(1) This document contains a microteaching assessment form for a Teaching Practice IV student-teacher. (2) The form evaluates the student-teacher on 10 criteria related to their lesson delivery across presentation, practice, and production stages. (3) Each criterion is scored on a scale of 1 to 5, with 5 being "excellent" and 1 being "needs improvement."

1. UNIVERSIDAD CATÓLICA DE LA SANTÍSIMA CONCEPCIÓN
FACULTAD DE EDUCACIÓN
DEPARTAMENTO DE LENGUAS
TEACHING PRACTICE IV
PPP Microteaching Assessment
STUDENT-TEACHER’S NAME : _______________________________ DATE: _________________
EVALUATOR’S NAME : _______________________________ SELF CO
CRITERIA Excellen Good Satisfactory Fair Needs
t Improvement
a) Is the aim of the lesson clearly communicated 5 4 3 2 1
to the students?
b) Does the student-teacher start the class by 5 4 3 2 1
doing a meaningful lead-in activity?
c) Is the new language clearly presented in the 5 4 3 2 1
Presentation Stage?
d) Does the student-teacher try any drilling 5 4 3 2 1
exercise other than the “repeat-after-me” ?
e) Does the student-teacher start the Practice 5 4 3 2 1
Stage with a suitable controlled activity?
f) Does the student-teacher work with a 5 4 3 2 1
suitable Less-controlled activity ?
g) Are the activities in the Production Stage 5 4 3 2 1
strongly connected with the aim of the lesson?
h) Are materials well-chosen & well-prepared? 5 4 3 2 1
i) Is the student-teacher’s voice clear & loud 5 4 3 2 1
enough?
j) Is the language used by the student-teacher 5 4 3 2 1
accurate in terms of grammar and
pronunciation?
*POST LESSON COMMENTS:

2. Please explain or support any 5 or 1 score.
_________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________
Evaluator’s signature: ____________________