REDEM Workshop Reconstructing Democracy in Times of Crisis: A Voter-Centred Perspective. Strengthening Electoral Participation, 4 May 2022
More info:
https://ictlogy.net/bibliography/reports/projects.php?idp=4678
call girls in Mehrauli DELHI 🔝 >༒9540349809 🔝 genuine Escort Service 🔝✔️✔️
Ethics and legitimacy of institutions solving wicked problems: the Catalan elections during the COVID-19 crisis
1. Ethics and legitimacy of institutions
solving wicked problems:
the Catalan elections during the COVID-19 crisis
REDEM Workshop Reconstructing Democracy in Times
of Crisis: A Voter-Centred Perspective. Strengthening
Electoral Participation
Barcelona, 4 May 2022
Ismael Peña-López
2. Table of contents
2
The problem: a wicked problem
The approach to solutions:
o Splitting the problem into smaller parts
o Open Government
o The Administration as a Platform
Strategies and instruments:
o Scoreboard, indicators and decision thresholds
o Dedicated task forces & coordinating devices
o Transmedia communication strategy
4. Elections and the COVID crisis: Catalan Parliament 2021
4
Daily new confirmed COVID-19 cases, 7-day rolling average.
Source: OurWorld in Data / Johns Hopkins University CSSE COVID-19 Data
Lockdown
Basque and Galician elections are postponed
Basque and Galician elections
newly called election day
Catalan president disabled
by Spanish Supreme Court
Catalan elections
are called
Election day
14 February 2021
Electoral campaign begins
Proposed
new election day
(didn’t happen)
Catalan elections
are postponed
Catalan Supreme
court suspends
postponement
Catalan Supreme court
cancels postponement
A big share of elections worldwide were held between the 1st and the 2nd wave
1st wave
2nd wave 3rd wave
4th wave
Initially scheduled
Basque and Galician
election day
5. A wicked problem
There is no definitive formulation of a wicked problem.
Wicked problems have no stopping rule.
Solutions to wicked problems are not true-or-false, but better or worse.
There is no immediate and no ultimate test of a solution to a wicked
problem.
Every solution to a wicked problem is a "one-shot operation".
Wicked problems do not have an enumerable (or an exhaustively
describable) set of potential solutions.
Every wicked problem is essentially unique.
Every wicked problem can be considered to be a symptom of another
problem.
The existence of a discrepancy representing a wicked problem can be
explained in numerous ways.
The social planner are liable for the consequences they generate.
5
Rittel, H.W.J. & Webber, M.M. (1973). “Dilemmas in a general theory of planning”.
7. Splitting the problem into smaller parts
The health scenario
Minimize the risk to vote
Minimize the risk of taking part in the organization (esp. polling
stations)
The right to vote scenario
Everyone has to be able to vote, no exceptions
Prevent abstention for non-political reasons (e.g. fear)
The legitimacy scenario
Maximize transparency and consensus about the electoral process
Minimize boycott to the electoral institution, intended and unintended
7
8. Open Government
The transparency and open data component
All data open: health, budget, protocols, procedures, minutes of
meetings… and also: doubts, dissensus, issues
Minimize the risk of taking part in the organization (esp. polling
stations)
The participation component
G2G, political parties, citizens
Active listening
The collaboration component
Co-design
Co-management
8
9. The Administration as a Platform
Protocols
Polling stations and voting procedures
COVID Office (i.e. protection)
Electoral campaigning
Institutional communication and ways of voting
Parties’ Table of Dialogue (political parties + government)
Tools for different profiles to foster autonomy and empowerment
9
Voters Polling stations
Infected and
disabled people
Elderly people
Local
administrations
COVID Officers
Representatives
of the
Administration
Candidates
Media
11. Scoreboard, indicators and decision thresholds
11
Scenario Goal Health Voting rights Legitimacy
Deliberation
Passive suffrage
Active suffrage
Operations
Effectiveness
Scenario Goal Health Voting rights Legitimacy
Deliberation Suspend
Passive suffrage
Active suffrage
Maintain
Operations
Effectiveness
Suspend Suspend
Scenario EPC21-Normal EPC21-Newnormal EPC21-Local EPC21-Stage4 EPC21-Tram3 EPC21-Stage2 EPC21-Stage1 EPC21-Stop EPC21-Lockdown
Mobility
Social Activity
Voting issues
Electoral Protocol COVID19
Progression according to
Value of RT significantly and persistently varies
Number of hospitalizations significantly and persistently varies
Health scenarios for elections
Tasks and risks scoreboard
Was of great inspiration: James, T.S. & Alihodzic, S. (2020). “When Is It Democratic to Postpone
an Election? Elections During Natural Disasters, COVID-19, and Emergency Situations”.
12. Dedicated task forces & coordinating devices
12
Procurement
COVID-19
Elections
Task Force
Electoral Office
Data and
information
Task Force
Communication
Task Force
Polling stations
Municipalities
National
COVID19
Task Force
Expat voting
Task Force
Technical
commission for
the COVID19
Election boards
Census office
Mail office
Parties’ Table of
Dialogue
Parliament
14. Last thoughts
Three main phases
Design: be open and collaborative, name, frame
Implement: work consensus, empower actors
Explain: be defensive (i.e. protect both team and project)
Keys for legitimacy
Plan in (much) advance, master the issue
Set the pace, tone and level
Radical transparency, become authority
Be quick to advance the issues, leave no room for doubts
Own the higher ground, leave no room for mis-/dis-information
14
15. To cite this document:
Peña-López, I. (2019). Catalan ecosystem of citizen participation. Participation
infrastructures. European Week of Regions and Cities, 7 October 2019.
Brussels: Four Motors for Europe
http://ictlogy.net/presentations/20191007_ismael_pena-lopez_-_catalan_ecosystem_citizen_participation.pdf
To contact the author:
ismael.pena@gencat.cat
@ictlogist
All the information in this document under a
Creative Commons license:
Attribution – Non Commercial
More information please visit
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Notas do Editor
"Towards a citizen-centered multi-level ecosystem of political engagement"
Political institutions need to unfold a new toolbox of participation approaches and instruments.
There is a need to shift from (only) speaking to citizens to (also) listening to them.
This is especially relevant when one considers the general trend of citizens fleeing from institutional
participation and into informal spaces and means of participation, usually led by new actors that operate
with different logics than traditional, institutional or representative ones.
Part of this new approach relies on making participation a structural strategy, not a one-time initiative.
At its turn, this structural strategy implies deploying a whole ecosystem of tools to support bi-directional
information and communications and multi-level participation initiatives, from the local level to the
European Union and vice-versa. This ecosystem should consist on, among other things, a network of institutions
collaborating at different levels, a training system, a technological strategy to support participation and a
governance body to coordinate it all.
A new strategy with a new ecosystem necessarily demands a thorough transformation on how Administrations work,
especially European institutions. The ideological framework that promotes this transformation is, at the
institutional level, the Open Government model. This model is the answer that governments can give to the
shift or paradigm of technopolitics happening at the citizens level. We have to transform the Administration
by means of citizen participation and to transform the Administration to enable citizen participation.