Processing Sketches More Dynamic with ModulatorsNathan Koch
 
เครื่องใช..
เครื่องใช..เครื่องใช..
เครื่องใช..Boyz Bill
 
งานนำเสนอ
งานนำเสนองานนำเสนอ
งานนำเสนอBoyz Bill
 
The Nature of Code via Cinder - Modeling the Natural World in C++
The Nature of Code via Cinder - Modeling the Natural World in C++The Nature of Code via Cinder - Modeling the Natural World in C++
The Nature of Code via Cinder - Modeling the Natural World in C++Nathan Koch
 

Destaque (7)

testsfw5
testsfw5testsfw5
testsfw5
 
Ct+powerpointz
Ct+powerpointzCt+powerpointz
Ct+powerpointz
 
Personagens grand chase.
Personagens grand chase.Personagens grand chase.
Personagens grand chase.
 
Modulator p5: Make your Processing Sketches More Dynamic with Modulators
Modulator p5: Make your Processing Sketches More Dynamic with ModulatorsModulator p5: Make your Processing Sketches More Dynamic with Modulators
Modulator p5: Make your Processing Sketches More Dynamic with Modulators
 
เครื่องใช..
เครื่องใช..เครื่องใช..
เครื่องใช..
 
งานนำเสนอ
งานนำเสนองานนำเสนอ
งานนำเสนอ
 
The Nature of Code via Cinder - Modeling the Natural World in C++
The Nature of Code via Cinder - Modeling the Natural World in C++The Nature of Code via Cinder - Modeling the Natural World in C++
The Nature of Code via Cinder - Modeling the Natural World in C++
 

Semelhante a test

Chapter 3 SOFTWARE TESTING PROCESS
Chapter 3 SOFTWARE TESTING PROCESSChapter 3 SOFTWARE TESTING PROCESS
Chapter 3 SOFTWARE TESTING PROCESSst. michael
 
Software testing mtech project in jalandhar
Software testing mtech project in jalandharSoftware testing mtech project in jalandhar
Software testing mtech project in jalandhardeepikakaler1
 
Software testing mtech project in ludhiana
Software testing mtech project in ludhianaSoftware testing mtech project in ludhiana
Software testing mtech project in ludhianadeepikakaler1
 
6months industrial training in software testing, jalandhar
6months industrial training in software testing, jalandhar6months industrial training in software testing, jalandhar
6months industrial training in software testing, jalandhardeepikakaler1
 
6 weeks summer training in software testing,ludhiana
6 weeks summer training in software testing,ludhiana6 weeks summer training in software testing,ludhiana
6 weeks summer training in software testing,ludhianadeepikakaler1
 
6 weeks summer training in software testing,jalandhar
6 weeks summer training in software testing,jalandhar6 weeks summer training in software testing,jalandhar
6 weeks summer training in software testing,jalandhardeepikakaler1
 

Semelhante a test (6)

Chapter 3 SOFTWARE TESTING PROCESS
Chapter 3 SOFTWARE TESTING PROCESSChapter 3 SOFTWARE TESTING PROCESS
Chapter 3 SOFTWARE TESTING PROCESS
 
Software testing mtech project in jalandhar
Software testing mtech project in jalandharSoftware testing mtech project in jalandhar
Software testing mtech project in jalandhar
 
Software testing mtech project in ludhiana
Software testing mtech project in ludhianaSoftware testing mtech project in ludhiana
Software testing mtech project in ludhiana
 
6months industrial training in software testing, jalandhar
6months industrial training in software testing, jalandhar6months industrial training in software testing, jalandhar
6months industrial training in software testing, jalandhar
 
6 weeks summer training in software testing,ludhiana
6 weeks summer training in software testing,ludhiana6 weeks summer training in software testing,ludhiana
6 weeks summer training in software testing,ludhiana
 
6 weeks summer training in software testing,jalandhar
6 weeks summer training in software testing,jalandhar6 weeks summer training in software testing,jalandhar
6 weeks summer training in software testing,jalandhar
 

Mais de lmscollaborative2 (20)

contrucci
contruccicontrucci
contrucci
 
contrucci
contruccicontrucci
contrucci
 
remoto2
remoto2remoto2
remoto2
 
finalelocale2
finalelocale2finalelocale2
finalelocale2
 
finalelocale
finalelocalefinalelocale
finalelocale
 
 
test2
test2test2
test2
 
provoora
provooraprovoora
provoora
 
provacompleta4
provacompleta4provacompleta4
provacompleta4
 
provacompleta3
provacompleta3provacompleta3
provacompleta3
 
provacompleta2
provacompleta2provacompleta2
provacompleta2
 
provaoggi2
provaoggi2provaoggi2
provaoggi2
 
domenica3
domenica3domenica3
domenica3
 
domenica2
domenica2domenica2
domenica2
 
domenica1
domenica1domenica1
domenica1
 
provarealw4
provarealw4provarealw4
provarealw4
 
provarealw4
provarealw4provarealw4
provarealw4
 
provarealw3
provarealw3provarealw3
provarealw3
 
provarealw2
provarealw2provarealw2
provarealw2
 
testsfw7
testsfw7testsfw7
testsfw7
 

test

  • 1. Software Testing Basics Elaine Weyuker AT&T Labs – Research Florham Park, NJ November 11, 2002
  • 2.
  • 3.
  • 4.
  • 5.
  • 6.
  • 7.
  • 8.
  • 9.
  • 10.
  • 11.
  • 12.
  • 13.
  • 14.
  • 15.
  • 16. Test Selection Strategies Every systematic test selection strategy can be viewed as a way of dividing the input domain into subdomains , and selecting one or more test case from each. The division can be based on such things as code characteristics (white box), specification details (black box), domain structure, risk analysis, etc. Subdomains are not necessarily disjoint, even though the testing literature frequently refers to them as partitions.
  • 17.
  • 18.
  • 19.
  • 20.
  • 21.
  • 22.
  • 23.
  • 24.
  • 25.
  • 26.
  • 27.
  • 28.
  • 29.
  • 30.
  • 31. Risk Priority Table 9 High = 3 High = 3 Withdraw cash 4 Medium = 2 Medium = 2 Transfer money 1 Low = 1 Low = 1 Read balance 3 High = 3 Low = 1 Make payment 3 Low = 1 High = 3 Buy train ticket 6 High = 3 Medium = 2 Security Priority (L x C) Failure Consequence Occurrence Likelihood Features & Attributes
  • 32. Ordered Risk Priority Table 1 Low = 1 Low = 1 Read balance 6 High = 3 Medium = 2 Security 9 High = 3 High = 3 Withdraw cash 4 Medium = 2 Medium = 2 Transfer money 3 High = 3 Low = 1 Make payment 3 Low 1 High = 3 Buy train ticket Priority (L x C) Failure Consequence Occurrence Likelihood Features & Attributes
  • 33.
  • 34.
  • 35.
  • 36.
  • 37.
  • 38.
  • 39.
  • 40.
  • 41.
  • 42.
  • 43.
  • 44.
  • 45.
  • 46.
  • 47. Estimated Cost of Inadequate Testing *NIST Report: The Economic Impact of Inadequate Infrastructure for Software Testing, 2002. $22 billion $59 billion Total U.S. Economy $1,510,000,000 $3,340,000,000 Financial Services $589,000,000 $1,800,000,000 Transportation Manufacture Potential Cost Reduction from Feasible Improvements Cost of Inadequate Software Testing