On 23 October 2013, the OECD launched the "Science, Technology and Industry (STI) Scoreboard: Innovation for Growth 2013" at its headquarters in Paris. The 260 indicators in the STI Scoreboard 2013 show how OECD and partner economies are performing in a wide range of areas to help governments design more effective and efficient policies and monitor progress towards their desired goals.

1. Science, Technology, Industry Scoreboard 2013
INNOVATION FOR GROWTH
www.oecd.org/sti/scoreboard

2. Cc
The value of the STI Scoreboard






Wide-ranging resource book of indicator
To inform policy making
Broad scope – includes BRIICS
New, experimental indicators
Web book
Additional data and visualisation online

3. StatLinks and More data

4. StatLinks and More data

5. STI Scoreboard 2013
Knowledge economies – trends and features
Building knowledge
Connecting to knowledge
Targeting new growth areas
Unleashing innovation in firms
Competing in the knowledge economy
Participating in the global economy

6. Today, with an uneven
pace of recovery across
the OECD, unemployment
remains the most pressing
challenge

7. Where people lost their jobs, 2008-11
Relative contribution to change in total employment by major sectors of economic activity
Mining, manufacturing and utilities
Public administration, education, health and other services
Agriculture, forestry and fishing
Information and communication
%
125
Construction
Finance, insurance and real estate activities
Professional, scientific, technical and other business services
558
295
110
212
491
Wholesale, retail, hotels, food services and transport
448
1,025
4,679
2,222
100
75
Gains, thousands
50
25
0
-25
-50
-75
Losses, thousands
-100
-6,453
-1,707
-627
-384
-766
-153
-125
Source: OECD Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard 2013.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/888932889440
-209
-13,805
-6,581

8. Job losses in Europe 2011-12
Relative contribution to change in total employment by major sectors of economic activity
Professional, scientific, technical and other business services
Finance, insurance and real estate activities
0
Information and communication
Agriculture, forestry and fishing
%
125
Wholesale, retail, hotels, food services and transport
Public administration, education, health and other services
Construction
0
3
9
8
422
Mining, manufacturing and utilities
534
44
51
57
455
100
75
Gains, thousands
50
25
0
-25
-50
-75
Losses, thousands
-100
-371
-206
-790
-20
-16
-1313
-177
-125
Source: OECD Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard 2013.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/888932889440
-11
-4
-2
0

9. … and the challenge
affects all

10. Demand in one country sustains jobs
in another
Jobs in the business sector sustained by foreign final demand, 1995 and 2008
As a percentage of total business sector employment
%
2008
1995
40
30
20
10
0
Source: OECD Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard 2013.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/888932904469

11. and European demand is critical to
European jobs
Jobs sustained by foreign final demand, by region of demand, 2008
As a percentage of total jobs embodied in foreign final demand
Source: OECD Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard 2013.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/888932904507

12. Young, dynamic firms
create more jobs than
destroy, even during crisis
periods …

13. Net job growth,
younger versus older firms, 2001-11
Average over 15 countries
Young firms (5 years or or less)
Old firms (6 years oldold more)
Youngfirms (6 years old or more)
Old firms (5 years old or less)
Total
%
,6
,4
,2
,0
-,2
-,4
-,6
2001-02
2002-03
2003-04
2004-05
2005-06
2006-07
2007-08
Source: OECD Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard 2013.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/888932889383
2008-09
2009-10
2010-11

14. Net job growth,
younger versus older firms, 2001-11
Average over 15 countries
%
Employment
Job destruction
Job creation
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
Small young
Small old
Medium young
Medium old
Source: OECD Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard 2013.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/888932889402
Large young
Large old

15. Patenting activity of young firms by
sector, 2009-11
Share of young patenting firms and share of patents filed by young patenting firms
High and medium-high-technology manufactures
Low and medium-low-technology manufactures
%
50
Business-sector services, excluding real estate
Other sectors
Share of patents filed by young firms
1
2
2
1
1
2
7
5
3
3
2
2
5
2
3
18
40
Average number of patents filed by firms
under 5 years old, 2009-11
30
20
10
0
Source: OECD Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard 2013.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/888932893525

16. Well-designed incentives
matter for younger and
smaller innovative firms

17. Direct funding of business R&D and R&D
tax incentives, 2011
As a percentage of GDP, 2011
Source: OECD Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard 2013.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/888932891112

18. Implied tax subsidy on R&D
expenditures, 2013
Source: OECD Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard 2013.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/888932891150

19. Implied tax subsidy on R&D
expenditures, 2013
Source: OECD Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard 2013.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/888932891150

20. Researchers on the move:
brain circulation results in
in higher scientific impact

21. The 9 largest bilateral flows involve the US
International flows of scientific authors, 1996-2011
Selected bilateral flows, by first and last affiliation
Total bilateral flows
(x + y)
Pairs, ordered by net flow direction
%
Bilateral flows
25000
20000
15000
For DEU↔CHE, the
lozenge shows that
CHE gains 31% of
total bilateral flows.
10000
70
60
50
40
30
20
5000
0
Source: OECD Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard 2013.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/888932891511
10
0

22. Mobility patterns vary across economies
International mobility of scientific authors, 1996-2011
As a percentage of authors with two or more publications, by last reported affiliation
New inflows
Returnees
%
40
100
30
20
10
0
Source: OECD Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard 2013.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/888932891530
Stayers

23. What is the impact of mobility?
Impact of scientific authors, by category of mobility, 1996-2011
Based on the median source-normalized impact per paper (SNIP)
Stayers
Returnees
New inflows
Impact factor
1.4
1.3
1.2
1.1
1.0
Source: OECD Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard 2013.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/888932891549
Outflows

24. The impact of internationally mobile
scientists, inflows versus outflows, 1996-2011
Based on citation impact and changes in the affiliation of scientific authors
Median impact of outflows
1.30
NLD
1 000
10 000
ITA
70 000
CAN
DEU
DNK
SWE
FIN
1.20
FRA
AUT
GRC
KOR
BEL
NOR
USA
GBR
AUS
SGP
HKG
NZL
ARG
ESP
CHL
TWN
1.10
CHN
POL
IND
JPN
TUR
ZAF
PRT
MEX
BRA
CZE
RUS: Inflows
impact= 0.71
1.00
0.90
1.00
http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/888932890333
1.10
1.20
1.30
Median impact of inflows
Source: OECD Science, Technology and Industry
Scoreboard 2013.
CHE
Average flows, inflows plus
outflows , of scientific authors

25. Whole counts of
internationally
co-authored
documents,
2003-2011
http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/888932890314
Source: OECD Science, Technology and Industry
Scoreboard 2013.
The impact of scientific production and the
extent of international scientific collaboration

26. Innovation at the
technology frontier
requires being “near” to
science and exploit the
cross-fertilisation of
different technology areas

27. Technologies drawing on science
Patents citing non-patent literature (NPL), selected technologies,
1997-2002 and 2007-12
Share of citations to NPL in backward citations, average
Source: OECD Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard 2013.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/888932891701

28. Technology burst in 2000s
Phone and wireless communication
Patents in selected IPC4-digits,
Share in total PCT filings and burst period
%
,1.0
,0.8
,0.6
,0.4
,0.2
,0.0
%
,2.0
H04Q: SELECTING APPARATUS OR ARRANGEMENTS
155 PCT filings
H04M: TELEPHONIC COMMUNICATION
,1.5
,1.0
869 PCT filings
,0.5
,0.0
%
,5.0
,4.0
,3.0
,2.0
,1.0
,0.0
H04W: WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
Source: OECD, calculations based on PATSTAT, EPO, April 2013.
6433 PCT filings

29. Technology burst in 2000s
Co-development of the top 40 technologies
H05B
H04W
H04Q
2006-11
Digital data
acquisition, processing
and transmission
Energy storage and
distribution for electric
and hybrid vehicles
1996-2001
H04N
H04L
H02J
H01M
Displaying
devices
H01L
G09G
G09F
G07F
G06F
G02F
G01V
International Patent Classes (IPC)
Semiconductors
Batteries
Electronic games
Wireless
and digital
communication
Detergents
Chemistry and
biotechnology
G01N
Lighting
F21Y
F21V
D06L
C12Q
C12P
C12N
C07K
Micromolecular
chemistry
PCT patent applications
500 patents
C07D
C07B
B60W
B60L
1 000 patents
Electric and
hybrid
vehicles
A61K
A61P
Source: OECD Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard 2013.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/888932892385
10 000 patents
A01 - Agriculture
A61 - Medical/veterinary science
A63 - Sports, games, etc.
B01 - Physical or chemical devices
B60 - Vehicles
C07 - Organic chemistry
C09 - Dyes, paints, etc.
C11 - Oils, fats and waxes
C12 - Biochemistry
C40 - Combinatorial technology
D06 - Treatment of Textiles
E21 - Earth/rock drilling, mining
F21 - Lighting
F24 - Heating, ventilating, etc.
G01 - Measuring, testing
G02 - Optics
G03 - Photography, etc.
G06 - Computing
G07 - Checking-devices
G09 - Educating, display, etc.
G11 - Information storage
H01 - Basic electric elements
H02 - Electric power
H04 - Electric communication
H05 - Electric techniques n.e.c.

30. Innovation involves
investments and policies
beyond R&D …

31. Innovation is broader than R&D
Product innovation, by R&D status, 2008-10
%
Non R&D-active product innovators
R&D-active product innovators
100
75
50
25
0
Source: OECD Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard 2013.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/888932892480

32. Investment in physical and knowledgebased capital, 2010
As a percentage of value added of the business sector
Non-residential physical assets
%
Software and databases
R&D and other intellectual property products
Brand equity, firm-specific human capital, organisational capital
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
Source: OECD Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard 2013.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/888932889820

33. … policies that target
complementary assets

34. Knowledge-based capital =
workers, their tasks and skills
% of total employed persons, 2012
Organisational Capital
Design
Overlapping assets
Computerised Information
Research & Development
United States
2 assets: Computerised Information, Design
3 assets: Computerised Information, R&D, Design
2 assets: Organisational Capital, Computerised Information
United
Kingdom
4 Assets
2 assets: Organisational Capital, R&D
3 assets: Organisational Capital, Computerised Information, R&D
2 assets: Computerised Information, R&D
Norway
%
9
9
11
10
11
11
7
9
11
10
Share of overlapping KBC-related employed persons in total employment
100
France
75
Germany
50
Sweden
25
0
Netherlands
Belgium
Finland
Source: OECD Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard 2013.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/888932890618
Ireland
Denmark
Greece
0
10
20
30
%

35. Beyond patents: the IP bundle
IP bundle of top 20 applicants, 2010-12
EPO Patents
OHIM Trademarks
Thousands of applications
150
125
100
75
50
25
0
Source: OECD Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard 2013.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/888932892575
OHIM Designs

36. The IP portfolio of firms
Firms with trademarks and patents, 2009-11
Trademarks only
Patents and trademarks
Number of firms matched to ORBIS© firms
%
,100
Patents only
5 951
108 580
9 501
763
1 480
3 971
7 247
3 573
2 343
1 781
,75
,50
,25
,0
Source: OECD Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard 2013.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/888932892803
5 689
960
13 198
2 698
536
3 194

37. Science, Technology, Industry Scoreboard 2013
INNOVATION FOR GROWTH
THANK YOU!
Send us feedbacks:
sti.contact@oecd.org
Help us disseminate:
www.oecd.org/sti/scoreboard
www.oecd.org/sti/rd-tax-stats.htm
Launch @ countries