1. PRELIMINARY EVALUATION SHEET
Quality of Summary My honest evaluation- what Strategies put forward to
was done well and what was make sure a high quality is
not of good standard? Try to maintained.
cite specific example and
moments from your video
Quality of holding a shot The quality of our holding In order to make sure a high
steady shot was generally, good quality of shots are steady,
considering we did not have using a tripod would be the
a tripod, to balance the ideal tool for maintaining, if
camera. The only negative not, improving our steadiness
was that, the camera was of holding shots, because it
wobbly, and this was acts as a perfect balance for
established in the first few the camera, and the person
shots of our preliminary holding the camera.
task.
Quality of the framing shots Overall, the quality of the A tripod would be a good
framing shots were perfect, asset for framing shots, and
although there were times also learning to move our
when the actors head was hands quicker, but especially
cut off from the shot, and appropriately, so the framing
this was probably because shots would be more
our hands were static, and effective.
our timing was not great.
Nevertheless, the framing
was good.
Quality of shooting material Quality of the shooting From my perspective, the
appropriate to the task set- material was appropriate to everyone else in the group
i.e. the content of your film the content of our film pre done what was required of
pre and post editing was and post editing was them, but on my part, I let the
consistent with the exam consistent with the exam group down, in the final shot,
directives directive, The only setback, because I kept laughing and
and this was largely due to failing to get my positioning
my own fault, was that in the and actions correct. This is
last particular shot, I had something I would strive to
failed to correct my actions, improve on in the real thing.
so the task was not fully
reflective of the directive.
Quality of selecting mise-en- The mise-en-scene that we In relation to the exam
scène including colour, figure, were selected, in my opinion directive, it would of made
lighting, objects and setting; represented what our task more sense if I wore,
was about. The lighting was something red, that connotes

2. good, the setting was great danger, caution, violence and
(interview room), as there even death. However, it was
was a feeling of suspense not that significant.
and intimidation, by the
criminal. The objects were
also appropriate, for
example the poster;
however, it was humorous,
as there was no actual
picture- just a blank shadow.
Quality of editing so that The quality of editing was
meaning is apparent to the excellent considering we did
viewer not have enough time to
work with. Nevertheless, the
editing is apparent to the
viewer.
Quality of using sound with The quality of using sound
images and editing with images was very good,
appropriately for the task set; and the editing matched the
task set from us. To be
honest, there was nothing to
note on the sound because
there was no sound as it
was an interview that we
was filming. Nevertheless,
the sound still matched the
image.
Quality of positioning and The quality of positioning Practice on my positioning
movements of actors and movement of the actors and movement, and become
were fine, until the final shot, more serious, especially
I which we had to change when the group is running
our plan to save time, against time.
because my positioning and
movement were not good as
good, added to the fact that I
was giggling as well, which
goes down as a fault of
mine.

3. Quality of group planning, The group planning was
meeting targets, organization excellent, as we fulfilled our
expectations and our
organization was very god
as well. There is nothing
negative about our group` s
planning, that I can
remember.
Group dynamics i.e. how did The team chemistry in the If we have a feedback of our
your group work together group is very high, as we all performance as an individual
get along with each other as well as a group, then the
very well, in and outside of chances of use obtaining a
class. Another vital thing, in high grade would rise
my opinion, that illustrates considerably, although there
how well we work, is that we are several different areas of
are not afraid to shout at gaining a respectable grade.
each other, and confront
one another if we believe we
are not doing something
right. This is important, as
we need to inform each
other as to what they are
doing right, and what they
are doing wrong, because if
we do not, then we are
never going to improve.
Other points of evaluation
( e.g. equipment related etc)