SlideShare uma empresa Scribd logo
1 de 5
10.1 CHI-SQUARE: TESTS OF
INDEPENDENCE AND
HOMOGENEITY
Part 2: Tests of Homogeneity
Tests of Homogeneity
   Homogeneous:     of the same structure or
                     composed of similar parts

   When we perform a test of homogeneity, we
    use a contingency table and the chi-square
    distribution to determine whether several
    populations share the same proportions of
    distinct categories.

   A test of homogeneity tests the claim that
    different populations share the same proportions
    of specified characteristics.
Tests of Independence VS Tests of Homogeneity


How to Test for Homogeneity of Populations






                       Note: when we reject the null
                       hypothesis, we do not know which
                       proportions differ among the
                       populations, we only know that the
                       populations differ in some of the
                       proportions sharing a characteristic.
Example: Test for Homogeneity
Tim is doing a research project involving pet
preferences among students at his college. He took
random samples of 300 female and 250 male students.
Each sample member responded to the survey question
“If you could own only one pet, what kind would you
choose?” The possible responses were: “dog,” “cat,”
“other pet,”
“no pet.” The results of the study follow.




                         Pet Preference


Does the same proportion of males as females prefer
each type of pet? Use a 1% level of significance. We’ll
answer this question in several steps

Mais conteúdo relacionado

Destaque

The Chi-Square Statistic: Tests for Goodness of Fit and Independence
The Chi-Square Statistic: Tests for Goodness of Fit and IndependenceThe Chi-Square Statistic: Tests for Goodness of Fit and Independence
The Chi-Square Statistic: Tests for Goodness of Fit and Independencejasondroesch
 
Chi square test final
Chi square test finalChi square test final
Chi square test finalHar Jindal
 
Chi Square Worked Example
Chi Square Worked ExampleChi Square Worked Example
Chi Square Worked ExampleJohn Barlow
 
State of the Word 2011
State of the Word 2011State of the Word 2011
State of the Word 2011photomatt
 

Destaque (8)

The Chi-Square Statistic: Tests for Goodness of Fit and Independence
The Chi-Square Statistic: Tests for Goodness of Fit and IndependenceThe Chi-Square Statistic: Tests for Goodness of Fit and Independence
The Chi-Square Statistic: Tests for Goodness of Fit and Independence
 
Chi square test final
Chi square test finalChi square test final
Chi square test final
 
Chi Square Worked Example
Chi Square Worked ExampleChi Square Worked Example
Chi Square Worked Example
 
Chi square test
Chi square test Chi square test
Chi square test
 
The Chi-Squared Test
The Chi-Squared TestThe Chi-Squared Test
The Chi-Squared Test
 
Chi – square test
Chi – square testChi – square test
Chi – square test
 
Chi square test
Chi square testChi square test
Chi square test
 
State of the Word 2011
State of the Word 2011State of the Word 2011
State of the Word 2011
 

Semelhante a 10.1 part2

Altruism Theories
Altruism TheoriesAltruism Theories
Altruism Theoriesabonica
 
Altruism theories
Altruism theoriesAltruism theories
Altruism theoriesabonica
 
Altruism theories
Altruism theoriesAltruism theories
Altruism theoriesabonica
 
Altruism theories
Altruism theoriesAltruism theories
Altruism theoriesabonica
 
Bradford mvsu fall 2012 lecture 3 methods
Bradford mvsu fall 2012 lecture 3 methodsBradford mvsu fall 2012 lecture 3 methods
Bradford mvsu fall 2012 lecture 3 methodsJohn Bradford
 
Admission in india 2015
Admission in india 2015Admission in india 2015
Admission in india 2015Edhole.com
 
Mate Choice Versus Predation
Mate Choice Versus PredationMate Choice Versus Predation
Mate Choice Versus PredationKRENCHBOY
 
Scientific method
Scientific methodScientific method
Scientific methodNits Kedia
 
Presentation chi-square test & Anova
Presentation   chi-square test & AnovaPresentation   chi-square test & Anova
Presentation chi-square test & AnovaSonnappan Sridhar
 
Vocabulary of science
Vocabulary of scienceVocabulary of science
Vocabulary of scienceJohn Bradford
 

Semelhante a 10.1 part2 (12)

Altruism Theories
Altruism TheoriesAltruism Theories
Altruism Theories
 
Altruism theories
Altruism theoriesAltruism theories
Altruism theories
 
Altruism theories
Altruism theoriesAltruism theories
Altruism theories
 
Altruism theories
Altruism theoriesAltruism theories
Altruism theories
 
Bradford mvsu fall 2012 lecture 3 methods
Bradford mvsu fall 2012 lecture 3 methodsBradford mvsu fall 2012 lecture 3 methods
Bradford mvsu fall 2012 lecture 3 methods
 
hedges.ppt
hedges.ppthedges.ppt
hedges.ppt
 
Admission in india 2015
Admission in india 2015Admission in india 2015
Admission in india 2015
 
Mate Choice Versus Predation
Mate Choice Versus PredationMate Choice Versus Predation
Mate Choice Versus Predation
 
Scientific method
Scientific methodScientific method
Scientific method
 
Scientific method
Scientific methodScientific method
Scientific method
 
Presentation chi-square test & Anova
Presentation   chi-square test & AnovaPresentation   chi-square test & Anova
Presentation chi-square test & Anova
 
Vocabulary of science
Vocabulary of scienceVocabulary of science
Vocabulary of science
 

Mais de leblance

Parent night contact&survey
Parent night contact&surveyParent night contact&survey
Parent night contact&surveyleblance
 
7.3 daqy 2
7.3 daqy 27.3 daqy 2
7.3 daqy 2leblance
 
10.3 part 1
10.3 part 110.3 part 1
10.3 part 1leblance
 
10.1 part 1
10.1 part 110.1 part 1
10.1 part 1leblance
 
Ch 9 practice exam
Ch 9 practice examCh 9 practice exam
Ch 9 practice examleblance
 
5.4 synthetic division
5.4 synthetic division5.4 synthetic division
5.4 synthetic divisionleblance
 
5.4 long division
5.4 long division5.4 long division
5.4 long divisionleblance
 
9.3 Part 1
9.3 Part 19.3 Part 1
9.3 Part 1leblance
 
9.1 9.2 9.3 using the graph calc
9.1 9.2 9.3 using the graph calc9.1 9.2 9.3 using the graph calc
9.1 9.2 9.3 using the graph calcleblance
 
5.1 part 2
5.1 part 25.1 part 2
5.1 part 2leblance
 
9.2 lin reg coeff of det
9.2 lin reg coeff of det9.2 lin reg coeff of det
9.2 lin reg coeff of detleblance
 
Ch 8 review answers
Ch 8 review answersCh 8 review answers
Ch 8 review answersleblance
 

Mais de leblance (20)

Parent night contact&survey
Parent night contact&surveyParent night contact&survey
Parent night contact&survey
 
7.3 daqy 2
7.3 daqy 27.3 daqy 2
7.3 daqy 2
 
7.3
7.37.3
7.3
 
7.1
7.17.1
7.1
 
7.2
7.27.2
7.2
 
10.3 part 1
10.3 part 110.3 part 1
10.3 part 1
 
10.2
10.210.2
10.2
 
10.1 part 1
10.1 part 110.1 part 1
10.1 part 1
 
Ch 9 practice exam
Ch 9 practice examCh 9 practice exam
Ch 9 practice exam
 
5.4 synthetic division
5.4 synthetic division5.4 synthetic division
5.4 synthetic division
 
5.4 long division
5.4 long division5.4 long division
5.4 long division
 
5.3
5.35.3
5.3
 
9.3 Part 1
9.3 Part 19.3 Part 1
9.3 Part 1
 
9.1 9.2 9.3 using the graph calc
9.1 9.2 9.3 using the graph calc9.1 9.2 9.3 using the graph calc
9.1 9.2 9.3 using the graph calc
 
5.2
5.25.2
5.2
 
5.1 part 2
5.1 part 25.1 part 2
5.1 part 2
 
5.1[1]
5.1[1]5.1[1]
5.1[1]
 
9.1
9.19.1
9.1
 
9.2 lin reg coeff of det
9.2 lin reg coeff of det9.2 lin reg coeff of det
9.2 lin reg coeff of det
 
Ch 8 review answers
Ch 8 review answersCh 8 review answers
Ch 8 review answers
 

10.1 part2

  • 1. 10.1 CHI-SQUARE: TESTS OF INDEPENDENCE AND HOMOGENEITY Part 2: Tests of Homogeneity
  • 2. Tests of Homogeneity  Homogeneous: of the same structure or composed of similar parts  When we perform a test of homogeneity, we use a contingency table and the chi-square distribution to determine whether several populations share the same proportions of distinct categories.  A test of homogeneity tests the claim that different populations share the same proportions of specified characteristics.
  • 3. Tests of Independence VS Tests of Homogeneity 
  • 4. How to Test for Homogeneity of Populations  Note: when we reject the null hypothesis, we do not know which proportions differ among the populations, we only know that the populations differ in some of the proportions sharing a characteristic.
  • 5. Example: Test for Homogeneity Tim is doing a research project involving pet preferences among students at his college. He took random samples of 300 female and 250 male students. Each sample member responded to the survey question “If you could own only one pet, what kind would you choose?” The possible responses were: “dog,” “cat,” “other pet,” “no pet.” The results of the study follow. Pet Preference Does the same proportion of males as females prefer each type of pet? Use a 1% level of significance. We’ll answer this question in several steps