1. Public Workshop Meeting #4 March 30th, 2011

2. 2 Meeting Agenda Project Recap Project Update Summary of Workshop #3 Concepts Overview of Tech Memo 7.1 Work Session to Select and Refine Concepts for Further Review Public Comment Period Next Steps Key Goal: Identify 3 Most Promising Roadway Alignment Alternatives

3. 3 Project Background Video

4. 4 Project Website/Virtual Workshop (http://172nd.com)

5. 5 Project Purpose Statement The purpose of this project is to effectively address the 172nd-190th corridor congestion and safety problems, serve future north-south traffic, serve expected population growth in Damascus, Happy Valley, the Pleasant Valley Plan Area and Gresham, and to serve the growing demand for regional travel.

6. Project Process WE ARE HERE

7. 7 Alternatives Development Process WE ARE HERE

9. Introduce Background and Project Purpose

10. Workshop #2 - October 6th, 2010

11. Develop Corridor Alignment and Streetscape Concepts

12. Workshop #3 - December 8th, 2010

13. Screen Corridor Alignment and Streetscape Concepts to 3 Alternatives

14. Workshop #4 – March 30th, 2011

16. December 2011 – Damascus Planning Commission

17. January 2012 – Happy Valley Planning Commission

18. January 2012 – Damascus City Council

19. February 2012 – Happy Valley City Council

23. Project Evaluation Criteria Vehicular Mobility Multi-Modal Mobility Local Access Multi-Modal Safety Impacts to Natural Environment Impacts to Built Environment Land Use Compatability Cost (Construction Only) Aesthetic Character

24. Alignment Concepts – AT2

25. Alignment Concepts – AT4

26. Alignment Concepts – AT5

27. Alignment Concepts – AT6

28. Alignment Concepts – AS10a

29. Evaluation Scores

31. Pros/Cons

32. ScoresUse “Notes” Section of Your Handout to Provide Feedback Today’s Goals are to: 1) Narrow the Alignment Concepts to 3 Most Promising Alternatives 2) Provide Suggested Refinements to the 3 Most Promising Alternatives

33. Next Steps Process Feedback from PAC, Virtual Workshop #4, and Public Workshop #4 PMT to narrow the 5 Corridor Alignment Concepts Down to the 3 Most Promising Alternatives for Further Review Report back to PAC and the public regarding the PMT’s recommendations for concepts to be further reviewed in the next round Open House on July 13th, 2011 to review and comment on preferred corridor

34. Thanks!