Apidays Singapore 2024 - Building Digital Trust in a Digital Economy by Veron...
2010 Multi Tip Flare Ignition Presentation
1. www.inl.gov
Prediction and Measurement of
Flare Ignition Using the LES
based C3d
J. D. Smith, Ph.D., Idaho National Laboratory
A. Suo-Anttila, Ph.D., Systems Analyses and Solutions
S. Smith and N. Philpot, Zeeco, Inc.
American Flame Research Committees - International Pacific Rim Combustion Symposium
Advances in Combustion Technology: Improving the Environment and Energy Efficiency
Sheraton, Maui, Hawaii – September 26-29, 2010
2. OUTLINE
• Background and Introduction
• Flare Tests
• Model Setup and Methodology
• Simulation Results
– Low Flow Conditions
– High Flow Conditions
• Observations and Conclusions
Slide 2
American Flame Research Committees - International Pacific Rim Combustion Symposium Advances in
Combustion Technology: Improving the Environment and Energy Efficiency Sheraton
Maui, Hawaii
September 27 - 29, 2010
3. Slide 3
Elevated Multi-Tip Gas Flare Ignition
Slide 3
• Nominal Firing Rate = 350 Tons
Per Hour (TPH)
• Max Firing Rate – 1350 TPH
• Mostly Natural Gas (Mwt = 18)
• Experienced Pressure Wave during
ignition
• Conducted Tests to quantify
ignition phenomena:
− Microphones used to measure
pressure wave
− High Speed Video used to capture
flame during ignition
• Test results reported elsewhere
(summarized below)
• Test video shows ignition behavior
American Flame Research Committees - International Pacific Rim Combustion Symposium Advances in
Combustion Technology: Improving the Environment and Energy Efficiency Sheraton
Maui, Hawaii
September 27 - 29, 2010
4. Slide 4
Test Layout
Slide 4
American Flame Research Committees - International Pacific Rim Combustion Symposium Advances in
Combustion Technology: Improving the Environment and Energy Efficiency Sheraton
Maui, Hawaii
September 27 - 29, 2010
5. Slide 5
Flame during Ignition
Slide 5
Maui, Hawaii
September 27 - 29, 2010
American Flame Research Committees - International Pacific Rim Combustion Symposium Advances in
Combustion Technology: Improving the Environment and Energy Efficiency Sheraton
6. Slide 6
Test Results:
Sound Level (pressure wave) and Flame speed estimate
Slide 6
American Flame Research Committees - International Pacific Rim Combustion Symposium Advances in
Combustion Technology: Improving the Environment and Energy Efficiency Sheraton
• Flame speed estimate from tests is 45 m/s
(Test 1) and 50 m/s (Test 2)
• Maximum pressure generated by spherical
flame propagating at 50 m/s would be ~48
mB (AIChE correlation*)
* Center for Chemical Process Safety, Guidelines for Evaluating the Characteristics of Vapor Cloud
Explosions, Flash Fires and BLEVEs. AIChE (1994).
Maui, Hawaii
September 27 - 29, 2010
7. Model Setup: General Comments
• Transient conservation equations with radiative heat transfer and
combustion chemistry
• Considers soot formation and other multi-phase systems using
Eulerian/Eulerian formulation
• Accurately assess different operation scenarios (wind, flow rate,
fuel type, surroundings)
• Reasonable CPU time requirements on “standard” workstation
• Trade offs for “Engineering” Approach
– Sacrifice generality (large fires only) in favor of quick turnaround with
quantitative accuracy
– Reaction rates and radiation heat transfer models apply only to large fires
– Models intended to make predictions “good-enough” for industrial use
– Model validation for each application to establish accuracy of results
Slide 7
American Flame Research Committees - International Pacific Rim Combustion Symposium Advances in
Combustion Technology: Improving the Environment and Energy Efficiency Sheraton
Maui, Hawaii
September 27 - 29, 2010
8. Combustion Model
• Variant of Said et al. (1997) turbulent flame model
• Relevant Species (model includes relevant reactions)
F = Fuel Vapor (from evaporation or flare tip)
O2 = Oxygen
PC = H20(v) + CO2
C = Radiating Carbon Soot
IS = Non-radiating Intermediate Species
• Eddy dissipation effects and local equivalence ratio effects
• Reactions based on Arrhenius kinetics
C and TA determined for all reactions
Slide 8
American Flame Research Committees - International Pacific Rim Combustion Symposium Advances in
Combustion Technology: Improving the Environment and Energy Efficiency Sheraton
Maui, Hawaii
September 27 - 29, 2010
9. Reaction Rate Model
• Arrhenius rate model
– Consumption of primary reactant increases on reactants mass fraction fRi and
temperature T in volume
– Coefficients C and Activation Temperatures (TA) determined for all reactions
– Where:
Ak = Pre-exponential Factor X1 = Natural Gas Mol Frac
X2 = O2 Mol Frac Ea = Activation Temperature
T = Local Gas Temperature b, c, d = Global Exponents
American Flame Research Committees - International Pacific Rim Combustion Symposium Advances in
Combustion Technology: Improving the Environment and Energy Efficiency Sheraton
Slide 9
Maui, Hawaii
September 27 - 29, 2010
10. Approach (1)
American Flame Research Committees - International Pacific Rim Combustion Symposium Advances in
Combustion Technology: Improving the Environment and Energy Efficiency Sheraton
Slide 10
• Laminar flame global mechanism used as starting point
– Used Activation temperature + mol frac exponents (based on reaction)
– Pre-exponential (Ak) factor adjusted to match turbulent combustion rxn rates
• Turbulent mixing effect on combustion included via LES
– Two coefficients adjust effect (ε = turbulence intensity scale factor;
δ = combustion species mixing time delay)
• Parameters adjusted to to match experimental results
Maui, Hawaii
September 27 - 29, 2010
11. Approach (2)
• Other model variations considered:
– Computational grid size cell number
– Turbulence model (zero equation and one-equation LES)
– Nozzle structure (jet cone vs nozzle surface)
– Numerical upwind differencing
– Time to ignition
• Boundary Conditions
– Hydrostatic pressure on all external boundaries (adjusted to account for wind)
– Initial temperature and composition set to 300 K and air
• Other Assumptions
– Flare gas combustion approximated as described above
– Thermal radiation calculated w/ standard radiation models
– Wind conditions, flare gas inlet temperature and pressure, and radiation
effects set to match measured value
– Flame emissivity = F (gas comp, soot fv, flame size/shape, temp)
Slide 11
American Flame Research Committees - International Pacific Rim Combustion Symposium Advances in
Combustion Technology: Improving the Environment and Energy Efficiency Sheraton
Maui, Hawaii
September 27 - 29, 2010
12. Slide 12
American Flame Research Committees - International Pacific Rim Combustion Symposium Advances in
Combustion Technology: Improving the Environment and Energy Efficiency Sheraton
Nozzle Approximation
Two approaches considered for detailed nozzle
structure:
1.Mass Sources on Nozzle Cone:
• Place source terms on cone surface and inject natural
gas at correct velocity and mass rate as if resolved using
fine cells
• Individual nozzle flow kept exactly identical (in absence
of any flow mal-distribution)
2.Mass Inlet on Nozzle Surface
• Inject fluid through cells representing nozzles
• Total inlet adjusted for correct mass flow
• Individual rates varied (nozzle sizes varied due to
overlap of square cells on circular tips)
3.More general “mass source” approach selected
Maui, Hawaii
September 27 - 29, 2010
13. Slide 13
American Flame Research Committees - International Pacific Rim Combustion Symposium Advances in
Combustion Technology: Improving the Environment and Energy Efficiency Sheraton
Computational Mesh
o Flare dimensions approximated as 3.35m square, computational volume set as 20m
long X 20m wide X 15m high (domain extended ~9m beyond flare edge)
o Domain bottom set at top of elevated flare exit (reduce mesh size)
o Domain separated into two regions
Region 1: Near Tip Region just above nozzle and 7m square by 8m high
• Fixed horizontal cells with equal spacing (80 cells 0.0875m on a side)
• Vertical dimension slowly varied with 0.05m at nozzle face to 0.14m at top of region (90 cells)
• High resolution region had 576,000 cells
Region 2: Buffer Region surrounding Near Tip Region
• Course, stretched cells to provide buffer between boundaries and near tip
• Both horizontal dimensions included 14 cells; vertical dimension included 12 cells
• Provided large distance from edge of domain (pressure boundary) and flame surface to prevent
estimated pressure in igniting flame ball
o During analysis, mesh refined several times to improve calculation results
Maui, Hawaii
September 27 - 29, 2010
14. Slide 14
American Flame Research Committees - International Pacific Rim Combustion Symposium Advances in
Combustion Technology: Improving the Environment and Energy Efficiency Sheraton
Pressure Monitoring Locations
Note: x and z are horizontal positions (x = 0
and z = 0 is flare center) and y is height above
flare tip as shown in graphic)
Maui, Hawaii
September 27 - 29, 2010
15. Model Tuning (1)
• Over 60 CFD runs indicated pressure wave magnitude mostly dependent on
ignition time (combustion kinetics and turbulence had secondary effects)
• Typical pressure pulse of +30 to +40 mB wave followed by negative wave of -10
to -20 mB
• Runs with ignition delay exhibited higher pressures waves
– Combustion parameters varied over significant range but had little effect on predicted
peak pressure wave
• Ignition delay accomplished by:
– Natural gas jets turned on for 0.25 sec prior to igniting pilot
– After ignition, pilot flame grew and ignited flare gas at approximately 1 sec
– Resulting flame ball had significantly higher pressures than nearly all other cases
considered
– Cases #3 and #41 had overpressures ~0.5 atm
American Flame Research Committees - International Pacific Rim Combustion Symposium Advances in
Combustion Technology: Improving the Environment and Energy Efficiency Sheraton
Slide 15
Maui, Hawaii
September 27 - 29, 2010
16. Predicted Pressure for
All Cases at Low Flow Conditions
American Flame Research Committees - International Pacific Rim Combustion Symposium Advances in
Combustion Technology: Improving the Environment and Energy Efficiency Sheraton
Slide 16
Maui, Hawaii
September 27 - 29, 2010
17. Model Tuning (2)
• Final chemical kinetics coefficients selected as providing “best” fit to ignition
tests:
– Ak = 5.0e16, Ta = 20098, b = 0.5, c = 1, and d = 1
• Turbulence parameters selected:
– ε = 0.2; δ = 1e-5
• Kinetics and turbulence parameters not highest values tested (i.e. fastest
kinetics and most rapid mixing)
• Cases with higher values not always result in higher pressures since high
values also leads to combustion in non-ideal mixtures
• Increasing turbulence scale improves mixing and suppresses natural fluid
oscillations in turbulent jet (scale factor not allowed to exceed 2x recommended
value of 0.2)
American Flame Research Committees - International Pacific Rim Combustion Symposium Advances in
Combustion Technology: Improving the Environment and Energy Efficiency Sheraton
Slide 17
Maui, Hawaii
September 27 - 29, 2010
18. Slide 18
Low Flow Results:
Filtering Effect
Slide 18
American Flame Research Committees - International Pacific Rim Combustion Symposium Advances in
Combustion Technology: Improving the Environment and Energy Efficiency Sheraton
• Time history plot of local gas pressure for typical case @ 4m elevation above nozzle
• LHS figure has each point representing average of 4 time steps (slight filtering)
• Without filtering (RHS figure), isolated pressure peaks for single time steps ( 0.1 ms) predicted considered not representative
of experimental measurements (too fast for test equipment to accurately monitor)
• Filtering used to insure pressure histories representative of large regions and times more consistent with pressure histories
inferred from flame velocity measurements
• Pressure change (max – min) reaches approximately 50 mB (or more) – same as reported in flare tests
• Time between max and min pressure is on order of 16 ms (~60 Hz sound frequency)
Case 18 Case 37
42 mB (0.62 psig)
-10 mB (0.15 psig)
0.77 psig
Maui, Hawaii
September 27 - 29, 2010
19. Slide 19
American Flame Research Committees - International Pacific Rim Combustion Symposium Advances in
Combustion Technology: Improving the Environment and Energy Efficiency Sheraton
Low Flow Results:
Ignition Delay Effect
• Pressure histories from two delayed ignition cases (Case 3 and Case 41)
• Highest Pressure observed on outer edge of growing fire ball
• Minimum pressure observed at center of growing fire ball after high pressure
propagates outward
Case 41Case 3
425 mB (6.25 psig)
125 mB (1.84 psig)
-130 mB (1.91 psig)
-60 mB (0.88 psig)
2.72 psig
8.16 psig
Maui, Hawaii
September 27 - 29, 2010
20. Slide 20
American Flame Research Committees - International Pacific Rim Combustion Symposium Advances in
Combustion Technology: Improving the Environment and Energy Efficiency Sheraton
Low Flow Results:
Pressure Spikes from Ignition Delay
• Highest Pressure on outer edge of growing fire ball
• Minimum pressure at fire ball center after high pressure
region propagates outward
Maui, Hawaii
September 27 - 29, 2010
21. Slide 21
American Flame Research Committees - International Pacific Rim Combustion Symposium Advances in
Combustion Technology: Improving the Environment and Energy Efficiency Sheraton
Low Flow Results:
Horizontal temperature contour through flame ball at 4m
Beginning of Ignition Mid-Point of Ignition Near End of Ignition
• Spatial distance between tick marks on plots is 1m; temporal distance between plots is 30 ms
• Dividing flame propagation distance by time between frames yields flame velocity of 33 m/s
• Experimental flame propagation velocity ~50 m/s (examining video data indicated they failed to subtract
initial ball diameter). Correcting test results yields actual growth rate of 40 – 44 m/s
Maui, Hawaii
September 27 - 29, 2010
22. Slide 22
American Flame Research Committees - International Pacific Rim Combustion Symposium Advances in
Combustion Technology: Improving the Environment and Energy Efficiency Sheraton
Low Flow Results:
Flame ball growth for normal and delayed ignition
Normal Ignition Delayed Ignition
Maui, Hawaii
September 27 - 29, 2010
23. Slide 23
American Flame Research Committees - International Pacific Rim Combustion Symposium Advances in
Combustion Technology: Improving the Environment and Energy Efficiency Sheraton
Low Flow Results:
Normal Ignition Video
Maui, Hawaii
September 27 - 29, 2010
24. Slide 24
American Flame Research Committees - International Pacific Rim Combustion Symposium Advances in
Combustion Technology: Improving the Environment and Energy Efficiency Sheraton
Low Flow Results:
Delayed Ignition Video
Maui, Hawaii
September 27 - 29, 2010
25. Slide 25
American Flame Research Committees - International Pacific Rim Combustion Symposium Advances in
Combustion Technology: Improving the Environment and Energy Efficiency Sheraton
High Flow Results:
Ignition Delay Effect
• Pressure history from non-delayed (RHS) and delayed (LHS) ignition pressure wave
(4m above flare tip)
• Higher flow wo/ ignition delay caused slightly higher pressure wave (3.53 vs 0.77 psig)
• With Ignition delay, pressure builds until calculation becomes unstable (detonation)
High Rate w/ Ignition DelayHigh Rate wo/ Ignition Delay
160 mB (2.35 psig)
1700 mB (24.98 psig)
-80 mB (1.18 psig)
3.53 psig
Maui, Hawaii
September 27 - 29, 2010
26. Slide 26
American Flame Research Committees - International Pacific Rim Combustion Symposium Advances in
Combustion Technology: Improving the Environment and Energy Efficiency Sheraton
High Flow Results:
Normal Ignition Video
Maui, Hawaii
September 27 - 29, 2010
27. Slide 27
American Flame Research Committees - International Pacific Rim Combustion Symposium Advances in
Combustion Technology: Improving the Environment and Energy Efficiency Sheraton
High Flow Results:
Delayed Ignition Video (only two frames at sampling rate)
Maui, Hawaii
September 27 - 29, 2010
28. Conclusions
• Natural Gas Flare Gas Fired through multi-burner tip:
– C3d flare model based on LES mixing model
– Combustion model used EBU type reactions (includes soot)
– 2-zone computational mesh (adjusted to optimize grid)
– Final mesh size ~1.2MM cells
• Simulated low flow (200-350 TPH) and high flow (1350 TPH) conditions
• Compared results to test results
– Pressure wave estimated by AIChE correlation + flame speed estimated from high speed
video (pressure measurements via microphone – not sensitive enough)
– Predictions compared well to data for flame speed and pressure wave
– from 12 tests (2 tip sizes, 3 operating pressures, 2 radiation sample locations)
• Estimated Pressure wave
– Low flow, no ignition delay 0.75 psig, flame speed ~33 m/s (measured 40 m/s)
– Low flow, ignition delay ~ 8 psig possible!
– High flow, no ignition delay 3.5 psig
– High flow, ignition delay resulted in explosion!
Slide 28
American Flame Research Committees - International Pacific Rim Combustion Symposium Advances in
Combustion Technology: Improving the Environment and Energy Efficiency Sheraton
Maui, Hawaii
September 27 - 29, 2010
29. Backup Slides
American Flame Research Committees - International Pacific Rim Combustion Symposium Advances in
Combustion Technology: Improving the Environment and Energy Efficiency Sheraton
Slide 29
Maui, Hawaii September 27 - 29,
2010
30. Radiation Inside Large Fires
• High soot volume fractions make large fires non-transparent
(optically thick) which causes flame to radiate as a cloud
(radiatively diffuse)
• Fire volume defined where soot volume fraction (fi) greater than
minimum volume fraction (fsoot fmin)
• Flame edge (fflameedge) where soot volume fraction = 0.05 ppm
Calculated flame surfaces from 3 time steps from validation against test
Slide 30
American Flame Research Committees - International Pacific Rim Combustion Symposium Advances in
Combustion Technology: Improving the Environment and Energy Efficiency Sheraton
Maui, Hawaii
September 27 - 29, 2010
31. • When fsoot fflameedge then outside “flame” (participating medium
considered)
• View factors from fire to surrounding surfaces calculated at each
time step (includes attenuation by gas and soot media for
flames)
• Re-radiation from surroundings also calculated at each time
• Fire considered black body radiator (εfiresurface = 1)
• Radiation from flame to surroundings assumes Tsurround =
constant
Radiation Outside of Large Fires
Slide 31
American Flame Research Committees - International Pacific Rim Combustion Symposium Advances in
Combustion Technology: Improving the Environment and Energy Efficiency Sheraton
Maui, Hawaii
September 27 - 29, 2010
32. Diffuse Radiation Within Fire
• Calculated indirectly using a Rossland effective thermal
conductivity
– σ = Stefan-Boltzman Constant
– T = local temperature
– βR= local extinction coefficient. Dependent on local species concentrations
• Radiation transport model:
– Predicts radiant flux on external (and internal) surfaces
– Provides source/sinks terms to overall energy equation
Air
R
R k
T
k =
β
σ
3
16 3
Slide 32
American Flame Research Committees - International Pacific Rim Combustion Symposium Advances in
Combustion Technology: Improving the Environment and Energy Efficiency Sheraton
Maui, Hawaii
September 27 - 29, 2010
33. Reactions Involving Fuel
• Incomplete Fuel Combustion (soot producing)
1 kg F + (2.87-2.6S1) kg O2 → S1 kg C + (3.87-3.6S1) kg PC + (50-32S1) MJ
– Combustion Soot Mass Parameter, S1 = 0.005
• Endothermic Fuel Pyrolysis (soot producing)
1 kg F + 0.3 MJ → S2 kg C + (1-S2) kg IS
– Cracking Parameter, S2 = 0.15
American Flame Research Committees - International Pacific Rim Combustion Symposium Advances in
Combustion Technology: Improving the Environment and Energy Efficiency Sheraton
Slide 33
Maui, Hawaii
September 27 - 29, 2010
34. Reactions Not Involving Fuel
• Soot Combustion
1 kg C + 2.6 kg O2 → 3.6 kg CO2 + 32 MJ
• Combustion of Intermediate Species
– Coefficients chosen so that complete combustion of C and IS produce same
species and thermal energy as direct combustion of fuel
American Flame Research Committees - International Pacific Rim Combustion Symposium Advances in
Combustion Technology: Improving the Environment and Energy Efficiency Sheraton
Slide 34
Maui, Hawaii
September 27 - 29, 2010