3. Remembering a Relationship
Given the challenges facing
society and our planet…
…remembering and
recovering our individual and
collective ecological identity
is of the utmost urgency…
However hopeless this
endeavor feels in daily life, it is
when we are faced with
calamity that our withering
ecological identity suddenly
flushes and blooms…
5. Greening in the Red Zone
Greening in the Red Zone --
• creation and access to green spaces
confers resilience and recovery in
systems disrupted by violent conflict or
disaster.
• provides evidence for this assertion
through cases and examples.
• a variety of research and policy
frameworks to explore how creation
and access to green spaces in extreme
situations might contribute to
resistance, recovery, and resilience of
social-ecological systems.
6. Road Map for Today
Concepts & Constructs
• Biophilia / Urgent biophilia
• Restorative Topophilia
• Memorialization mechanisms
• Social-ecological symbols and
rituals
• Discourses of defiance
Cases
Conclusions
7. Concepts and Questions
What processes or mechanisms
might explain the phenomena of
Greening in the Red Zone– why do
people turn to Nature and Green
Spaces as Sources, Sites, and
Systems of Resilience and other
Re-Words?
8. Biophilia?
… we are human in good part because of the
particular way we affiliate with other
organisms (p. 129).
Biophilia, if it exists, and I believe it exists, is
the innately emotional affiliation of human
beings to other living organisms (p.31).
9. Proliferation
Wilson-
Biophilia
Frumkin-
Kellert- Human
Design Health
Tidball-
SES Resilience
& Human
Security
10. Hort Therapy
There are many examples of people, stunned by a
crisis, benefitting from the therapeutic qualities of
nature contact to ease trauma and to aid the
process of recovery. (Miavitz 1998; Hewson 2001)
• benefits of horticulture therapy (Markee and Janick 1979;
PeoplePlantCouncil 1993; Relf and Dorn 1995; Relf 2005)
– among returning war veterans (Brdanovic 2009)
– in refugee contexts
– and in prisons
11. Restorative Environments
• Frumkin (2001) and Hartig (2007) traced human-nature relationships
contributing to human health to the ancient Greeks, to the New
England transcendentalists, and through the American landscape
designers Andrew Jackson Downing (1869) and Frederick Law Olmsted
(1865) (Nash 1982; McLuhan 1994; Murphy, Gifford et al. 1998; Mazel 2000).
• To see or actively experience plants and green spaces can: reduce
domestic violence, quicken healing times, reduce stress, improve
physical health, and bring about cognitive and psychological benefits
in individuals and populations as a whole (Ulrich 1984; Kaplan and Kaplan 1989; Hartig, Mang
et al. 1991; Sullivan and Kuo 1996; Taylor, Wiley et al. 1998; Wells 2000; Hartig, Mang et al. 1991).
• The study of restorative environments complements research on the
conditions in which our functional resources and capabilities diminish,
such as red zones.
12. Systemic Therapies
What might gardening, tree planting, or other
greening activities contribute to post-
catastrophe individual or SES resilience?
Moving toward an ‘ecological’ approach, the
field of systemic therapies contributes
alternative approaches to healing.
Address the environment not merely as a setting
but as a partner in the process (Berger and
McLeod 2006).
13. Systems Within Systems Facilitate
Human Resilience
• Communication • Hydrological Cycle
• Transportation • Carbon Cycle
• Manufacturing • Nitrogen Cycle
14. What IS Urgent Biophilia?
• Attraction humans have for the rest of nature (and the rest of
nature for us?)
• Process of remembering that attraction
• Urge to express it through creation of restorative
environments
• restore or increase ecological function
• confer resilience across multiple scales
Based on Biological Attraction Principle
(Agnati et al. 2009)
Analogous to Newton’s Law of Gravitation
Biological activities, processes, or patterns are all deemed to be mutually attractive
Biological attractive force is intrinsic to living organisms and manifests itself
through the propensity of any living organism to act
15. Road Map for Today
Concepts & Constructs
Biophilia / Urgent biophilia
• Memorialization Mechanisms
• Social-ecological symbols and
rituals
• Discourses of defiance
Cases
Conclusions
16. Restorative Topophilia
• Topophilia = love of place (Tuan, 1974,1975,1977)
• Emphasizes attachment to place and the symbolic meanings that underlie this
attachment
• Base for individual and collective action that repair and/or enhance valued attributes of
place
• Not only attachment, but also on meanings (Stedman, 2003,2008)
• Urgent biophilia & restorative topophilia together comprise “positive dependency”
• Positive dependency is resource dependence that enhances resilience, rather than
eroding it
Tidball, KG & RC Stedman. Positive Dependency and Virtuous Cycles: From Resource Dependence to
Resilience in Urban Social-Ecological Systems. Ecological Economics 86(0) 292-299..
17. Memorialization Mechanism
• spontaneous and collective memorialization of lost ones through
gardening and tree planting
• community of practice emerges to act upon and apply these
memories to social learning about greening practices
• confers SES resilience, through contributing to psychological–social
resistance and resilience and to ecosystem goods and services
production
18.
19. Memorialization Mechanism
• spontaneous and collective memorialization of lost ones through
gardening and tree planting
• community of practice emerges to act upon and apply these
memories to social learning about greening practices
• confers SES resilience, through contributing to psychological–social
resistance and resilience and to ecosystem goods and services
production
20. Social-ecological symbols &
Rituals
http://candychang.com/sexy-trees-of-the-marigny-2011-
calendar/
Tidball, KG (2013). Trees and Rebirth: Social-Ecological Symbols, Rituals and Resilience in Post-Katrina New Orleans. In:
Tidball and Krasny, Eds., Greening in the Red Zone: Disaster, Resilience, and Community Greening. Springer publishing.
23. Discourses of Defiance
What I realized…doing this is that you don’t plant trees where
there’s no hope for a better future… if there’s no hope for a
future you’re not going to put a tree there. What would be the
point? …so if we’re not going to be around to see it, then why,
why would we plant it? – Tree planting resident of New Orleans
24. what Might initiate greening?
Tidball, KG. 2012. Urgent Biophilia: Human-Nature Interactions and
Biological Attractions in Disaster Resilience. Accepted at: Ecology
and Society.
Tidball, KG & RC Stedman. Positive Dependency and Virtuous
Cycles: From Resource Dependence to Resilience in Urban Social-
Ecological Systems. Submitted to: Ecological Economics .
Tidball, KG, ME Krasny, E Svendsen, L Campbell, & K Helphand.
2010. Stewardship, Learning, and Memory in Disaster Resilience.
“Resilience in Social-Ecological Systems: the Role of Learning and
Education,” Special Issue of Environmental Education Research,
16(5): 341-357.
Tidball, KG (2013). Trees and Rebirth: Social-Ecological Symbols,
Rituals and Resilience in Post-Katrina New Orleans. In: Tidball and
Krasny, Eds., Greening in the Red Zone: Disaster, Resilience, and
Community Greening. Springer publishing.
Tidball, KG, Svendsen, E, Campbell, L, Falxa-raymond, N. (in
preparation). Landscapes of Resilience and Discourses of Defiance:
Greening as Recovery in Joplin and New York City.
*Positive Dependency complex
25. Road Map for Today
Concepts & Constructs
Biophilia / Urgent biophilia
Restorative Topophilia
Memorialization Mechanisms
Social-ecological symbols and
rituals
Discourses of Defiance
Cases
Conclusions
26. G3– The Green Complex
Greening
(G1)
Green(ed)
Greeners
space
(G2)
(G3)
31. Cases in Greening in the Red Zone
LOCATION RED ZONE TYPE
Afghanistan Ongoing wars in the Middle East
Berlin, Germany Post-Cold War divisions
Charleston, South Carolina 1989 Hurricane Hugo
Cameroon and Chad Mid 2000’s civil unrest in Central Africa
Cyprus Demarcation between Greek and Turkish Cyprus
Europe 1940’s WW II Nazi internment camps
Guatemala Ongoing post-conflict insecurity
Iraq Ongoing wars in the Middle East
Johannesburg, South Africa Early 2000’s Soweto, Post-Apartheid violence
Kenya Early 2000’s Resource scarcity conflict
Liberia 1989- 2003 civil war
Madagascar Costal vulnerability
New Orleans, USA 2005 Hurricane Katrina
New York City, USA 2001 September 11th terrorist attacks
Rotterdam, Netherlands Ongoing urban insecurity
Port-au-Prince, Haiti 2010 earthquake
Russia Post-Soviet Cold War urban insecurity
Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina 1992-1996 conflict
South Korea Demilitarized Zone
South Korea 2002 Typhoon and coastal vulnerability
Stockholm, Sweden Urban insecurity in times of war
Tokyo and Hiroshima, Japan WW II bombings
United States WW II involvement
United States Violence and prison populations
32. Conclusions
“A human being is a part of the whole called by us
universe, a part limited in time and space. He
experiences himself, his thoughts and feeling as
something separated from the rest, a kind of optical
delusion of his consciousness. This delusion is a
kind of prison for us, restricting us to our personal
desires and to affection for a few persons nearest
to us. Our task must be to free ourselves from this
prison by widening our circle of compassion to
embrace all living creatures and the whole of
nature in its beauty.”
― Albert Einstein
Do overs, another opportunity, second chance -- this is only “A” thru “F” Suggest alternate endings and outcomes, improved performance or satisfaction, a kind of optimism and hopefulness that a second chance means a better conclusion
My work is mostly about a kind of archeology of the human social-ecological experience, trying to excavate and peel back the layers of history that have covered over our ecological identity. I am interested in this because fundamentally I believe that our species faces very dark days indeed if we cannot remember our ecological identity and recover a relationship with the ecosystems upon which we depend.Given the challenges facing society and our planet,remembering and recovering our individual and collective ecological identity is of the utmost urgency.However hopeless this endeavor feels in daily life, it is when we are faced with calamity that our withering ecological identity suddenly flushes and blooms.
Picture on right of a soldier appreciating nature while on patrol– incongruent? Perhaps not. My personal experience…Influenced by these books and became interested in exploring these ideas further, which led to --
Creation and access to green spaces promotes individual human health, especially in therapeutic contexts among those suffering traumatic events. But what of the role of access to green space and the act of creating and caring for such places in promoting social health and well-being? Greening in the Red Zone asserts that creation and access to green spaces confers resilience and recovery in systems, from individual human systems to regional and landscape scale systems, which have been disrupted by violent conflict, crisis, or disaster. This edited volume provides evidence for this assertion through cases and examples. The contributors to this volume use a variety of research and policy frameworks to explore how creation and access to green spaces in extreme situations might contribute to resistance, recovery, and resilience of social-ecological systems.
So I start by unpacking the terminology and supporting literatures I rely on, beginning with Biophilia.
Pedigree of the conceptKellert worked with EO Wilson to expand biophilia as conceptFrumkin is the Director National Center for Environmental Health / Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Now seeing HUMAN SECURITY on that last slide might give you pause. Given the hardships and urgent safety issues faced by civilians, soldiers, and first-responders after a disaster or during war, it seems counter-intuitive that they would engage in the simple act of gardening, tree planting, or other greening activities. Yet, intriguing and compelling examples exist of people, stunned by a crisis, benefitting from the therapeutic qualities of nature contact to ease trauma and to aid the process of recovery. A large literature exists on the benefits of horticulture therapy more generally, as well as in more specific contexts such as among returning war veterans, in refugee contexts, and in prisons to name a few.
Beyond the therapeutic value of plants themselves, others have researched the value of green places, or restorative environments to ease trauma or discomfort. Studies have shown that the ability to see or actively experience plants and green spaces can reduce domestic violence, quicken healing times, reduce stress, improve physical health, and bring about cognitive and psychological benefits in individuals and populations as a whole.The study of restorative environments complements research on the conditions in which our functional resources and capabilities diminish, such as red zones.
But the question still remains, in your minds and probably still in mine, what might gardening, tree planting, or other greening activities contribute to post-catastrophe individual or SES resilience? In much of the research and practice conducted under the rubric of horticultural therapy, the individual person in need of an intervention is considered a kind of patient who is prescribed horticultural interventions by a professional practitioner. Moving toward an ‘ecological’ approach, researchers in the field of systemic therapies have proposed alternative approaches to healing, conducted in creative ways in nature, that address the environment not merely as a setting but as a partner in the process.
Scientists acknowledge that larger, and I would add perhaps also smaller, systems facilitate human resilience, especially in post-catastrophe contexts, but agree that those systems are unlikely to be directly available during an unfolding disaster. Their description of these systems includes primarily manufactured ones, such as communication, transportation, manufacturing, and others, and not ecological ones. But what if we included in this list of systems that facilitate resilience, especially after a disaster, locally available biological and ecological systems, subsystems and components, from the smallest to the largest, from the most simple to the most complex? After all, at least according to Kurakin (2009), ‘the structures and dynamics of all living organizations, from proteins and cells to societies and ecologies, embody their evolutionary histories [and] memories.’ And what if, in terms of human resilience, we focused on the nearly scale-free property of life itself, of the compulsion to live, of living (Kurakin 2007)?
So what Is Urgent Biophilia?I define Urgent biophilia like this: when humans faced with a disaster, as individuals and as communities and populations, seek out doses of contact and engagement with nature to further their efforts to summon and demonstrate resilience in the face of a crisis, they exemplify an urgent biophilia. This urgent biophilia represents an important set of human-nature interactions in SES perturbed by a catastrophe. The relationships those human-nature interactions have to other components within interdependent systems at many different scales, may be one critical source of resilience after a catastrophe. In other words, the affinity we humans have for the rest of nature and the urge to express that affinity through creation of restorative environments, which may also restore or increase ecological function, may confer resilience. So, when faced with a disaster, as individuals and as communities and populations, we seek engagement with nature to summon and demonstrate resilience in the face of a crisis, we are demonstrating an urgent biophilia.urgent biophilia represents an important set of human-nature interactions in SES characterized by hazard, disaster, or vulnerability.Builds upon contemporary work on principles of biological attraction as well as earlier work on biophilia while synthesizing literatures on restorative environments, community-based ecological restoration, and both community and social-ecological disaster resilience
This mechanism is yin to the yang of urgent biophilia. Here, drawing upon Tuan’s notion of topophilia (literally ‘love of place’), I am emphasizing a social actor’s attachment to place and the symbolic meanings that underlie this attachment. In contrast to urgent biophilia, restorative topophilia is conceived and operationalized as more experiential and ‘constructed’ rather than innate, and suggests that topophilia serves as a powerful base for individual and collective action that repair and/or enhance valued attributes of place. These restorative greening actions are based not only on attachment—people fight for the places they care about as Rich says—but also on meanings, which define the kinds of places people are fighting for.
A memorialization mechanism begins right after a crisis, when spontaneous and collective memorialization of lost ones through gardening and tree planting happens. Then a community of practice emerges to act upon and apply these memories to social learning about greening practices. This, in turn, may lead to new kinds of learning, including about collective efficacy and ecosystem services production, through feedback between remembering, learning, and enhancing individual, social, and environmental well-being. Map of Living memorials project. 667 greening memorialization sites re 9-11. major spikes in September each year.
Image of Hurricane Katrina memorial– remains of unidentified and unclaimed persons. Important tree planting group took on the landscaping for this memorialization work.
Tree symbols everywhere – THREE SLIDES
Graphic depiction of concepts, themes, connectivity, and relevance from initial interview data of Parkway Partners Tree Trooper class (n34). Note the closeness of concepts of trees and tree with New Orleans, homes, and neighborhood, indicating strong symbolic significance in trees and ideas of place.The Leximancer system is a relatively new method for transforming lexical co-occurrence informationfrom natural language into semantic patterns in an unsupervised manner. It employs two stages ofco-occurrence information extraction—semantic and relational—using a different algorithm for eachstage. The algorithms used are statistical, but they employ nonlinear dynamics and machine learning.
Refers back to meanings described in Restorative Topophilia and memorialization mechanismmultiple symbolic meanings of trees in different contexts. three broad families of symbolic meanings of trees: (A) trees themselves as symbols (their presence, their absence, their status); (B) tree planting as a kind of symbol or symbolic action; and (C) both trees and tree planting explicitly combined in the discourse. 20 general categories of symbolic meanings of trees and tree planting, representing more than 70 specific and nuanced types of symbolic instances. further separated into positive meaning and negative meaning groups based on textual analysis of interview data. The presence of tree symbols, the social-ecological memories that define them and that inform the rituals that perpetuate them, and the resulting social-ecological relationships between people and trees or forests, as expressed through symbols and rituals, reveals a possible mechanism within the greening in the red zone system, and a source of resilience in this kind of SES undergoing rapid change.
Propose mechanisms and positioning (later repositioning)
Now I’d like to move a way the sort of theoretical stuff and just share with you some of the work I and my colleagues and students are doing… I might mention the one of the mechanisms we are looking at or for in a particular case, but mostly I just want to share with you the breadth and depth of the research underway looking at green spaces and nature and resilience, recovery, reintegration etc.
In nearly all cases we focus on a comprehensive understanding of the action, the actors and the activity space – G3, the green complex as you see here. The interactions and overlaps are very interesting areas of study but I will save that for another lecture some other time.
Other than Post-Katrina new Orleans and post-9/11 NYC, we are working in Joplin, MO after their horrific tornado.We are seeing multiple mechanisms at work- tree symbolism and ritual of many kinds, the memorialization mechanism, the positive dependency complex (UB/RT)
Around 550 Residents and Other Participants Plant Almost 3,400 TreesUrban Satoyama (integrated social-ecological landscapes with higher biodiversity and ecosystem service production than many pristine natural areas that exclude humans)
I hope you have both enjoyed what I shared with you, and have been challenged by it. I hope it inspires you, in that what you do, what we are here to learn more about today, is fundamental to the survival of people and the planet