AMD Latam Press Tour Buenos Aires Mayo 2018

1 | AMD PARTNER SUMMIT 2018 | ACCELERATING BUSINESS TOGETHER | AMD CONFIDENTIAL – NDA REQUIRED
This presentation contains forward-looking statements concerning Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (AMD)
including, but not limited to, the features, functionality, availability, timing, expectations and expected
benefits of AMD’s current and future products; objectives, strategies and goals; product and technology
roadmaps; future product roll-out; go-to-market strategies and programs; market trends and expectations;
consumer and commercial strategy; and potential growth, which are made pursuant to the Safe Harbor
provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements are
commonly identified by words such as "would," "may," "expects," "believes," "plans," "intends," "projects"
and other terms with similar meaning. Investors are cautioned that the forward-looking statements in this
presentation are based on current beliefs, assumptions and expectations, speak only as of the date of this
presentation and involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from
current expectations. Such statements are subject to certain known and unknown risks and uncertainties,
many of which are difficult to predict and generally beyond AMD's control, that could cause actual results
and other future events to differ materially from those expressed in, or implied or projected by, the
forward-looking information and statements. Investors are urged to review in detail the risks and
uncertainties in AMD's Securities and Exchange Commission filings, including but not limited to AMD’s
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 30, 2017.

AMD RYZEN 2018
Desktop Processor Update

▪
▪
▪
▪

▪
▪
▪

▪
▪
▪
▪
1T 2T 3T 4T 5T 6T 7T 8T 9T 10T 11T 12T 13T 14T 15T 16T

▪
▪
▪
1T 2T 3T 4T 5T 6T 7T 8T 9T 10T 11T 12T 13T 14T 15T 16T

⁰ ⁰ ⁰

-1%
+75%
+16%
+18%
+38%
FILE ENCYRPTION
MEDIA ENCODING
CONTENT CREATIONBLOCKCHAIN MINING
(CryptoNight Performance only)
+24%
FILE COMPRESSION
GAMING (1440P)

-1%
+134%
+29%
+16%
+50%
FILE ENCYRPTION
MEDIA ENCODING
CONTENT CREATIONBLOCKCHAIN MINING
(CryptoNight Performance only)
+20%
FILE COMPRESSION
GAMING (1440P)

°

▪
▪
▪
▪
▪
▪
▪
▪
▪
▪
▪

RYZEN DESKTOP 2000 SERIES PROCESSOR
RYZEN DESKTOP 1000 SERIES PROCESSOR

▪
▪
▪
▪
▪
▪
▪
▪
▪

RYZEN™ DESKTOP APU
DISCRETE-CLASS
GRAPHICS ON BOARD
65W TDP 65W TDP 65W/30W TDP
See endnotes

*

▪ “Processor for ultrathin notebooks” defined as 15W nominal processor TDP. Based on testing of the AMD Ryzen™ 7 2700U, AMD Ryzen™ 5 2500U, and Core i7-8550U mobile processors as of 10/6/2017 Performance based on
Cinebench R15 nT and 3DMark® TimeSpy in order of AMD 2700U, AMD 2500U and Intel 8550U. Cinebench R15 nT results: 660.5, 606.5, 498.2; 3DMark TimeSpy results: 978, 865, 350. 50:50 CPU:GPU weighted relative performance with i7
baseline: Intel i7-8650U = (498.2/498.2*.5) + (350/350*.5) = 100%; AMD Ryzen 5 2500U = (606.5/498.2*.5) + (865/350*.5) = 184%; AMD Ryzen 7 2700U = (660.5/498.2*.5) + (978/350*.5) = 206%. RVM-26
▪ Testing by AMD Performance labs as of 12/08/2017 for the Ryzen 5 2400G, and 09/04/2015 for the Core i7-5775c on the following systems. PC manufacturers may vary configurations yielding different results. Results may vary based
on driver versions used. System Configs: All systems equipped with Samsung 850 PRO 512GB SSD, Windows 10 RS2 operating system. Socket AM4 System: Ryzen 5 2400G processor, 16B (2 x 8GB) DDR4-2667 RAM, Graphics Driver
1710181048-17.40-171018a-319170E 23.20.768.0 :: 12/08/2017. Socket LGA1150 System: Core i7-5775c processor, 8GB (2x4GB) DDR3-1867 MHz RAM, graphics driver 10.18.15.4256:: 09/04/2015. 3DMark 11 Performance benchmark used
to represent graphics power. The following processors achieved the following scores in 3DMark 11 ‘performance’ benchmark v1.0.132.0: The Ryzen 5 2400G: 5042. Also in v1.0.132.0, .The Core i7-5775c, the Intel desktop processor with the
highest Intel desktop graphics performance, achieved 3094. RZG-01
▪ Testing by AMD Performance labs as of 01/05/2018 on the following system. PC manufacturers may vary configurations yielding different results. Results may vary based on driver versions used. System Configs: 16GB DDR4-3200,
Samsung 950 PRO SSD, Windows 10 RS2. Socket AM4 System: AMD Ryzen 5 2400G ($169 USD SEP, 65W TDP), Turpan motherboard. Graphics driver 23.20.768.0 (17.40):: 01/05/2018 . Socket LGA1155 System: Core i5-8400 ($199 on Newegg
as of Jan 5, 2018, 65W TDP), Z370 Aorus Gaming-5 motherboard, graphics driver 23.20.16.4849.(with GeForce GTX 1030 ($89 on Newegg as of Jan 5, 2018, 30W TDP) – graphics driver 23.20.16.4901) :: 01/05/2018.The Ryzen 5 2400G (with
Radeon graphics) achieved 1231 in 3DMark Time Spy, and 3276 in 3DMark Fire Strike. The Core i5 8400 (using integrated graphics) achieved 419 in 3DMark Time Spy, and 1118 in 3DMark Fire Strike. The Core i5 8400 (using GeForce GTX
1030 graphics) achieved 1234 in 3DMark Time Spy, and 3349 in 3DMark Fire Strike. RZG-11
▪ The launch price of the 8-core Core i7-5960X was $999; the launch price of the 8-core Core i7-6900K was $1089.00; the launch price of the 8-core Core i7-7820X is $599. The launch price of the 10-core Core i7-6950X was $1723.00;
the launch price of the 10-Core i9-7900X is $999. RZN-71
▪ Over period 3/1/17 – 10/9/17 in int’l survey covering etailers in UK, USA, Ger., Can., and Fr. More details. (This should be used for smaller banners with the larger footnote below in close proximity.) Average over period 1 March to
9 October 2017. International survey covering UK, USA, Germany, Canada, and France. Etailers selling either or both families of processors in a box amazon-de, amazon-uk, amazon-us, bestbuy-us, ebuyer-uk, ldlc-fr, materielnet-fr,
microcenter-us, mindfactory-de, ncix-us, newegg-ca, newegg-us, pcworld-ukstaples-us, walmart-us. AMD Ryzen processor family: Ryzen 7 1800X, Ryzen 7 1700X, Ryzen 7 1700, Ryzen 5 1500X, Ryzen 5 1600, Ryzen 5 1400, Ryzen 5 1600X,
Ryzen 3 1300X, Ryzen 3 1200, Threadripper 1950X, Threadripper 1920X, Threadripper 1900X. Comparable Intel processor family: i7-7700K, i5-7600, i7-6850K, i5-7500, i5-7600K, i7-7700, i5-7400, i7-5820K, i3-7100, i7-6800K, i3-7300, i7-6950X,
i3-7350K, i7-6900K, i7-5930K, i5-7600T, i7-7700T, i7-7820X, i7-7800X, I9-7900X, i3-7320, i7-7740X, i5-7640X, I9-7920X. Excludes Ryzen mobile processors. “Processor for ultrathin notebooks” defined as 15W nominal processor TDP. Based on
testing of the AMD Ryzen™ 7 2700U, AMD Ryzen™ 5 2500U, and Core i7-8550U mobile processors as of 10/6/2017 Performance based on Cinebench R15 nT and 3DMark® TimeSpy in order of AMD 2700U, AMD 2500U and Intel 8550U.
Cinebench R15 nT results: 660.5, 606.5, 498.2; 3DMark TimeSpy results: 978, 865, 350. 50:50 CPU:GPU weighted relative performance with i7 baseline: Intel i7-8650U = (498.2/498.2*.5) + (350/350*.5) = 100%; AMD Ryzen 5 2500U =
(606.5/498.2*.5) + (865/350*.5) = 184%; AMD Ryzen 7 2700U = (660.5/498.2*.5) + (978/350*.5) = 206%. RZN-102
▪ RZ2-1: Testing by AMD Performance labs as of 3/02/2018 on the following system. PC manufacturers may vary configurations yielding different results. Results may vary based on driver versions used. AMD System Config: AMD Ryzen 7
2700X, ‘Turpan’ reference motherboard, 16GB of dual-channel DDR3-3200, GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Graphics Card, Graphics driver 390.77, and a Samsung 850 PRO 512GB SSD using the Windows 10 RS3 operating system. Intel System Config:
Intel Core i7-8700K, Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming5 motherboard, 16GB of dual-channel DDR3-3200, GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Graphics Card, Graphics driver 390.77, and a Samsung 850 PRO 512GB SSD using the Windows 10 RS3 operating
system. Multiprocessing performance represented by Cinebench R15 nT multiprocessing performance. Mainstream desktop platform means Socket AM4 for AMD platforms and LGA 1151 for Intel platforms. he Ryzen 7 2700X (AMD’s highest
performing mainstream desktop processor) achieved a score of 1837 (1837/1397=up to 36% faster than the Core i7-8700K), while the Core i7-8700K (Intel’s highest performing mainstream desktop processor) achieved a score of 1397
(1397/1837= up to 76% as fast, or up to 24% slower than the Ryzen 7 2700X). RZ2-1
FOOTNOTES (RVM-26 | RZG-01,11 | RZN-71,102 | RZ2-4)

RZ2-2: Testing by AMD Performance labs as of 3/02/2018 on the following system. PC manufacturers may vary configurations yielding different results. Results may vary based on driver versions used. AMD System Config: AMD Ryzen 7 2700X, ‘Turpan’ reference motherboard,
16GB of dual-channel DDR3-3200, GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Graphics Card, Graphics driver 390.77, and a Samsung 850 PRO 512GB SSD using the Windows 10 RS3 operating system. Intel System Config: Intel Core i7-8700K, Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming5 motherboard, 16GB of
dual-channel DDR3-3200, GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Graphics Card, Graphics driver 390.77, and a Samsung 850 PRO 512GB SSD using the Windows 10 RS3 operating system. Multiprocessing performance represented by Cinebench R15 nT multiprocessing performance. Processor
class is defined here by competing price points between MSRP $380 and $220 USD. Suggested pricing found at ark.intel.com and amd.com. The Ryzen 7 2700X achieved a score of 1807 (1807/1405= up to 29% faster than the Core i7-8700K), while the Core i7-8700K (MSRP
$370) achieved a score of 1405 (1405/1807= up to 78% as fast, or up to 22% slower than the Ryzen 7 2700X). The Ryzen 7 2700 (MSRP $299) achieved a score of 1569 (1569/1392=up to 12% faster than the Core i7-8700), while the Core i7-8700 (MSRP $370) achieved a score of
1392 (1392/1569= up to 89% as fast, or up to 11% slower than the Ryzen 7 2700). The Ryzen 5 2600X (MSRP $249) achieved a score of 1380 (1380/1029= up to 34% faster than the Core i5-8600K), while the Core i5-8600K (MSRP $258) achieved a score of 1029 (1029/1380= up to
75% as fast, or up to 25% slower than the Ryzen 5 2600X). The Ryzen 5 2600 (MSRP $249) achieved a score of 1297 (1297/1024= up to 26% faster than the Core i5-8600), while the Core i5-8600 (MSRP $258) achieved a score of 1026 (1024/1297= up to 79% as fast, or up to 21%
slower than the Ryzen 5 2600). RZ2-2
As measured by AMD Performance Labs on 03/12/2018. Application Scores (AMD Ryzen 7 2700X vs. Intel Core i7-8700K): Cinebench R15 (“3D Rendering”): 1846 v. 1396 (1846/1396=132%, or) 32% faster; Blender 2.79 (“3D rendering”): 22.06 seconds vs. 26.6 seconds
(22.06/26.6=83% as much time to render, or) 17% faster; Handbrake 1.0.7 (“video encoding”): 497 seconds vs. 604 seconds (497/604=82% as much time to render, or) 18% faster; TrueCrypt 1GB AES (“file encryption”): 11.1 vs. 8 (11.1/8=138% as fast, or) or 38% faster; POVRay
3.7 nT (“raytracing”), 3768 vs. 2959 (3768/2959=127% as fast, or) or 27% faster; Nicehash miner (“Blockchain Mining”), 532 H/s vs. 304 H/s (532/304=1.75% as fast, or) 75% faster; 7-Zip (“File Compression”), 46195 MIPS vs 39779 MIPS (46195/39779=116% as fast, or) 16%
faster. Average of all “content creation” percentages (Cinebench, Blender, Handbrake, POVRay=32%, 17%, 18%, 27%): 24% higher performance for AMD Ryzen™ 7 2700X. Test configuration: Reference Motherboard + AMD Ryzen™ 7 2700X, Gigabyte AORUS Z370 + Core i7-
8700K, GeForce GTX 1080 (driver 390.77), 2x8 GB DDR4-3200 (14-14-14-36), Windows 140 x64 Pro (RS3), Samsung 850 Pro SSD. Performance may vary with different drivers and system configurations. RZ2-4
As measured by AMD Performance Labs on 03/12/2018. Application Scores (AMD Ryzen 5 2600X vs. Intel Core i5-8600K): Cinebench R15 (“3D Rendering”): 1373 v. 1020 (1373/1020=134%, or) or 34% faster; Blender 2.79 (“3D rendering”): 29.40 seconds vs. 35.28 seconds
(29.4/35.28=83% as much time to render, or) or 17% faster; Handbrake 1.0.7 (“video encoding”): 662 seconds vs. 785 seconds (662/785=84% as much time to render, or) 16% faster; TrueCrypt 1GB AES (“file encryption”): 8.3 vs. 5.5 (8.3/5.5=150% as fast, or) 50% faster; POVRay
3.7 nT (“raytracing”): 2799 vs. 2506 (2799/2506=112% as fast, or) 12% faster; Nicehash miner (“Blockchain Mining”), 475 H/s vs. 200 H/s (475/200=2.34% as fast, or) 134% faster; 7-Zip (“File Compression”), 36374 MIPS vs 28142 MIPS (36374/28142=129% as fast, or) 29% faster.
Average of all “content creation” percentages (Cinebench, Blender, Handbrake, POVRay=34%,17%,16%,12%): 20% higher performance for AMD Ryzen™ 5 2600X. Test configuration: Reference Motherboard + AMD Ryzen™ 5 2600X, Gigabyte AORUS Z370 + Core i5-8600K,
GeForce GTX 1080 (driver 390.77), 2x8 GB DDR4-3200 (14-14-14-36), Windows 10 x64 Pro (RS3), Samsung 850 Pro SSD. Performance may vary with different drivers and system configurations. RZ2-5
As measured by AMD Performance Labs on 03/12/2018. All games tested at 1920x1080 resolution with the highest built-in image quality preset. Results ordered in AMD vs. Intel (Relative%): Grand Theft Auto™ V: 70 vs. 72 (-3%); Metro: Last Light™ Redux: 85 vs. 92 (-
8%); Ashes of the Singularity™: 58 vs. 59 (-1%); Deus Ex: Mankind Divided™: 79 vs. 79 (Tie); Sid Meier's Civilization® VI: 98 vs. 105 (-8%); F1® 2017: 119 vs. 130 (-9%); Middle-earth™: Shadow of War™: 99 vs. 101 (-2%); HITMAN® (2016): 89 vs. 90 (-2%); Overwatch™: 110 vs. 123 (-
10%); The Witcher™ 3: 79 vs. 83 (-5%); Tom Clancy's The Division™: 110 vs. 106 (+4%); Rise of the Tomb Raider™: 73 vs. 72 (+1%); Average of all percentages: -5%. Test configuration: Reference Motherboard + AMD Ryzen™ 7 2700X, Gigabyte AORUS Z370 + Core i7-8700K,
As measured by AMD Performance Labs on 03/12/2018. All games tested at 1920x1080 resolution with the highest built-in image quality preset. Results ordered in AMD vs. Intel (Relative%): Grand Theft Auto™ V: 70 vs. 74 (-6%); Metro: Last Light™ Redux: 86 vs. 89 (-
3%); Ashes of the Singularity™: 59 vs. 60 (-2%); Deus Ex: Mankind Divided™: 79 vs. 79 (Tie); Sid Meier's Civilization® VI: 95 vs. 110 (-13%); F1® 2017: 118 vs. 131 (-10%); Middle-earth™: Shadow of War™: 99 vs. 101 (-2%); HITMAN® (2016): 88 vs. 90 (-2%); Overwatch™: 111 vs.
110 (+1%); The Witcher™ 3: 80 vs. 92 (-13%); Tom Clancy's The Division™: 110 vs. 108 (+2%); Rise of the Tomb Raider™: 73 vs.74 (-2%); Average of all percentages: -6%. Test configuration: Reference Motherboard + AMD Ryzen™ 5 2600X, Gigabyte AORUS Z370 + Core i7-8700K,
As measured by AMD Performance Labs on 03/14/2018. All games tested at 2560x1440 resolution with the in-game “High” image quality presets. Results ordered in AMD vs. Intel (Relative%): Grand Theft Auto™ V: 98 vs. 104 (-5%); Metro: Last Light™ Redux: 161 vs. 142
(+13%); Ashes of the Singularity™: 87 vs. 89 (-2%); Deus Ex: Mankind Divided™: 72 vs. 72 (Tie); Sid Meier's Civilization® VI: 89 vs. 98 (-9%); F1® 2017: 127 vs. 137 (-7%); Middle-earth™: Shadow of War™: 84 vs. 85 (-1%); HITMAN® (2016): 89 vs. 90 (-2%); Overwatch™: 130 vs. 134
(-3%); The Witcher™ 3: 83 vs. 85 (-2%); Tom Clancy's The Division™: 95.5 vs. 95 (Tie); Rise of the Tomb Raider™: 113 vs. 113 (Tie); Average of all percentages: -1%. Test configuration: Reference Motherboard + AMD Ryzen™ 7 2700X, Gigabyte AORUS Z370 + Core i7-8700K,
As measured by AMD Performance Labs on 03/14/2018. All games tested at 2560x1440 resolution with the in-game “High” image quality presets. Results ordered in AMD vs. Intel (Relative%): Grand Theft Auto™ V: 98 vs. 104 (-5%); Metro: Last Light™ Redux: 161 vs. 141
(+14%); Ashes of the Singularity™: 89 vs. 90 (-2%); Deus Ex: Mankind Divided™: 72 vs. 72 (Tie); Sid Meier's Civilization® VI: 93 vs. 102 (-9%); F1® 2017: 138 vs. 140 (-1%); Middle-earth™: Shadow of War™: 86 vs. 86 (Tie); HITMAN® (2016): 88 vs. 90 (-2%); Overwatch™: 130 vs. 136
(-4%); The Witcher™ 3: 84 vs. 86 (-1%); Tom Clancy's The Division™: 94 vs. 96 (-2%); Rise of the Tomb Raider™: 113 vs. 115 (-2%); Average of all percentages: -1%. Test configuration: Reference Motherboard + AMD Ryzen™ 5 2600X, Gigabyte AORUS Z370 + Core i5-8600K,
FOOTNOTES (RZ2-2 through RZ2-9)

▪
As measured by AMD Performance Labs on 03/14/2018. PCMark® 10 (Standard) results presented in order of AMD Ryzen™ 7 2700X vs. Core i7-8700K (relative%) and AMD Ryzen™ 5 2600X vs. Core i5-8600K
(relative%): 6673 vs. 6807 (-2%) and 7976 vs. 8058. (-1%). Test configuration(s): Reference Motherboard + AMD Ryzen™ 7 2700X, AMD Reference Motherboard + AMD Ryzen™ 5 2600X, Gigabyte AORUS Z370 + Core
i7-8700K, Gigabyte AORUS Z370 + Core i5-8600K, GeForce GTX 1080 (driver 390.77), 2x8 GB DDR4-3200 (14-14-14-36), Windows 10 x64 Pro (RS3), Samsung 850 Pro SSD. Performance may vary with different drivers
and system configurations. RZ2-10
▪
As measured by AMD Performance Labs on 03/14/2018. 3DMark® Time Spy results presented in order of AMD Ryzen™ 7 2700X vs. Core i7-8700K (relative%) and AMD Ryzen™ 5 2600X vs. Core i5-8600K (relative%):
7901 vs. 7619 (+3.7%) and 7432 vs. 7329. (+1.4%). Test configuration(s): Reference Motherboard + AMD Ryzen™ 7 2700X, AMD Reference Motherboard + AMD Ryzen™ 5 2600X, Gigabyte AORUS Z370 + Core i7-
8700K, Gigabyte AORUS Z370 + Core i5-8600K, GeForce GTX 1080 (driver 390.77), 2x8 GB DDR4-3200 (14-14-14-36), Windows 10 x64 Pro (RS3), Samsung 850 Pro SSD. Performance may vary with different drivers
and system configurations. RZ2-11
▪
As measured by AMD Performance Labs with Cinebench R15 nT test as of 3/22/2018. Results for 95W cooler in 32C ambient thermal chamber (baseline): 1701. Results for AMD Wraith Prism cooler in 32C ambient
thermal chamber: 1770 (+4% over baseline). Results for Noctua NH-D15S cooler in 20C ambient room: 1816 (6.7% over baseline). System configuration: AMD Reference Motherboard + AMD Ryzen™ 7 2700X, 2x8GB
DDR4-3200 (16-16-16-36), Samsung 850 Pro SSD, GeForce GTX 1080 (driver 390.77), Windows® 10 Pro RS3. Results may vary by system configuration and drivers used. RZ2-12
▪
As measured by AMD Performance Labs with the Iometer throughput storage test on 3/22/2018. 1MB Read performance of a 7200 RPM Western Digital Black HDD: 139 MBps. 1MB Read performance of a Samsung
850 Pro: 553 MBps. 1MB Read performance of an AMD StoreMI configuration that fuses the aforementioned HDD and SSD into a single virtual storage device: 553 MBps. System configuration: AMD Reference
Motherboard + AMD Ryzen™ 7 2700X, 2x8GB DDR4-3200 (16-16-16-36), 128GB Samsung 850 Pro SSD, 1TB Western Digital Black HDD, GeForce GTX 1080 (driver 390.77), Windows® 10 Pro RS3, AMD StoreMI
Technology beta. Results may vary by system configuration and driver version. RZ2-13
▪
As tested by AMD Performance Labs in the World of Warcraft® application on 3/22/2018. Test procedure: character selection screen to playable input in the Stormshield zone (Warlords of Draenor expansion).
Storage Comparison: HDD vs. AMD StoreMI technology with HDD+NVMe SSD+2GB RAM in a fused virtual drive. Load time(s): 41.37 seconds for HDD, 14.74 seconds for StoreMI configuration (280%/2.8X faster).
System configuration: AMD Reference Motherboard + AMD Ryzen™ 7 2700X, 2x8GB DDR4-3200 (16-16-16-36), 512GB Samsung 960 Pro NVMe SSD, 1TB Western Digital Black HDD, GeForce GTX 1080 (driver 390.77),
Windows® 10 Pro RS3, AMD StoreMI Technology beta. Results may vary by system configuration. RZ2-14
▪
As tested by AMD Performance labs with the PCMark® 10 application launch sub-test on 3/22/2018. Scores presented in order of HDD vs. AMD StoreMI with HDD+NVMe SSD+RAM (uplift%). Chrome: 4.232 vs. 0.432
(980%/9.8X faster); Writer: 12.06 vs. 1.729 (697%/6.97X faster); GIMP: 5.73 vs. 2.383 (240%/2.4X faster); Firefox: 4.27 vs. 1.19 (359%/3.59X faster). Average of all results: 458%/4.58X faster for AMD StoreMI. System
configuration: AMD Reference Motherboard + AMD Ryzen™ 7 2700X, 2x8GB DDR4-3200 (16-16-16-36), 512GB Samsung 960 Pro NVMe SSD, 1TB Western Digital Black HDD, GeForce GTX 1080 (driver 390.77),
Windows® 10 Pro RS3, AMD StoreMI Technology beta . Results may vary by system configuration. RZ2-15

As tested by AMD Performance Labs with the Iometer storage performance test as of 3/22/2018. 1MB read results: HDD (Baseline): 139MBps; SATA SSD: 553 (3.9X faster); StoreMI HDD+SATA SSD: 553MBps (3.9X faster); StoreMI
HDD+NVMe SSD+RAM: 1795MBps (12.9X faster). 1MB write results: HDD (Baseline): 97.97MBps; SATA SSD: 536MBps (3.8X faster); StoreMI HDD+SATA SSD: 536MBps (3.8X faster); StoreMI HDD+NVMe SSD+RAM: 1753MBps (12.6X
faster). System configuration: AMD Reference Motherboard + AMD Ryzen™ 7 2700X, 2x8GB DDR4-3200 (16-16-16-36), 128GB Samsung 850 SATA SSD, 512GB Samsung 960 Pro NVMe SSD, 1TB Western Digital Black HDD, GeForce GTX
1080 (driver 390.77), Windows® 10 Pro RS3, AMD StoreMI Technology beta . Results may vary by system configuration and driver version. RZ2-16
As measured on 3/22/2018 by AMD Performance Labs with Cinebench R15 1T at a fixed 3.725GHz clockspeed. AMD Ryzen™ 7 1800X score (baseline): 151.98. AMD Ryzen™ 7 2700X score: 156.09 (+2.7%). System configuration:
AMD Reference Motherboard + AMD Ryzen™ 7 2700X, 2x8GB DDR4-3200 (16-16-16-36), Samsung 850 Pro SSD, GeForce GTX 1080 (driver 390.77), Windows® 10 Pro RS3. Results may vary by system configuration and driver version. RZ2-
17
As measured on 3/22/2018 by AMD Performance Labs using Cinebench R15 1T (“single-thread”) and Cinebench R15 nT (“multithread”) on the AMD Ryzen 7 1800X and 2700X. 1800X vs. 2700X in 1T: 160 vs. 180 (+12.5%). 1800X vs.
2700X in nT: 1629 vs. 1847 (+13.4%). System configuration: AMD Reference Motherboard + AMD Ryzen™ 7 1800X and 2700X, 2x8GB DDR4-3200 (16-16-16-36), Samsung 850 Pro SSD, GeForce GTX 1080 (driver 390.77), Windows® 10 Pro
RS3. Results may vary by system configuration and driver version. RZ2-18
As measured on 3/27/2018 by AMD Performance Labs using Cinebench R15 nT at a fixed 3.5GHz clockspeed. Score and Power for AMD Ryzen 5 1600X: 1182 at 117W of system power (10.10 perf/W). Score and Power for AMD
Ryzen 5 2600X: 1208 at 104W of system power (11.62 perf/W). Relative power consumption improvement for 1600X 117W v. 2600X 104W = 11% less power. 1600X 10.10 perf/W vs. 2600X 11.62 perf/W = 13% greater perf/W. System
configuration: AMD Reference Motherboard + AMD Ryzen™ 7 1800X and 2700X, 2x8GB DDR4-3200 (16-16-16-36), Samsung 850 Pro SSD, GeForce GTX 1080 (driver 390.77), Windows® 10 Pro RS3. Results may vary by system configuration
and driver version. RZ2-19
As measured on 3/25/2018 by AMD Performance Labs using Cinebench R15 nT. Performance for the AMD Ryzen 7 1700 (65W TDP): 1355. Performance for the AMD Ryzen 7 2700 (65W TDP): 1576 (16.3% greater). System
configuration: AMD Reference Motherboard + AMD Ryzen™ 7 1700 and 2700, 2x8GB DDR4-3200 (16-16-16-36), Samsung 850 Pro SSD, GeForce GTX 1080 (driver 390.77), Windows® 10 Pro RS3. Results may vary by system configuration
and driver version. RZ2-20.
RZ2-21: Testing by AMD as of 3/20/2018. All values based on AMD Ryzen™ 7 1800X vs. AMD Ryzen™ 7 2700X as measured by AIDA64 in standard out-of-box operation. AMD Ryzen™ 7 1800X vs. 2700X: L3 cache latency (~11ns vs. ~9.2ns,
which is (11-9.2)/11 or ~16%), L2 Cache Latency (~3ns vs. 4.6ns, which is (4.6-3)/4.6 or ~34%), L1 Cache Latency (~1.1ns vs. ~0.95ns, which is (1.1-0.95)1.1 or ~13%), Memory Latency (~74ns vs. ~66ns @ 3200 MT/s, which is (74-66)/74 or
~11%). System Configuration: AMD Ryzen™ 7 2700X and AMD Ryzen 7 1800X, common platform: Gigabyte GA-AX370 Gaming5, 2 x 8 GB DDR4-3200 (16-16-16-36-1T), Geforce GTX 1080 graphics, driver 388.71, Windows 10 x64. Different
configurations and drivers may yield different results. RZ2-21
RZ2-22: Testing by AMD Performance labs as of 03/30/2018. PC manufacturers may vary configurations yielding different results. Results may vary based on driver versions used. Test configuration: Reference Motherboard + AMD Ryzen™
7 2700X, GeForce GTX 1080 (driver 390.77), 2x8GB DDR4-3200 (14-14-14-36), Windows 10 x64 Pro (RS3), Samsung 850 Pro SSD, AMD Wraith Prism cooler. Results may vary with application and system configuration. Based on the
Windows “OCCT” application which checks stability. 1T frequency: 4.285GHz; 2T frequency: 4.255181818 GHz; 3T frequency: 4.219908602 GHz; 4T frequency: 4.208328261 GHz; 5T frequency: 4.110437158 GHz; 6T frequency: 4.098858491
GHz; 7T frequency: 4.089337017 GHz; 8T frequency: 4.092879121 GHz; 9T frequency : 4.086346154 GHz; 10T frequency: 4.07599005 GHz; 11T frequency: 4.040813187 GHz; 12T frequency: 4.038722222 GHz; 13T frequency:
4.014054645 GHz; 14T frequency: 4.00978125 GHz; 15T frequency : 4.017430168 GHz; 16T frequency: 4.013950276 GHz. RZ2-22
RZ2-30: Based on AMD internal specifications, engineering data, and testing by AMD performance labs as of 04/17/2018. Top max boost clock of the fastest 2nd Gen Ryzen processor, the Ryzen 7 2700X, is 4.35 GHz. Top max boost clock
of the fastest 1st Gen Ryzen processor, the Ryzen 7 1800X, is 4.1GHz. This means the fastest clockspeeds on 2nd Gen Ryzen processors, built on the 12nm process, have raised by ~250 MHz. AMD Lab testing demonstrates the maximum
all-core overclock on Ryzen 2 processors can achieve 4.2 GHz. Processor testing on 2nd Gen Ryzen processors vs. 1st Gen Ryzen processors demonstrates a ~50mV vcore reduction for 2nd Gen Ryzen processors at specific clock-to-clock
comparisons. Test configuration: AMD Reference Motherboard + Ryzen™ 7 2700X, GeForce GTX 1080 (driver 390.77), 2x8 GB DDR4-3200 (14-14-14-36), Windows 10 x64 Pro (RS3), Samsung 850 Pro SSD. Performance may vary with
different drivers and system configurations. RZ2-30

DISCLAIMER AND ATTRIBUTIONS
DISCLAIMER
The information contained herein is for informational purposes only, and is subject to change without notice. While every precaution has been taken in the preparation of this
document, it may contain technical inaccuracies, omissions and typographical errors, and AMD is under no obligation to update or otherwise correct this information. Advanced Micro
Devices, Inc. makes no representations or warranties with respect to the accuracy or completeness of the contents of this document, and assumes no liability of any kind, including the
implied warranties of noninfringement, merchantability or fitness for particular purposes, with respect to the operation or use of AMD hardware, software or other products described
herein. No license, including implied or arising by estoppel, to any intellectual property rights is granted by this document. Terms and limitations applicable to the purchase or use of
AMD’s products are as set forth in a signed agreement between the parties or in AMD's Standard Terms and Conditions of Sale. GD-18
©2018 Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. All rights reserved. AMD, the AMD Arrow logo, Ryzen, Radeon and combinations thereof are trademarks of Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 3DMark
and PCMark are registered trademarks of Futuremark Corporation in the United States and other jurisdictions. GLOBALFOUNDRIES® and the GLOBALFOUNDRIES logo and sphere design
are trademarks and/or service marks of GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. in the United States and/or other jurisdictions. DirectX® is a registered trademark of Microsoft Corporation in the United
States in other jurisdictions. Other product names used in this publication are for identification purposes only and may be trademarks of their respective companies.

AMD Latam Press Tour Buenos Aires Mayo 2018

AMD Latam Press Tour Buenos Aires Mayo 2018

Recomendados

Recomendados

Mais conteúdo relacionado

Semelhante a AMD Latam Press Tour Buenos Aires Mayo 2018

Semelhante a AMD Latam Press Tour Buenos Aires Mayo 2018 (20)

Mais de ITSitio.com

Mais de ITSitio.com (20)

Último

Último (20)

AMD Latam Press Tour Buenos Aires Mayo 2018